Loading…
The heterozygote superiority hypothesis for polymorphic color vision is not supported by long-term fitness data from wild neotropical monkeys
The leading explanatory model for the widespread occurrence of color vision polymorphism in Neotropical primates is the heterozygote superiority hypothesis, which postulates that trichromatic individuals have a fitness advantage over other phenotypes because redgreen chromatic discrimination is usef...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2014-01, Vol.9 (1), p.e84872-e84872 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9a035edbcccb3d107ab2d3a5816b9c795258b3371cce737bd21b1031432a2ca73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9a035edbcccb3d107ab2d3a5816b9c795258b3371cce737bd21b1031432a2ca73 |
container_end_page | e84872 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e84872 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Fedigan, Linda M Melin, Amanda D Addicott, John F Kawamura, Shoji |
description | The leading explanatory model for the widespread occurrence of color vision polymorphism in Neotropical primates is the heterozygote superiority hypothesis, which postulates that trichromatic individuals have a fitness advantage over other phenotypes because redgreen chromatic discrimination is useful for foraging, social signaling, or predator detection. Alternative explanatory models predict that dichromatic and trichromatic phenotypes are each suited to distinct tasks. To conclusively evaluate these models, one must determine whether proposed visual advantages translate into differential fitness of trichromatic and dichromatic individuals. We tested whether color vision phenotype is a significant predictor of female fitness in a population of wild capuchins, using longterm 26 years survival and fertility data. We found no advantage to trichromats over dichromats for three fitness measures fertility rates, offspring survival and maternal survival. This finding suggests that a selective mechanism other than heterozygote advantage is operating to maintain the color vision polymorphism. We propose that attention be directed to field testing the alternative mechanisms of balancing selection proposed to explain opsin polymorphism nichedivergence, frequencydependence and mutual benefit of association. This is the first indepth, longterm study examining the effects of color vision variation on survival and reproductive success in a naturallyoccurring population of primates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0084872 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1473958117</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478878789</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ee79b7bc0d904d12b9fc6f087826a613</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478878789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9a035edbcccb3d107ab2d3a5816b9c795258b3371cce737bd21b1031432a2ca73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk89u1DAQxiMEoqXwBggsISE47GLHSZxckKqKP5UqVYLC1XKcycbFyQTbKYR34J1x2G3VRT0gH2yNf_N5_NmTJE8ZXTMu2JtLnNyg7HrEAdaUllkp0nvJIat4uipSyu_fWh8kj7y_pDTnZVE8TA7SLKMZq_LD5PdFB6SDAA5_zRsMQPw0gjPoTJhJN48YOvDGkxYdGdHOPbqxM5potDFyZbzBgcT9AcOSOqIL0JB6JhaHzSrq9qQ1YQDvSaOCIq3DnvwwtiEDYHA4Gq0s6XH4BrN_nDxolfXwZDcfJV_ev7s4-bg6O_9wenJ8ttJFlYZVpSjPoam11jVvGBWqThuu8pIVdaVFlad5WfNoktYguKiblNWMcpbxVKVaCX6UPN_qjha93DnpJcsEr6IKW4jTLdGgupSjM71ys0Rl5N8Auo1ULhhtQQKIqha1pk1Fs4alddXqoqWlKNNCFYxHrbe706a6h0bDEJyye6L7O4Pp5AavJC_LWHUVBV7tBBx-n8AH2RuvwVoVPZyWuisqKCtEHtEX_6B3325HbVS8gBna-BJKL6LyOBNlLF2Uy7HrO6g4GuiNjt-uNTG-l_B6LyEyAX6GjZq8l6efP_0_e_51n315i-1A2dB5tFOIf8_vg9kW1A69d9DemMyoXLrm2g25dI3cdU1Me3b7gW6SrtuE_wHTgBZZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1473958117</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The heterozygote superiority hypothesis for polymorphic color vision is not supported by long-term fitness data from wild neotropical monkeys</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Fedigan, Linda M ; Melin, Amanda D ; Addicott, John F ; Kawamura, Shoji</creator><contributor>Addessi, Elsa</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fedigan, Linda M ; Melin, Amanda D ; Addicott, John F ; Kawamura, Shoji ; Addessi, Elsa</creatorcontrib><description>The leading explanatory model for the widespread occurrence of color vision polymorphism in Neotropical primates is the heterozygote superiority hypothesis, which postulates that trichromatic individuals have a fitness advantage over other phenotypes because redgreen chromatic discrimination is useful for foraging, social signaling, or predator detection. Alternative explanatory models predict that dichromatic and trichromatic phenotypes are each suited to distinct tasks. To conclusively evaluate these models, one must determine whether proposed visual advantages translate into differential fitness of trichromatic and dichromatic individuals. We tested whether color vision phenotype is a significant predictor of female fitness in a population of wild capuchins, using longterm 26 years survival and fertility data. We found no advantage to trichromats over dichromats for three fitness measures fertility rates, offspring survival and maternal survival. This finding suggests that a selective mechanism other than heterozygote advantage is operating to maintain the color vision polymorphism. We propose that attention be directed to field testing the alternative mechanisms of balancing selection