Loading…
Quality of longer term mental health facilities in Europe: validation of the quality indicator for rehabilitative care against service users' views
The Quality Indicator for Rehabilitative Care (QuIRC) is a staff rated, international toolkit that assesses care in longer term hospital and community based mental health facilities. The QuIRC was developed from review of the international literature, an international Delphi exercise with over 400 s...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2012-06, Vol.7 (6), p.e38070-e38070 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-ad2844e8fa677b2180e2cd24eed1e6815a08468e4f33ebffe107725816d2f5c83 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | e38070 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e38070 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Killaspy, Helen White, Sarah Wright, Christine Taylor, Tatiana L Turton, Penny Kallert, Thomas Schuster, Mirjam Cervilla, Jorge A Brangier, Paulette Raboch, Jiri Kalisova, Lucie Onchev, Georgi Alexiev, Spiridon Mezzina, Roberto Ridente, Pina Wiersma, Durk Visser, Ellen Kiejna, Andrzej Piotrowski, Patryk Ploumpidis, Dimitris Gonidakis, Fragiskos Caldas-de-Almeida, José Miguel Cardoso, Graça King, Michael |
description | The Quality Indicator for Rehabilitative Care (QuIRC) is a staff rated, international toolkit that assesses care in longer term hospital and community based mental health facilities. The QuIRC was developed from review of the international literature, an international Delphi exercise with over 400 service users, practitioners, carers and advocates from ten European countries at different stages of deinstitutionalisation, and review of the care standards in these countries. It can be completed in under an hour by the facility manager and has robust content validity, acceptability and inter-rater reliability. In this study, we investigated the internal validity of the QuIRC. Our aim was to identify the QuIRC domains of care that independently predicted better service user experiences of care.
At least 20 units providing longer term care for adults with severe mental illness were recruited in each of ten European countries. Service users completed standardised measures of their experiences of care, quality of life, autonomy and the unit's therapeutic milieu. Unit managers completed the QuIRC. Multilevel modelling allowed analysis of associations between service user ratings as dependent variables with unit QuIRC domain ratings as independent variables.
1750/2495 (70%) users and the managers of 213 units from across ten European countries participated. QuIRC ratings were positively associated with service users' autonomy and experiences of care. Associations between QuIRC ratings and service users' ratings of their quality of life and the unit's therapeutic milieu were explained by service user characteristics (age, diagnosis and functioning). A hypothetical 10% increase in QuIRC rating resulted in a clinically meaningful improvement in autonomy.
Ratings of the quality of longer term mental health facilities made by service managers were positively associated with service users' autonomy and experiences of care. Interventions that improve quality of care in these settings may promote service users' autonomy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0038070 