Rapoport's rule revisited: geographical distributions of human languages

One of the most well studied ecological patterns is Rapoport's rule, which posits that the geographical extent of species ranges increases at higher latitudes. However, studies to date have been limited in their geographic scope and results have been equivocal. In turn, much debate exists over...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2014-09, Vol.9 (9), p.e107623-e107623
Main Authors: Gavin, Michael C, Stepp, John Richard
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biodiversity
Biogeography
Biology and Life Sciences
Computer and Information Sciences
Earth Sciences
Ecological monitoring
Ecology
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Frequency distribution
Geographical distribution
Geography
Humans
Language
Languages
Latitude
Linguistics
Multiculturalism & pluralism
Phylogenetics
Skewed distributions
Social Sciences
Species richness
Studies
Tropical environments
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:One of the most well studied ecological patterns is Rapoport's rule, which posits that the geographical extent of species ranges increases at higher latitudes. However, studies to date have been limited in their geographic scope and results have been equivocal. In turn, much debate exists over potential links between Rapoport's rule and latitudinal patterns in species richness. Humans collectively speak nearly 7000 different languages, which are spread unevenly across the globe, with loci in the tropics. Causes of this skewed distribution have received only limited study. We analyze the extent of Rapoport's rule in human languages at a global scale and within each region of the globe separately. We test the relationship between Rapoport's rule and the richness of languages spoken in different regions. We also explore the frequency distribution of language-range sizes. The language-range area distribution is strongly right-skewed, with 87% of languages having range areas less than 10,000 km(2), and only nine languages with range areas over 1,000,000 km(2). At a global scale, language-range extents and areas are positively correlated with latitude. At a global scale and in five of the six regions examined, language-range extent and language-range area are strongly correlated with language richness. Our results point to group boundary formation as a critical mediator of the relationship between Rapoport's rule and diversity patterns. Where strong group boundaries limit range overlap, as is the case with human languages, and range sizes increase with latitude, latitudinal richness gradients may result.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0107623