Loading…
Not all kinds of revegetation are created equal: revegetation type influences bird assemblages in threatened Australian woodland ecosystems
The value for biodiversity of large intact areas of native vegetation is well established. The biodiversity value of regrowth vegetation is also increasingly recognised worldwide. However, there can be different kinds of revegetation that have different origins. Are there differences in the richness...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2012-04, Vol.7 (4), p.e34527-e34527 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-c8aa4e359b4d2cff588f7f63c4650d582bc87bb9add68ac36ffd2f021dbc62be3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-c8aa4e359b4d2cff588f7f63c4650d582bc87bb9add68ac36ffd2f021dbc62be3 |
container_end_page | e34527 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e34527 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Lindenmayer, David B Northrop-Mackie, Amanda R Montague-Drake, Rebecca Crane, Mason Michael, Damian Okada, Sachiko Gibbons, Philip |
description | The value for biodiversity of large intact areas of native vegetation is well established. The biodiversity value of regrowth vegetation is also increasingly recognised worldwide. However, there can be different kinds of revegetation that have different origins. Are there differences in the richness and composition of biotic communities in different kinds of revegetation? The answer remains unknown or poorly known in many ecosystems. We examined the conservation value of different kinds of revegetation through a comparative study of birds in 193 sites surveyed over ten years in four growth types located in semi-cleared agricultural areas of south-eastern Australia. These growth types were resprout regrowth, seedling regrowth, plantings, and old growth. Our investigation produced several key findings: (1) Marked differences in the bird assemblages of plantings, resprout regrowth, seedling regrowth, and old growth. (2) Differences in the number of species detected significantly more often in the different growth types; 29 species for plantings, 25 for seedling regrowth, 20 for resprout regrowth, and 15 for old growth. (3) Many bird species of conservation concern were significantly more often recorded in resprout regrowth, seedling regrowth or plantings but no species of conservation concern were recorded most often in old growth. We suggest that differences in bird occurrence among different growth types are likely to be strongly associated with growth-type differences in stand structural complexity.Our findings suggest a range of vegetation growth types are likely to be required in a given farmland area to support the diverse array of bird species that have the potential to occur in Australian temperate woodland ecosystems. Our results also highlight the inherent conservation value of regrowth woodland and suggest that current policies which allow it to be cleared or thinned need to be carefully re-examined. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0034527 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1340965873</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A477145443</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d7c16fa8e4c64ef49b93f3c129412f7c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A477145443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-c8aa4e359b4d2cff588f7f63c4650d582bc87bb9add68ac36ffd2f021dbc62be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11vFCEUhidGY2v1HxidxETjxa7DxzDghUnT-NGksYlft4SBwy6VHbbAVPc3-Kdl223TMb0wXEAOz3kPvHCq6ilq5oh06M1ZGOOg_HwdBpg3DaEt7u5V-0gQPGO4IfdvrfeqRymdNU1LOGMPqz2MqSBM8P3qz-eQa-V9_dMNJtXB1hEuYAFZZReGWkWodQSVwdRwPir_drqfN2uo3WD9CIOGVPcumlqlBKveq0UJuMIsLwWGInE4phyVd2qof4VgvBqKrA5pkzKs0uPqgVU-wZPdfFB9__D-29Gn2cnpx-Ojw5OZZgLlmeZKUSCt6KnB2tqWc9tZRjRlbWNajnvNu74XyhjGlSbMWoNtg5HpNcM9kIPq-ZXu2ockdz4miQhtBGt5RwpxfEWYoM7kOrqVihsZlJOXgRAXUsXstAdpOo2YVRyoZhQsFb0glmiEBUXYdrpovdtVG_sVGA3D1oKJ6HRncEu5CBeSENxwTovAq51ADOcjpCxXLmnwxT0IY5JCENEI1PJCvviHvPtyO2qhyvnL44VSVm815SHtOkRbSrfU_A6qDAMrp8ufs67EJwmvJwmFyfA7L9SYkjz--uX_2dMfU_blLXYJyudlCn7c_r80BekVqGNIKYK98Rg1ctsy127IbcvIXcuUtGe33-cm6bpHyF8-8BV7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1340965873</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Not all kinds of revegetation are created equal: revegetation type influences bird assemblages in threatened Australian woodland ecosystems</title><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Lindenmayer, David B ; Northrop-Mackie, Amanda R ; Montague-Drake, Rebecca ; Crane, Mason ; Michael, Damian ; Okada, Sachiko ; Gibbons, Philip</creator><contributor>Hayward, Matt</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lindenmayer, David