Loading…
Charles Bonnet syndrome: evidence for a generative model in the cortex?
Several theories propose that the cortex implements an internal model to explain, predict, and learn about sensory data, but the nature of this model is unclear. One condition that could be highly informative here is Charles Bonnet syndrome (CBS), where loss of vision leads to complex, vivid visual...
Saved in:
Published in: | PLoS computational biology 2013, Vol.9 (7), p.e1003134-e1003134 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-b8390a2872b4e1ba37398f1bcff8f4145830085f3b07b0a2bafc6b8b1db3abc43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-b8390a2872b4e1ba37398f1bcff8f4145830085f3b07b0a2bafc6b8b1db3abc43 |
container_end_page | e1003134 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e1003134 |
container_title | PLoS computational biology |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Reichert, David P Seriès, Peggy Storkey, Amos J |
description | Several theories propose that the cortex implements an internal model to explain, predict, and learn about sensory data, but the nature of this model is unclear. One condition that could be highly informative here is Charles Bonnet syndrome (CBS), where loss of vision leads to complex, vivid visual hallucinations of objects, people, and whole scenes. CBS could be taken as indication that there is a generative model in the brain, specifically one that can synthesise rich, consistent visual representations even in the absence of actual visual input. The processes that lead to CBS are poorly understood. Here, we argue that a model recently introduced in machine learning, the deep Boltzmann machine (DBM), could capture the relevant aspects of (hypothetical) generative processing in the cortex. The DBM carries both the semantics of a probabilistic generative model and of a neural network. The latter allows us to model a concrete neural mechanism that could underlie CBS, namely, homeostatic regulation of neuronal activity. We show that homeostatic plasticity could serve to make the learnt internal model robust against e.g. degradation of sensory input, but overcompensate in the case of CBS, leading to hallucinations. We demonstrate how a wide range of features of CBS can be explained in the model and suggest a potential role for the neuromodulator acetylcholine. This work constitutes the first concrete computational model of CBS and the first application of the DBM as a model in computational neuroscience. Our results lend further credence to the hypothesis of a generative model in the brain. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003134 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1430783092</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A341456436</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5c0e065beaab41be8931464a1e7e0e1d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A341456436</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-b8390a2872b4e1ba37398f1bcff8f4145830085f3b07b0a2bafc6b8b1db3abc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUkGPEyEYJUbjrtV_YHSOXlr5CjMwHjRro-smm3jRMwHmo6WZgQrTxv33MnZ2sxsOEHjv8Xg8Qt4CXQET8HEfjynofnWwxq-AUgaMPyOXUNdsKVgtnz9aX5BXOe8LppZt85JcrJkUHIS4JNebnU495uprDAHHKt-FLsUBP1V48h0Gi5WLqdLVFgMmPfoTVkPssK98qMYdVjamEf9-eU1eON1nfDPPC_L7-7dfmx_L25_XN5ur26WtmRiXRrKW6rUUa8MRjGaCtdKBsc5Jx4HXklEqa8cMFaYAjXa2MdJAZ5g2lrMFeX_WPfQxqzmDrIAzKgq3XRfEzRnRRb1Xh-QHne5U1F7934hpq3Qave1R1ZYibWqDWhsOBmXLgDdcAwqkCF3R-jzfdjQDdhbDmHT_RPTpSfA7tY0nVT6oZA9F4MMskOKfI-ZRDT5b7HsdMB4n3wAN45P3BVmdoVtdrPngYlG0ZXQ4eBsDOl_2r9iUUsNZUwj8TLAp5pzQPfgCqqaK3MejpoqouSKF9u7xmx5I951g_wAUPLo_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1411634078</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Charles Bonnet syndrome: evidence for a generative model in the cortex?</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Reichert, David P ; Seriès, Peggy ; Storkey, Amos J</creator><creatorcontrib>Reichert, David P ; Seriès, Peggy ; Storkey, Amos J</creatorcontrib><description>Several theories propose that the cortex implements an internal model to explain, predict, and learn about sensory data, but the nature of this model is unclear. One condition that could be highly informative here is Charles Bonnet syndrome (CBS), where loss of vision leads to complex, vivid visual hallucinations of objects, people, and whole scenes. CBS could be taken as indication that there is a generative model in the brain, specifically one that can synthesise rich, consistent visual representations even in the absence of actual visual input. The processes that lead to CBS are poorly understood. Here, we argue that a model recently introduced in machine learning, the deep Boltzmann machine (DBM), could capture the relevant aspects of (hypothetical) generative processing in the cortex. The DBM carries both the semantics of a probabilistic generative model and of a neural network. The latter allows us to model a concrete neural mechanism that could underlie CBS, namely, homeostatic regulation of neuronal activity. We show that homeostatic