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1325002942</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A477116656</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b8c5504983474584adeb4ed83117f1f6</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A477116656</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-ad2844e8fa677b2180e2cd24eed1e6815a08468e4f33ebffe107725816d2f5c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9GA4MfFrvmaJOuFUErVhULx8zZkMye7KbOTbZJZ7e_wD5txp6UrvZAhTEie983JyTlV9ZTgKWGSvL0IfexMO92EDqYYM4UlvlcdkhmjE0Exu39rflA9SukC45opIR5WB5QKWddYHVa_P_em9fkKBYfa0C0hogxxjdbQZdOiFZg2r5Az1hfKQ0K-Q6d9DBt4h7ZF2ZjsQzeo8wrQ5Wjmu8Zbk0NErowIK7MY9IXdArImAjJL47uUUYK49RZQXybpFdp6-JkeVw-caRM8Gf9H1fcPp99OPk3Ozj_OT47PJlbWKk9MQxXnoJwRUi4oURiobSgHaAgIRWqDFRcKuGMMFs4BwVLSWhHRUFdbxY6q5zvfTRuSHvOZNGG0xpjOOC3EfEc0wVzoTfRrE690MF7_XQhxqU3M3ragF8qWjPKZYlzyWnHTwIJDoxgh0hEnitf78bR-sYbGlgRH0-6Z7u90fqWXYasZE2JWs2LwejSI4bKHlPXaJwttazoIfYkbk5kgtcRD3C_-Qe--3UgtTbmA71wo59rBVB9zKQkRoh7int5Bla-Btbel-Jwv63uCN3uCwmT4lZemT0nPv375f_b8xz778ha7q8wU2n4owLQP8h1oY0gpgrtJMsF66J3rbOihd_TYO0X27PYD3Yium4X9AU4LFgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1325002942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality of longer term mental health facilities in Europe: validation of the quality indicator for rehabilitative care against service users' views</title><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Killaspy, Helen ; White, Sarah ; Wright, Christine ; Taylor, Tatiana L ; Turton, Penny ; Kallert, Thomas ; Schuster, Mirjam ; Cervilla, Jorge A ; Brangier, Paulette ; Raboch, Jiri ; Kalisova, Lucie ; Onchev, Georgi ; Alexiev, Spiridon ; Mezzina, Roberto ; Ridente, Pina ; Wiersma, Durk ; Visser, Ellen ; Kiejna, Andrzej ; Piotrowski, Patryk ; Ploumpidis, Dimitris ; Gonidakis, Fragiskos ; Caldas-de-Almeida, José Miguel ; Cardoso, Graça ; King, Michael</creator><contributor>Botbol, Michel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Killaspy, Helen ; White, Sarah ; Wright, Christine ; Taylor, Tatiana L ; Turton, Penny ; Kallert, Thomas ; Schuster, Mirjam ; Cervilla, Jorge A ; Brangier, Paulette ; Raboch, Jiri ; Kalisova, Lucie ; Onchev, Georgi ; Alexiev, Spiridon ; Mezzina, Roberto ; Ridente, Pina ; Wiersma, Durk ; Visser, Ellen ; Kiejna, Andrzej ; Piotrowski, Patryk ; Ploumpidis, Dimitris ; Gonidakis, Fragiskos ; Caldas-de-Almeida, José Miguel ; Cardoso, Graça ; King, Michael ; Botbol, Michel</creatorcontrib><description>The Quality Indicator for Rehabilitative Care (QuIRC) is a staff rated, international toolkit that assesses care in longer term hospital and community based mental health facilities. The QuIRC was developed from review of the international literature, an international Delphi exercise with over 400 service users, practitioners, carers and advocates from ten European countries at different stages of deinstitutionalisation, and review of the care standards in these countries. It can be completed in under an hour by the facility manager and has robust content validity, acceptability and inter-rater reliability. In this study, we investigated the internal validity of the QuIRC. Our aim was to identify the QuIRC domains of care that independently predicted better service user experiences of care.
At least 20 units providing longer term care for adults with severe mental illness were recruited in each of ten European countries. Service users completed standardised measures of their experiences of care, quality of life, autonomy and the unit's therapeutic milieu. Unit managers completed the QuIRC. Multilevel modelling allowed analysis of associations between service user ratings as dependent variables with unit QuIRC domain ratings as independent variables.
1750/2495 (70%) users and the managers of 213 units from across ten European countries participated. QuIRC ratings were positively associated with service users' autonomy and experiences of care. Associations between QuIRC ratings and service users' ratings of their quality of life and the unit's therapeutic milieu were explained by service user characteristics (age, diagnosis and functioning). A hypothetical 10% increase in QuIRC rating resulted in a clinically meaningful improvement in autonomy.
