Loading…
Intra- and interspecific differences in diet quality and composition in a large herbivore community
Species diversity in large herbivore communities is often explained by niche segregation allowed by differences in body mass and digestive morphophysiological features. Based on large number of gut samples in fall and winter, we analysed the temporal dynamics of diet composition, quality and intersp...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2014-02, Vol.9 (2), p.e84756-e84756 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-5163fec20d2be87988be89165d6abc24327f73f94c655fb306e011f7e78c1be3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-5163fec20d2be87988be89165d6abc24327f73f94c655fb306e011f7e78c1be3 |
container_end_page | e84756 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e84756 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Redjadj, Claire Darmon, Gaëlle Maillard, Daniel Chevrier, Thierry Bastianelli, Denis Verheyden, Hélène Loison, Anne Saïd, Sonia |
description | Species diversity in large herbivore communities is often explained by niche segregation allowed by differences in body mass and digestive morphophysiological features. Based on large number of gut samples in fall and winter, we analysed the temporal dynamics of diet composition, quality and interspecific overlap of 4 coexisting mountain herbivores. We tested whether the relative consumption of grass and browse differed among species of different rumen types (moose-type and intermediate-type), whether diet was of lower quality for the largest species, whether we could identify plant species which determined diet quality, and whether these plants, which could be "key-food-resources" were similar for all herbivores. Our analyses revealed that (1) body mass and rumen types were overall poor predictors of diet composition and quality, although the roe deer, a species with a moose-type rumen was confirmed as an "obligatory non grazer", while red deer, the largest species, had the most lignified diet; (2) diet overlap among herbivores was well predicted by rumen type (high among species of intermediate types only), when measured over broad plant groups, (3) the relationship between diet composition and quality differed among herbivore species, and the actual plant species used during winter which determined the diet quality, was herbivore species-specific. Even if diets overlapped to a great extent, the species-specific relationships between diet composition and quality suggest that herbivores may select different plant species within similar plant group types, or different plant parts and that this, along with other behavioural mechanisms of ecological niche segregation, may contribute to the coexistence of large herbivores of relatively similar body mass, as observed in mountain ecosystems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0084756 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1501614174</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478794095</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7d01082d2ec34643879dc8876c7fb564</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478794095</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-5163fec20d2be87988be89165d6abc24327f73f94c655fb306e011f7e78c1be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99r2zAQx83YWLtu_8HYDIOxPiTTL0v2yyCUbQ0EClvZq5DlU6JgW6lkh_W_n5y4JS59GHqQdPe5r3QnXZK8x2iOqcBft673rarnO9fCHKGciYy_SM5xQcmME0RfnqzPkjchbBHKaM756-SMsCznhNLzRC_bzqtZqtoqtW0HPuxAW2N1WlljwEOrIURP3EKX3vWqtt39gdau2blgO-vawa_SWvk1pBvwpd07DwPQ9G3E3yavjKoDvBvni-T2x_fbq-vZ6ubn8mqxmmlBeDfLMKcGNEEVKSEXRZ7HqcA8q7gqNWGUCCOoKZjmWWZKijggjI0AkWtcAr1IPh5ld7ULcixPkDhDmGOGBYvE8khUTm3lzttG-XvplJUHg_NrqXxndQ1SVAijnFQENGWc0XifSue54FqYMuOD1rfxtL5soNIw1LGeiE49rd3ItdtLWlAaU4kCl0eBzZOw68VKDjZEOI0Pjfc4sl_Gw7y76yF0srFBQ12rFlx_yJHhjBEyoJ-eoM9XYqTWKiZrW-PiHfUgKhdMxGQZKrJIzZ-h4qigsTr-O2OjfRJwOQmITAd_u7XqQ5DL37_-n735M2U_n7AbUHW3Ca7uh88XpiA7gtq7EDyYx8piJIe2eaiGHNpGjm0Twz6cPuZj0EOf0H-eexE4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1501614174</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intra- and interspecific differences in diet quality and composition in a large herbivore community</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Redjadj, Claire ; Darmon, Gaëlle ; Maillard, Daniel ; Chevrier, Thierry ; Bastianelli, Denis ; Verheyden, Hélène ; Loison, Anne ; Saïd, Sonia</creator><contributor>Laudet, Vincent</contributor><creatorcontrib>Redjadj, Claire ; Darmon, Gaëlle ; Maillard, Daniel ; Chevrier, Thierry ; Bastianelli, Denis ; Verheyden, Hélène ; Loison, Anne ; Saïd, Sonia ; Laudet, Vincent</creatorcontrib><description>Species diversity in large herbivore communities is often explained by niche segregation allowed by differences in body mass and digestive morphophysiological features. Based on large number of gut samples in fall and winter, we analysed the temporal dynamics of diet composition, quality and interspecific overlap of 4 coexisting mountain herbivores. We tested whether the relative consumption of grass and browse differed among species of different rumen types (moose-type and intermediate-type), whether diet was of lower quality for the largest species, whether we could identify plant species which determined diet quality, and whether these plants, which could be "key-food-resources" were similar for all herbivores. Our analyses revealed that (1) body mass and rumen types were overall poor predictors of diet composition and quality, although the roe deer, a species with a moose-type rumen was confirmed as an "obligatory non grazer", while red deer, the largest species, had the most lignified diet; (2) diet overlap among herbivores was well predicted by rumen type (high among species of intermediate types only), when measured over broad plant groups, (3) the relationship between diet composition and quality differed among herbivore species, and the actual plant species used during winter which determined the diet quality, was herbivore species-specific. Even if diets overlapped to a great extent, the species-specific relationships between diet composition and quality suggest that herbivores may select different plant species within similar plant group types, or different