Equal contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship in major anaesthesia journals during a 10-yr period

The practice of giving certain authors equal credit in original research publications was increasingly common in some specialty. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of designating some authors with equally credited authors (ECAs) in major anaesthesia journals. The prac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2013-08, Vol.8 (8), p.e71430-e71430
Main Authors: Li, Zhi, Sun, Yu-Ming, Wu, Fei-Xiang, Yang, Li-Qun, Lu, Zhi-Jie, Yu, Wei-Feng
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analgesia
Anesthesia
Anesthesiology
Authoring
Authorship
Authorship - standards
Critical care
Humans
Impact factors
Mathematics
Medical research
Medicine
Pain perception
Professional Practice - trends
Publishing - trends
Science Policy
Scientific papers
Scientometrics
Serial Publications - standards
Serial Publications - trends
Studies
Surgery
Trends
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-8fcf735fe80c71603f06a1f916fb7c63fc6c2ef31e600b2e68cca0b275bafd5c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-8fcf735fe80c71603f06a1f916fb7c63fc6c2ef31e600b2e68cca0b275bafd5c3
container_end_page e71430
container_issue 8
container_start_page e71430
container_title PloS one
container_volume 8
creator Li, Zhi
Sun, Yu-Ming
Wu, Fei-Xiang
Yang, Li-Qun
Lu, Zhi-Jie
Yu, Wei-Feng
description The practice of giving certain authors equal credit in original research publications was increasingly common in some specialty. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of designating some authors with equally credited authors (ECAs) in major anaesthesia journals. The practice of giving authors equal credit was searched and identified in the three major anaesthesia journals between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2011. Papers with ECAs had a higher proportion of the total number of articles in 2011 versus published in 2002 (Anesthesiology, 8.8% vs. 0.9%; British Journal of Anaesthesia, 8.8% vs. 0%; Anesthesia & Analgesia, 3.4% vs. 0.3%; totally, 6.4% vs. 0.4%). A significant increasing trend in annual proportion of articles with ECA was found in the three journals. The first two authors listed in the byline had equal credit in most cases. The practice of giving authors equal credit in original research papers is increasingly common in major anaesthesia journals. It may be warranted for the journals to guide the authors how to regard this practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0071430
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1417977492</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478419502</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f298a57997fd48dbaafffa995833ad39</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478419502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-8fcf735fe80c71603f06a1f916fb7c63fc6c2ef31e600b2e68cca0b275bafd5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9-K1DAUxoso7rr6BqIBQfRixqRpk2YvhGVZdWBhwX-34TRN2gxtM5u04voKvrSp01m2shfSixxyft-Xk9OcJHlO8JpQTt5t3eh7aNc71-s1xpxkFD9Ijomg6YqlmD68Ex8lT0LYYpzTgrHHyVFKRYZ5To-T3xfXI7RIuX7wthwH6_qAoK-Q8rqyw2mMke60r21fo8HrmLE9GhqNVAMe1KC9_QWTDDmDYBwa50NjdxPVwdb5aAA6REGwgOaaA6pGPxkCInh149EuurjqafLIxKR-Nq8nybcPF1_PP60urz5uzs8uV4qJdFgVRhlOc6MLrDhhmBrMgBhBmCm5YtQoplJtKNEM4zLVrFAKYsDzEkyVK3qSvNz77loX5KEmSTLCBeeZSCOx2ROVg63ceduBv5EOrPy74XwtwQ9WtVqaVBSQcyG4qbKiKgGMMSBEXlAKFRXR6_182lh2ulI6dhraheky09tG1u6HpJxmmGXR4M1s4N31GHspOxuUblvotRunulPMCGUZj-irf9D7bzdTNcQL2N64eK6aTOVZxouMiBxP1PoeKn6V7mx8L9rYuL8QvF0Ipjelfw41jCHIzZfP_89efV-yr--wjYZ2aIJr9291CWZ7UHkXgtfmtskEy2lmDt2Q08zIeWai7MXdH3QrOgwJ_QO46xRS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1417977492</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Equal contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship in major anaesthesia journals during a 10-yr period</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Li, Zhi ; Sun, Yu-Ming ; Wu, Fei-Xiang ; Yang, Li-Qun ; Lu, Zhi-Jie ; Yu, Wei-Feng</creator><contributor>Friede, Tim</contributor><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhi ; Sun, Yu-Ming ; Wu, Fei-Xiang ; Yang, Li-Qun ; Lu, Zhi-Jie ; Yu, Wei-Feng ; Friede, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>The practice of giving certain authors equal credit in original research publications was increasingly common in some specialty. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of designating some authors with equally credited authors (ECAs) in major anaesthesia journals. The practice of giving authors equal credit was searched and identified in the three major anaesthesia journals between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2011. Papers with ECAs had a higher proportion of the total number of articles in 2011 versus published in 2002 (Anesthesiology, 8.8% vs. 0.9%; British Journal of Anaesthesia, 8.8% vs. 0%; Anesthesia &amp; Analgesia, 3.4% vs. 0.3%; totally, 6.4% vs. 0.4%). A significant increasing trend in annual proportion of articles with ECA was found in the three journals. The first two authors listed in the byline had equal credit in most cases. The practice of giving authors equal credit in original research papers is increasingly common in major anaesthesia journals. It may be warranted for the journals to guide the authors how to regard this practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071430</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23940753</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analgesia ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesiology ; Authoring ; Authorship ; Authorship - standards ; Critical care ; Humans ; Impact factors ; Mathematics ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Pain perception ; Professional Practice - trends ; Publishing - trends ; Science Policy ; Scientific papers ; Scientometrics ; Serial Publications - standards ; Serial Publications - trends ; Studies ; Surgery ; Trends</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2013-08, Vol.8 (8), p.e71430-e71430</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2013 Li et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2013 Li et al 2013 Li et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-8fcf735fe80c71603f06a1f916fb7c63fc6c2ef31e600b2e68cca0b275bafd5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-8fcf735fe80c71603f06a1f916fb7c63fc6c2ef31e600b2e68cca0b275bafd5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1417977492/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1417977492?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,74998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23940753$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Friede, Tim</contributor><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yu-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Fei-Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Li-Qun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Zhi-Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Wei-Feng</creatorcontrib><title>Equal contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship in major anaesthesia journals during a 10-yr period</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The practice of giving certain authors equal credit in original research publications was increasingly common in some specialty. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of designating some authors with equally credited authors (ECAs) in major anaesthesia journals. The practice of giving authors equal credit was searched and identified in the three major anaesthesia journals between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2011. Papers with ECAs had a higher proportion of the total number of articles in 2011 versus published in 2002 (Anesthesiology, 8.8% vs. 0.9%; British Journal of Anaesthesia, 8.8% vs. 0%; Anesthesia &amp; Analgesia, 3.4% vs. 0.3%; totally, 6.4% vs. 0.4%). A significant increasing trend in annual proportion of articles with ECA was found in the three journals. The first two authors listed in the byline had equal credit in most cases. The practice of giving authors equal credit in original research papers is increasingly common in major anaesthesia journals. It may be warranted for the journals to guide the authors how to regard this practice.</description><subject>Analgesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Authoring</subject><subject>Authorship</subject><subject>Authorship - standards</subject><subject>Critical care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impact factors</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Professional Practice - trends</subject><subject>Publishing - trends</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><subject>Scientific papers</subject><subject>Scientometrics</subject><subject>Serial Publications - standards</subject><subject>Serial Publications - trends</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9-K1DAUxoso7rr6BqIBQfRixqRpk2YvhGVZdWBhwX-34TRN2gxtM5u04voKvrSp01m2shfSixxyft-Xk9OcJHlO8JpQTt5t3eh7aNc71-s1xpxkFD9Ijomg6YqlmD68Ex8lT0LYYpzTgrHHyVFKRYZ5To-T3xfXI7RIuX7wthwH6_qAoK-Q8rqyw2mMke60r21fo8HrmLE9GhqNVAMe1KC9_QWTDDmDYBwa50NjdxPVwdb5aAA6REGwgOaaA6pGPxkCInh149EuurjqafLIxKR-Nq8nybcPF1_PP60urz5uzs8uV4qJdFgVRhlOc6MLrDhhmBrMgBhBmCm5YtQoplJtKNEM4zLVrFAKYsDzEkyVK3qSvNz77loX5KEmSTLCBeeZSCOx2ROVg63ceduBv5EOrPy74XwtwQ9WtVqaVBSQcyG4qbKiKgGMMSBEXlAKFRXR6_182lh2ulI6dhraheky09tG1u6HpJxmmGXR4M1s4N31GHspOxuUblvotRunulPMCGUZj-irf9D7bzdTNcQL2N64eK6aTOVZxouMiBxP1PoeKn6V7mx8L9rYuL8QvF0Ipjelfw41jCHIzZfP_89efV-yr--wjYZ2aIJr9291CWZ7UHkXgtfmtskEy2lmDt2Q08zIeWai7MXdH3QrOgwJ_QO46xRS</recordid><startdate>20130805</startdate><enddate>20130805</enddate><creator>Li, Zhi</creator><creator>Sun, Yu-Ming</creator><creator>Wu, Fei-Xiang</creator><creator>Yang, Li-Qun</creator><creator>Lu, Zhi-Jie</creator><creator>Yu, Wei-Feng</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130805</creationdate><title>Equal contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship in major anaesthesia journals during a 10-yr period</title><author>Li, Zhi ; Sun, Yu-Ming ; Wu, Fei-Xiang ; Yang, Li-Qun ; Lu, Zhi-Jie ; Yu, Wei-Feng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-8fcf735fe80c71603f06a1f916fb7c63fc6c2ef31e600b2e68cca0b275bafd5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Analgesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Authoring</topic><topic>Authorship</topic><topic>Authorship - standards</topic><topic>Critical care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impact factors</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Professional Practice - trends</topic><topic>Publishing - trends</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><topic>Scientific papers</topic><topic>Scientometrics</topic><topic>Serial Publications - standards</topic><topic>Serial Publications - trends</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yu-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Fei-Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Li-Qun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Zhi-Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Wei-Feng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Zhi</au><au>Sun, Yu-Ming</au><au>Wu, Fei-Xiang</au><au>Yang, Li-Qun</au><au>Lu, Zhi-Jie</au><au>Yu, Wei-Feng</au><au>Friede, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Equal contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship in major anaesthesia journals during a 10-yr period</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2013-08-05</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e71430</spage><epage>e71430</epage><pages>e71430-e71430</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The practice of giving certain authors equal credit in original research publications was increasingly common in some specialty. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of designating some authors with equally credited authors (ECAs) in major anaesthesia journals. The practice of giving authors equal credit was searched and identified in the three major anaesthesia journals between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2011. Papers with ECAs had a higher proportion of the total number of articles in 2011 versus published in 2002 (Anesthesiology, 8.8% vs. 0.9%; British Journal of Anaesthesia, 8.8% vs. 0%; Anesthesia &amp; Analgesia, 3.4% vs. 0.3%; totally, 6.4% vs. 0.4%). A significant increasing trend in annual proportion of articles with ECA was found in the three journals. The first two authors listed in the byline had equal credit in most cases. The practice of giving authors equal credit in original research papers is increasingly common in major anaesthesia journals. It may be warranted for the journals to guide the authors how to regard this practice.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>23940753</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0071430</doi><tpages>e71430</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2013-08, Vol.8 (8), p.e71430-e71430
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1417977492
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Analgesia
Anesthesia
Anesthesiology
Authoring
Authorship
Authorship - standards
Critical care
Humans
Impact factors
Mathematics
Medical research
Medicine
Pain perception
Professional Practice - trends
Publishing - trends
Science Policy
Scientific papers
Scientometrics
Serial Publications - standards
Serial Publications - trends
Studies
Surgery
Trends
title Equal contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship in major anaesthesia journals during a 10-yr period
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A22%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Equal%20contributions%20and%20credit:%20an%20emerging%20trend%20in%20the%20characterization%20of%20authorship%20in%20major%20anaesthesia%20journals%20during%20a%2010-yr%20period&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Li,%20Zhi&rft.date=2013-08-05&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e71430&rft.epage=e71430&rft.pages=e71430-e71430&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0071430&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478419502%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-8fcf735fe80c71603f06a1f916fb7c63fc6c2ef31e600b2e68cca0b275bafd5c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1417977492&rft_id=info:pmid/23940753&rft_galeid=A478419502&rfr_iscdi=true