plasticity could serve to make the learnt internal model robust against e.g. degradation of sensory input, but overcompensate in the case of CBS, leading to hallucinations. We demonstrate how a wide range of features of CBS can be explained in the model and suggest a potential role for the neuromodulator acetylcholine. This work constitutes the first concrete computational model of CBS and the first application of the DBM as a model in computational neuroscience. Our results lend further credence to the hypothesis of a generative model in the brain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-7358</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1553-734X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-7358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003134</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23874177</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology ; Brain research ; Computational biology ; Computer Science ; Councils ; Hallucinations - physiopathology ; Homeostasis ; Humans ; Machine learning ; Medicine ; Mental illness ; Models, Biological ; Nerve Net ; Neurosciences ; Noise ; Pathology ; Physiological aspects ; Probability ; Studies ; Syndrome ; Training</subject><ispartof>PLoS computational biology, 2013, Vol.9 (7), p.e1003134-e1003134</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2013 Reichert et al 2013 Reichert et al</rights><rights>2013 Reichert et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited: Reichert DP, Seriès P, Storkey AJ (2013) Charles Bonnet Syndrome: Evidence for a Generative Model in the Cortex? PLoS Comput Biol 9(7): e1003134. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003134</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-b8390a2872b4e1ba37398f1bcff8f4145830085f3b07b0a2bafc6b8b1db3abc43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-b8390a2872b4e1ba37398f1bcff8f4145830085f3b07b0a2bafc6b8b1db3abc43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715531/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715531/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,4010,27900,27901,27902,36990,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874177$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reichert, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seriès, Peggy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storkey, Amos J</creatorcontrib><title>Charles Bonnet syndrome: evidence for a generative model in the cortex?</title><title>PLoS computational biology</title><addtitle>PLoS Comput Biol</addtitle><description>Several theories propose that the cortex implements an internal model to explain, predict, and learn about sensory data, but the nature of this model is unclear. One condition that could be highly informative here is Charles Bonnet syndrome (CBS), where loss of vision leads to complex, vivid visual hallucinations of objects, people, and whole scenes. CBS could be taken as indication that there is a generative model in the brain, specifically one that can synthesise rich, consistent visual representations even in the absence of actual visual input. The processes that lead to CBS are poorly understood. Here, we argue that a model recently introduced in machine learning, the deep Boltzmann machine (DBM), could capture the relevant aspects of (hypothetical) generative processing in the cortex. The DBM carries both the semantics of a probabilistic generative model and of a neural network. The latter allows us to model a concrete neural mechanism that could underlie CBS, namely, homeostatic regulation of neuronal activity. We show that homeostatic plasticity could serve to make the learnt internal model robust against e.g. degradation of sensory input, but overcompensate in the case of CBS, leading to hallucinations. We demonstrate how a wide range of features of CBS can be explained in the model and suggest a potential role for the neuromodulator acetylcholine. This work constitutes the first concrete computational model of CBS and the first application of the DBM as a model in computational neuroscience. Our results lend further credence to the hypothesis of a generative model in the brain.</description><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Computational biology</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Hallucinations - physiopathology</subject><subject>Homeostasis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Mental illness</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Nerve Net</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Syndrome</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1553-7358</issn><issn>1553-734X</issn><issn>1553-7358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUkGPEyEYJUbjrtV_YHSOXlr5CjMwHjRro-smm3jRMwHmo6WZgQrTxv33MnZ2sxsOEHjv8Xg8Qt4CXQET8HEfjynofnWwxq-AUgaMPyOXUNdsKVgtnz9aX5BXOe8LppZt85JcrJkUHIS4JNebnU495uprDAHHKt-FLsUBP1V48h0Gi5WLqdLVFgMmPfoTVkPssK98qMYdVjamEf9-eU1eON1nfDPPC_L7-7dfmx_L25_XN5ur26WtmRiXRrKW6rUUa8MRjGaCtdKBsc5Jx4HXklEqa8cMFaYAjXa2MdJAZ5g2lrMFeX_WPfQxqzmDrIAzKgq3XRfEzRnRRb1Xh-QHne5U1F7934hpq3Qave1R1ZYibWqDWhsOBmXLgDdcAwqkCF3R-jzfdjQDdhbDmHT_RPTpSfA7tY0nVT6oZA9F4MMskOKfI-ZRDT5b7HsdMB4n3wAN45P3BVmdoVtdrPngYlG0ZXQ4eBsDOl_2r9iUUsNZUwj8TLAp5pzQPfgCqqaK3MejpoqouSKF9u7xmx5I951g_wAUPLo_</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Reichert, David P</creator><creator>Seriès, Peggy</creator><creator>Storkey, Amos J</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>Charles Bonnet syndrome: evidence for a generative model in the cortex?