plant parts and that this, along with other behavioural mechanisms of ecological niche segregation, may contribute to the coexistence of large herbivores of relatively similar body mass, as observed in mountain ecosystems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084756</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24586233</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Alces alces ; Analysis ; Animal behavior ; Animals ; Biodiversity ; Biology ; Body mass ; Body Mass Index ; Buffalo ; Coexistence ; Deer ; Deer - physiology ; Diet ; Diet - methods ; Ecological niches ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystems ; Feeding Behavior - physiology ; Food ; Food plants ; Food quality ; Herbivores ; Herbivory - physiology ; Interspecific ; Life Sciences ; Metabolism ; Moose ; Niches (Ecology) ; Ovis ammon ; Poaceae ; Population density ; Residence Characteristics ; Rumen ; Rupicapra rupicapra ; Seasons ; Species diversity ; Species Specificity ; Winter</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-02, Vol.9 (2), p.e84756-e84756</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Redjadj et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>2014 Redjadj et al 2014 Redjadj et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-5163fec20d2be87988be89165d6abc24327f73f94c655fb306e011f7e78c1be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-5163fec20d2be87988be89165d6abc24327f73f94c655fb306e011f7e78c1be3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6394-5920 ; 0000-0002-9484-9501 ; 0000-0002-4252-0392</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1501614174/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1501614174?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,53770,53772,74873</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24586233$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02633711$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Laudet, Vincent</contributor><creatorcontrib>Redjadj, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darmon, Gaëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maillard, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevrier, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastianelli, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verheyden, Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loison, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saïd, Sonia</creatorcontrib><title>Intra- and interspecific differences in diet quality and composition in a large herbivore community</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Species diversity in large herbivore communities is often explained by niche segregation allowed by differences in body mass and digestive morphophysiological features. Based on large number of gut samples in fall and winter, we analysed the temporal dynamics of diet composition, quality and interspecific overlap of 4 coexisting mountain herbivores. We tested whether the relative consumption of grass and browse differed among species of different rumen types (moose-type and intermediate-type), whether diet was of lower quality for the largest species, whether we could identify plant species which determined diet quality, and whether these plants, which could be "key-food-resources" were similar for all herbivores. Our analyses revealed that (1) body mass and rumen types were overall poor predictors of diet composition and quality, although the roe deer, a species with a moose-type rumen was confirmed as an "obligatory non grazer", while red deer, the largest species, had the most lignified diet; (2) diet overlap among herbivores was well predicted by rumen type (high among species of intermediate types only), when measured over broad plant groups, (3) the relationship between diet composition and quality differed among herbivore species, and the actual plant species used during winter which determined the diet quality, was herbivore species-specific. Even if diets overlapped to a great extent, the species-specific relationships between diet composition and quality suggest that herbivores may select different plant species within similar plant group types, or different plant parts and that this, along with other behavioural mechanisms of ecological niche segregation, may contribute to the coexistence of large herbivores of relatively similar body mass, as observed in mountain ecosystems.</description><subject>Alces alces</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Buffalo</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Deer - physiology</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet - methods</subject><subject>Ecological niches</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food plants</subject><subject>Food quality</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Herbivory - physiology</subject><subject>Interspecific</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Moose</subject><subject>Niches (Ecology)</subject><subject>Ovis ammon</subject><subject>Poaceae</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics</subject><subject>Rumen</subject><subject>Rupicapra rupicapra</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99r2zAQx83YWLtu_8HYDIOxPiTTL0v2yyCUbQ0EClvZq5DlU6JgW6lkh_W_n5y4JS59GHqQdPe5r3QnXZK8x2iOqcBft673rarnO9fCHKGciYy_SM5xQcmME0RfnqzPkjchbBHKaM756-SMsCznhNLzRC_bzqtZqtoqtW0HPuxAW2N1WlljwEOrIURP3EKX3vWqtt39gdau2blgO-vawa_SWvk1pBvwpd07DwPQ9G3E3yavjKoDvBvni-T2x_fbq-vZ6ubn8mqxmmlBeDfLMKcGNEEVKSEXRZ7HqcA8q7gqNWGUCCOoKZjmWWZKijggjI0AkWtcAr1IPh5ld7ULcixPkDhDmGOGBYvE8khUTm3lzttG-XvplJUHg_NrqXxndQ1SVAijnFQENGWc0XifSue54FqYMuOD1rfxtL5soNIw1LGeiE49rd3ItdtLWlAaU4kCl0eBzZOw68VKDjZEOI0Pjfc4sl_Gw7y76yF0srFBQ12rFlx_yJHhjBEyoJ-eoM9XYqTWKiZrW-PiHfUgKhdMxGQZKrJIzZ-h4qigsTr-O2OjfRJwOQmITAd_u7XqQ5DL37_-n735M2U_n7AbUHW3Ca7uh88XpiA7gtq7EDyYx8piJIe2eaiGHNpGjm0Twz6cPuZj0EOf0H-eexE4</recordid><startdate>20140224</startdate><enddate>20140224</enddate><creator>Redjadj, Claire</creator><creator>Darmon, Gaëlle</creator><creator>Maillard, Daniel</creator><creator>Chevrier, Thierry</creator><creator>Bastianelli, Denis</creator><creator>Verheyden, Hélène</creator><creator>Loison, Anne</creator><creator>Saïd, Sonia</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6394-5920</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9484-9501</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-0392</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140224</creationdate><title>Intra- and