B ; Northrop-Mackie, Amanda R ; Montague-Drake, Rebecca ; Crane, Mason ; Michael, Damian ; Okada, Sachiko ; Gibbons, Philip ; Hayward, Matt</creatorcontrib><description>The value for biodiversity of large intact areas of native vegetation is well established. The biodiversity value of regrowth vegetation is also increasingly recognised worldwide. However, there can be different kinds of revegetation that have different origins. Are there differences in the richness and composition of biotic communities in different kinds of revegetation? The answer remains unknown or poorly known in many ecosystems. We examined the conservation value of different kinds of revegetation through a comparative study of birds in 193 sites surveyed over ten years in four growth types located in semi-cleared agricultural areas of south-eastern Australia. These growth types were resprout regrowth, seedling regrowth, plantings, and old growth. Our investigation produced several key findings: (1) Marked differences in the bird assemblages of plantings, resprout regrowth, seedling regrowth, and old growth. (2) Differences in the number of species detected significantly more often in the different growth types; 29 species for plantings, 25 for seedling regrowth, 20 for resprout regrowth, and 15 for old growth. (3) Many bird species of conservation concern were significantly more often recorded in resprout regrowth, seedling regrowth or plantings but no species of conservation concern were recorded most often in old growth. We suggest that differences in bird occurrence among different growth types are likely to be strongly associated with growth-type differences in stand structural complexity.Our findings suggest a range of vegetation growth types are likely to be required in a given farmland area to support the diverse array of bird species that have the potential to occur in Australian temperate woodland ecosystems. Our results also highlight the inherent conservation value of regrowth woodland and suggest that current policies which allow it to be cleared or thinned need to be carefully re-examined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034527</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22493698</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agriculture ; Animals ; Australia ; Biodiversity ; Biology ; Biota ; Birds ; Birds - physiology ; Comparative studies ; Conservation ; Conservation biology ; Ecosystem biology ; Ecosystems ; Endangered Species ; Environmental aspects ; Eucalyptus ; Farmlands ; Forestry ; Habitats ; Hypotheses ; Old growth ; Phylogeography ; Plant Development ; Population Dynamics ; Protection and preservation ; Regrowth ; Revegetation ; Seedlings ; Seedlings - growth & development ; Species ; Vegetation ; Vegetation growth ; Wildlife conservation ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2012-04, Vol.7 (4), p.e34527-e34527</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2012 Lindenmayer et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Lindenmayer et al. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-c8aa4e359b4d2cff588f7f63c4650d582bc87bb9add68ac36ffd2f021dbc62be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-c8aa4e359b4d2cff588f7f63c4650d582bc87bb9add68ac36ffd2f021dbc62be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1340965873/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1340965873?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22493698$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Hayward, Matt</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lindenmayer, David B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Northrop-Mackie, Amanda R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montague-Drake, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crane, Mason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michael, Damian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Sachiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, Philip</creatorcontrib><title>Not all kinds of revegetation are created equal: revegetation type influences bird assemblages in threatened Australian woodland ecosystems</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The value for biodiversity of large intact areas of native vegetation is well established. The biodiversity value of regrowth vegetation is also increasingly recognised worldwide. However, there can be different kinds of revegetation that have different origins. Are there differences in the richness and composition of biotic communities in different kinds of revegetation? The answer remains unknown or poorly known in many ecosystems. We