Loading…

The heterozygote superiority hypothesis for polymorphic color vision is not supported by long-term fitness data from wild neotropical monkeys

The leading explanatory model for the widespread occurrence of color vision polymorphism in Neotropical primates is the heterozygote superiority hypothesis, which postulates that trichromatic individuals have a fitness advantage over other phenotypes because redgreen chromatic discrimination is usef...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2014-01, Vol.9 (1), p.e84872-e84872
Main Authors: Fedigan, Linda M, Melin, Amanda D, Addicott, John F, Kawamura, Shoji
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9a035edbcccb3d107ab2d3a5816b9c795258b3371cce737bd21b1031432a2ca73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9a035edbcccb3d107ab2d3a5816b9c795258b3371cce737bd21b1031432a2ca73
container_end_page e84872
container_issue 1
container_start_page e84872
container_title PloS one
container_volume 9
creator Fedigan, Linda M
Melin, Amanda D
Addicott, John F
Kawamura, Shoji
description The leading explanatory model for the widespread occurrence of color vision polymorphism in Neotropical primates is the heterozygote superiority hypothesis, which postulates that trichromatic individuals have a fitness advantage over other phenotypes because redgreen chromatic discrimination is useful for foraging, social signaling, or predator detection. Alternative explanatory models predict that dichromatic and trichromatic phenotypes are each suited to distinct tasks. To conclusively evaluate these models, one must determine whether proposed visual advantages translate into differential fitness of trichromatic and dichromatic individuals. We tested whether color vision phenotype is a significant predictor of female fitness in a population of wild capuchins, using longterm 26 years survival and fertility data. We found no advantage to trichromats over dichromats for three fitness measures fertility rates, offspring survival and maternal survival. This finding suggests that a selective mechanism other than heterozygote advantage is operating to maintain the color vision polymorphism. We propose that attention be directed to field testing the alternative mechanisms of balancing selection proposed to explain opsin polymorphism nichedivergence, frequencydependence and mutual benefit of association. This is the first indepth, longterm study examining the effects of color vision variation on survival and reproductive success in a naturallyoccurring population of primates.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0084872
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1473958117</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478878789</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ee79b7bc0d904d12b9fc6f087826a613</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478878789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9a035edbcccb3d107ab2d3a5816b9c795258b3371cce737bd21b1031432a2ca73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk89u1DAQxiMEoqXwBggsISE47GLHSZxckKqKP5UqVYLC1XKcycbFyQTbKYR34J1x2G3VRT0gH2yNf_N5_NmTJE8ZXTMu2JtLnNyg7HrEAdaUllkp0nvJIat4uipSyu_fWh8kj7y_pDTnZVE8TA7SLKMZq_LD5PdFB6SDAA5_zRsMQPw0gjPoTJhJN48YOvDGkxYdGdHOPbqxM5potDFyZbzBgcT9AcOSOqIL0JB6JhaHzSrq9qQ1YQDvSaOCIq3DnvwwtiEDYHA4Gq0s6XH4BrN_nDxolfXwZDcfJV_ev7s4-bg6O_9wenJ8ttJFlYZVpSjPoam11jVvGBWqThuu8pIVdaVFlad5WfNoktYguKiblNWMcpbxVKVaCX6UPN_qjha93DnpJcsEr6IKW4jTLdGgupSjM71ys0Rl5N8Auo1ULhhtQQKIqha1pk1Fs4alddXqoqWlKNNCFYxHrbe706a6h0bDEJyye6L7O4Pp5AavJC_LWHUVBV7tBBx-n8AH2RuvwVoVPZyWuisqKCtEHtEX_6B3325HbVS8gBna-BJKL6LyOBNlLF2Uy7HrO6g4GuiNjt-uNTG-l_B6LyEyAX6GjZq8l6efP_0_e_51n315i-1A2dB5tFOIf8_vg9kW1A69d9DemMyoXLrm2g25dI3cdU1Me3b7gW6SrtuE_wHTgBZZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1473958117</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The heterozygote superiority hypothesis for polymorphic color vision is not supported by long-term fitness data from wild neotropical monkeys</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Fedigan, Linda M ; Melin, Amanda D ; Addicott, John F ; Kawamura, Shoji</creator><contributor>Addessi, Elsa</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fedigan, Linda M ; Melin, Amanda D ; Addicott, John F ; Kawamura, Shoji ; Addessi, Elsa</creatorcontrib><description>The leading explanatory model for the widespread occurrence of color vision polymorphism in Neotropical primates is the heterozygote superiority hypothesis, which postulates that trichromatic individuals have a fitness advantage over other phenotypes because redgreen chromatic discrimination is useful for foraging, social signaling, or predator detection. Alternative explanatory models predict that dichromatic and trichromatic phenotypes are each suited to distinct tasks. To conclusively evaluate these models, one must determine whether proposed visual advantages translate into differential fitness of trichromatic and dichromatic individuals. We tested whether color vision phenotype is a significant predictor of female fitness in a population of wild capuchins, using longterm 26 years survival and fertility data. We found no advantage to trichromats over dichromats for three fitness measures fertility rates, offspring survival and maternal survival. This finding suggests that a selective mechanism other than heterozygote advantage is operating to maintain the color vision polymorphism. We propose that attention be directed to field testing the alternative