Loading…

Tillage, mulch and N fertilizer affect emissions of CO2 under the rain fed condition

A two year (2010-2012) study was conducted to assess the effects of different agronomic management practices on the emissions of CO2 from a field of non-irrigated wheat planted on China's Loess Plateau. Management practices included four tillage methods i.e. T1: (chisel plow tillage), T2: (zero...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2013-09, Vol.8 (9), p.e72140-e72140
Main Authors: Tanveer, Sikander Khan, Wen, Xiaoxia, Lu, Xing Li, Zhang, Junli, Liao, Yuncheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-fa22067a998a1db203c5363980b98b62eae765f52864a88f495c33d6e43181e03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-fa22067a998a1db203c5363980b98b62eae765f52864a88f495c33d6e43181e03
container_end_page e72140
container_issue 9
container_start_page e72140
container_title PloS one
container_volume 8
creator Tanveer, Sikander Khan
Wen, Xiaoxia
Lu, Xing Li
Zhang, Junli
Liao, Yuncheng
description A two year (2010-2012) study was conducted to assess the effects of different agronomic management practices on the emissions of CO2 from a field of non-irrigated wheat planted on China's Loess Plateau. Management practices included four tillage methods i.e. T1: (chisel plow tillage), T2: (zero-tillage), T3: (rotary tillage) and T4: (mold board plow tillage), 2 mulch levels i.e., M0 (no corn residue mulch) and M1 (application of corn residue mulch) and 5 levels of N fertilizer (0, 80, 160, 240, 320 kg N/ha). A factorial experiment having a strip split-split arrangement, with tillage methods in the main plots, mulch levels in the sub plots and N-fertilizer levels in the sub-sub plots with three replicates, was used for this study. The CO2 data were recorded three times per week using a portable GXH-3010E1 gas analyzer. The highest CO2 emissions were recorded following rotary tillage, compared to the lowest emissions from the zero tillage planting method. The lowest emissions were recorded at the 160 kg N/ha, fertilizer level. Higher CO2 emissions were recorded during the cropping year 2010-11 relative to the year 2011-12. During cropping year 2010-11, applications of corn residue mulch significantly increased CO2 emissions in comparison to the non-mulched treatments, and during the year 2011-12, equal emissions were recorded for both types of mulch treatments. Higher CO2 emissions were recorded immediately after the tillage operations. Different environmental factors, i.e., rain, air temperatures, soil temperatures and soil moistures, had significant effects on the CO2 emissions. We conclude that conservation tillage practices, i.e., zero tillage, the use of corn residue mulch and optimum N fertilizer use, can reduce CO2 emissions, give better yields and provide environmentally friendly options.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0072140
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1436786006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3fd3e40c6484496f8cf81e9c15f5a1b2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3082136541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-fa22067a998a1db203c5363980b98b62eae765f52864a88f495c33d6e43181e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1vEzEUXCEQLYV_gMASFw4k-Gu93gsSigpUquglnC2v_Zw4cuxg7yLBr69DtlWLONmyZ-bNPE3TvCZ4SVhHPu7SlKMOy0OKsMS4o4TjJ8056RldCIrZ0wf3s-ZFKTuMWyaFeN6cUY6loK04b9ZrH4LewAe0n4LZIh0t-o4c5NEH_wcy0s6BGRHsfSk-xYKSQ6sbiqZo6--4BZS1j5VhkUnR-rGCXjbPnA4FXs3nRfPjy-V69W1xffP1avX5emFaKsaF05Ri0em-l5rYofo0LROsl3jo5SAoaOhE61oqBddSOt63hjErgDMiCWB20bw96R5CKmpeSFGEM9FJgbGoiKsTwia9U4fs9zr_Vkl79fch5Y3SNaoJoJizDDg2gkvOe-GkcXVIb0h1oMlAq9anedo07MEaiGPW4ZHo45_ot2qTfinWScY7XgXezwI5_ZygjKou1UDdf4Q0HX1zVtP3mFXou3-g_0_HTyiTUykZ3L0ZgtWxJHcsdSyJmktSaW8eBrkn3bWC3QIyMrjQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1436786006</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tillage, mulch and N fertilizer affect emissions of CO2 under the rain fed condition</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest Open Access資料庫)</source><creator>Tanveer, Sikander Khan ; Wen, Xiaoxia ; Lu, Xing Li ; Zhang, Junli ; Liao, Yuncheng</creator><contributor>Bond-Lamberty, Ben</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tanveer, Sikander Khan ; Wen, Xiaoxia ; Lu, Xing Li ; Zhang, Junli ; Liao, Yuncheng ; Bond-Lamberty, Ben</creatorcontrib><description>A two year (2010-2012) study was conducted to assess the effects of different agronomic management practices on the emissions of CO2 from a field of non-irrigated wheat planted on China's Loess Plateau. Management practices included four tillage methods i.e. T1: (chisel plow tillage), T2: (zero-tillage), T3: (rotary tillage) and T4: (mold board plow tillage), 2 mulch levels i.e., M0 (no corn residue mulch) and M1 (application of corn residue mulch) and 5 levels of N fertilizer (0, 80, 160, 240, 320 kg N/ha). A factorial experiment having a strip split-split arrangement, with tillage methods in the main plots, mulch levels in the sub plots and N-fertilizer levels in the sub-sub plots with three replicates, was used for this study. The CO2 data were recorded three times per week using a portable GXH-3010E1 gas analyzer. The highest CO2 emissions were recorded following rotary tillage, compared to the lowest emissions from the zero tillage planting method. The lowest emissions were recorded at the 160 kg N/ha, fertilizer level. Higher CO2 emissions were recorded during the cropping year 2010-11 relative to the year 2011-12. During cropping year 2010-11, applications of corn residue mulch significantly increased CO2 emissions in comparison to the non-mulched treatments, and during the year 2011-12, equal emissions were recorded for both types of mulch treatments. Higher CO2 emissions were recorded immediately after the tillage operations. Different environmental factors, i.e., rain, air temperatures, soil temperatures and soil moistures, had significant effects on the CO2 emissions. We conclude that conservation tillage practices, i.e., zero tillage, the use of corn residue mulch and optimum N fertilizer use, can reduce CO2 emissions, give better yields and provide environmentally friendly options.