Loading…
The effect of feeding Bt MON810 maize to pigs for 110 days on intestinal microbiota
To assess the effects of feeding Bt MON810 maize to pigs for 110 days on the intestinal microbiota. Forty male pigs (∼40 days old) were blocked by weight and litter ancestry and assigned to one of four treatments; 1) Isogenic maize-based diet for 110 days (Isogenic); 2) Bt maize-based diet (MON810)...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2012-05, Vol.7 (5), p.e33668 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-ac72133fe03c53ea15f8ac1ebfbabda140ccb092aa7833540e8011dc6fc250023 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-ac72133fe03c53ea15f8ac1ebfbabda140ccb092aa7833540e8011dc6fc250023 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e33668 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Buzoianu, Stefan G Walsh, Maria C Rea, Mary C O'Sullivan, Orla Crispie, Fiona Cotter, Paul D Ross, R Paul Gardiner, Gillian E Lawlor, Peadar G |
description | To assess the effects of feeding Bt MON810 maize to pigs for 110 days on the intestinal microbiota.
Forty male pigs (∼40 days old) were blocked by weight and litter ancestry and assigned to one of four treatments; 1) Isogenic maize-based diet for 110 days (Isogenic); 2) Bt maize-based diet (MON810) for 110 days (Bt); 3) Isogenic maize-based diet for 30 days followed by a Bt maize-based diet for 80 days (Isogenic/Bt); 4) Bt maize-based diet for 30 days followed by an isogenic maize-based diet for 80 days (Bt/Isogenic). Enterobacteriaceae, Lactobacillus and total anaerobes were enumerated in the feces using culture-based methods on days 0, 30, 60 and 100 of the study and in ileal and cecal digesta on day 110. No differences were found between treatments for any of these counts at any time point. The relative abundance of cecal bacteria was also determined using high-throughput 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. No differences were observed in any bacterial taxa between treatments, with the exception of the genus Holdemania which was more abundant in the cecum of pigs fed the isogenic/Bt treatment compared to pigs fed the Bt treatment (0.012 vs 0.003%; P≤0.05).
Feeding pigs a Bt maize-based diet for 110 days did not affect counts of any of the culturable bacteria enumerated in the feces, ileum or cecum. Neither did it influence the composition of the cecal microbiota, with the exception of a minor increase in the genus Holdemania. As the role of Holdemania in the intestine is still under investigation and no health abnormalities were observed, this change is not likely to be of clinical significance. These results indicate that feeding Bt maize to pigs in the context of its influence on the porcine intestinal microbiota is safe. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0033668 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1324604986</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A477127543</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_80fbf30d61d641d4956edd4f10509a30</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A477127543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-ac72133fe03c53ea15f8ac1ebfbabda140ccb092aa7833540e8011dc6fc250023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBYQkJw2MVfcZILUqn4WKmwEi1cLcceZ73KxkvsVC2_Hi-bVhvUA_LB1viZd8bjN8ueEzwnrCDv1n7oO9XOt76DOcaMCVE-yI5JxehMUMweHpyPsichrDHOWSnE4-yI0rzgBIvj7OJyBQisBR2Rt8gCGNc16ENEX5ffSoLRRrnfgKJHW9cEZH2PSIoadROQ75DrIoToUh9o43Tva-ejepo9sqoN8GzcT7Ifnz5enn2ZnS8_L85Oz2e6qEicKV1QwpgFzHTOQJHclkoTqG2taqMIx1rXuKJKFSVjOcdQYkKMFlbTHGPKTrKXe91t64Mc5xEkYZQLzKtSJGKxJ4xXa7nt3Ub1N9IrJ_8GfN9I1UenW5AltrVl2AhiBCeGV7kAY7glOMeVYjhpvR-rDfUGjIYu9qqdiE5vOreSjb-SjHFe0l27b0aB3v8a0tjkxgUNbas68EPqm5Y5LnMieEJf_YPe_7qRalR6gOusT3X1TlSe8qIgtMg5S9T8HiotA-nLknmsS_FJwttJQmIiXMdGDSHIxcX3_2eXP6fs6wN2BaqNq-DbITrfhSnI92AyVAg92LshEyx33r-dhtx5X47eT2kvDj_oLunW7OwPvjb72A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1324604986</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of feeding Bt MON810 maize to pigs for 110 days on intestinal microbiota</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Buzoianu, Stefan G ; Walsh, Maria C ; Rea, Mary C ; O'Sullivan, Orla ; Crispie, Fiona ; Cotter, Paul D ; Ross, R Paul ; Gardiner, Gillian E ; Lawlor, Peadar G</creator><contributor>Gilbert, Jack Anthony</contributor><creatorcontrib>Buzoianu, Stefan G ; Walsh, Maria C ; Rea, Mary C ; O'Sullivan, Orla ; Crispie, Fiona ; Cotter, Paul D ; Ross, R Paul ; Gardiner, Gillian E ; Lawlor, Peadar G ; Gilbert, Jack Anthony</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the effects of feeding Bt MON810 maize to pigs for 110 days on the intestinal microbiota.
