Loading…
Tillage, mulch and N fertilizer affect emissions of CO2 under the rain fed condition
A two year (2010-2012) study was conducted to assess the effects of different agronomic management practices on the emissions of CO2 from a field of non-irrigated wheat planted on China's Loess Plateau. Management practices included four tillage methods i.e. T1: (chisel plow tillage), T2: (zero...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2013-09, Vol.8 (9), p.e72140-e72140 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-fa22067a998a1db203c5363980b98b62eae765f52864a88f495c33d6e43181e03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-fa22067a998a1db203c5363980b98b62eae765f52864a88f495c33d6e43181e03 |
container_end_page | e72140 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e72140 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Tanveer, Sikander Khan Wen, Xiaoxia Lu, Xing Li Zhang, Junli Liao, Yuncheng |
description | A two year (2010-2012) study was conducted to assess the effects of different agronomic management practices on the emissions of CO2 from a field of non-irrigated wheat planted on China's Loess Plateau. Management practices included four tillage methods i.e. T1: (chisel plow tillage), T2: (zero-tillage), T3: (rotary tillage) and T4: (mold board plow tillage), 2 mulch levels i.e., M0 (no corn residue mulch) and M1 (application of corn residue mulch) and 5 levels of N fertilizer (0, 80, 160, 240, 320 kg N/ha). A factorial experiment having a strip split-split arrangement, with tillage methods in the main plots, mulch levels in the sub plots and N-fertilizer levels in the sub-sub plots with three replicates, was used for this study. The CO2 data were recorded three times per week using a portable GXH-3010E1 gas analyzer. The highest CO2 emissions were recorded following rotary tillage, compared to the lowest emissions from the zero tillage planting method. The lowest emissions were recorded at the 160 kg N/ha, fertilizer level. Higher CO2 emissions were recorded during the cropping year 2010-11 relative to the year 2011-12. During cropping year 2010-11, applications of corn residue mulch significantly increased CO2 emissions in comparison to the non-mulched treatments, and during the year 2011-12, equal emissions were recorded for both types of mulch treatments. Higher CO2 emissions were recorded immediately after the tillage operations. Different environmental factors, i.e., rain, air temperatures, soil temperatures and soil moistures, had significant effects on the CO2 emissions. We conclude that conservation tillage practices, i.e., zero tillage, the use of corn residue mulch and optimum N fertilizer use, can reduce CO2 emissions, give better yields and provide environmentally friendly options. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0072140 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1436786006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3fd3e40c6484496f8cf81e9c15f5a1b2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3082136541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-fa22067a998a1db203c5363980b98b62eae765f52864a88f495c33d6e43181e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1vEzEUXCEQLYV_gMASFw4k-Gu93gsSigpUquglnC2v_Zw4cuxg7yLBr69DtlWLONmyZ-bNPE3TvCZ4SVhHPu7SlKMOy0OKsMS4o4TjJ8056RldCIrZ0wf3s-ZFKTuMWyaFeN6cUY6loK04b9ZrH4LewAe0n4LZIh0t-o4c5NEH_wcy0s6BGRHsfSk-xYKSQ6sbiqZo6--4BZS1j5VhkUnR-rGCXjbPnA4FXs3nRfPjy-V69W1xffP1avX5emFaKsaF05Ri0em-l5rYofo0LROsl3jo5SAoaOhE61oqBddSOt63hjErgDMiCWB20bw96R5CKmpeSFGEM9FJgbGoiKsTwia9U4fs9zr_Vkl79fch5Y3SNaoJoJizDDg2gkvOe-GkcXVIb0h1oMlAq9anedo07MEaiGPW4ZHo45_ot2qTfinWScY7XgXezwI5_ZygjKou1UDdf4Q0HX1zVtP3mFXou3-g_0_HTyiTUykZ3L0ZgtWxJHcsdSyJmktSaW8eBrkn3bWC3QIyMrjQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1436786006</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tillage, mulch and N fertilizer affect emissions of CO2 under the rain fed condition</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest Open Access資料庫)</source><creator>Tanveer, Sikander Khan ; Wen, Xiaoxia ; Lu, Xing Li ; Zhang, Junli ; Liao, Yuncheng</creator><contributor>Bond-Lamberty, Ben</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tanveer, Sikander Khan ; Wen, Xiaoxia ; Lu, Xing Li ; Zhang, Junli ; Liao, Yuncheng ; Bond-Lamberty, Ben</creatorcontrib><description>A two year (2010-2012) study was conducted to assess the effects of different agronomic management practices on the emissions of CO2 from a field of non-irrigated wheat planted on China's Loess Plateau. Management practices included four tillage methods i.e. T1: (chisel plow tillage), T2: (zero-tillage), T3: (rotary tillage) and T4: (mold board plow tillage), 2 mulch levels i.e., M0 (no corn residue mulch) and M1 (application of corn residue mulch) and 5 levels of N fertilizer (0, 80, 160, 240, 320 kg N/ha). A factorial experiment having a strip split-split arrangement, with tillage methods in the main plots, mulch levels in the sub plots and N-fertilizer levels in the sub-sub plots with three replicates, was used for this study. The CO2 data were recorded three times per week using a portable GXH-3010E1 gas analyzer. The highest CO2 emissions were recorded following rotary tillage, compared to the lowest emissions from the zero tillage planting method. The lowest emissions were recorded at the 160 kg N/ha, fertilizer level. Higher CO2 emissions were recorded during the cropping year 2010-11 relative to the year 2011-12. During cropping year 2010-11, applications of corn residue mulch significantly increased CO2 emissions in comparison to the non-mulched treatments, and during the year 2011-12, equal emissions were recorded for both types of mulch treatments. Higher CO2 emissions were recorded immediately after the tillage operations. Different environmental factors, i.e., rain, air temperatures, soil temperatures and soil moistures, had significant effects on the CO2 emissions. We conclude that conservation tillage practices, i.e., zero tillage, the use of corn residue mulch and optimum N fertilizer use, can reduce CO2 emissions, give better yields and provide environmentally friendly options.