proposed to explain opsin polymorphism nichedivergence, frequencydependence and mutual benefit of association. This is the first indepth, longterm study examining the effects of color vision variation on survival and reproductive success in a naturallyoccurring population of primates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084872</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24404195</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animal reproduction ; Animals ; Ateles geoffroyi ; Biology ; Breeding success ; Cebus capucinus ; Color blindness ; Color Perception - genetics ; Color Vision ; Computer Science ; Female ; Females ; Fertility ; Fitness ; Forage ; Fruits ; Haplorhini - physiology ; Heterozygote ; Heterozygote advantage ; Hypotheses ; Males ; Mathematical models ; Monkeys ; Offspring ; Other ; Phenotype ; Polymorphism ; Population ; Primates ; Reproduction ; Reproductive fitness ; Signaling ; Social and Behavioral Sciences ; Studies ; Success ; Survival ; Survival analysis ; Veterinary Science ; Visual discrimination</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-01, Vol.9 (1), p.e84872-e84872</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Fedigan etal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Fedigan etal 2014 Fedigan etal</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9a035edbcccb3d107ab2d3a5816b9c795258b3371cce737bd21b1031432a2ca73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9a035edbcccb3d107ab2d3a5816b9c795258b3371cce737bd21b1031432a2ca73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1473958117/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1473958117?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24404195$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Addessi, Elsa</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fedigan, Linda M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melin, Amanda D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Addicott, John F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawamura, Shoji</creatorcontrib><title>The heterozygote superiority hypothesis for polymorphic color vision is not supported by long-term fitness data from wild neotropical monkeys</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The leading explanatory model for the widespread occurrence of color vision polymorphism in Neotropical primates is the heterozygote superiority hypothesis, which postulates that trichromatic individuals have a fitness advantage over other phenotypes because redgreen chromatic discrimination is useful for foraging, social signaling, or predator detection. Alternative explanatory models predict that dichromatic and trichromatic phenotypes are each suited to distinct tasks. To conclusively evaluate these models, one must determine whether proposed visual advantages translate into differential fitness of trichromatic and dichromatic individuals. We tested whether color vision phenotype is a significant predictor of female fitness in a population of wild capuchins, using longterm 26 years survival and fertility data. We found no advantage to trichromats over dichromats for three fitness measures fertility rates, offspring survival and maternal survival. This finding suggests that a selective mechanism other than heterozygote advantage is operating to maintain the color vision polymorphism. We propose that attention be directed to field testing the alternative mechanisms of balancing selection proposed to explain opsin polymorphism nichedivergence, frequencydependence and mutual benefit of association. This is the first indepth, longterm study examining the effects of color vision variation on survival and reproductive success in a naturallyoccurring population of primates.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ateles geoffroyi</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>Cebus capucinus</subject><subject>Color blindness</subject><subject>Color Perception - genetics</subject><subject>Color Vision</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Haplorhini - physiology</subject><subject>Heterozygote</subject><subject>Heterozygote advantage</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Monkeys</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Other</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Polymorphism</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Reproductive fitness</subject><subject>Signaling</subject><subject>Social and Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Visual discrimination</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk89u1DAQxiMEoqXwBggsISE47GLHSZxckKqKP5UqVYLC1XKcycbFyQTbKYR34J1x2G3VRT0gH2yNf_N5_NmTJE8ZXTMu2JtLnNyg7HrEAdaUllkp0nvJIat4uipSyu_fWh8kj7y_pDTnZVE8TA7SLKMZq_LD5PdFB6SDAA5_zRsMQPw0gjPoTJhJN48YOvDGkxYdGdHOPbqxM5potDFyZbzBgcT9AcOSOqIL0JB6JhaHzSrq9qQ1YQDvSaOCIq3DnvwwtiEDYHA4Gq0s6XH4BrN_nDxolfXwZDcfJV_ev7s4-bg6O_9wenJ8ttJFlYZVpSjPoam11jVvGBWqThuu8pIVdaVFlad5WfNoktYguKiblNWMcpbxVKVaCX6UPN_qjha93DnpJcsEr6IKW4jTLdGgupSjM71ys0Rl5N8Auo1ULhhtQQKIqha1pk1Fs4alddXqoqWlKNNCFYxHrbe706a6h0bDEJyye6L7O4Pp5AavJC_LWHUVBV7tBBx-n8AH2RuvwVoVPZyWuisqKCtEHtEX_6B3325HbVS8gBna-BJKL6LyOBNlLF2Uy7HrO6g4GuiNjt-uNTG-l_B6LyEyAX6GjZq8l6efP_0_e_51n315i-1A2dB5tFOIf8_vg9kW1A69d9DemMyoXLrm2g25dI3cdU1Me3b7gW6SrtuE_wHTgBZZ</recordid><startdate>20140103</startdate><enddate>20140103</enddate><creator>Fedigan, Linda M</creator><creator>Melin, Amanda D</creator><creator>Addicott, John