Loading…
Detusking fence-breaker elephants as an approach in human-elephant conflict mitigation
Human-elephant conflict (HEC) is a recurring problem that appears wherever the range of elephants and humans overlap. Different methods including the use of electric fences are used worldwide to mitigate this conflict. Nonetheless, elephants learn quickly that their tusks do not conduct electricity...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2014-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e91749-e91749 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c743t-9e7ed643cbc94de48b7e0d0eb9098b284004f401630b3389099cfc689e7b10d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c743t-9e7ed643cbc94de48b7e0d0eb9098b284004f401630b3389099cfc689e7b10d3 |
container_end_page | e91749 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e91749 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Mutinda, Matthew Chenge, Geoffrey Gakuya, Francis Otiende, Moses Omondi, Patrick Kasiki, Samuel Soriguer, Ramón C Alasaad, Samer |
description | Human-elephant conflict (HEC) is a recurring problem that appears wherever the range of elephants and humans overlap. Different methods including the use of electric fences are used worldwide to mitigate this conflict. Nonetheless, elephants learn quickly that their tusks do not conduct electricity and use them to break down fences (fence-breakers).
In Lewa Wildlife Conservancy, Kenya, destructive elephants (Loxodonta africana) were monitored between 2010 and 2013. The fence-breaking rate reached four incidents (fence-breaking) per elephant per 100 days. Ten bull males and 57 females were identified as fence-breakers. The bulls were involved in 85.07% and the females in 14.93% of incidents. The Kenya Wildlife Service approved detusking (partial cutting of tusks) in four of the 10 fence-breakers as a way of preventing them from breaking down fences, thereby mitigating HEC in the Conservancy. The result of the detusking was a drastic six-fold reduction in damage to fences (range: 1.67 to 14.5 times less fence-breaking) by the four worst fence-breaker elephants, because with trimmed tusks elephants lack the tools to break down fences. Detusking could not totally eliminate fence destruction because, despite lacking their tools, elephants can still destroy fences using their heads, bodies and trunks, albeit less effectively. On the other hand, apart from inherent aesthetic considerations, the detusking of elephants may have certain negative effects on factors such as elephants' social hierarchies, breeding, mate selection and their access to essential minerals and food.
Elephant detusking seems to be effective in drastically reducing fence-breaking incidents, nonetheless its negative effects on behaviour, access to food and its aesthetical consequences still need to be further studied and investigated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0091749 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1506075882</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478772765</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_88b63ba403344b958af7ef9e63914b8e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A478772765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c743t-9e7ed643cbc94de48b7e0d0eb9098b284004f401630b3389099cfc689e7b10d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl-L1DAUxYso7rr6DUQLguhDx6RJ2-RFWNZ_AwsLuuxrSNLbNrOdpNukot_ejNNZprIP0kLTm985SW5OkrzEaIVJhT9s3DRa2a8GZ2GFEMcV5Y-SU8xJnpU5Io-PxifJM-83CBWEleXT5CSnJabx5zS5-QRh8rfGtmkDVkOmRpC3MKbQw9BJG3wq42tTOQyjk7pLjU27aSttdiBS7WzTGx3SrQmmlcE4-zx50sjew4v5e5Zcf_l8ffEtu7z6ur44v8x0RUnIOFRQl5RopTmtgTJVAaoRKI44UzmjCNGGIlwSpAhhscp1o0sWdQqjmpwlr_e2Q--8mDviBS5QiaqCsTwS6z1RO7kRw2i2cvwtnDTib8GNrZBjMLoHwZgqiZIUEUKp4gWTTQUNh5JwTBWD6PVxXm1SW6g12DDKfmG6nLGmE637KQinjDEUDd7NBqO7m8AHsTVeQ99LC27a77viuMA4om_-QR8-3Uy1Mh7A2MbFdfXOVJzTilVVXpVFpFYPUPGpYWvi5UFjYn0heL8QRCbAr9DKyXux_vH9_9mrmyX79ojtQPah866fdonxS5DuQT0670do7puMkdil_9ANsUu_mNMfZa-OL-hedIg7-QO6uP8l</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1506075882</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detusking fence-breaker elephants as an approach in human-elephant conflict mitigation</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><creator>Mutinda, Matthew ; Chenge, Geoffrey ; Gakuya, Francis ; Otiende, Moses ; Omondi, Patrick ; Kasiki, Samuel ; Soriguer, Ramón C ; Alasaad, Samer</creator><contributor>Sueur, Cédric</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mutinda, Matthew ; Chenge, Geoffrey ; Gakuya, Francis ; Otiende, Moses ; Omondi, Patrick ; Kasiki, Samuel ; Soriguer, Ramón C ; Alasaad, Samer ; Sueur, Cédric</creatorcontrib><description>Human-elephant conflict (HEC) is a recurring problem that appears wherever the range of elephants and humans overlap. Different methods including the use of electric fences are used worldwide to mitigate this conflict. Nonetheless, elephants learn quickly that their tusks do not conduct electricity and use them to break down fences (fence-breakers).