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072140</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24086256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Agronomy ; Air temperature ; Atmosphere ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon Dioxide - analysis ; Carbon dioxide effects ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Carbon sequestration ; Conservation ; Conservation tillage ; Corn ; Crop residues ; Crop rotation ; Crops, Agricultural ; Data processing ; Decomposition ; Ecosystems ; Emissions ; Environmental factors ; Fertilizers ; Forests ; Greenhouse gases ; Loess ; Manures ; Nitrogen ; Rain ; Respiration ; Soil ; Soil conservation ; Soil moisture ; Soil temperature ; Studies ; Temperature effects ; Tillage ; Triticum ; Wheat ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2013-09, Vol.8 (9), p.e72140-e72140</ispartof><rights>2013 Tanveer et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2013 Tanveer et al 2013 Tanveer et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-fa22067a998a1db203c5363980b98b62eae765f52864a88f495c33d6e43181e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-fa22067a998a1db203c5363980b98b62eae765f52864a88f495c33d6e43181e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1436786006/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1436786006?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24086256$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Bond-Lamberty, Ben</contributor><creatorcontrib>Tanveer, Sikander Khan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Xiaoxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xing Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Junli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Yuncheng</creatorcontrib><title>Tillage, mulch and N fertilizer affect emissions of CO2 under the rain fed condition</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>A two year (2010-2012) study was conducted to assess the effects of different agronomic management practices on the emissions of CO2 from a field of non-irrigated wheat planted on China's Loess Plateau. Management practices included four tillage methods i.e. T1: (chisel plow tillage), T2: (zero-tillage), T3: (rotary tillage) and T4: (mold board plow tillage), 2 mulch levels i.e., M0 (no corn residue mulch) and M1 (application of corn residue mulch) and 5 levels of N fertilizer (0, 80, 160, 240, 320 kg N/ha). A factorial experiment having a strip split-split arrangement, with tillage methods in the main plots, mulch levels in the sub plots and N-fertilizer levels in the sub-sub plots with three replicates, was used for this study. The CO2 data were recorded three times per week using a portable GXH-3010E1 gas analyzer. The highest CO2 emissions were recorded following rotary tillage, compared to the lowest emissions from the zero tillage planting method. The lowest emissions were recorded at the 160 kg N/ha, fertilizer level. Higher CO2 emissions were recorded during the cropping year 2010-11 relative to the year 2011-12. During cropping year 2010-11, applications of corn residue mulch significantly increased CO2 emissions in comparison to the non-mulched treatments, and during the year 2011-12, equal emissions were recorded for both types of mulch treatments. Higher CO2 emissions were recorded immediately after the tillage operations. Different environmental factors, i.e., rain, air temperatures, soil temperatures and soil moistures, had significant effects on the CO2 emissions. We conclude that conservation tillage practices, i.e., zero tillage, the use of corn residue mulch and optimum N fertilizer use, can reduce CO2 emissions, give better yields and provide environmentally friendly options.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide effects</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation tillage</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crop residues</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Crops, Agricultural</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Loess</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil conservation</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil temperature</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Triticum</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1vEzEUXCEQLYV_gMASFw4k-Gu93gsSigpUquglnC2v_Zw4cuxg7yLBr69DtlWLONmyZ-bNPE3TvCZ4SVhHPu7SlKMOy0OKsMS4o4TjJ8056RldCIrZ0wf3s-ZFKTuMWyaFeN6cUY6loK04b9ZrH4LewAe0n4LZIh0t-o4c5NEH_wcy0s6BGRHsfSk-xYKSQ6sbiqZo6--4BZS1j5VhkUnR-rGCXjbPnA4FXs3nRfPjy-V69W1xffP1avX5emFaKsaF05Ri0em-l5rYofo0LROsl3jo5SAoaOhE61oqBddSOt63hjErgDMiCWB20bw96R5CKmpeSFGEM9FJgbGoiKsTwia9U4fs9zr_Vkl79fch5Y3SNaoJoJizDDg2gkvOe-GkcXVIb0h1oMlAq9anedo07MEaiGPW4ZHo45_ot2qTfinWScY7XgXezwI5_ZygjKou1UDdf4Q0HX1zVtP3mFXou3-g_0_HTyiTUykZ3L0ZgtWxJHcsdSyJmktSaW8eBrkn3bWC3QIyMrjQ</recordid><startdate>20130925</startdate><enddate>20130925</enddate><creator>Tanveer, Sikander