Loading…
Juvenile survival in a neotropical migratory songbird is lower than expected
Attempts to estimate and identify factors influencing first-year survival in passerines, survival between fledging and the first reproductive attempt (i.e. juvenile survival), have largely been confounded by natal dispersal, particularly in long-distance migratory passerines. We studied Prothonotary...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2013-02, Vol.8 (2), p.e56059-e56059 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-666485be2a961e6114bd0d5a5e09345de86f32fd704776f20b1e41f39d986b103 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-666485be2a961e6114bd0d5a5e09345de86f32fd704776f20b1e41f39d986b103 |
container_end_page | e56059 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e56059 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | McKim-Louder, Matthew I Hoover, Jeffrey P Benson, Thomas J Schelsky, Wendy M |
description | Attempts to estimate and identify factors influencing first-year survival in passerines, survival between fledging and the first reproductive attempt (i.e. juvenile survival), have largely been confounded by natal dispersal, particularly in long-distance migratory passerines. We studied Prothonotary Warblers (Protonotaria citrea) breeding in nest boxes to estimate first-year survival while accounting for biases related to dispersal that are common in mark-recapture studies. The natal dispersal distribution (median = 1420 m; n = 429) and a distance-dependent recruitment rate, which controls for effects of study site configuration, both indicated a pattern of short-distance natal dispersal. This pattern was consistent with results of a systematic survey for birds returning outside the nest box study sites (up to 30 km in all directions) within a majority (81%) of total available bottomland forest habitat, further suggesting that permanent emigration outside of the study system was rare. We used multistate mark-recapture modeling to estimate first-year survival and incorporated factors thought to influence survival while accounting for the potential confounding effects of dispersal on recapture probabilities for warblers that fledged during 2004-2009 (n = 6093). Overall, the average first-year survival for warblers reared without cowbird nestmates was 0.11 (95% CI = 0.09-0.13), decreased with fledging date (0.22 early to 0.03 late) and averaged 40% lower for warblers reared with a brood parasite nestmate. First-year survival was less than half of the rate thought to represent population replacement in migratory passerines (∼0.30). This very low rate suggests that surviving the first year of life for many Neotropical migratory species is even more difficult than previously thought, forcing us to rethink estimates used in population models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0056059 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1330877585</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478375845</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_86b17fa78ad744619b6067c5091ab046</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478375845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-666485be2a961e6114bd0d5a5e09345de86f32fd704776f20b1e41f39d986b103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7jr6D0QLgujFjEmTJu2NsCx-jAws-HUb0ua0kyGTjEk67v57M053mcpeSKAJp89527znzbLnGC0w4fjdxg3eSrPYOQsLhEqGyvpBdo5rUsxZgcjDk_NZ9iSETYJIxdjj7KwgFNW4KM6z1ZdhD1YbyMPg93ovTa5tLnMLLnq3020qbHXvZXT-Jg_O9o32KtchN-43-Dyupc3hegdtBPU0e9RJE-DZuM-yHx8_fL_8PF9dfVpeXqzmLauLOGeM0apsoJA1w8Awpo1CqpQloJrQUkHFOlJ0iiPKOesK1GCguCO1qivWYERm2cuj7s64IEYjgsCEoIrzsioTsTwSysmN2Hm9lf5GOKnF34LzvZA-6taAOEjyTvJKKk4pw3XDEONtmQySDaIsab0fvzY0W1At2OilmYhO31i9Fr3bC1KyCtE6CbwZBbz7NUCIYqtDC8bI5PKQ_ruoKoIJTs9Z9uof9P7bjVQv0wW07dKsZHsQFReUVyRB9EAt7qHSUrDVbUpNl8Y-bXg7aUhMhOvYyyEEsfz29f_Zq59T9vUJuwZp4jo4M0TtbJiC9Ai23oXgobszGSNxCP2tG-IQejGGPrW9OB3QXdNtyskfyAP67A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1330877585</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Juvenile survival in a neotropical migratory songbird is lower than expected</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>McKim-Louder, Matthew I ; Hoover, Jeffrey P ; Benson, Thomas J ; Schelsky, Wendy M</creator><contributor>Renton, Katherine</contributor><creatorcontrib>McKim-Louder, Matthew I ; Hoover, Jeffrey P ; Benson, Thomas J ; Schelsky, Wendy M ; Renton, Katherine</creatorcontrib><description>Attempts to estimate and identify factors influencing first-year survival in passerines, survival between fledging and the first reproductive attempt (i.e. juvenile survival), have largely been confounded by natal dispersal, particularly in long-distance migratory passerines. We studied Prothonotary Warblers (Protonotaria citrea) breeding in nest boxes to estimate first-year survival while accounting for biases related to dispersal that are common in mark-recapture studies. The natal dispersal distribution (median = 1420 m; n = 429) and a distance-dependent recruitment rate, which controls for effects of study site configuration, both indicated a pattern of short-distance natal dispersal. This pattern was consistent with results of a systematic survey for birds returning outside the nest box study sites (up to 30 km in all directions) within a majority (81%) of total available bottomland forest habitat, further suggesting that permanent emigration outside of the study system was rare. We used multistate mark-recapture modeling to estimate first-year survival and incorporated factors thought to influence survival while accounting for the potential confounding effects of dispersal on recapture probabilities for warblers that fledged during 2004-2009 (n = 6093). Overall, the average first-year survival for warblers reared without