interspecific differences in diet quality and composition in a large herbivore community</title><author>Redjadj, Claire ; Darmon, Gaëlle ; Maillard, Daniel ; Chevrier, Thierry ; Bastianelli, Denis ; Verheyden, Hélène ; Loison, Anne ; Saïd, Sonia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-5163fec20d2be87988be89165d6abc24327f73f94c655fb306e011f7e78c1be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Alces alces</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Buffalo</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Deer - physiology</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet - methods</topic><topic>Ecological niches</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food plants</topic><topic>Food quality</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Herbivory - physiology</topic><topic>Interspecific</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Moose</topic><topic>Niches (Ecology)</topic><topic>Ovis ammon</topic><topic>Poaceae</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics</topic><topic>Rumen</topic><topic>Rupicapra rupicapra</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Redjadj, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darmon, Gaëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maillard, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevrier, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastianelli, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verheyden, Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loison, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saïd, Sonia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Redjadj, Claire</au><au>Darmon, Gaëlle</au><au>Maillard, Daniel</au><au>Chevrier, Thierry</au><au>Bastianelli, Denis</au><au>Verheyden, Hélène</au><au>Loison, Anne</au><au>Saïd, Sonia</au><au>Laudet, Vincent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intra- and interspecific differences in diet quality and composition in a large herbivore community</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-02-24</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e84756</spage><epage>e84756</epage><pages>e84756-e84756</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Species diversity in large herbivore communities is often explained by niche segregation allowed by differences in body mass and digestive morphophysiological features. Based on large number of gut samples in fall and winter, we analysed the temporal dynamics of diet composition, quality and interspecific overlap of 4 coexisting mountain herbivores. We tested whether the relative consumption of grass and browse differed among species of different rumen types (moose-type and intermediate-type), whether diet was of lower quality for the largest species, whether we could identify plant species which determined diet quality, and whether these plants, which could be "key-food-resources" were similar for all herbivores. Our analyses revealed that (1) body mass and rumen types were overall poor predictors of diet composition and quality, although the roe deer, a species with a moose-type rumen was confirmed as an "obligatory non grazer", while red deer, the largest species, had the most lignified diet; (2) diet overlap among herbivores was well predicted by rumen type (high among species of intermediate types only), when measured over broad plant groups, (3) the relationship between diet composition and quality differed among herbivore species, and the actual plant species used during winter which determined the diet quality, was herbivore species-specific. Even if diets overlapped to a great extent, the species-specific relationships between diet composition and quality suggest that herbivores may select different plant species within similar plant group types, or different plant parts and that this, along with other behavioural mechanisms of ecological niche segregation, may contribute to the coexistence of large herbivores of relatively similar body mass, as observed in mountain ecosystems.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24586233</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0084756</doi><tpages>e84756</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6394-5920</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9484-9501</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-0392</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2014-02, Vol.9 (2), p.e84756-e84756 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1501614174 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central |
subjects | Alces alces Analysis Animal behavior Animals Biodiversity Biology Body mass Body Mass Index Buffalo Coexistence Deer Deer - physiology Diet Diet - methods Ecological niches Ecosystem Ecosystems Feeding Behavior - physiology Food Food plants Food quality Herbivores Herbivory - physiology Interspecific Life Sciences Metabolism Moose Niches (Ecology) Ovis ammon Poaceae Population density Residence Characteristics Rumen Rupicapra rupicapra Seasons Species diversity Species Specificity Winter |
title | Intra- and interspecific differences in diet quality and composition in a large herbivore community |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T10%3A48%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intra-%20and%20interspecific%20differences%20in%20diet%20quality%20and%20composition%20in%20a%20large%20herbivore%20community&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Redjadj,%20Claire&rft.date=2014-02-24&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e84756&rft.epage=e84756&rft.pages=e84756-e84756&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0084756&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478794095%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-5163fec20d2be87988be89165d6abc24327f73f94c655fb306e011f7e78c1be3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1501614174&rft_id=info:pmid/24586233&rft_galeid=A478794095&rfr_iscdi=true |