Ratings of the quality of longer term mental health facilities made by service managers were positively associated with service users' autonomy and experiences of care. Interventions that improve quality of care in these settings may promote service users' autonomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038070</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22675508</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Adults ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analysis ; Autonomy ; Dependent variables ; Education ; Epidemiology ; Europe - epidemiology ; Female ; Health aspects ; Health care ; Health care facilities ; Health centres ; Health Facilities - standards ; Health Facilities - statistics & numerical data ; Health sciences ; Health services ; Hospital facilities ; Hospitals ; Human rights ; Humans ; Independent variables ; Intellectual disabilities ; Literature reviews ; Long-Term Care - standards ; Long-Term Care - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Medical care quality ; Medical ethics ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Mental disorders ; Mental Disorders - epidemiology ; Mental Disorders - rehabilitation ; Mental health ; Mental Health Services - standards ; Mental Health Services - statistics & numerical data ; Mental Health Services - utilization ; Middle Aged ; Multilevel ; Population ; Psychiatrists ; Psychiatry ; Psychotherapy ; Quality control ; Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards ; Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Quality of life ; Ratings ; Rehabilitation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research methodology ; Studies ; User satisfaction ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2012-06, Vol.7 (6), p.e38070-e38070</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2012 Killaspy et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Killaspy et al. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-ad2844e8fa677b2180e2cd24eed1e6815a08468e4f33ebffe107725816d2f5c83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1325002942/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1325002942?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22675508$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Botbol, Michel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Killaspy, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Tatiana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turton, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallert, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, Mirjam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cervilla, Jorge A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brangier, Paulette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raboch, Jiri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalisova, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onchev, Georgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexiev, Spiridon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mezzina, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ridente, Pina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiersma, Durk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiejna, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piotrowski, Patryk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploumpidis, Dimitris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonidakis, Fragiskos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldas-de-Almeida, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Graça</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Quality of longer term mental health facilities in Europe: validation of the quality indicator for rehabilitative care against service users' views</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The Quality Indicator for Rehabilitative Care (QuIRC) is a staff rated, international toolkit that assesses care in longer term hospital and community based mental health facilities. The QuIRC was developed from review of the international literature, an international Delphi exercise with over 400 service users, practitioners, carers and advocates from ten European countries at different stages of deinstitutionalisation, and review of the care standards in these countries. It can be completed in under an hour by the facility manager and has robust content validity, acceptability and inter-rater reliability. In this study, we investigated the internal validity of the QuIRC. Our aim was to identify the QuIRC domains of care that independently predicted better service user experiences of care.
At least 20 units providing longer term care for adults with severe mental illness were recruited in each of ten European countries. Service users completed standardised measures of their experiences of care, quality of life, autonomy and the unit's therapeutic milieu. Unit managers completed the QuIRC. Multilevel modelling allowed analysis of associations between service user ratings as dependent variables with unit QuIRC domain ratings as independent variables.
1750/2495 (70%) users and the managers of 213 units from across ten European countries participated. QuIRC ratings were positively associated with service users' autonomy and experiences of care. Associations between QuIRC ratings and service users' ratings of their quality of life and the unit's therapeutic milieu were explained by service user characteristics (age, diagnosis and functioning). A hypothetical 10% increase in QuIRC rating resulted in a clinically meaningful improvement in autonomy.