cowbird nestmates was 0.11 (95% CI = 0.09-0.13), decreased with fledging date (0.22 early to 0.03 late) and averaged 40% lower for warblers reared with a brood parasite nestmate. First-year survival was less than half of the rate thought to represent population replacement in migratory passerines (∼0.30). This very low rate suggests that surviving the first year of life for many Neotropical migratory species is even more difficult than previously thought, forcing us to rethink estimates used in population models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056059</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23409122</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Analysis ; Animal behavior ; Animal Migration ; Animals ; Biology ; Birds ; Bottomland ; Breeding ; Cowbirds ; Dispersal ; Dispersion ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Emigration ; Estimates ; Evolution ; Female ; Illinois ; Juveniles ; Kentucky ; Male ; Migratory birds ; Migratory species ; Molothrus ater ; Mortality ; Natural history ; Nest boxes ; Ornithology ; Parasites ; Population growth ; Predation ; Probability ; Protonotaria ; Protonotaria citrea ; Recruitment ; Reproduction ; Songbirds ; Survival ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2013-02, Vol.8 (2), p.e56059-e56059</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2013 McKim-Louder et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2013 McKim-Louder et al 2013 McKim-Louder et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-666485be2a961e6114bd0d5a5e09345de86f32fd704776f20b1e41f39d986b103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-666485be2a961e6114bd0d5a5e09345de86f32fd704776f20b1e41f39d986b103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1330877585/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1330877585?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23409122$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Renton, Katherine</contributor><creatorcontrib>McKim-Louder, Matthew I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoover, Jeffrey P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benson, Thomas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schelsky, Wendy M</creatorcontrib><title>Juvenile survival in a neotropical migratory songbird is lower than expected</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Attempts to estimate and identify factors influencing first-year survival in passerines, survival between fledging and the first reproductive attempt (i.e. juvenile survival), have largely been confounded by natal dispersal, particularly in long-distance migratory passerines. We studied Prothonotary Warblers (Protonotaria citrea) breeding in nest boxes to estimate first-year survival while accounting for biases related to dispersal that are common in mark-recapture studies. The natal dispersal distribution (median = 1420 m; n = 429) and a distance-dependent recruitment rate, which controls for effects of study site configuration, both indicated a pattern of short-distance natal dispersal. This pattern was consistent with results of a systematic survey for birds returning outside the nest box study sites (up to 30 km in all directions) within a majority (81%) of total available bottomland forest habitat, further suggesting that permanent emigration outside of the study system was rare. We used multistate mark-recapture modeling to estimate first-year survival and incorporated factors thought to influence survival while accounting for the potential confounding effects of dispersal on recapture probabilities for warblers that fledged during 2004-2009 (n = 6093). Overall, the average first-year survival for warblers reared without cowbird nestmates was 0.11 (95% CI = 0.09-0.13), decreased with fledging date (0.22 early to 0.03 late) and averaged 40% lower for warblers reared with a brood parasite nestmate. First-year survival was less than half of the rate thought to represent population replacement in migratory passerines (∼0.30). This very low rate suggests that surviving the first year of life for many Neotropical migratory species is even more difficult than previously thought, forcing us to rethink estimates used in population models.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal Migration</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Bottomland</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Cowbirds</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Dispersion</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Emigration</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Illinois</subject><subject>Juveniles</subject><subject>Kentucky</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Migratory birds</subject><subject>Migratory species</subject><subject>Molothrus ater</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Natural history</subject><subject>Nest boxes</subject><subject>Ornithology</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Protonotaria</subject><subject>Protonotaria citrea</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Songbirds</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7jr6D0QLgujFjEmTJu2NsCx-jAws-HUb0ua0kyGTjEk67v57M053mcpeSKAJp89527znzbLnGC0w4fjdxg3eSrPYOQsLhEqGyvpBdo5rUsxZgcjDk_NZ9iSETYJIxdjj7KwgFNW4KM6z1ZdhD1YbyMPg93ovTa5tLnMLLnq3020qbHXvZXT-Jg_O9o32KtchN-43-Dyupc3hegdtBPU0e9RJE-DZuM-yHx8_fL_8PF9dfVpeXqzmLauLOGeM0apsoJA1w8Awpo1CqpQloJrQUkHFOlJ0iiPKOesK1GCguCO1qivWYERm2cuj7s64IEYjgsCEoIrzsioTsTwSysmN2Hm9lf5GOKnF34LzvZA-6taAOEjyTvJKKk4pw3XDEONtmQySDaIsab0fvzY0W1At2OilmYhO31i9Fr3bC1KyCtE6CbwZBbz7NUCIYqtDC8bI5PKQ_ruoKoIJTs9Z9uof9P7bjVQv0wW07dKsZHsQFReUVyRB9EAt7qHSUrDVbUpNl8Y-bXg7aUhMhOvYyyEEsfz29f_Zq59T9vUJuwZp4jo4M0TtbJiC9Ai23oXgobszGSNxCP2tG-IQejGGPrW9OB3QXdNtyskfyAP67A</recordid><startdate>20130208</startdate><enddate>20130208</enddate><creator>McKim-Louder, Matthew