Loading…

Spatial variation in foraging behaviour of a marine top predator (Phoca vitulina) determined by a large-scale satellite tagging program

The harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) is a widespread marine predator in Northern Hemisphere waters. British populations have been subject to rapid declines in recent years. Food supply or inter-specific competition may be implicated but basic ecological data are lacking and there are few studies of har...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2012-05, Vol.7 (5), p.e37216-e37216
Main Authors: Sharples, Ruth J, Moss, Simon E, Patterson, Toby A, Hammond, Philip S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-fb1eeb26ebb9ada288d4a1149b603db6a7cb4152ccf010a63f09588fc5923aee3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-fb1eeb26ebb9ada288d4a1149b603db6a7cb4152ccf010a63f09588fc5923aee3
container_end_page e37216
container_issue 5
container_start_page e37216
container_title PloS one
container_volume 7
creator Sharples, Ruth J
Moss, Simon E
Patterson, Toby A
Hammond, Philip S
description The harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) is a widespread marine predator in Northern Hemisphere waters. British populations have been subject to rapid declines in recent years. Food supply or inter-specific competition may be implicated but basic ecological data are lacking and there are few studies of harbour seal foraging distribution and habits. In this study, satellite tagging conducted at the major seal haul outs around the British Isles showed both that seal movements were highly variable among individuals and that foraging strategy appears to be specialized within particular regions. We investigated whether these apparent differences could be explained by individual level factors: by modelling measures of trip duration and distance travelled as a function of size, sex and body condition. However, these were not found to be good predictors of foraging trip duration or distance, which instead was best predicted by tagging region, time of year and inter-trip duration. Therefore, we propose that local habitat conditions and the constraints they impose are the major determinants of foraging movements. Specifically the distance to profitable feeding grounds from suitable haul-out locations may dictate foraging strategy and behaviour. Accounting for proximity to productive foraging resources is likely to be an important component of understanding population processes. Despite more extensive offshore movements than expected, there was also marked fidelity to the local haul-out region with limited connectivity between study regions. These empirical observations of regional exchange at short time scales demonstrates the value of large scale electronic tagging programs for robust characterization of at-sea foraging behaviour at a wide spatial scale.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0037216
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1324609892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A477052637</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7329aef47037417d8d43f8a8627f0b3d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A477052637</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-fb1eeb26ebb9ada288d4a1149b603db6a7cb4152ccf010a63f09588fc5923aee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkstq3DAUhk1padJp36C0gm7SxUx1sSV7Ewihl0CghbZrcSwfeRQ8lit7BvIEfe2eyTghU4IXFvL3_-fiP8veCr4SyohPN3GbeuhWQ-xxxbkyUuhn2amolFxqydXzR-eT7NU43nBeqFLrl9mJlFpWyvDT7O_PAaYAHdtBCnSKPQs98zFBG_qW1biGXaBKLHoGbENQj2yKAxsSNjDFxM5-rKMDtgvTtgs9fGQNTpg2xDWsviVRB6nF5eigQzbChF0XJvKA9q7CkGKbYPM6e-GhG_HN_F5kv798_nX5bXn9_evV5cX10hWVmpa-Foi11FjXFTQgy7LJQYi8qjVXTa3BuDoXhXTOc8FBK8-roiw9qaUCRLXI3h98hy6Odt7haIWSueZVSdQiuzoQTYQbO6RAQ9_aCMHeXcTUWkhTcB1ao2QF6HND28-FaagZ5UsotTSe16ohr_O52rbeYOOwnxJ0R6bHX_qwtm3cWaUKk_OKDM5mgxT_bHGc7CaMjlYIPcYt9c2F1oZXXBH64T_06elmqqXfYUPvI9V1e1N7kRvDC6mVIWr1BEVPg5vgKHA-0P2RID8IXIrjmNA_zCi43cf1vhm7j6ud40qyd4_38yC6z6f6B8ty6Wo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1324609892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial variation in foraging behaviour of a marine top predator (Phoca vitulina) determined by a large-scale satellite tagging program</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sharples, Ruth J ; Moss, Simon E ; Patterson, Toby A ; Hammond, Philip S</creator><contributor>Fahlman, Andreas</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sharples, Ruth J ; Moss, Simon E ; Patterson, Toby A ; Hammond, Philip S ; Fahlman, Andreas</creatorcontrib><description>The harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) is a widespread marine predator in Northern Hemisphere waters. British populations have been subject to rapid declines in recent years. Food supply or inter-specific competition may be implicated but basic ecological data are lacking and there are few studies of harbour seal foraging distribution and habits. In this study, satellite tagging conducted at the major seal haul outs around the British Isles showed both that seal movements were highly variable among individuals and that foraging strategy appears to be specialized within particular regions. We investigated whether these apparent differences could be explained by individual level factors: by modelling measures of trip duration and distance travelled as a function of size, sex and body condition. However, these were not found to be good predictors of foraging trip duration or distance, which instead was best predicted by tagging region, time of year and inter-trip duration. Therefore, we propose that local habitat conditions and the constraints they impose are the major determinants of foraging movements. Specifically the distance to profitable feeding grounds from suitable haul-out locations may dictate foraging strategy and behaviour. Accounting for proximity to productive foraging resources is likely to be an important component of understanding population processes. Despite more extensive offshore movements than expected, there was also marked fidelity to the local haul-out region with limited connectivity between study regions. These empirical observations of regional exchange at short time scales demonstrates the value of large scale electronic tagging programs for robust characterization of at-sea foraging behaviour at a wide spatial scale.