Loading…

Intra- and interspecific differences in diet quality and composition in a large herbivore community

Species diversity in large herbivore communities is often explained by niche segregation allowed by differences in body mass and digestive morphophysiological features. Based on large number of gut samples in fall and winter, we analysed the temporal dynamics of diet composition, quality and intersp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2014-02, Vol.9 (2), p.e84756-e84756
Main Authors: Redjadj, Claire, Darmon, Gaëlle, Maillard, Daniel, Chevrier, Thierry, Bastianelli, Denis, Verheyden, Hélène, Loison, Anne, Saïd, Sonia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-5163fec20d2be87988be89165d6abc24327f73f94c655fb306e011f7e78c1be3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-5163fec20d2be87988be89165d6abc24327f73f94c655fb306e011f7e78c1be3
container_end_page e84756
container_issue 2
container_start_page e84756
container_title PloS one
container_volume 9
creator Redjadj, Claire
Darmon, Gaëlle
Maillard, Daniel
Chevrier, Thierry
Bastianelli, Denis
Verheyden, Hélène
Loison, Anne
Saïd, Sonia
description Species diversity in large herbivore communities is often explained by niche segregation allowed by differences in body mass and digestive morphophysiological features. Based on large number of gut samples in fall and winter, we analysed the temporal dynamics of diet composition, quality and interspecific overlap of 4 coexisting mountain herbivores. We tested whether the relative consumption of grass and browse differed among species of different rumen types (moose-type and intermediate-type), whether diet was of lower quality for the largest species, whether we could identify plant species which determined diet quality, and whether these plants, which could be "key-food-resources" were similar for all herbivores. Our analyses revealed that (1) body mass and rumen types were overall poor predictors of diet composition and quality, although the roe deer, a species with a moose-type rumen was confirmed as an "obligatory non grazer", while red deer, the largest species, had the most lignified diet; (2) diet overlap among herbivores was well predicted by rumen type (high among species of intermediate types only), when measured over broad plant groups, (3) the relationship between diet composition and quality differed among herbivore species, and the actual plant species used during winter which determined the diet quality, was herbivore species-specific. Even if diets overlapped to a great extent, the species-specific relationships between diet composition and quality suggest that herbivores may select different plant species within similar plant group types, or different plant parts and that this, along with other behavioural mechanisms of ecological niche segregation, may contribute to the coexistence of large herbivores of relatively similar body mass, as observed in mountain ecosystems.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0084756
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1501614174</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478794095</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7d01082d2ec34643879dc8876c7fb564</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478794095</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-5163fec20d2be87988be89165d6abc24327f73f94c655fb306e011f7e78c1be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99r2zAQx83YWLtu_8HYDIOxPiTTL0v2yyCUbQ0EClvZq5DlU6JgW6lkh_W_n5y4JS59GHqQdPe5r3QnXZK8x2iOqcBft673rarnO9fCHKGciYy_SM5xQcmME0RfnqzPkjchbBHKaM756-SMsCznhNLzRC_bzqtZqtoqtW0HPuxAW2N1WlljwEOrIURP3EKX3vWqtt39gdau2blgO-vawa_SWvk1pBvwpd07DwPQ9G3E3yavjKoDvBvni-T2x_fbq-vZ6ubn8mqxmmlBeDfLMKcGNEEVKSEXRZ7HqcA8q7gqNWGUCCOoKZjmWWZKijggjI0AkWtcAr1IPh5ld7ULcixPkDhDmGOGBYvE8khUTm3lzttG-XvplJUHg_NrqXxndQ1SVAijnFQENGWc0XifSue54FqYMuOD1rfxtL5soNIw1LGeiE49rd3ItdtLWlAaU4kCl0eBzZOw68VKDjZEOI0Pjfc4sl_Gw7y76yF0srFBQ12rFlx_yJHhjBEyoJ-eoM9XYqTWKiZrW-PiHfUgKhdMxGQZKrJIzZ-h4qigsTr-O2OjfRJwOQmITAd_u7XqQ5DL37_-n735M2U_n7AbUHW3Ca7uh88XpiA7gtq7EDyYx8piJIe2eaiGHNpGjm0Twz6cPuZj0EOf0H-eexE4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1501614174</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intra- and interspecific differences in diet quality and composition in a large herbivore community</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Redjadj, Claire ; Darmon, Gaëlle ; Maillard, Daniel ; Chevrier, Thierry ; Bastianelli, Denis ; Verheyden, Hélène ; Loison, Anne ; Saïd, Sonia</creator><contributor>Laudet, Vincent</contributor><creatorcontrib>Redjadj, Claire ; Darmon, Gaëlle ; Maillard, Daniel ; Chevrier, Thierry ; Bastianelli, Denis ; Verheyden, Hélène ; Loison, Anne ; Saïd, Sonia ; Laudet, Vincent</creatorcontrib><description>Species diversity in large herbivore communities is often explained by niche segregation allowed by differences in body mass and digestive morphophysiological features. Based on large number of gut samples in fall and winter, we analysed the temporal dynamics of diet composition, quality and interspecific overlap of 4 coexisting mountain herbivores. We tested whether the relative consumption of grass and browse differed among species of different rumen types (moose-type and intermediate-type), whether diet was of lower quality for the largest species, whether we could identify plant species which determined diet quality, and whether these plants, which could be "key-food-resources" were similar for all herbivores. Our analyses revealed that (1) body mass and rumen types were overall poor predictors of diet composition and quality, although the roe deer, a species with a moose-type rumen was confirmed as an "obligatory non grazer", while red deer, the largest species, had the most lignified diet; (2) diet overlap among herbivores was well predicted by rumen type (high among species of intermediate types only), when measured over broad plant groups, (3) the relationship between diet composition and quality differed among herbivore species, and the actual plant species used during winter which determined the diet quality, was herbivore species-specific. Even if diets overlapped to a great extent, the species-specific relationships between diet composition and quality suggest that herbivores may select different plant species within similar plant group types, or different plant parts and that this, along with other behavioural mechanisms of ecological niche segregation, may contribute to the coexistence of large herbivores of relatively similar body mass, as observed in mountain ecosystems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084756</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24586233</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Alces alces ; Analysis ; Animal behavior ; Animals ; Biodiversity ; Biology ; Body mass ; Body Mass Index ; Buffalo ; Coexistence ; Deer ; Deer - physiology ; Diet ; Diet - methods ; Ecological niches ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystems ; Feeding Behavior - physiology ; Food ; Food plants ; Food quality ; Herbivores ; Herbivory - physiology ; Interspecific ; Life Sciences ; Metabolism ; Moose ; Niches (Ecology) ; Ovis ammon ; Poaceae ; Population density ; Residence Characteristics ; Rumen ; Rupicapra rupicapra ; Seasons ; Species diversity ; Species Specificity ; Winter</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-02, Vol.9 (2), p.e84756-e84756</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Redjadj et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>2014 Redjadj et al 2014 Redjadj et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-5163fec20d2be87988be89165d6abc24327f73f94c655fb306e011f7e78c1be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-5163fec20d2be87988be89165d6abc24327f73f94c655fb306e011f7e78c1be3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6394-5920 ; 0000-0002-9484-9501 ; 0000-0002-4252-0392</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1501614174/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1501614174?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,53770,53772,74873</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24586233$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02633711$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Laudet, Vincent</contributor><creatorcontrib>Redjadj, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darmon, Gaëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maillard, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevrier, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastianelli, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verheyden, Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loison, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saïd, Sonia</creatorcontrib><title>Intra- and interspecific differences in diet quality and composition in a large herbivore community</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Species diversity in large herbivore communities is often explained by niche segregation allowed by differences in body mass and digestive morphophysiological features. Based on large number of gut samples in fall and winter, we analysed the temporal dynamics of diet composition, quality and interspecific overlap of 4 coexisting mountain herbivores. We tested whether the relative consumption of grass and browse differed among species of