F</creator><creator>Kawamura, Shoji</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140103</creationdate><title>The heterozygote superiority hypothesis for polymorphic color vision is not supported by long-term fitness data from wild neotropical monkeys</title><author>Fedigan, Linda M ; Melin, Amanda D ; Addicott, John F ; Kawamura, Shoji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9a035edbcccb3d107ab2d3a5816b9c795258b3371cce737bd21b1031432a2ca73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ateles geoffroyi</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>Cebus capucinus</topic><topic>Color blindness</topic><topic>Color Perception - genetics</topic><topic>Color Vision</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Haplorhini - physiology</topic><topic>Heterozygote</topic><topic>Heterozygote advantage</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Monkeys</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Other</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Polymorphism</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Reproductive fitness</topic><topic>Signaling</topic><topic>Social and Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Visual discrimination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fedigan, Linda M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melin, Amanda D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Addicott, John F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawamura, Shoji</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fedigan, Linda M</au><au>Melin, Amanda D</au><au>Addicott, John F</au><au>Kawamura, Shoji</au><au>Addessi, Elsa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The heterozygote superiority hypothesis for polymorphic color vision is not supported by long-term fitness data from wild neotropical monkeys</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-01-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e84872</spage><epage>e84872</epage><pages>e84872-e84872</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The leading explanatory model for the widespread occurrence of color vision polymorphism in Neotropical primates is the heterozygote superiority hypothesis, which postulates that trichromatic individuals have a fitness advantage over other phenotypes because redgreen chromatic discrimination is useful for foraging, social signaling, or predator detection. Alternative explanatory models predict that dichromatic and trichromatic phenotypes are each suited to distinct tasks. To conclusively evaluate these models, one must determine whether proposed visual advantages translate into differential fitness of trichromatic and dichromatic individuals. We tested whether color vision phenotype is a significant predictor of female fitness in a population of wild capuchins, using longterm 26 years survival and fertility data. We found no advantage to trichromats over dichromats for three fitness measures fertility rates, offspring survival and maternal survival. This finding suggests that a selective mechanism other than heterozygote advantage is operating to maintain the color vision polymorphism. We propose that attention be directed to field testing the alternative mechanisms of balancing selection proposed to explain opsin polymorphism nichedivergence, frequencydependence and mutual benefit of association. This is the first indepth, longterm study examining the effects of color vision variation on survival and reproductive success in a naturallyoccurring population of primates.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24404195</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0084872</doi><tpages>e84872</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2014-01, Vol.9 (1), p.e84872-e84872 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1473958117 |
source | PubMed Central Free; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Analysis Animal reproduction Animals Ateles geoffroyi Biology Breeding success Cebus capucinus Color blindness Color Perception - genetics Color Vision Computer Science Female Females Fertility Fitness Forage Fruits Haplorhini - physiology Heterozygote Heterozygote advantage Hypotheses Males Mathematical models Monkeys Offspring Other Phenotype Polymorphism Population Primates Reproduction Reproductive fitness Signaling Social and Behavioral Sciences Studies Success Survival Survival analysis Veterinary Science Visual discrimination |
title | The heterozygote superiority hypothesis for polymorphic color vision is not supported by long-term fitness data from wild neotropical monkeys |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A21%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20heterozygote%20superiority%20hypothesis%20for%20polymorphic%20color%20vision%20is%20not%20supported%20by%20long-term%20fitness%20data%20from%20wild%20neotropical%20monkeys&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Fedigan,%20Linda%20M&rft.date=2014-01-03&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e84872&rft.epage=e84872&rft.pages=e84872-e84872&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0084872&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478878789%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-9a035edbcccb3d107ab2d3a5816b9c795258b3371cce737bd21b1031432a2ca73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1473958117&rft_id=info:pmid/24404195&rft_galeid=A478878789&rfr_iscdi=true |