In Lewa Wildlife Conservancy, Kenya, destructive elephants (Loxodonta africana) were monitored between 2010 and 2013. The fence-breaking rate reached four incidents (fence-breaking) per elephant per 100 days. Ten bull males and 57 females were identified as fence-breakers. The bulls were involved in 85.07% and the females in 14.93% of incidents. The Kenya Wildlife Service approved detusking (partial cutting of tusks) in four of the 10 fence-breakers as a way of preventing them from breaking down fences, thereby mitigating HEC in the Conservancy. The result of the detusking was a drastic six-fold reduction in damage to fences (range: 1.67 to 14.5 times less fence-breaking) by the four worst fence-breaker elephants, because with trimmed tusks elephants lack the tools to break down fences. Detusking could not totally eliminate fence destruction because, despite lacking their tools, elephants can still destroy fences using their heads, bodies and trunks, albeit less effectively. On the other hand, apart from inherent aesthetic considerations, the detusking of elephants may have certain negative effects on factors such as elephants' social hierarchies, breeding, mate selection and their access to essential minerals and food.
Elephant detusking seems to be effective in drastically reducing fence-breaking incidents, nonetheless its negative effects on behaviour, access to food and its aesthetical consequences still need to be further studied and investigated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091749</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24614538</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Animal Structures - anatomy & histology ; Animals ; Biology ; Breakers ; Breaking down ; Breeding ; Circuit breakers ; Conflict (Psychology) ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Conservation organizations ; Electric fences ; Electric properties ; Elephants ; Elephants - anatomy & histology ; Female ; Females ; Fences ; Hierarchies ; Human-environment relationship ; Humans ; Kenya ; Loxodonta africana ; Male ; Males ; Mate selection ; Minerals ; Mitigation ; Teeth ; Time Factors ; Veterinary Science ; Wildlife ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e91749-e91749</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Mutinda et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Mutinda et al 2014 Mutinda et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c743t-9e7ed643cbc94de48b7e0d0eb9098b284004f401630b3389099cfc689e7b10d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c743t-9e7ed643cbc94de48b7e0d0eb9098b284004f401630b3389099cfc689e7b10d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1506075882/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1506075882?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24614538$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Sueur, Cédric</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mutinda, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chenge, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gakuya, Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otiende, Moses</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omondi, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasiki, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soriguer, Ramón C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alasaad, Samer</creatorcontrib><title>Detusking fence-breaker elephants as an approach in human-elephant conflict mitigation</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Human-elephant conflict (HEC) is a recurring problem that appears wherever the range of elephants and humans overlap. Different methods including the use of electric fences are used worldwide to mitigate this conflict. Nonetheless, elephants learn quickly that their tusks do not conduct electricity and use them to break down fences (fence-breakers).