Forty male pigs (∼40 days old) were blocked by weight and litter ancestry and assigned to one of four treatments; 1) Isogenic maize-based diet for 110 days (Isogenic); 2) Bt maize-based diet (MON810) for 110 days (Bt); 3) Isogenic maize-based diet for 30 days followed by a Bt maize-based diet for 80 days (Isogenic/Bt); 4) Bt maize-based diet for 30 days followed by an isogenic maize-based diet for 80 days (Bt/Isogenic). Enterobacteriaceae, Lactobacillus and total anaerobes were enumerated in the feces using culture-based methods on days 0, 30, 60 and 100 of the study and in ileal and cecal digesta on day 110. No differences were found between treatments for any of these counts at any time point. The relative abundance of cecal bacteria was also determined using high-throughput 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. No differences were observed in any bacterial taxa between treatments, with the exception of the genus Holdemania which was more abundant in the cecum of pigs fed the isogenic/Bt treatment compared to pigs fed the Bt treatment (0.012 vs 0.003%; P≤0.05).
Feeding pigs a Bt maize-based diet for 110 days did not affect counts of any of the culturable bacteria enumerated in the feces, ileum or cecum. Neither did it influence the composition of the cecal microbiota, with the exception of a minor increase in the genus Holdemania. As the role of Holdemania in the intestine is still under investigation and no health abnormalities were observed, this change is not likely to be of clinical significance. These results indicate that feeding Bt maize to pigs in the context of its influence on the porcine intestinal microbiota is safe.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033668</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22574106</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abnormalities ; Abundance ; Agriculture ; Anaerobes ; Animal Feed - adverse effects ; Animals ; Antimicrobial agents ; Bacillus thuringiensis ; Bacillus thuringiensis - genetics ; Bacteria ; Biology ; Bt gene ; Cecum ; Cecum - microbiology ; Clostridium difficile ; Consumer research ; Corn ; Diets ; Enterobacteriaceae ; Feces ; Feeding ; Food ; Food, Genetically Modified - adverse effects ; Gene sequencing ; Genetically engineered foods ; Genetically engineered organisms ; Genetically modified crops ; Grasslands ; Hogs ; Ileum ; Intestinal microflora ; Intestine ; Intestines - microbiology ; Lactobacillus ; Life sciences ; Litter ; Male ; Metabolism ; Metagenome ; Microbiota ; Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) ; Obesity ; Plants, Genetically Modified - adverse effects ; Relative abundance ; RNA ; rRNA ; Studies ; Swine ; Taxa ; Time Factors ; Zea mays ; Zea mays - genetics</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2012-05, Vol.7 (5), p.e33668</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2012 Buzoianu et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Buzoianu et al. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-ac72133fe03c53ea15f8ac1ebfbabda140ccb092aa7833540e8011dc6fc250023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-ac72133fe03c53ea15f8ac1ebfbabda140ccb092aa7833540e8011dc6fc250023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1324604986/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1324604986?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792,74897</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22574106$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gilbert, Jack Anthony</contributor><creatorcontrib>Buzoianu, Stefan G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Maria C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rea, Mary C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Orla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crispie, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotter, Paul D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, R Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, Gillian E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawlor, Peadar G</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of feeding Bt MON810 maize to pigs for 110 days on intestinal microbiota</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>To assess the effects of feeding Bt MON810 maize to pigs for 110 days on the intestinal microbiota.