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037216</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22629370</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Animal behavior ; Animals ; Appetitive Behavior - physiology ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Biology ; Body size ; Delphinidae ; Diet ; Ecological monitoring ; Feeding Behavior - physiology ; Fish ; Food supply ; Foraging behavior ; Foraging habitats ; Habitats ; Habits ; Halichoerus grypus ; Marine ecology ; Marine mammals ; Marking ; Northern Hemisphere ; Oceans ; Oceans and Seas ; Phoca - physiology ; Physiology ; Population ; Satellite Communications ; Spatial Behavior - physiology ; Spatial distribution ; Studies ; Tagging ; Telemetry</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2012-05, Vol.7 (5), p.e37216-e37216</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2012 Sharples et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Sharples et al. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-fb1eeb26ebb9ada288d4a1149b603db6a7cb4152ccf010a63f09588fc5923aee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-fb1eeb26ebb9ada288d4a1149b603db6a7cb4152ccf010a63f09588fc5923aee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1324609892/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1324609892?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22629370$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Fahlman, Andreas</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sharples, Ruth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, Simon E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Toby A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Philip S</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial variation in foraging behaviour of a marine top predator (Phoca vitulina) determined by a large-scale satellite tagging program</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) is a widespread marine predator in Northern Hemisphere waters. British populations have been subject to rapid declines in recent years. Food supply or inter-specific competition may be implicated but basic ecological data are lacking and there are few studies of harbour seal foraging distribution and habits. In this study, satellite tagging conducted at the major seal haul outs around the British Isles showed both that seal movements were highly variable among individuals and that foraging strategy appears to be specialized within particular regions. We investigated whether these apparent differences could be explained by individual level factors: by modelling measures of trip duration and distance travelled as a function of size, sex and body condition. However, these were not found to be good predictors of foraging trip duration or distance, which instead was best predicted by tagging region, time of year and inter-trip duration. Therefore, we propose that local habitat conditions and the constraints they impose are the major determinants of foraging movements. Specifically the distance to profitable feeding grounds from suitable haul-out locations may dictate foraging strategy and behaviour. Accounting for proximity to productive foraging resources is likely to be an important component of understanding population processes. Despite more extensive offshore movements than expected, there was also marked fidelity to the local haul-out region with limited connectivity between study regions. These empirical observations of regional exchange at short time scales demonstrates the value of large scale electronic tagging programs for robust characterization of at-sea foraging behaviour at a wide spatial scale.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Appetitive Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Delphinidae</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Food supply</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Foraging habitats</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Habits</subject><subject>Halichoerus grypus</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Marine mammals</subject><subject>Marking</subject><subject>Northern Hemisphere</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Oceans and Seas</subject><subject>Phoca - physiology</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Satellite Communications</subject><subject>Spatial Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tagging</subject><subject>Telemetry</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkstq3DAUhk1padJp36C0gm7SxUx1sSV7Ewihl0CghbZrcSwfeRQ8lit7BvIEfe2eyTghU4IXFvL3_-fiP8veCr4SyohPN3GbeuhWQ-xxxbkyUuhn2amolFxqydXzR-eT7NU43nBeqFLrl9mJlFpWyvDT7O_PAaYAHdtBCnSKPQs98zFBG_qW1biGXaBKLHoGbENQj2yKAxsSNjDFxM5-rKMDtgvTtgs9fGQNTpg2xDWsviVRB6nF5eigQzbChF0XJvKA9q7CkGKbYPM6e-GhG_HN_F5kv798_nX5bXn9_evV5cX10hWVmpa-Foi11FjXFTQgy7LJQYi8qjVXTa3BuDoXhXTOc8FBK8-roiw9qaUCRLXI3h98hy6Odt7haIWSueZVSdQiuzoQTYQbO6RAQ9_aCMHeXcTUWkhTcB1ao2QF6HND28-FaagZ5UsotTSe16ohr_O52rbeYOOwnxJ0R6bHX_qwtm3cWaUKk_OKDM5mgxT_bHGc7CaMjlYIPcYt9c2F1oZXXBH64T_06elmqqXfYUPvI9V1e1N7kRvDC6mVIWr1BEVPg5vgKHA-0P2RID8IXIrjmNA_zCi43cf1vhm7j6ud40qyd4_38yC6z6f6B8ty6Wo</recordid><startdate>20120521</startdate><enddate>20120521</enddate><creator>Sharples, Ruth