Logopenic and nonfluent variants of primary progressive aphasia are differentiated by acoustic measures of speech production

• Published in: PloS one 2014-02, Vol.9 (2), p.e89864-e89864
• Main Authors: Ballard, Kirrie J, Savage, Sharon, Leyton, Cristian E, Vogel, Adam P, Hornberger, Michael, Hodges, John R
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acoustic measurement; Acoustics; Adults; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Agrammatism; Amyloid; Aphasia; Aphasia, Primary Progressive - pathology; Aphasia, Primary Progressive - physiopathology; Apraxia; Behavior; Biology; Cognition & reasoning; Cognitive ability; Dementia; Dementia disorders; Female; Frontal gyrus; Frontotemporal dementia; Handbooks; Hemispheric laterality; Homology; Humans; Hypotheses; Judgment; Language; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Medicine; Middle Aged; Morphometry; Neurosciences; Pathology; Patients; Phonetics; Positron emission; Precentral gyrus; Predictive control; Repetition; Silence; Social and Behavioral Sciences; Sound; Sound duration; Sound intensity; Speech; Speech - physiology; Speech disorders; Speech motor control; Speech perception; Speech production; Studies; Substantia grisea; Supplementary motor area; Tomography; Vowels
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089864

Differentiation of logopenic (lvPPA) and nonfluent/agrammatic (nfvPPA) variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia is important yet remains challenging since it hinges on expert based evaluation of speech and language production. In this study acoustic measures of speech in conjunction with voxel-based morphometry were used to determine the success of the measures as an adjunct to diagnosis and to explore the neural basis of apraxia of speech in nfvPPA. Forty-one patients (21 lvPPA, 20 nfvPPA) were recruited from a consecutive sample with suspected frontotemporal dementia. Patients were diagnosed using the current gold-standard of expert perceptual judgment, based on presence/absence of particular speech features during speaking tasks. Seventeen healthy age-matched adults served as controls. MRI scans were available for 11 control and 37 PPA cases; 23 of the PPA cases underwent amyloid ligand PET imaging. Measures, corresponding to perceptual features of apraxia of speech, were periods of silence during reading and relative vowel duration and intensity in polysyllable word repetition. Discriminant function analyses revealed that a measure of relative vowel duration differentiated nfvPPA cases from both control and lvPPA cases (r(2) = 0.47) with 88% agreement with expert judgment of presence of apraxia of speech in nfvPPA cases. VBM analysis showed that relative vowel duration covaried with grey matter intensity in areas critical for speech motor planning and programming: precentral gyrus, supplementary motor area and inferior frontal gyrus bilaterally, only affected in the nfvPPA group. This bilateral involvement of frontal speech networks in nfvPPA potentially affects access to compensatory mechanisms involving right hemisphere homologues. Measures of silences during reading also discriminated the PPA and control groups, but did not increase predictive accuracy. Findings suggest that a measure of relative vowel duration from of a polysyllable word repetition task may be sufficient for detecting most cases of apraxia of speech and distinguishing between nfvPPA and lvPPA.