Foraging ecology of fall-migrating shorebirds in the Illinois River valley

• Published in: PloS one 2012-09, Vol.7 (9), p.e45121-e45121
• Main Authors: Smith, Randolph V, Stafford, Joshua D, Yetter, Aaron P, Horath, Michelle M, Hine, Christopher S, Hoover, Jeffery P
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abundance; Agriculture; Animal behavior; Animal Migration - physiology; Animals; Aquatic birds; Behavior; Biology; Biomass; Bird migration; Bird populations; Birds; Body mass; Body size; Body Weight; Calidris canutus; Calidris melanotos; Calidris minutilla; Carrying capacity; Charadriiformes - physiology; Charadrius vociferus; Diet; Earth Sciences; Ecology; Ecosystem; Environmental aspects; Environmental protection; Feeding Behavior; Floods; Food; Food availability; Food resources; Food selection; Foraging behavior; Foraging habitats; Geography; Habitat selection; Habitats; Illinois; Invertebrates - growth & development; Migratory birds; Natural history; Natural resources; Optimal foraging; Ornithology; Populations; Researchers; Rivers; Scolopacidae; Seasons; Selectivity; Shorebirds; Species; Studies; Substrates; Taxa; Tringa flavipes; Veterinary Science; Wetlands; Wildlife conservation
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045121

Populations of many shorebird species appear to be declining in North America, and food resources at stopover habitats may limit migratory bird populations. We investigated body condition of, and foraging habitat and diet selection by 4 species of shorebirds in the central Illinois River valley during fall migrations 2007 and 2008 (Killdeer [Charadrius vociferus], Least Sandpiper [Calidris minutilla], Pectoral Sandpiper [Calidris melanotos], and Lesser Yellowlegs [Tringa flavipes]). All species except Killdeer were in good to excellent condition, based on size-corrected body mass and fat scores. Shorebird diets were dominated by invertebrate taxa from Orders Diptera and Coleoptera. Additionally, Isopoda, Hemiptera, Hirudinea, Nematoda, and Cyprinodontiformes contribution to diets varied by shorebird species and year. We evaluated diet and foraging habitat selection by comparing aggregate percent dry mass of food items in shorebird diets and core samples from foraging substrates. Invertebrate abundances at shorebird collection sites and random sites were generally similar, indicating that birds did not select foraging patches within wetlands based on invertebrate abundance. Conversely, we found considerable evidence for selection of some diet items within particular foraging sites, and consistent avoidance of Oligochaeta. We suspect the diet selectivity we observed was a function of overall invertebrate biomass (51.2 ± 4.4 [SE] kg/ha; dry mass) at our study sites, which was greater than estimates reported in most other food selection studies. Diet selectivity in shorebirds may follow tenants of optimal foraging theory; that is, at low food abundances shorebirds forage opportunistically, with the likelihood of selectivity increasing as food availability increases. Nonetheless, relationships between the abundance, availability, and consumption of Oligochaetes for and by waterbirds should be the focus of future research, because estimates of foraging carrying capacity would need to be revised downward if Oligochaetes are truly avoided or unavailable for consumption.