different rumen types (moose-type and intermediate-type), whether diet was of lower quality for the largest species, whether we could identify plant species which determined diet quality, and whether these plants, which could be "key-food-resources" were similar for all herbivores. Our analyses revealed that (1) body mass and rumen types were overall poor predictors of diet composition and quality, although the roe deer, a species with a moose-type rumen was confirmed as an "obligatory non grazer", while red deer, the largest species, had the most lignified diet; (2) diet overlap among herbivores was well predicted by rumen type (high among species of intermediate types only), when measured over broad plant groups, (3) the relationship between diet composition and quality differed among herbivore species, and the actual plant species used during winter which determined the diet quality, was herbivore species-specific. Even if diets overlapped to a great extent, the species-specific relationships between diet composition and quality suggest that herbivores may select different plant species within similar plant group types, or different plant parts and that this, along with other behavioural mechanisms of ecological niche segregation, may contribute to the coexistence of large herbivores of relatively similar body mass, as observed in mountain ecosystems.</description><subject>Alces alces</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Buffalo</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Deer - physiology</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet - methods</subject><subject>Ecological niches</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food plants</subject><subject>Food quality</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Herbivory - physiology</subject><subject>Interspecific</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Moose</subject><subject>Niches (Ecology)</subject><subject>Ovis ammon</subject><subject>Poaceae</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics</subject><subject>Rumen</subject><subject>Rupicapra rupicapra</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99r2zAQx83YWLtu_8HYDIOxPiTTL0v2yyCUbQ0EClvZq5DlU6JgW6lkh_W_n5y4JS59GHqQdPe5r3QnXZK8x2iOqcBft673rarnO9fCHKGciYy_SM5xQcmME0RfnqzPkjchbBHKaM756-SMsCznhNLzRC_bzqtZqtoqtW0HPuxAW2N1WlljwEOrIURP3EKX3vWqtt39gdau2blgO-vawa_SWvk1pBvwpd07DwPQ9G3E3yavjKoDvBvni-T2x_fbq-vZ6ubn8mqxmmlBeDfLMKcGNEEVKSEXRZ7HqcA8q7gqNWGUCCOoKZjmWWZKijggjI0AkWtcAr1IPh5ld7ULcixPkDhDmGOGBYvE8khUTm3lzttG-XvplJUHg_NrqXxndQ1SVAijnFQENGWc0XifSue54FqYMuOD1rfxtL5soNIw1LGeiE49rd3ItdtLWlAaU4kCl0eBzZOw68VKDjZEOI0Pjfc4sl_Gw7y76yF0srFBQ12rFlx_yJHhjBEyoJ-eoM9XYqTWKiZrW-PiHfUgKhdMxGQZKrJIzZ-h4qigsTr-O2OjfRJwOQmITAd_u7XqQ5DL37_-n735M2U_n7AbUHW3Ca7uh88XpiA7gtq7EDyYx8piJIe2eaiGHNpGjm0Twz6cPuZj0EOf0H-eexE4</recordid><startdate>20140224</startdate><enddate>20140224</enddate><creator>Redjadj, Claire</creator><creator>Darmon, Gaëlle</creator><creator>Maillard, Daniel</creator><creator>Chevrier, Thierry</creator><creator>Bastianelli, Denis</creator><creator>Verheyden, Hélène</creator><creator>Loison, Anne</creator><creator>Saïd, Sonia</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6394-5920</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9484-9501</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-0392</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140224</creationdate><title>Intra- and interspecific differences in diet quality and composition in a large herbivore community</title><author>Redjadj, Claire ; Darmon, Gaëlle ; Maillard, Daniel ; Chevrier, Thierry ; Bastianelli, Denis ; Verheyden, Hélène ; Loison, Anne ; Saïd, Sonia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-5163fec20d2be87988be89165d6abc24327f73f94c655fb306e011f7e78c1be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Alces alces</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Buffalo</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Deer - physiology</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet - methods</topic><topic>Ecological niches</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food plants</topic><topic>Food quality</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Herbivory - physiology</topic><topic>Interspecific</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Moose</topic><topic>Niches (Ecology)</topic><topic>Ovis ammon</topic><topic>Poaceae</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics</topic><topic>Rumen</topic><topic>Rupicapra