I</creator><creator>Hoover, Jeffrey P</creator><creator>Benson, Thomas J</creator><creator>Schelsky, Wendy M</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130208</creationdate><title>Juvenile survival in a neotropical migratory songbird is lower than expected</title><author>McKim-Louder, Matthew I ; Hoover, Jeffrey P ; Benson, Thomas J ; Schelsky, Wendy M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-666485be2a961e6114bd0d5a5e09345de86f32fd704776f20b1e41f39d986b103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal Migration</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Bottomland</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Cowbirds</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Dispersion</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Emigration</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Illinois</topic><topic>Juveniles</topic><topic>Kentucky</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Migratory birds</topic><topic>Migratory species</topic><topic>Molothrus ater</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Natural history</topic><topic>Nest boxes</topic><topic>Ornithology</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Protonotaria</topic><topic>Protonotaria citrea</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Songbirds</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKim-Louder, Matthew I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoover, Jeffrey P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benson, Thomas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schelsky, Wendy M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale_Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKim-Louder, Matthew I</au><au>Hoover, Jeffrey P</au><au>Benson, Thomas J</au><au>Schelsky, Wendy M</au><au>Renton, Katherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Juvenile survival in a neotropical migratory songbird is lower than expected</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2013-02-08</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e56059</spage><epage>e56059</epage><pages>e56059-e56059</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Attempts to estimate and identify factors influencing first-year survival in passerines, survival between fledging and the first reproductive attempt (i.e. juvenile survival), have largely been confounded by natal dispersal, particularly in long-distance migratory passerines. We studied Prothonotary Warblers (Protonotaria citrea) breeding in nest boxes to estimate first-year survival while accounting for biases related to dispersal that are common in mark-recapture studies. The natal dispersal distribution (median = 1420 m; n = 429) and a distance-dependent recruitment rate, which controls for effects of study site configuration, both indicated a pattern of short-distance natal dispersal. This pattern was consistent with results of a systematic survey for birds returning outside the nest box study sites (up to 30 km in all directions) within a majority (81%) of total available bottomland forest habitat, further suggesting that permanent emigration outside of the study system was rare. We used multistate mark-recapture modeling to estimate first-year survival and incorporated factors thought to influence survival while accounting for the potential confounding effects of dispersal on recapture probabilities for warblers that fledged during 2004-2009 (n = 6093). Overall, the average first-year survival for warblers reared without cowbird nestmates was 0.11 (95% CI = 0.09-0.13), decreased with fledging date (0.22 early to 0.03 late) and averaged 40% lower for warblers reared with a brood parasite nestmate. First-year survival was less than half of the rate thought to represent population replacement in migratory passerines (∼0.30). This very low rate suggests that surviving the first year of life for many Neotropical migratory species is even more difficult than previously thought, forcing us to rethink estimates used in population models.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>23409122</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0056059</doi><tpages>e56059</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2013-02, Vol.8 (2), p.e56059-e56059 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1330877585 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Accounting Analysis Animal behavior Animal Migration Animals Biology Birds Bottomland Breeding Cowbirds Dispersal Dispersion Ecology Ecosystem Emigration Estimates Evolution Female Illinois Juveniles Kentucky Male Migratory birds Migratory species Molothrus ater Mortality Natural history Nest boxes Ornithology Parasites Population growth Predation Probability Protonotaria Protonotaria citrea Recruitment Reproduction Songbirds Survival Wetlands |
title | Juvenile survival in a neotropical migratory songbird is lower than expected |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A36%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Juvenile%20survival%20in%20a%20neotropical%20migratory%20songbird%20is%20lower%20than%20expected&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=McKim-Louder,%20Matthew%20I&rft.date=2013-02-08&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e56059&rft.epage=e56059&rft.pages=e56059-e56059&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0056059&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478375845%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-666485be2a961e6114bd0d5a5e09345de86f32fd704776f20b1e41f39d986b103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1330877585&rft_id=info:pmid/23409122&rft_galeid=A478375845&rfr_iscdi=true |