Loading…
A comparative study on the efficacy of solifenacin succinate in patients with urinary frequency with or without urgency
Patients with overactive bladder (OAB) often have trouble perceiving urgency because of difficulties in distinguishing between urgency and desire to void. Empirical antimuscarinic treatment of patients with frequency only may be reasonable if conservative management has failed. We compared the effic...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2014-11, Vol.9 (11), p.e112063-e112063 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-a82140c5aaba027588a46efaad3b2d3db82421d932ff31cd84c6c1714fa0e1113 |
container_end_page | e112063 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e112063 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Han, Ji-Yeon Lee, Kyu-Sung Park, Won Hee Park, Choal Hee Lee, Jeong Gu Lee, Jeong Zoo Kim, Duk Yoon Na, Yong Gil Kwon, Dong Deuk Choo, Myung-Soo |
description | Patients with overactive bladder (OAB) often have trouble perceiving urgency because of difficulties in distinguishing between urgency and desire to void. Empirical antimuscarinic treatment of patients with frequency only may be reasonable if conservative management has failed. We compared the efficacy of solifenacin in patients with frequency with or without urgency.
This multicenter, 12-week, open-label, comparative, non-inferiority clinical trial assessed whether the solifenacin efficacy for frequency without urgency is non-inferior to its efficacy for frequency with urgency. All patients had micturition frequency ≥ 8 voids/day with or without urgency. Primary efficacy variable: daily frequency change at 12 weeks relative to baseline. Secondary efficacy variables: change at 12 weeks relative to baseline in Patients' Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), OAB Symptom Score (OABSS), and Benefit, Satisfaction, Willingness to continue (BSW) questionnaire.
Of the 286 enrolled patients, 240 (83.9%) completed the study (without urgency n = 115; with urgency n = 125). Full dataset analysis revealed that the groups without and with urgency exhibited significant reductions in daily micturition frequency of -2.49 ± 0.35 (mean ± standard error) and -2.63 ± 0.37, respectively. The lower limit of the 95% two-sided CI of the comparison of the two group means was -1.14, which is smaller than the -0.8 margin of clinical equivalence. The two groups did not differ in improvement in PPBC, OABSS, or BSW scores. Both tolerated the treatment well.
It was not possible to verify that the solifenacin efficacy for frequency alone was non-inferior to its efficacy for OAB. Nevertheless, solifenacin tended to be effective for frequency regardless of urgency.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00979472. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0112063 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1625585853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A418424750</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_14f228c926f44d698fcac1fbff3d2c9f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A418424750</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-a82140c5aaba027588a46efaad3b2d3db82421d932ff31cd84c6c1714fa0e1113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk22LEzEQxxdRvLP6DUQXBNEXrXnabfpGKIcPhYMDn96GaTZpU7ZJTbJ33rd32u4dXbkXEpYkk99_ZmeSKYqXlEwon9IPm9BFD-1kF7yZEEoZqfmj4pzOOBvXjPDHJ-uz4llKG0IqLuv6aXHGKkHoVIrz4mZe6rDdQYTsrk2ZctfclsGXeW1KY63ToHFvyxRaZ40H7XyZOo0TZFPiZodC43Mqb1xel13Eg3hb2mh-d8aj9mAO8TCHLiOx2tufF08stMm86OdR8fPzpx8XX8eXV18WF_PLsa4FzWOQjAqiK4AlEDatpARRGwvQ8CVreLOUTDDaYJ7WcqobKXSt6ZQKC8RQSvmoeH30u2tDUn3NkqI1qyqJgyOxOBJNgI3aRbfFBFQApw6GEFcKYna6NQrdMib1jNVWiKaeSYvloXaJsRumZxZ9feyjdcutaTQWJkI7cDo88W6tVuFaCcYFx-saFe96BzFgAVNWW5e0aVvwJnSH_67xk5wh-uYf9OHsemoFmIDzNmBcvXeq5oJKwcS0IkhNHqBwNGbrND4w69A-ELwfCJDJ5k9eQZeSWnz_9v_s1a8h-_aEXRto8xqfXpdd8GkIiiOoY0gpGntfZErUvj_uqqH2_aH6_kDZq9MLuhfdNQT_C9Y7DPU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1625585853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative study on the efficacy of solifenacin succinate in patients with urinary frequency with or without urgency</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Han, Ji-Yeon ; Lee, Kyu-Sung ; Park, Won Hee ; Park, Choal Hee ; Lee, Jeong Gu ; Lee, Jeong Zoo ; Kim, Duk Yoon ; Na, Yong Gil ; Kwon, Dong Deuk ; Choo, Myung-Soo</creator><contributor>Atkin, Stephen L.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Han, Ji-Yeon ; Lee, Kyu-Sung ; Park, Won Hee ; Park, Choal Hee ; Lee, Jeong Gu ; Lee, Jeong Zoo ; Kim, Duk Yoon ; Na, Yong Gil ; Kwon, Dong Deuk ; Choo, Myung-Soo ; Atkin, Stephen L.</creatorcontrib><description>Patients with overactive bladder (OAB) often have trouble perceiving urgency because of difficulties in distinguishing between urgency and desire to void. Empirical antimuscarinic treatment of patients with frequency only may be reasonable if conservative management has failed. We compared the efficacy of solifenacin in patients with frequency with or without urgency.