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072140</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24086256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Agronomy ; Air temperature ; Atmosphere ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon Dioxide - analysis ; Carbon dioxide effects ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Carbon sequestration ; Conservation ; Conservation tillage ; Corn ; Crop residues ; Crop rotation ; Crops, Agricultural ; Data processing ; Decomposition ; Ecosystems ; Emissions ; Environmental factors ; Fertilizers ; Forests ; Greenhouse gases ; Loess ; Manures ; Nitrogen ; Rain ; Respiration ; Soil ; Soil conservation ; Soil moisture ; Soil temperature ; Studies ; Temperature effects ; Tillage ; Triticum ; Wheat ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2013-09, Vol.8 (9), p.e72140-e72140</ispartof><rights>2013 Tanveer et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2013 Tanveer et al 2013 Tanveer et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-fa22067a998a1db203c5363980b98b62eae765f52864a88f495c33d6e43181e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-fa22067a998a1db203c5363980b98b62eae765f52864a88f495c33d6e43181e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1436786006/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1436786006?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24086256$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Bond-Lamberty, Ben</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tanveer, Sikander Khan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Xiaoxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xing Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Junli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Yuncheng</creatorcontrib><title>Tillage, mulch and N fertilizer affect emissions of CO2 under the rain fed condition</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>A two year (2010-2012) study was conducted to assess the effects of different agronomic management practices on the emissions of CO2 from a field of non-irrigated wheat planted on China's Loess Plateau. Management practices included four tillage methods i.e. T1: (chisel plow tillage), T2: (zero-tillage), T3: (rotary tillage) and T4: (mold board plow tillage), 2 mulch levels i.e., M0 (no corn residue mulch) and M1 (application of corn residue mulch) and 5 levels of N fertilizer (0, 80, 160, 240, 320 kg N/ha). A factorial experiment having a strip split-split arrangement, with tillage methods in the main plots, mulch levels in the sub plots and N-fertilizer levels in the sub-sub plots with three replicates, was used for this study. The CO2 data were recorded three times per week using a portable GXH-3010E1 gas analyzer. The highest CO2 emissions were recorded following rotary tillage, compared to the lowest emissions from the zero tillage planting method. The lowest emissions were recorded at the 160 kg N/ha, fertilizer level. Higher CO2 emissions were recorded during the cropping year 2010-11 relative to the year 2011-12. During cropping year 2010-11, applications of corn residue mulch significantly increased CO2 emissions in comparison to the non-mulched treatments, and during the year 2011-12, equal emissions were recorded for both types of mulch treatments. Higher CO2 emissions were recorded immediately after the tillage operations. Different environmental factors, i.e., rain, air temperatures, soil temperatures and soil moistures, had significant effects on the CO2 emissions. We conclude that conservation tillage practices, i.e., zero tillage, the use of corn residue mulch and optimum N fertilizer use, can reduce CO2 emissions, give better yields and provide environmentally friendly options.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide effects</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation tillage</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crop residues</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Crops, Agricultural</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Loess</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil conservation</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil temperature</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Triticum</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1vEzEUXCEQLYV_gMASFw4k-Gu93gsSigpUquglnC2v_Zw4cuxg7yLBr69DtlWLONmyZ-bNPE3TvCZ4SVhHPu7SlKMOy0OKsMS4o4TjJ8056RldCIrZ0wf3s-ZFKTuMWyaFeN6cUY6loK04b9ZrH4LewAe0n4LZIh0t-o4c5NEH_wcy0s6BGRHsfSk-xYKSQ6sbiqZo6--4BZS1j5VhkUnR-rGCXjbPnA4FXs3nRfPjy-V69W1xffP1avX5emFaKsaF05Ri0em-l5rYofo0LROsl3jo5SAoaOhE61oqBddSOt63hjErgDMiCWB20bw96R5CKmpeSFGEM9FJgbGoiKsTwia9U4fs9zr_Vkl79fch5Y3SNaoJoJizDDg2gkvOe-GkcXVIb0h1oMlAq9anedo07MEaiGPW4ZHo45_ot2qTfinWScY7XgXezwI5_ZygjKou1UDdf4Q0HX1zVtP3mFXou3-g_0_HTyiTUykZ3L0ZgtWxJHcsdSyJmktSaW8eBrkn3bWC3QIyMrjQ</recordid><startdate>20130925</startdate><enddate>20130925</enddate><creator>Tanveer, Sikander