Forty male pigs (∼40 days old) were blocked by weight and litter ancestry and assigned to one of four treatments; 1) Isogenic maize-based diet for 110 days (Isogenic); 2) Bt maize-based diet (MON810) for 110 days (Bt); 3) Isogenic maize-based diet for 30 days followed by a Bt maize-based diet for 80 days (Isogenic/Bt); 4) Bt maize-based diet for 30 days followed by an isogenic maize-based diet for 80 days (Bt/Isogenic). Enterobacteriaceae, Lactobacillus and total anaerobes were enumerated in the feces using culture-based methods on days 0, 30, 60 and 100 of the study and in ileal and cecal digesta on day 110. No differences were found between treatments for any of these counts at any time point. The relative abundance of cecal bacteria was also determined using high-throughput 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. No differences were observed in any bacterial taxa between treatments, with the exception of the genus Holdemania which was more abundant in the cecum of pigs fed the isogenic/Bt treatment compared to pigs fed the Bt treatment (0.012 vs 0.003%; P≤0.05).
Feeding pigs a Bt maize-based diet for 110 days did not affect counts of any of the culturable bacteria enumerated in the feces, ileum or cecum. Neither did it influence the composition of the cecal microbiota, with the exception of a minor increase in the genus Holdemania. As the role of Holdemania in the intestine is still under investigation and no health abnormalities were observed, this change is not likely to be of clinical significance. These results indicate that feeding Bt maize to pigs in the context of its influence on the porcine intestinal microbiota is safe.</description><subject>Abnormalities</subject><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Anaerobes</subject><subject>Animal Feed - adverse effects</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Bacillus thuringiensis</subject><subject>Bacillus thuringiensis - genetics</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Bt gene</subject><subject>Cecum</subject><subject>Cecum - microbiology</subject><subject>Clostridium difficile</subject><subject>Consumer research</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Diets</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food, Genetically Modified - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Genetically engineered foods</subject><subject>Genetically engineered organisms</subject><subject>Genetically modified crops</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Ileum</subject><subject>Intestinal microflora</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Intestines - microbiology</subject><subject>Lactobacillus</subject><subject>Life sciences</subject><subject>Litter</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Metagenome</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Plants, Genetically Modified - adverse effects</subject><subject>Relative abundance</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>rRNA</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><subject>Zea mays - genetics</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBYQkJw2MVfcZILUqn4WKmwEi1cLcceZ73KxkvsVC2_Hi-bVhvUA_LB1viZd8bjN8ueEzwnrCDv1n7oO9XOt76DOcaMCVE-yI5JxehMUMweHpyPsichrDHOWSnE4-yI0rzgBIvj7OJyBQisBR2Rt8gCGNc16ENEX5ffSoLRRrnfgKJHW9cEZH2PSIoadROQ75DrIoToUh9o43Tva-ejepo9sqoN8GzcT7Ifnz5enn2ZnS8_L85Oz2e6qEicKV1QwpgFzHTOQJHclkoTqG2taqMIx1rXuKJKFSVjOcdQYkKMFlbTHGPKTrKXe91t64Mc5xEkYZQLzKtSJGKxJ4xXa7nt3Ub1N9IrJ_8GfN9I1UenW5AltrVl2AhiBCeGV7kAY7glOMeVYjhpvR-rDfUGjIYu9qqdiE5vOreSjb-SjHFe0l27b0aB3v8a0tjkxgUNbas68EPqm5Y5LnMieEJf_YPe_7qRalR6gOusT3X1TlSe8qIgtMg5S9T8HiotA-nLknmsS_FJwttJQmIiXMdGDSHIxcX3_2eXP6fs6wN2BaqNq-DbITrfhSnI92AyVAg92LshEyx33r-dhtx5X47eT2kvDj_oLunW7OwPvjb72A</recordid><startdate>20120504</startdate><enddate>20120504</enddate><creator>Buzoianu, Stefan G</creator><creator>Walsh, Maria C</creator><creator>Rea, Mary C</creator><creator>O'Sullivan, Orla</creator><creator>Crispie, Fiona</creator><creator>Cotter, Paul D</creator><creator>Ross, R Paul</creator><creator>Gardiner, Gillian E</creator><creator>Lawlor, Peadar G</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120504</creationdate><title>The effect of feeding Bt MON810 maize to pigs for 110 days on intestinal microbiota</title><author>Buzoianu, Stefan G ; Walsh, Maria C ; Rea, Mary C ; O'Sullivan, Orla ; Crispie, Fiona ; Cotter, Paul D ; Ross, R Paul ; Gardiner, Gillian E ; Lawlor, Peadar G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-ac72133fe03c53ea15f8ac1ebfbabda140ccb092aa7833540e8011dc6fc250023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities</topic><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Anaerobes</topic><topic>Animal Feed - adverse effects</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Bacillus thuringiensis</topic><topic>Bacillus thuringiensis - genetics</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Bt gene</topic><topic>Cecum</topic><topic>Cecum - microbiology</topic><topic>Clostridium difficile</topic><topic>Consumer research</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Diets</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food, Genetically Modified - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Genetically engineered foods</topic><topic>Genetically engineered organisms</topic><topic>Genetically modified crops</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Ileum</topic><topic>Intestinal