mechanisms of balancing selection proposed to explain opsin polymorphism nichedivergence, frequencydependence and mutual benefit of association. This is the first indepth, longterm study examining the effects of color vision variation on survival and reproductive success in a naturallyoccurring population of primates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084872</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24404195</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animal reproduction ; Animals ; Ateles geoffroyi ; Biology ; Breeding success ; Cebus capucinus ; Color blindness ; Color Perception - genetics ; Color Vision ; Computer Science ; Female ; Females ; Fertility ; Fitness ; Forage ; Fruits ; Haplorhini - physiology ; Heterozygote ; Heterozygote advantage ; Hypotheses ; Males ; Mathematical models ; Monkeys ; Offspring ; Other ; Phenotype ; Polymorphism ; Population ; Primates ; Reproduction ; Reproductive fitness ; Signaling ; Social and Behavioral Sciences ; Studies ; Success ; Survival ; Survival analysis ; Veterinary Science ; Visual discrimination</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-01, Vol.9 (1), p.e84872-e84872</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Fedigan etal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Fedigan etal 2014 Fedigan etal</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9a035edbcccb3d107ab2d3a5816b9c795258b3371cce737bd21b1031432a2ca73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9a035edbcccb3d107ab2d3a5816b9c795258b3371cce737bd21b1031432a2ca73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1473958117/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1473958117?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24404195$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Addessi, Elsa</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fedigan, Linda M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melin, Amanda D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Addicott, John F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawamura, Shoji</creatorcontrib><title>The heterozygote superiority hypothesis for polymorphic color vision is not supported by long-term fitness data from wild neotropical monkeys</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The leading explanatory model for the widespread occurrence of color vision polymorphism in Neotropical primates is the heterozygote superiority hypothesis, which postulates that trichromatic individuals have a fitness advantage over other phenotypes because redgreen chromatic discrimination is useful for foraging, social signaling, or predator detection. Alternative explanatory models predict that dichromatic and trichromatic phenotypes are each suited to distinct tasks. To conclusively evaluate these models, one must determine whether proposed visual advantages translate into differential fitness of trichromatic and dichromatic individuals. We tested whether color vision phenotype is a significant predictor of female fitness in a population of wild capuchins, using longterm 26 years survival and fertility data. We found no advantage to trichromats over dichromats for three fitness measures fertility rates, offspring survival and maternal survival. This finding suggests that a selective mechanism other than heterozygote advantage is operating to maintain the color vision polymorphism. We propose that attention be directed to field testing the alternative mechanisms of balancing selection proposed to explain opsin polymorphism nichedivergence, frequencydependence and mutual benefit of association. This is the first indepth, longterm study examining the effects of color vision variation on survival and reproductive success in a naturallyoccurring population of primates.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ateles geoffroyi</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>Cebus capucinus</subject><subject>Color blindness</subject><subject>Color Perception - genetics</subject><subject>Color Vision</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Haplorhini - physiology</subject><subject>Heterozygote</subject><subject>Heterozygote advantage</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Monkeys</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Other</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Polymorphism</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Reproductive fitness</subject><subject>Signaling</subject><subject>Social and Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Visual discrimination</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk89u1DAQxiMEoqXwBggsISE47GLHSZxckKqKP5UqVYLC1XKcycbFyQTbKYR34J1x2G3VRT0gH2yNf_N5_NmTJE8ZXTMu2JtLnNyg7HrEAdaUllkp0nvJIat4uipSyu_fWh8kj7y_pDTnZVE8TA7SLKMZq_LD5PdFB6SDAA5_zRsMQPw0gjPoTJhJN48YOvDGkxYdGdHOPbqxM5potDFyZbzBgcT9AcOSOqIL0JB6JhaHzSrq9qQ1YQDvSaOCIq3DnvwwtiEDYHA4Gq0s6XH4BrN_nDxolfXwZDcfJV_ev7s4-bg6O_9wenJ8ttJFlYZVpSjPoam11jVvGBWqThuu8pIVdaVFlad5WfNoktYguKiblNWMcpbxVKVaCX6UPN_qjha93DnpJcsEr6IKW4jTLdGgupSjM71ys0Rl5N8Auo1ULhhtQQKIqha1pk1Fs4alddXqoqWlKNNCFYxHrbe706a6h0bDEJyye6L7O4Pp5AavJC_LWHUVBV7tBBx-n8AH2RuvwVoVPZyWuisqKCtEHtEX_6B3325HbVS8gBna-BJKL6LyOBNlLF2Uy7HrO6g4GuiNjt-uNTG-l_B6LyEyAX6GjZq8l6efP_0_e_51n315i-1A2dB5tFOIf8_vg9kW1A69d9DemMyoXLrm2g25dI3cdU1Me3b7gW6SrtuE_wHTgBZZ</recordid><startdate>20140103</startdate><enddate>20140103</enddate><creator>Fedigan, Linda M</creator><creator>Melin, Amanda D</creator><creator>Addicott, John