Emotional picture and word processing: an FMRI study on effects of stimulus complexity

• Published in: PloS one 2013-02, Vol.8 (2), p.e55619-e55619
• Main Authors: Schlochtermeier, Lorna H, Kuchinke, Lars, Pehrs, Corinna, Urton, Karolina, Kappelhoff, Hermann, Jacobs, Arthur M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Arousal; Biology; Brain; Complexity; Correlation analysis; Data processing; Emotions; Female; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Humans; Information processing; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Medical imaging; Medicine; Neurosciences; Pattern Recognition, Visual; Pictures; Processing speed; Semantics; Social and Behavioral Sciences; Studies; Visual stimuli; Word processing; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055619

Neuroscientific investigations regarding aspects of emotional experiences usually focus on one stimulus modality (e.g., pictorial or verbal). Similarities and differences in the processing between the different modalities have rarely been studied directly. The comparison of verbal and pictorial emotional stimuli often reveals a processing advantage of emotional pictures in terms of larger or more pronounced emotion effects evoked by pictorial stimuli. In this study, we examined whether this picture advantage refers to general processing differences or whether it might partly be attributed to differences in visual complexity between pictures and words. We first developed a new stimulus database comprising valence and arousal ratings for more than 200 concrete objects representable in different modalities including different levels of complexity: words, phrases, pictograms, and photographs. Using fMRI we then studied the neural correlates of the processing of these emotional stimuli in a valence judgment task, in which the stimulus material was controlled for differences in emotional arousal. No superiority for the pictorial stimuli was found in terms of emotional information processing with differences between modalities being revealed mainly in perceptual processing regions. While visual complexity might partly account for previously found differences in emotional stimulus processing, the main existing processing differences are probably due to enhanced processing in modality specific perceptual regions. We would suggest that both pictures and words elicit emotional responses with no general superiority for either stimulus modality, while emotional responses to pictures are modulated by perceptual stimulus features, such as picture complexity.