microflora</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Intestines - microbiology</topic><topic>Lactobacillus</topic><topic>Life sciences</topic><topic>Litter</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Metagenome</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms)</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Plants, Genetically Modified - adverse effects</topic><topic>Relative abundance</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>rRNA</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><topic>Zea mays - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buzoianu, Stefan G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Maria C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rea, Mary C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Orla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crispie, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotter, Paul D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, R Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, Gillian E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawlor, Peadar G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buzoianu, Stefan G</au><au>Walsh, Maria C</au><au>Rea, Mary C</au><au>O'Sullivan, Orla</au><au>Crispie, Fiona</au><au>Cotter, Paul D</au><au>Ross, R Paul</au><au>Gardiner, Gillian E</au><au>Lawlor, Peadar G</au><au>Gilbert, Jack Anthony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of feeding Bt MON810 maize to pigs for 110 days on intestinal microbiota</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2012-05-04</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e33668</spage><pages>e33668-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>To assess the effects of feeding Bt MON810 maize to pigs for 110 days on the intestinal microbiota.
Forty male pigs (∼40 days old) were blocked by weight and litter ancestry and assigned to one of four treatments; 1) Isogenic maize-based diet for 110 days (Isogenic); 2) Bt maize-based diet (MON810) for 110 days (Bt); 3) Isogenic maize-based diet for 30 days followed by a Bt maize-based diet for 80 days (Isogenic/Bt); 4) Bt maize-based diet for 30 days followed by an isogenic maize-based diet for 80 days (Bt/Isogenic). Enterobacteriaceae, Lactobacillus and total anaerobes were enumerated in the feces using culture-based methods on days 0, 30, 60 and 100 of the study and in ileal and cecal digesta on day 110. No differences were found between treatments for any of these counts at any time point. The relative abundance of cecal bacteria was also determined using high-throughput 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. No differences were observed in any bacterial taxa between treatments, with the exception of the genus Holdemania which was more abundant in the cecum of pigs fed the isogenic/Bt treatment compared to pigs fed the Bt treatment (0.012 vs 0.003%; P≤0.05).
Feeding pigs a Bt maize-based diet for 110 days did not affect counts of any of the culturable bacteria enumerated in the feces, ileum or cecum. Neither did it influence the composition of the cecal microbiota, with the exception of a minor increase in the genus Holdemania. As the role of Holdemania in the intestine is still under investigation and no health abnormalities were observed, this change is not likely to be of clinical significance. These results indicate that feeding Bt maize to pigs in the context of its influence on the porcine intestinal microbiota is safe.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>22574106</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0033668</doi><tpages>e33668</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2012-05, Vol.7 (5), p.e33668 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1324604986 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Abnormalities Abundance Agriculture Anaerobes Animal Feed - adverse effects Animals Antimicrobial agents Bacillus thuringiensis Bacillus thuringiensis - genetics Bacteria Biology Bt gene Cecum Cecum - microbiology Clostridium difficile Consumer research Corn Diets Enterobacteriaceae Feces Feeding Food Food, Genetically Modified - adverse effects Gene sequencing Genetically engineered foods Genetically engineered organisms Genetically modified crops Grasslands Hogs Ileum Intestinal microflora Intestine Intestines - microbiology Lactobacillus Life sciences Litter Male Metabolism Metagenome Microbiota Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) Obesity Plants, Genetically Modified - adverse effects Relative abundance RNA rRNA Studies Swine Taxa Time Factors Zea mays Zea mays - genetics |
title | The effect of feeding Bt MON810 maize to pigs for 110 days on intestinal microbiota |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T23%3A28%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20feeding%20Bt%20MON810%20maize%20to%20pigs%20for%20110%20days%20on%20intestinal%20microbiota&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Buzoianu,%20Stefan%20G&rft.date=2012-05-04&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e33668&rft.pages=e33668-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033668&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA477127543%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c791t-ac72133fe03c53ea15f8ac1ebfbabda140ccb092aa7833540e8011dc6fc250023%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1324604986&rft_id=info:pmid/22574106&rft_galeid=A477127543&rfr_iscdi=true |