Ecosystem-service tradeoffs associated with switching from annual to perennial energy crops in riparian zones of the US Midwest

• Published in: PloS one 2013-11, Vol.8 (11), p.e80093
• Main Authors: Meehan, Timothy D, Gratton, Claudio, Diehl, Erica, Hunt, Natalie D, Mooney, Daniel F, Ventura, Stephen J, Barham, Bradford L, Jackson, Randall D
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural economics; Agricultural land; Agricultural production; Agriculture; Analysis; Biodiversity; Biological control; Biological pest control; Carbon; Carbon sequestration; Conservation; Conservation of Natural Resources; Corn; Cost assessments; Costs; Crop production; Crops; Crops, Agricultural; Economic conditions; Ecosystem; Ecosystem assessment; Ecosystem services; Ecosystems; Emissions; Energy; Energy crops; Feeds; Impact analysis; Income; Landscape; Nitrous oxide; Nitrous oxide emissions; Perennial crops; Phosphorus; Pollution; Provisioning; Raw materials; Riparian environments; Soil erosion; Soil sciences; Studies; Surface water; Sustainability; Sustainable agriculture; Tradeoffs; United States; Water pollution; Water quality; Water resources; Watersheds; Waterways
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080093

Integration of energy crops into agricultural landscapes could promote sustainability if they are placed in ways that foster multiple ecosystem services and mitigate ecosystem disservices from existing crops. We conducted a modeling study to investigate how replacing annual energy crops with perennial energy crops along Wisconsin waterways could affect a variety of provisioning and regulating ecosystem services. We found that a switch from continuous corn production to perennial-grass production decreased annual income provisioning by 75%, although it increased annual energy provisioning by 33%, decreased annual phosphorous loading to surface water by 29%, increased below-ground carbon sequestration by 30%, decreased annual nitrous oxide emissions by 84%, increased an index of pollinator abundance by an average of 11%, and increased an index of biocontrol potential by an average of 6%. We expressed the tradeoffs between income provisioning and other ecosystem services as benefit-cost ratios. Benefit-cost ratios averaged 12.06 GJ of additional net energy, 0.84 kg of avoided phosphorus pollution, 18.97 Mg of sequestered carbon, and 1.99 kg of avoided nitrous oxide emissions for every $1,000 reduction in income. These ratios varied spatially, from 2- to 70-fold depending on the ecosystem service. Benefit-cost ratios for different ecosystem services were generally correlated within watersheds, suggesting the presence of hotspots--watersheds where increases in multiple ecosystem services would come at lower-than-average opportunity costs. When assessing the monetary value of ecosystem services relative to existing conservation programs and environmental markets, the overall value of enhanced services associated with adoption of perennial energy crops was far lower than the opportunity cost. However, when we monitized services using estimates for the social costs of pollution, the value of enhanced services far exceeded the opportunity cost. This disparity between recoverable costs and social value represents a fundamental challenge to expansion of perennial energy crops and sustainable agricultural landscapes.