Khan</creator><creator>Wen, Xiaoxia</creator><creator>Lu, Xing Li</creator><creator>Zhang, Junli</creator><creator>Liao, Yuncheng</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130925</creationdate><title>Tillage, mulch and N fertilizer affect emissions of CO2 under the rain fed condition</title><author>Tanveer, Sikander Khan ; Wen, Xiaoxia ; Lu, Xing Li ; Zhang, Junli ; Liao, Yuncheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-fa22067a998a1db203c5363980b98b62eae765f52864a88f495c33d6e43181e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide effects</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation tillage</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crop residues</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Crops, Agricultural</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Loess</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil conservation</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil temperature</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Triticum</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tanveer, Sikander Khan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Xiaoxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xing Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Junli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Yuncheng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest Open Access資料庫)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tanveer, Sikander Khan</au><au>Wen, Xiaoxia</au><au>Lu, Xing Li</au><au>Zhang, Junli</au><au>Liao, Yuncheng</au><au>Bond-Lamberty, Ben</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tillage, mulch and N fertilizer affect emissions of CO2 under the rain fed condition</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2013-09-25</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e72140</spage><epage>e72140</epage><pages>e72140-e72140</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>A two year (2010-2012) study was conducted to assess the effects of different agronomic management practices on the emissions of CO2 from a field of non-irrigated wheat planted on China's Loess Plateau. Management practices included four tillage methods i.e. T1: (chisel plow tillage), T2: (zero-tillage), T3: (rotary tillage) and T4: (mold board plow tillage), 2 mulch levels i.e., M0 (no corn residue mulch) and M1 (application of corn residue mulch) and 5 levels of N fertilizer (0, 80, 160, 240, 320 kg N/ha). A factorial experiment having a strip split-split arrangement, with tillage methods in the main plots, mulch levels in the sub plots and N-fertilizer levels in the sub-sub plots with three replicates, was used for this study. The CO2 data were recorded three times per week using a portable GXH-3010E1 gas analyzer. The highest CO2 emissions were recorded following rotary tillage, compared to the lowest emissions from the zero tillage planting method. The lowest emissions were recorded at the 160 kg N/ha, fertilizer level. Higher CO2 emissions were recorded during the cropping year 2010-11 relative to the year 2011-12. During cropping year 2010-11, applications of corn residue mulch significantly increased CO2 emissions in comparison to the non-mulched treatments, and during the year 2011-12, equal emissions were recorded for both types of mulch treatments. Higher CO2 emissions were recorded immediately after the tillage operations. Different environmental factors, i.e., rain, air temperatures, soil temperatures and soil moistures, had significant effects on the CO2 emissions. We conclude that conservation tillage practices, i.e., zero tillage, the use of corn residue mulch and optimum N fertilizer use, can reduce CO2 emissions, give better yields and provide environmentally friendly options.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24086256</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0072140</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2013-09, Vol.8 (9), p.e72140-e72140 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1436786006 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest Open Access資料庫) |
subjects | Agricultural practices Agricultural production Agriculture Agronomy Air temperature Atmosphere Carbon dioxide Carbon Dioxide - analysis Carbon dioxide effects Carbon dioxide emissions Carbon sequestration Conservation Conservation tillage Corn Crop residues Crop rotation Crops, Agricultural Data processing Decomposition Ecosystems Emissions Environmental factors Fertilizers Forests Greenhouse gases Loess Manures Nitrogen Rain Respiration Soil Soil conservation Soil moisture Soil temperature Studies Temperature effects Tillage Triticum Wheat Zea mays |
title | Tillage, mulch and N fertilizer affect emissions of CO2 under the rain fed condition |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A49%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tillage,%20mulch%20and%20N%20fertilizer%20affect%20emissions%20of%20CO2%20under%20the%20rain%20fed%20condition&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Tanveer,%20Sikander%20Khan&rft.date=2013-09-25&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e72140&rft.epage=e72140&rft.pages=e72140-e72140&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0072140&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E3082136541%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-fa22067a998a1db203c5363980b98b62eae765f52864a88f495c33d6e43181e03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1436786006&rft_id=info:pmid/24086256&rfr_iscdi=true |