Khan</creator><creator>Wen, Xiaoxia</creator><creator>Lu, Xing Li</creator><creator>Zhang, Junli</creator><creator>Liao, Yuncheng</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130925</creationdate><title>Tillage, mulch and N fertilizer affect emissions of CO2 under the rain fed condition</title><author>Tanveer, Sikander Khan ; Wen, Xiaoxia ; Lu, Xing Li ; Zhang, Junli ; Liao, Yuncheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-fa22067a998a1db203c5363980b98b62eae765f52864a88f495c33d6e43181e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide effects</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation tillage</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crop residues</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Crops, Agricultural</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Loess</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil conservation</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil temperature</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Triticum</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tanveer, Sikander Khan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Xiaoxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xing Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Junli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Yuncheng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest Open Access資料庫)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tanveer, Sikander Khan</au><au>Wen, Xiaoxia</au><au>Lu, Xing Li</au><au>Zhang, Junli</au><au>Liao, Yuncheng</au><au>Bond-Lamberty, Ben</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tillage, mulch and N fertilizer affect emissions of CO2 under the rain fed condition</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2013-09-25</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e72140</spage><epage>e72140</epage><pages>e72140-e72140</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>A two year (2010-2012) study was conducted to assess the effects of different agronomic management practices on the emissions of CO2 from a field of non-irrigated wheat planted on China's Loess Plateau. Management practices included four tillage methods i.e. T1: (chisel plow tillage), T2: (zero-tillage), T3: (rotary tillage) and T4: (mold board plow tillage), 2 mulch levels i.e., M0 (no corn residue mulch) and M1 (application of corn residue mulch) and 5 levels of N fertilizer (0, 80, 160, 240, 320 kg N/ha). A factorial experiment having a strip split-split arrangement, with tillage methods in the main plots, mulch levels in the sub plots and N-fertilizer levels in the sub-sub plots with three replicates, was used for this study. The CO2 data were recorded three times per week using a portable GXH-3010E1 gas analyzer. The highest CO2 emissions were recorded following rotary tillage, compared to the lowest emissions from the zero tillage planting method. The lowest emissions were recorded at the 160 kg N/ha, fertilizer level. Higher CO2 emissions were recorded during the cropping year 2010-11 relative to the year 2011-12. During cropping year 2010-11, applications of corn residue mulch significantly increased CO2 emissions in comparison to the non-mulched treatments, and during the year 2011-12, equal emissions were recorded for both types of mulch treatments. Higher CO2 emissions were recorded immediately after the tillage operations. Different environmental factors, i.e., rain, air temperatures, soil temperatures and soil moistures, had significant effects on the CO2 emissions. We conclude that conservation tillage practices, i.e., zero tillage, the use of corn residue mulch and optimum N fertilizer use, can reduce CO2 emissions, give better yields and provide environmentally friendly options.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24086256</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0072140</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2013-09, Vol.8 (9), p.e72140-e72140
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1436786006
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest Open Access資料庫)
subjects Agricultural practices
Agricultural production
Agriculture
Agronomy
Air temperature
Atmosphere
Carbon dioxide
Carbon Dioxide - analysis
Carbon dioxide effects
Carbon dioxide emissions
Carbon sequestration
Conservation
Conservation tillage
Corn
Crop residues
Crop rotation
Crops, Agricultural
Data processing
Decomposition
Ecosystems
Emissions
Environmental factors
Fertilizers
Forests
Greenhouse gases
Loess
Manures
Nitrogen
Rain
Respiration
Soil
Soil conservation
Soil moisture
Soil temperature
Studies
Temperature effects
Tillage
Triticum
Wheat
Zea mays
title Tillage, mulch and N fertilizer affect emissions of CO2 under the rain fed condition
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A49%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tillage,%20mulch%20and%20N%20fertilizer%20affect%20emissions%20of%20CO2%20under%20the%20rain%20fed%20condition&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Tanveer,%20Sikander%20Khan&rft.date=2013-09-25&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e72140&rft.epage=e72140&rft.pages=e72140-e72140&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0072140&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E3082136541%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-fa22067a998a1db203c5363980b98b62eae765f52864a88f495c33d6e43181e03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1436786006&rft_id=info:pmid/24086256&rfr_iscdi=true