</title><author>Reichert, David P ; Seriès, Peggy ; Storkey, Amos J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-b8390a2872b4e1ba37398f1bcff8f4145830085f3b07b0a2bafc6b8b1db3abc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Computational biology</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Hallucinations - physiopathology</topic><topic>Homeostasis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Mental illness</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Nerve Net</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Syndrome</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reichert, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seriès, Peggy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storkey, Amos J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PLoS computational biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reichert, David P</au><au>Seriès, Peggy</au><au>Storkey, Amos J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Charles Bonnet syndrome: evidence for a generative model in the cortex?</atitle><jtitle>PLoS computational biology</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Comput Biol</addtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e1003134</spage><epage>e1003134</epage><pages>e1003134-e1003134</pages><issn>1553-7358</issn><issn>1553-734X</issn><eissn>1553-7358</eissn><abstract>Several theories propose that the cortex implements an internal model to explain, predict, and learn about sensory data, but the nature of this model is unclear. One condition that could be highly informative here is Charles Bonnet syndrome (CBS), where loss of vision leads to complex, vivid visual hallucinations of objects, people, and whole scenes. CBS could be taken as indication that there is a generative model in the brain, specifically one that can synthesise rich, consistent visual representations even in the absence of actual visual input. The processes that lead to CBS are poorly understood. Here, we argue that a model recently introduced in machine learning, the deep Boltzmann machine (DBM), could capture the relevant aspects of (hypothetical) generative processing in the cortex. The DBM carries both the semantics of a probabilistic generative model and of a neural network. The latter allows us to model a concrete neural mechanism that could underlie CBS, namely, homeostatic regulation of neuronal activity. We show that homeostatic plasticity could serve to make the learnt internal model robust against e.g. degradation of sensory input, but overcompensate in the case of CBS, leading to hallucinations. We demonstrate how a wide range of features of CBS can be explained in the model and suggest a potential role for the neuromodulator acetylcholine. This work constitutes the first concrete computational model of CBS and the first application of the DBM as a model in computational neuroscience. Our results lend further credence to the hypothesis of a generative model in the brain.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>23874177</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003134</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1553-7358 |
ispartof | PLoS computational biology, 2013, Vol.9 (7), p.e1003134-e1003134 |
issn | 1553-7358 1553-734X 1553-7358 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1430783092 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Biology Brain research Computational biology Computer Science Councils Hallucinations - physiopathology Homeostasis Humans Machine learning Medicine Mental illness Models, Biological Nerve Net Neurosciences Noise Pathology Physiological aspects Probability Studies Syndrome Training |
title | Charles Bonnet syndrome: evidence for a generative model in the cortex? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T14%3A41%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Charles%20Bonnet%20syndrome:%20evidence%20for%20a%20generative%20model%20in%20the%20cortex?&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20computational%20biology&rft.au=Reichert,%20David%20P&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e1003134&rft.epage=e1003134&rft.pages=e1003134-e1003134&rft.issn=1553-7358&rft.eissn=1553-7358&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003134&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA341456436%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-b8390a2872b4e1ba37398f1bcff8f4145830085f3b07b0a2bafc6b8b1db3abc43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1411634078&rft_id=info:pmid/23874177&rft_galeid=A341456436&rfr_iscdi=true |