Ratings of the quality of longer term mental health facilities made by service managers were positively associated with service users' autonomy and experiences of care. Interventions that improve quality of care in these settings may promote service users' autonomy.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Dependent variables</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Europe - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care facilities</subject><subject>Health centres</subject><subject>Health Facilities - standards</subject><subject>Health Facilities - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Hospital facilities</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Independent variables</subject><subject>Intellectual disabilities</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Long-Term Care - standards</subject><subject>Long-Term Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical care quality</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental Health Services - standards</subject><subject>Mental Health Services - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Mental Health Services - utilization</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multilevel</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Psychiatrists</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Ratings</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>User satisfaction</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgdRbK3-A9GA4MfFrvmaJOuFUErVhULx8zZkMye7KbOTbZJZ7e_wD5txp6UrvZAhTEie983JyTlV9ZTgKWGSvL0IfexMO92EDqYYM4UlvlcdkhmjE0Exu39rflA9SukC45opIR5WB5QKWddYHVa_P_em9fkKBYfa0C0hogxxjdbQZdOiFZg2r5Az1hfKQ0K-Q6d9DBt4h7ZF2ZjsQzeo8wrQ5Wjmu8Zbk0NErowIK7MY9IXdArImAjJL47uUUYK49RZQXybpFdp6-JkeVw-caRM8Gf9H1fcPp99OPk3Ozj_OT47PJlbWKk9MQxXnoJwRUi4oURiobSgHaAgIRWqDFRcKuGMMFs4BwVLSWhHRUFdbxY6q5zvfTRuSHvOZNGG0xpjOOC3EfEc0wVzoTfRrE690MF7_XQhxqU3M3ragF8qWjPKZYlzyWnHTwIJDoxgh0hEnitf78bR-sYbGlgRH0-6Z7u90fqWXYasZE2JWs2LwejSI4bKHlPXaJwttazoIfYkbk5kgtcRD3C_-Qe--3UgtTbmA71wo59rBVB9zKQkRoh7int5Bla-Btbel-Jwv63uCN3uCwmT4lZemT0nPv375f_b8xz778ha7q8wU2n4owLQP8h1oY0gpgrtJMsF66J3rbOihd_TYO0X27PYD3Yium4X9AU4LFgw</recordid><startdate>20120604</startdate><enddate>20120604</enddate><creator>Killaspy, Helen</creator><creator>White, Sarah</creator><creator>Wright, Christine</creator><creator>Taylor, Tatiana L</creator><creator>Turton, Penny</creator><creator>Kallert, Thomas</creator><creator>Schuster, Mirjam</creator><creator>Cervilla, Jorge A</creator><creator>Brangier, Paulette</creator><creator>Raboch, Jiri</creator><creator>Kalisova, Lucie</creator><creator>Onchev, Georgi</creator><creator>Alexiev, Spiridon</creator><creator>Mezzina, Roberto</creator><creator>Ridente, Pina</creator><creator>Wiersma, Durk</creator><creator>Visser, Ellen</creator><creator>Kiejna, Andrzej</creator><creator>Piotrowski, Patryk</creator><creator>Ploumpidis, Dimitris</creator><creator>Gonidakis, Fragiskos</creator><creator>Caldas-de-Almeida, José Miguel</creator><creator>Cardoso, Graça</creator><creator>King, Michael</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120604</creationdate><title>Quality of longer term mental health facilities in Europe: validation of the quality indicator for rehabilitative care against service users' views</title><author>Killaspy, Helen ; White, Sarah ; Wright, Christine ; Taylor, Tatiana L ; Turton, Penny ; Kallert, Thomas ; Schuster, Mirjam ; Cervilla, Jorge A ; Brangier, Paulette ; Raboch, Jiri ; Kalisova, Lucie ; Onchev, Georgi ; Alexiev, Spiridon ; Mezzina, Roberto ; Ridente, Pina ; Wiersma, Durk ; Visser, Ellen ; Kiejna, Andrzej ; Piotrowski, Patryk ; Ploumpidis, Dimitris ; Gonidakis, Fragiskos ; Caldas-de-Almeida, José Miguel ; Cardoso, Graça ; King, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-ad2844e8fa677b2180e2cd24eed1e6815a08468e4f33ebffe107725816d2f5c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Dependent variables</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Europe - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care facilities</topic><topic>Health centres</topic><topic>Health Facilities - standards</topic><topic>Health Facilities - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Hospital facilities</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Independent variables</topic><topic>Intellectual disabilities</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Long-Term Care - standards</topic><topic>Long-Term Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical care quality</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental Health Services - standards</topic><topic>Mental Health Services - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Mental Health Services - utilization</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multilevel</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Psychiatrists</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Ratings</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>User satisfaction</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Killaspy, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Tatiana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turton, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallert, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, Mirjam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cervilla, Jorge A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brangier, Paulette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raboch, Jiri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalisova, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onchev, Georgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexiev, Spiridon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mezzina, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ridente, Pina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiersma, Durk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiejna, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piotrowski, Patryk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploumpidis, Dimitris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonidakis, Fragiskos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldas-de-Almeida, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Graça</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Killaspy, Helen</au><au>White, Sarah</au><au>Wright, Christine</au><au>Taylor, Tatiana