F</creator><creator>Kawamura, Shoji</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140103</creationdate><title>The heterozygote superiority hypothesis for polymorphic color vision is not supported by long-term fitness data from wild neotropical monkeys</title><author>Fedigan, Linda M ; Melin, Amanda D ; Addicott, John F ; Kawamura, Shoji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9a035edbcccb3d107ab2d3a5816b9c795258b3371cce737bd21b1031432a2ca73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ateles geoffroyi</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>Cebus capucinus</topic><topic>Color blindness</topic><topic>Color Perception - genetics</topic><topic>Color Vision</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Haplorhini - physiology</topic><topic>Heterozygote</topic><topic>Heterozygote advantage</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Monkeys</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Other</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Polymorphism</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Reproductive fitness</topic><topic>Signaling</topic><topic>Social and Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Visual discrimination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fedigan, Linda M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melin, Amanda D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Addicott, John F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawamura, Shoji</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fedigan, Linda M</au><au>Melin, Amanda D</au><au>Addicott, John F</au><au>Kawamura, Shoji</au><au>Addessi, Elsa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The heterozygote superiority hypothesis for polymorphic color vision is not supported by long-term fitness data from wild neotropical monkeys</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-01-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e84872</spage><epage>e84872</epage><pages>e84872-e84872</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The leading explanatory model for the widespread occurrence of color vision polymorphism in Neotropical primates is the heterozygote superiority hypothesis, which postulates that trichromatic individuals have a fitness advantage over other phenotypes because redgreen chromatic discrimination is useful for foraging, social signaling, or predator detection. Alternative explanatory models predict that dichromatic and trichromatic phenotypes are each suited to distinct tasks. To conclusively evaluate these models, one must determine whether proposed visual advantages translate into differential fitness of trichromatic and dichromatic individuals. We tested whether color vision phenotype is a significant predictor of female fitness in a population of wild capuchins, using longterm 26 years survival and fertility data. We found no advantage to trichromats over dichromats for three fitness measures fertility rates, offspring survival and maternal survival. This finding suggests that a selective mechanism other than heterozygote advantage is operating to maintain the color vision polymorphism. We propose that attention be directed to field testing the alternative mechanisms of balancing selection proposed to explain opsin polymorphism nichedivergence, frequencydependence and mutual benefit of association. This is the first indepth, longterm study examining the effects of color vision variation on survival and reproductive success in a naturallyoccurring population of primates.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24404195</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0084872</doi><tpages>e84872</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2014-01, Vol.9 (1), p.e84872-e84872
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1473958117
source PubMed Central Free; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Analysis
Animal reproduction
Animals
Ateles geoffroyi
Biology
Breeding success
Cebus capucinus
Color blindness
Color Perception - genetics
Color Vision
Computer Science
Female
Females
Fertility
Fitness
Forage
Fruits
Haplorhini - physiology
Heterozygote
Heterozygote advantage
Hypotheses
Males
Mathematical models
Monkeys
Offspring
Other
Phenotype
Polymorphism
Population
Primates
Reproduction
Reproductive fitness
Signaling
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Studies
Success
Survival
Survival analysis
Veterinary Science
Visual discrimination
title The heterozygote superiority hypothesis for polymorphic color vision is not supported by long-term fitness data from wild neotropical monkeys
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A21%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20heterozygote%20superiority%20hypothesis%20for%20polymorphic%20color%20vision%20is%20not%20supported%20by%20long-term%20fitness%20data%20from%20wild%20neotropical%20monkeys&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Fedigan,%20Linda%20M&rft.date=2014-01-03&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e84872&rft.epage=e84872&rft.pages=e84872-e84872&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0084872&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478878789%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9a035edbcccb3d107ab2d3a5816b9c795258b3371cce737bd21b1031432a2ca73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1473958117&rft_id=info:pmid/24404195&rft_galeid=A478878789&rfr_iscdi=true