J</creator><creator>Moss, Simon E</creator><creator>Patterson, Toby A</creator><creator>Hammond, Philip S</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120521</creationdate><title>Spatial variation in foraging behaviour of a marine top predator (Phoca vitulina) determined by a large-scale satellite tagging program</title><author>Sharples, Ruth J ; Moss, Simon E ; Patterson, Toby A ; Hammond, Philip S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-fb1eeb26ebb9ada288d4a1149b603db6a7cb4152ccf010a63f09588fc5923aee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Appetitive Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Delphinidae</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Food supply</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Foraging habitats</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Habits</topic><topic>Halichoerus grypus</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Marine mammals</topic><topic>Marking</topic><topic>Northern Hemisphere</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Oceans and Seas</topic><topic>Phoca - physiology</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Satellite Communications</topic><topic>Spatial Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tagging</topic><topic>Telemetry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharples, Ruth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, Simon E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Toby A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Philip S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharples, Ruth J</au><au>Moss, Simon E</au><au>Patterson, Toby A</au><au>Hammond, Philip S</au><au>Fahlman, Andreas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial variation in foraging behaviour of a marine top predator (Phoca vitulina) determined by a large-scale satellite tagging program</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2012-05-21</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e37216</spage><epage>e37216</epage><pages>e37216-e37216</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) is a widespread marine predator in Northern Hemisphere waters. British populations have been subject to rapid declines in recent years. Food supply or inter-specific competition may be implicated but basic ecological data are lacking and there are few studies of harbour seal foraging distribution and habits. In this study, satellite tagging conducted at the major seal haul outs around the British Isles showed both that seal movements were highly variable among individuals and that foraging strategy appears to be specialized within particular regions. We investigated whether these apparent differences could be explained by individual level factors: by modelling measures of trip duration and distance travelled as a function of size, sex and body condition. However, these were not found to be good predictors of foraging trip duration or distance, which instead was best predicted by tagging region, time of year and inter-trip duration. Therefore, we propose that local habitat conditions and the constraints they impose are the major determinants of foraging movements. Specifically the distance to profitable feeding grounds from suitable haul-out locations may dictate foraging strategy and behaviour. Accounting for proximity to productive foraging resources is likely to be an important component of understanding population processes. Despite more extensive offshore movements than expected, there was also marked fidelity to the local haul-out region with limited connectivity between study regions. These empirical observations of regional exchange at short time scales demonstrates the value of large scale electronic tagging programs for robust characterization of at-sea foraging behaviour at a wide spatial scale.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>22629370</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0037216</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2012-05, Vol.7 (5), p.e37216-e37216
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1324609892
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Accounting
Animal behavior
Animals
Appetitive Behavior - physiology
Aquatic ecosystems
Biology
Body size
Delphinidae
Diet
Ecological monitoring
Feeding Behavior - physiology
Fish
Food supply
Foraging behavior
Foraging habitats
Habitats
Habits
Halichoerus grypus
Marine ecology
Marine mammals
Marking
Northern Hemisphere
Oceans
Oceans and Seas
Phoca - physiology
Physiology
Population
Satellite Communications
Spatial Behavior - physiology
Spatial distribution
Studies
Tagging
Telemetry
title Spatial variation in foraging behaviour of a marine top predator (Phoca vitulina) determined by a large-scale satellite tagging program
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A30%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20variation%20in%20foraging%20behaviour%20of%20a%20marine%20top%20predator%20(Phoca%20vitulina)%20determined%20by%20a%20large-scale%20satellite%20tagging%20program&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Sharples,%20Ruth%20J&rft.date=2012-05-21&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e37216&rft.epage=e37216&rft.pages=e37216-e37216&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0037216&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA477052637%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-fb1eeb26ebb9ada288d4a1149b603db6a7cb4152ccf010a63f09588fc5923aee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1324609892&rft_id=info:pmid/22629370&rft_galeid=A477052637&rfr_iscdi=true