L</au><au>Turton, Penny</au><au>Kallert, Thomas</au><au>Schuster, Mirjam</au><au>Cervilla, Jorge A</au><au>Brangier, Paulette</au><au>Raboch, Jiri</au><au>Kalisova, Lucie</au><au>Onchev, Georgi</au><au>Alexiev, Spiridon</au><au>Mezzina, Roberto</au><au>Ridente, Pina</au><au>Wiersma, Durk</au><au>Visser, Ellen</au><au>Kiejna, Andrzej</au><au>Piotrowski, Patryk</au><au>Ploumpidis, Dimitris</au><au>Gonidakis, Fragiskos</au><au>Caldas-de-Almeida, José Miguel</au><au>Cardoso, Graça</au><au>King, Michael</au><au>Botbol, Michel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality of longer term mental health facilities in Europe: validation of the quality indicator for rehabilitative care against service users' views</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2012-06-04</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e38070</spage><epage>e38070</epage><pages>e38070-e38070</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The Quality Indicator for Rehabilitative Care (QuIRC) is a staff rated, international toolkit that assesses care in longer term hospital and community based mental health facilities. The QuIRC was developed from review of the international literature, an international Delphi exercise with over 400 service users, practitioners, carers and advocates from ten European countries at different stages of deinstitutionalisation, and review of the care standards in these countries. It can be completed in under an hour by the facility manager and has robust content validity, acceptability and inter-rater reliability. In this study, we investigated the internal validity of the QuIRC. Our aim was to identify the QuIRC domains of care that independently predicted better service user experiences of care.
At least 20 units providing longer term care for adults with severe mental illness were recruited in each of ten European countries. Service users completed standardised measures of their experiences of care, quality of life, autonomy and the unit's therapeutic milieu. Unit managers completed the QuIRC. Multilevel modelling allowed analysis of associations between service user ratings as dependent variables with unit QuIRC domain ratings as independent variables.
1750/2495 (70%) users and the managers of 213 units from across ten European countries participated. QuIRC ratings were positively associated with service users' autonomy and experiences of care. Associations between QuIRC ratings and service users' ratings of their quality of life and the unit's therapeutic milieu were explained by service user characteristics (age, diagnosis and functioning). A hypothetical 10% increase in QuIRC rating resulted in a clinically meaningful improvement in autonomy.
Ratings of the quality of longer term mental health facilities made by service managers were positively associated with service users' autonomy and experiences of care. Interventions that improve quality of care in these settings may promote service users' autonomy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>22675508</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0038070</doi><tpages>e38070</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2012-06, Vol.7 (6), p.e38070-e38070 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1325002942 |
source | PubMed Central(OpenAccess); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Adults Aged Aged, 80 and over Analysis Autonomy Dependent variables Education Epidemiology Europe - epidemiology Female Health aspects Health care Health care facilities Health centres Health Facilities - standards Health Facilities - statistics & numerical data Health sciences Health services Hospital facilities Hospitals Human rights Humans Independent variables Intellectual disabilities Literature reviews Long-Term Care - standards Long-Term Care - statistics & numerical data Male Medical care quality Medical ethics Medical research Medicine Mental disorders Mental Disorders - epidemiology Mental Disorders - rehabilitation Mental health Mental Health Services - standards Mental Health Services - statistics & numerical data Mental Health Services - utilization Middle Aged Multilevel Population Psychiatrists Psychiatry Psychotherapy Quality control Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics & numerical data Quality of life Ratings Rehabilitation Reproducibility of Results Research methodology Studies User satisfaction Young Adult |
title | Quality of longer term mental health facilities in Europe: validation of the quality indicator for rehabilitative care against service users' views |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A31%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20of%20longer%20term%20mental%20health%20facilities%20in%20Europe:%20validation%20of%20the%20quality%20indicator%20for%20rehabilitative%20care%20against%20service%20users'%20views&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Killaspy,%20Helen&rft.date=2012-06-04&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e38070&rft.epage=e38070&rft.pages=e38070-e38070&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0038070&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA477116656%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-ad2844e8fa677b2180e2cd24eed1e6815a08468e4f33ebffe107725816d2f5c83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1325002942&rft_id=info:pmid/22675508&rft_galeid=A477116656&rfr_iscdi=true |