In Lewa Wildlife Conservancy, Kenya, destructive elephants (Loxodonta africana) were monitored between 2010 and 2013. The fence-breaking rate reached four incidents (fence-breaking) per elephant per 100 days. Ten bull males and 57 females were identified as fence-breakers. The bulls were involved in 85.07% and the females in 14.93% of incidents. The Kenya Wildlife Service approved detusking (partial cutting of tusks) in four of the 10 fence-breakers as a way of preventing them from breaking down fences, thereby mitigating HEC in the Conservancy. The result of the detusking was a drastic six-fold reduction in damage to fences (range: 1.67 to 14.5 times less fence-breaking) by the four worst fence-breaker elephants, because with trimmed tusks elephants lack the tools to break down fences. Detusking could not totally eliminate fence destruction because, despite lacking their tools, elephants can still destroy fences using their heads, bodies and trunks, albeit less effectively. On the other hand, apart from inherent aesthetic considerations, the detusking of elephants may have certain negative effects on factors such as elephants' social hierarchies, breeding, mate selection and their access to essential minerals and food.
Elephant detusking seems to be effective in drastically reducing fence-breaking incidents, nonetheless its negative effects on behaviour, access to food and its aesthetical consequences still need to be further studied and investigated.</description><subject>Animal Structures - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Breakers</subject><subject>Breaking down</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Circuit breakers</subject><subject>Conflict (Psychology)</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Conservation organizations</subject><subject>Electric fences</subject><subject>Electric properties</subject><subject>Elephants</subject><subject>Elephants - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fences</subject><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>Human-environment relationship</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kenya</subject><subject>Loxodonta africana</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mate selection</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl-L1DAUxYso7rr6DUQLguhDx6RJ2-RFWNZ_AwsLuuxrSNLbNrOdpNukot_ejNNZprIP0kLTm985SW5OkrzEaIVJhT9s3DRa2a8GZ2GFEMcV5Y-SU8xJnpU5Io-PxifJM-83CBWEleXT5CSnJabx5zS5-QRh8rfGtmkDVkOmRpC3MKbQw9BJG3wq42tTOQyjk7pLjU27aSttdiBS7WzTGx3SrQmmlcE4-zx50sjew4v5e5Zcf_l8ffEtu7z6ur44v8x0RUnIOFRQl5RopTmtgTJVAaoRKI44UzmjCNGGIlwSpAhhscp1o0sWdQqjmpwlr_e2Q--8mDviBS5QiaqCsTwS6z1RO7kRw2i2cvwtnDTib8GNrZBjMLoHwZgqiZIUEUKp4gWTTQUNh5JwTBWD6PVxXm1SW6g12DDKfmG6nLGmE637KQinjDEUDd7NBqO7m8AHsTVeQ99LC27a77viuMA4om_-QR8-3Uy1Mh7A2MbFdfXOVJzTilVVXpVFpFYPUPGpYWvi5UFjYn0heL8QRCbAr9DKyXux_vH9_9mrmyX79ojtQPah866fdonxS5DuQT0670do7puMkdil_9ANsUu_mNMfZa-OL-hedIg7-QO6uP8l</recordid><startdate>20140310</startdate><enddate>20140310</enddate><creator>Mutinda, Matthew</creator><creator>Chenge, Geoffrey</creator><creator>Gakuya, Francis</creator><creator>Otiende, Moses</creator><creator>Omondi, Patrick</creator><creator>Kasiki, Samuel</creator><creator>Soriguer, Ramón C</creator><creator>Alasaad, Samer</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140310</creationdate><title>Detusking fence-breaker elephants as an approach in human-elephant conflict mitigation</title><author>Mutinda, Matthew ; Chenge, Geoffrey ; Gakuya, Francis ; Otiende, Moses ; Omondi, Patrick ; Kasiki, Samuel ; Soriguer, Ramón C ; Alasaad, Samer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c743t-9e7ed643cbc94de48b7e0d0eb9098b284004f401630b3389099cfc689e7b10d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal Structures - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Breakers</topic><topic>Breaking down</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Circuit breakers</topic><topic>Conflict (Psychology)</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Conservation organizations</topic><topic>Electric fences</topic><topic>Electric properties</topic><topic>Elephants</topic><topic>Elephants - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fences</topic><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>Human-environment relationship</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kenya</topic><topic>Loxodonta africana</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mate