rupicapra</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Redjadj, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darmon, Gaëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maillard, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevrier, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastianelli, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verheyden, Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loison, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saïd, Sonia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Redjadj, Claire</au><au>Darmon, Gaëlle</au><au>Maillard, Daniel</au><au>Chevrier, Thierry</au><au>Bastianelli, Denis</au><au>Verheyden, Hélène</au><au>Loison, Anne</au><au>Saïd, Sonia</au><au>Laudet, Vincent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intra- and interspecific differences in diet quality and composition in a large herbivore community</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-02-24</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e84756</spage><epage>e84756</epage><pages>e84756-e84756</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Species diversity in large herbivore communities is often explained by niche segregation allowed by differences in body mass and digestive morphophysiological features. Based on large number of gut samples in fall and winter, we analysed the temporal dynamics of diet composition, quality and interspecific overlap of 4 coexisting mountain herbivores. We tested whether the relative consumption of grass and browse differed among species of different rumen types (moose-type and intermediate-type), whether diet was of lower quality for the largest species, whether we could identify plant species which determined diet quality, and whether these plants, which could be "key-food-resources" were similar for all herbivores. Our analyses revealed that (1) body mass and rumen types were overall poor predictors of diet composition and quality, although the roe deer, a species with a moose-type rumen was confirmed as an "obligatory non grazer", while red deer, the largest species, had the most lignified diet; (2) diet overlap among herbivores was well predicted by rumen type (high among species of intermediate types only), when measured over broad plant groups, (3) the relationship between diet composition and quality differed among herbivore species, and the actual plant species used during winter which determined the diet quality, was herbivore species-specific. Even if diets overlapped to a great extent, the species-specific relationships between diet composition and quality suggest that herbivores may select different plant species within similar plant group types, or different plant parts and that this, along with other behavioural mechanisms of ecological niche segregation, may contribute to the coexistence of large herbivores of relatively similar body mass, as observed in mountain ecosystems.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24586233</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0084756</doi><tpages>e84756</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6394-5920</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9484-9501</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-0392</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2014-02, Vol.9 (2), p.e84756-e84756
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1501614174
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central
subjects Alces alces
Analysis
Animal behavior
Animals
Biodiversity
Biology
Body mass
Body Mass Index
Buffalo
Coexistence
Deer
Deer - physiology
Diet
Diet - methods
Ecological niches
Ecosystem
Ecosystems
Feeding Behavior - physiology
Food
Food plants
Food quality
Herbivores
Herbivory - physiology
Interspecific
Life Sciences
Metabolism
Moose
Niches (Ecology)
Ovis ammon
Poaceae
Population density
Residence Characteristics
Rumen
Rupicapra rupicapra
Seasons
Species diversity
Species Specificity
Winter
title Intra- and interspecific differences in diet quality and composition in a large herbivore community
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T10%3A48%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intra-%20and%20interspecific%20differences%20in%20diet%20quality%20and%20composition%20in%20a%20large%20herbivore%20community&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Redjadj,%20Claire&rft.date=2014-02-24&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e84756&rft.epage=e84756&rft.pages=e84756-e84756&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0084756&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478794095%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-5163fec20d2be87988be89165d6abc24327f73f94c655fb306e011f7e78c1be3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1501614174&rft_id=info:pmid/24586233&rft_galeid=A478794095&rfr_iscdi=true