Prediction models discriminating between nonlocomotive and locomotive activities in children using a triaxial accelerometer with a gravity-removal physical activity classification algorithm

• Published in: PloS one 2014-04, Vol.9 (4), p.e94940-e94940
• Main Authors: Hikihara, Yuki, Tanaka, Chiaki, Oshima, Yoshitake, Ohkawara, Kazunori, Ishikawa-Takata, Kazuko, Tanaka, Shigeho
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acceleration; Accelerometers; Accelerometry - instrumentation; Accuracy; Age; Age Factors; Algorithms; Analysis; Basal Metabolism; Biology and Life Sciences; Body Weight; Calibration; Carbon dioxide; Child; Children; Children & youth; Classification; Computer and Information Sciences; Discrimination (Psychology); Estimation accuracy; Exercise; Female; Girls; Gravitation; Gravity; Health aspects; Humans; Locomotion; Male; Mathematical models; Medicine and Health Sciences; Metabolic Equivalent; Metabolic rate; Metabolism; Model accuracy; Models, Biological; Motor Activity - physiology; Nutrition; Oxygen; Oxygen consumption; Physical activity; Physical Sciences; Prediction models; Probability; Regression Analysis; Reproducibility of Results; Task Performance and Analysis; Throwing
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094940

The aims of our study were to examine whether a gravity-removal physical activity classification algorithm (GRPACA) is applicable for discrimination between nonlocomotive and locomotive activities for various physical activities (PAs) of children and to prove that this approach improves the estimation accuracy of a prediction model for children using an accelerometer. Japanese children (42 boys and 26 girls) attending primary school were invited to participate in this study. We used a triaxial accelerometer with a sampling interval of 32 Hz and within a measurement range of ±6 G. Participants were asked to perform 6 nonlocomotive and 5 locomotive activities. We measured raw synthetic acceleration with the triaxial accelerometer and monitored oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production during each activity with the Douglas bag method. In addition, the resting metabolic rate (RMR) was measured with the subject sitting on a chair to calculate metabolic equivalents (METs). When the ratio of unfiltered synthetic acceleration (USA) and filtered synthetic acceleration (FSA) was 1.12, the rate of correct discrimination between nonlocomotive and locomotive activities was excellent, at 99.1% on average. As a result, a strong linear relationship was found for both nonlocomotive (METs = 0.013×synthetic acceleration +1.220, R2 = 0.772) and locomotive (METs = 0.005×synthetic acceleration +0.944, R2 = 0.880) activities, except for climbing down and up. The mean differences between the values predicted by our model and measured METs were -0.50 to 0.23 for moderate to vigorous intensity (>3.5 METs) PAs like running, ball throwing and washing the floor, which were regarded as unpredictable PAs. In addition, the difference was within 0.25 METs for sedentary to mild moderate PAs (