This multicenter, 12-week, open-label, comparative, non-inferiority clinical trial assessed whether the solifenacin efficacy for frequency without urgency is non-inferior to its efficacy for frequency with urgency. All patients had micturition frequency ≥ 8 voids/day with or without urgency. Primary efficacy variable: daily frequency change at 12 weeks relative to baseline. Secondary efficacy variables: change at 12 weeks relative to baseline in Patients' Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), OAB Symptom Score (OABSS), and Benefit, Satisfaction, Willingness to continue (BSW) questionnaire.
Of the 286 enrolled patients, 240 (83.9%) completed the study (without urgency n = 115; with urgency n = 125). Full dataset analysis revealed that the groups without and with urgency exhibited significant reductions in daily micturition frequency of -2.49 ± 0.35 (mean ± standard error) and -2.63 ± 0.37, respectively. The lower limit of the 95% two-sided CI of the comparison of the two group means was -1.14, which is smaller than the -0.8 margin of clinical equivalence. The two groups did not differ in improvement in PPBC, OABSS, or BSW scores. Both tolerated the treatment well.
It was not possible to verify that the solifenacin efficacy for frequency alone was non-inferior to its efficacy for OAB. Nevertheless, solifenacin tended to be effective for frequency regardless of urgency.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00979472.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112063</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25401784</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Bladder ; Care and treatment ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative studies ; Diaries ; Effectiveness ; Empirical analysis ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Muscarinic Antagonists - administration & dosage ; Muscarinic Antagonists - adverse effects ; Muscarinic Antagonists - therapeutic use ; Patients ; Quinuclidines - administration & dosage ; Quinuclidines - adverse effects ; Quinuclidines - therapeutic use ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Solifenacin Succinate ; Standard error ; Systematic review ; Tetrahydroisoquinolines - administration & dosage ; Tetrahydroisoquinolines - adverse effects ; Tetrahydroisoquinolines - therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary bladder ; Urinary Bladder, Overactive - drug therapy ; Urinary Bladder, Overactive - physiopathology ; Urinary incontinence ; Urinary tract diseases ; Urinary tract infections ; Urination ; Urine ; Urogenital system ; Urology</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-11, Vol.9 (11), p.e112063-e112063</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Han et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Han et al 2014 Han et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-a82140c5aaba027588a46efaad3b2d3db82421d932ff31cd84c6c1714fa0e1113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1625585853/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1625585853?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25401784$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Atkin, Stephen L.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Han, Ji-Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyu-Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Won Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Choal Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeong Gu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeong Zoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Duk Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Na, Yong Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Dong Deuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choo, Myung-Soo</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study on the efficacy of solifenacin succinate in patients with urinary frequency with or without urgency</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Patients with overactive bladder (OAB) often have trouble perceiving urgency because of difficulties in distinguishing between urgency and desire to void. Empirical antimuscarinic treatment of patients with frequency only may be reasonable if conservative management has failed. We compared the efficacy of solifenacin in patients with frequency with or without urgency.
This multicenter, 12-week, open-label, comparative, non-inferiority clinical trial assessed whether the solifenacin efficacy for frequency without urgency is non-inferior to its efficacy for frequency with urgency. All patients had micturition frequency ≥ 8 voids/day with or without urgency. Primary efficacy variable: daily frequency change at 12 weeks relative to baseline. Secondary efficacy variables: change at 12 weeks relative to baseline in Patients' Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), OAB Symptom Score (OABSS), and Benefit, Satisfaction, Willingness to continue (BSW) questionnaire.
Of the 286 enrolled patients, 240 (83.9%) completed the study (without urgency n = 115; with urgency n = 125). Full dataset analysis revealed that the groups without and with urgency exhibited significant reductions in daily micturition frequency of -2.49 ± 0.35 (mean ± standard error) and -2.63 ± 0.37, respectively. The lower limit of the 95% two-sided CI of the comparison of the two group means was -1.14, which is smaller than the -0.8 margin of clinical equivalence. The two groups did not differ in improvement in PPBC, OABSS, or BSW scores. Both tolerated the treatment well.