examined the conservation value of different kinds of revegetation through a comparative study of birds in 193 sites surveyed over ten years in four growth types located in semi-cleared agricultural areas of south-eastern Australia. These growth types were resprout regrowth, seedling regrowth, plantings, and old growth. Our investigation produced several key findings: (1) Marked differences in the bird assemblages of plantings, resprout regrowth, seedling regrowth, and old growth. (2) Differences in the number of species detected significantly more often in the different growth types; 29 species for plantings, 25 for seedling regrowth, 20 for resprout regrowth, and 15 for old growth. (3) Many bird species of conservation concern were significantly more often recorded in resprout regrowth, seedling regrowth or plantings but no species of conservation concern were recorded most often in old growth. We suggest that differences in bird occurrence among different growth types are likely to be strongly associated with growth-type differences in stand structural complexity.Our findings suggest a range of vegetation growth types are likely to be required in a given farmland area to support the diverse array of bird species that have the potential to occur in Australian temperate woodland ecosystems. Our results also highlight the inherent conservation value of regrowth woodland and suggest that current policies which allow it to be cleared or thinned need to be carefully re-examined.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Birds - physiology</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Ecosystem biology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Endangered Species</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Eucalyptus</subject><subject>Farmlands</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Old growth</subject><subject>Phylogeography</subject><subject>Plant Development</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Regrowth</subject><subject>Revegetation</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Seedlings - growth & development</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation growth</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11vFCEUhidGY2v1HxidxETjxa7DxzDghUnT-NGksYlft4SBwy6VHbbAVPc3-Kdl223TMb0wXEAOz3kPvHCq6ilq5oh06M1ZGOOg_HwdBpg3DaEt7u5V-0gQPGO4IfdvrfeqRymdNU1LOGMPqz2MqSBM8P3qz-eQa-V9_dMNJtXB1hEuYAFZZReGWkWodQSVwdRwPir_drqfN2uo3WD9CIOGVPcumlqlBKveq0UJuMIsLwWGInE4phyVd2qof4VgvBqKrA5pkzKs0uPqgVU-wZPdfFB9__D-29Gn2cnpx-Ojw5OZZgLlmeZKUSCt6KnB2tqWc9tZRjRlbWNajnvNu74XyhjGlSbMWoNtg5HpNcM9kIPq-ZXu2ockdz4miQhtBGt5RwpxfEWYoM7kOrqVihsZlJOXgRAXUsXstAdpOo2YVRyoZhQsFb0glmiEBUXYdrpovdtVG_sVGA3D1oKJ6HRncEu5CBeSENxwTovAq51ADOcjpCxXLmnwxT0IY5JCENEI1PJCvviHvPtyO2qhyvnL44VSVm815SHtOkRbSrfU_A6qDAMrp8ufs67EJwmvJwmFyfA7L9SYkjz--uX_2dMfU_blLXYJyudlCn7c_r80BekVqGNIKYK98Rg1ctsy127IbcvIXcuUtGe33-cm6bpHyF8-8BV7</recordid><startdate>20120406</startdate><enddate>20120406</enddate><creator>Lindenmayer, David B</creator><creator>Northrop-Mackie, Amanda R</creator><creator>Montague-Drake, Rebecca</creator><creator>Crane, Mason</creator><creator>Michael, Damian</creator><creator>Okada, Sachiko</creator><creator>Gibbons, Philip</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120406</creationdate><title>Not all kinds of revegetation are created equal: revegetation type influences bird assemblages in threatened Australian woodland ecosystems</title><author>Lindenmayer, David B ; Northrop-Mackie, Amanda R ; Montague-Drake, Rebecca ; Crane, Mason ; Michael, Damian ; Okada, Sachiko ; Gibbons, Philip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-c8aa4e359b4d2cff588f7f63c4650d582bc87bb9add68ac36ffd2f021dbc62be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Birds - physiology</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Ecosystem biology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Endangered Species</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Eucalyptus</topic><topic>Farmlands</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Old growth</topic><topic>Phylogeography</topic><topic>Plant Development</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Regrowth</topic><topic>Revegetation</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Seedlings - growth & development</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation growth</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindenmayer, David B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Northrop-Mackie, Amanda