selection</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mutinda, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chenge, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gakuya, Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otiende, Moses</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omondi, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasiki, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soriguer, Ramón C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alasaad, Samer</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale_Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mutinda, Matthew</au><au>Chenge, Geoffrey</au><au>Gakuya, Francis</au><au>Otiende, Moses</au><au>Omondi, Patrick</au><au>Kasiki, Samuel</au><au>Soriguer, Ramón C</au><au>Alasaad, Samer</au><au>Sueur, Cédric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detusking fence-breaker elephants as an approach in human-elephant conflict mitigation</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-03-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e91749</spage><epage>e91749</epage><pages>e91749-e91749</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Human-elephant conflict (HEC) is a recurring problem that appears wherever the range of elephants and humans overlap. Different methods including the use of electric fences are used worldwide to mitigate this conflict. Nonetheless, elephants learn quickly that their tusks do not conduct electricity and use them to break down fences (fence-breakers).
In Lewa Wildlife Conservancy, Kenya, destructive elephants (Loxodonta africana) were monitored between 2010 and 2013. The fence-breaking rate reached four incidents (fence-breaking) per elephant per 100 days. Ten bull males and 57 females were identified as fence-breakers. The bulls were involved in 85.07% and the females in 14.93% of incidents. The Kenya Wildlife Service approved detusking (partial cutting of tusks) in four of the 10 fence-breakers as a way of preventing them from breaking down fences, thereby mitigating HEC in the Conservancy. The result of the detusking was a drastic six-fold reduction in damage to fences (range: 1.67 to 14.5 times less fence-breaking) by the four worst fence-breaker elephants, because with trimmed tusks elephants lack the tools to break down fences. Detusking could not totally eliminate fence destruction because, despite lacking their tools, elephants can still destroy fences using their heads, bodies and trunks, albeit less effectively. On the other hand, apart from inherent aesthetic considerations, the detusking of elephants may have certain negative effects on factors such as elephants' social hierarchies, breeding, mate selection and their access to essential minerals and food.
Elephant detusking seems to be effective in drastically reducing fence-breaking incidents, nonetheless its negative effects on behaviour, access to food and its aesthetical consequences still need to be further studied and investigated.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>24614538</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0091749</doi><tpages>e91749</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2014-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e91749-e91749 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1506075882 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); NCBI_PubMed Central(免费) |
subjects | Animal Structures - anatomy & histology Animals Biology Breakers Breaking down Breeding Circuit breakers Conflict (Psychology) Conservation of Natural Resources Conservation organizations Electric fences Electric properties Elephants Elephants - anatomy & histology Female Females Fences Hierarchies Human-environment relationship Humans Kenya Loxodonta africana Male Males Mate selection Minerals Mitigation Teeth Time Factors Veterinary Science Wildlife Wildlife conservation |
title | Detusking fence-breaker elephants as an approach in human-elephant conflict mitigation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T13%3A40%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detusking%20fence-breaker%20elephants%20as%20an%20approach%20in%20human-elephant%20conflict%20mitigation&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Mutinda,%20Matthew&rft.date=2014-03-10&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e91749&rft.epage=e91749&rft.pages=e91749-e91749&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0091749&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA478772765%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c743t-9e7ed643cbc94de48b7e0d0eb9098b284004f401630b3389099cfc689e7b10d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1506075882&rft_id=info:pmid/24614538&rft_galeid=A478772765&rfr_iscdi=true |