Current analogues of future climate indicate the likely response of a sensitive montane tropical avifauna to a warming world

• Published in: PloS one 2013-07, Vol.8 (7), p.e69393
• Main Authors: Anderson, Alexander S, Storlie, Collin J, Shoo, Luke P, Pearson, Richard G, Williams, Stephen E
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Altitude; Animals; Australia; Avifauna; Biodiversity; Biology; Birds; Birds - classification; Birds - physiology; Climate; Climate Change; Climate models; Climate monitoring; Density; Ecosystem; Ecosystem biology; Ecosystems; Endangered & extinct species; Environment models; Environmental conditions; Environmental monitoring; Future climates; Gaging; Gauging; Geography; Hydrologic data; Models, Biological; Mountain climates; Niches; Population Density; Population Dynamics; Rainforests; Species; Species Specificity; Statistics, Nonparametric; Temperature; Temperature changes; Temperature effects; Temperature gradients; Temperature rise; Tropical Climate; Tropical climates; Tropical environments
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069393

Among birds, tropical montane species are likely to be among the most vulnerable to climate change, yet little is known about how climate drives their distributions, nor how to predict their likely responses to temperature increases. Correlative models of species' environmental niches have been widely used to predict changes in distribution, but direct tests of the relationship between key variables, such as temperature, and species' actual distributions are few. In the absence of historical data with which to compare observations and detect shifts, space-for-time substitutions, where warmer locations are used as analogues of future conditions, offer an opportunity to test for species' responses to climate. We collected density data for rainforest birds across elevational gradients in northern and southern subregions within the Australian Wet Tropics (AWT). Using environmental optima calculated from elevational density profiles, we detected a significant elevational difference between the two regions in ten of 26 species. More species showed a positive (19 spp.) than negative (7 spp.) displacement, with a median difference of ∼80.6 m across the species analysed that is concordant with that expected due to latitudinal temperature differences (∼75.5 m). Models of temperature gradients derived from broad-scale climate surfaces showed comparable performance to those based on in-situ measurements, suggesting the former is sufficient for modeling impacts. These findings not only confirm temperature as an important factor driving elevational distributions of these species, but also suggest species will shift upslope to track their preferred environmental conditions. Our approach uses optima calculated from elevational density profiles, offering a data-efficient alternative to distribution limits for gauging climate constraints, and is sensitive enough to detect distribution shifts in this avifauna in response to temperature changes of as little as 0.4 degrees. We foresee important applications in the urgent task of detecting and monitoring impacts of climate change on montane tropical biodiversity.