R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montague-Drake, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crane, Mason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michael, Damian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okada, Sachiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbons, Philip</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale_Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindenmayer, David B</au><au>Northrop-Mackie, Amanda R</au><au>Montague-Drake, Rebecca</au><au>Crane, Mason</au><au>Michael, Damian</au><au>Okada, Sachiko</au><au>Gibbons, Philip</au><au>Hayward, Matt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Not all kinds of revegetation are created equal: revegetation type influences bird assemblages in threatened Australian woodland ecosystems</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2012-04-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e34527</spage><epage>e34527</epage><pages>e34527-e34527</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The value for biodiversity of large intact areas of native vegetation is well established. The biodiversity value of regrowth vegetation is also increasingly recognised worldwide. However, there can be different kinds of revegetation that have different origins. Are there differences in the richness and composition of biotic communities in different kinds of revegetation? The answer remains unknown or poorly known in many ecosystems. We examined the conservation value of different kinds of revegetation through a comparative study of birds in 193 sites surveyed over ten years in four growth types located in semi-cleared agricultural areas of south-eastern Australia. These growth types were resprout regrowth, seedling regrowth, plantings, and old growth. Our investigation produced several key findings: (1) Marked differences in the bird assemblages of plantings, resprout regrowth, seedling regrowth, and old growth. (2) Differences in the number of species detected significantly more often in the different growth types; 29 species for plantings, 25 for seedling regrowth, 20 for resprout regrowth, and 15 for old growth. (3) Many bird species of conservation concern were significantly more often recorded in resprout regrowth, seedling regrowth or plantings but no species of conservation concern were recorded most often in old growth. We suggest that differences in bird occurrence among different growth types are likely to be strongly associated with growth-type differences in stand structural complexity.Our findings suggest a range of vegetation growth types are likely to be required in a given farmland area to support the diverse array of bird species that have the potential to occur in Australian temperate woodland ecosystems. Our results also highlight the inherent conservation value of regrowth woodland and suggest that current policies which allow it to be cleared or thinned need to be carefully re-examined.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>22493698</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0034527</doi><tpages>e34527</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2012-04, Vol.7 (4), p.e34527-e34527 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1340965873 |
source | NCBI_PubMed Central(免费); Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Agricultural land Agriculture Animals Australia Biodiversity Biology Biota Birds Birds - physiology Comparative studies Conservation Conservation biology Ecosystem biology Ecosystems Endangered Species Environmental aspects Eucalyptus Farmlands Forestry Habitats Hypotheses Old growth Phylogeography Plant Development Population Dynamics Protection and preservation Regrowth Revegetation Seedlings Seedlings - growth & development Species Vegetation Vegetation growth Wildlife conservation Woodlands |
title | Not all kinds of revegetation are created equal: revegetation type influences bird assemblages in threatened Australian woodland ecosystems |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A47%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Not%20all%20kinds%20of%20revegetation%20are%20created%20equal:%20revegetation%20type%20influences%20bird%20assemblages%20in%20threatened%20Australian%20woodland%20ecosystems&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Lindenmayer,%20David%20B&rft.date=2012-04-06&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e34527&rft.epage=e34527&rft.pages=e34527-e34527&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0034527&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA477145443%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-c8aa4e359b4d2cff588f7f63c4650d582bc87bb9add68ac36ffd2f021dbc62be3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1340965873&rft_id=info:pmid/22493698&rft_galeid=A477145443&rfr_iscdi=true |