It was not possible to verify that the solifenacin efficacy for frequency alone was non-inferior to its efficacy for OAB. Nevertheless, solifenacin tended to be effective for frequency regardless of urgency.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00979472.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bladder</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Diaries</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscarinic Antagonists - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Muscarinic Antagonists - adverse effects</subject><subject>Muscarinic Antagonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Quinuclidines - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Quinuclidines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Quinuclidines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Solifenacin Succinate</subject><subject>Standard error</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Tetrahydroisoquinolines - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Tetrahydroisoquinolines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Tetrahydroisoquinolines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urinary bladder</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder, Overactive - drug therapy</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder, Overactive - physiopathology</subject><subject>Urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Urinary tract infections</subject><subject>Urination</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Urogenital system</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk22LEzEQxxdRvLP6DUQXBNEXrXnabfpGKIcPhYMDn96GaTZpU7ZJTbJ33rd32u4dXbkXEpYkk99_ZmeSKYqXlEwon9IPm9BFD-1kF7yZEEoZqfmj4pzOOBvXjPDHJ-uz4llKG0IqLuv6aXHGKkHoVIrz4mZe6rDdQYTsrk2ZctfclsGXeW1KY63ToHFvyxRaZ40H7XyZOo0TZFPiZodC43Mqb1xel13Eg3hb2mh-d8aj9mAO8TCHLiOx2tufF08stMm86OdR8fPzpx8XX8eXV18WF_PLsa4FzWOQjAqiK4AlEDatpARRGwvQ8CVreLOUTDDaYJ7WcqobKXSt6ZQKC8RQSvmoeH30u2tDUn3NkqI1qyqJgyOxOBJNgI3aRbfFBFQApw6GEFcKYna6NQrdMib1jNVWiKaeSYvloXaJsRumZxZ9feyjdcutaTQWJkI7cDo88W6tVuFaCcYFx-saFe96BzFgAVNWW5e0aVvwJnSH_67xk5wh-uYf9OHsemoFmIDzNmBcvXeq5oJKwcS0IkhNHqBwNGbrND4w69A-ELwfCJDJ5k9eQZeSWnz_9v_s1a8h-_aEXRto8xqfXpdd8GkIiiOoY0gpGntfZErUvj_uqqH2_aH6_kDZq9MLuhfdNQT_C9Y7DPU</recordid><startdate>20141117</startdate><enddate>20141117</enddate><creator>Han, Ji-Yeon</creator><creator>Lee, Kyu-Sung</creator><creator>Park, Won Hee</creator><creator>Park, Choal Hee</creator><creator>Lee, Jeong Gu</creator><creator>Lee, Jeong Zoo</creator><creator>Kim, Duk Yoon</creator><creator>Na, Yong Gil</creator><creator>Kwon, Dong Deuk</creator><creator>Choo, Myung-Soo</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141117</creationdate><title>A comparative study on the efficacy of solifenacin succinate in patients with urinary frequency with or without urgency</title><author>Han, Ji-Yeon ; Lee, Kyu-Sung ; Park, Won Hee ; Park, Choal Hee ; Lee, Jeong Gu ; Lee, Jeong Zoo ; Kim, Duk Yoon ; Na, Yong Gil ; Kwon, Dong Deuk ; Choo, Myung-Soo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-a82140c5aaba027588a46efaad3b2d3db82421d932ff31cd84c6c1714fa0e1113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bladder</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Diaries</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscarinic Antagonists - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Muscarinic Antagonists - adverse effects</topic><topic>Muscarinic Antagonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Quinuclidines - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Quinuclidines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Quinuclidines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Solifenacin Succinate</topic><topic>Standard error</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Tetrahydroisoquinolines - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Tetrahydroisoquinolines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Tetrahydroisoquinolines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urinary bladder</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder, Overactive - drug therapy</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder, Overactive - physiopathology</topic><topic>Urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Urinary tract infections</topic><topic>Urination</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Urogenital system</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Han, Ji-Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyu-Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Won Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Choal Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeong Gu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeong Zoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Duk Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Na, Yong Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Dong Deuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choo, Myung-Soo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Han, Ji-Yeon</au><au>Lee, Kyu-Sung</au><au>Park, Won Hee</au><au>Park, Choal Hee</au><au>Lee, Jeong Gu</au><au>Lee, Jeong Zoo</au><au>Kim, Duk Yoon</au><au>Na, Yong Gil</au><au>Kwon, Dong Deuk</au><au>Choo, Myung-Soo</au><au>Atkin, Stephen L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative study on the efficacy of solifenacin succinate in patients with urinary frequency with or without urgency</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-11-17</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e112063</spage><epage>e112063</epage><pages>e112063-e112063</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Patients with overactive bladder (OAB) often have trouble perceiving urgency because of difficulties in distinguishing between urgency and desire to void. Empirical antimuscarinic treatment of patients with frequency only may be reasonable if conservative management has failed. We compared the efficacy of solifenacin in patients with frequency with or without urgency.
This multicenter, 12-week, open-label, comparative, non-inferiority clinical trial assessed whether the solifenacin efficacy for frequency without urgency is non-inferior to its efficacy for frequency with urgency. All patients had micturition frequency ≥ 8 voids/day with or without urgency. Primary efficacy variable: daily frequency change at 12 weeks relative to baseline. Secondary efficacy variables: change at 12 weeks relative to baseline in Patients' Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), OAB Symptom Score (OABSS), and Benefit, Satisfaction, Willingness to continue (BSW) questionnaire.
Of the 286 enrolled patients, 240 (83.9%) completed the study (without urgency n = 115; with urgency n = 125). Full dataset analysis revealed that the groups without and with urgency exhibited significant reductions in daily micturition frequency of -2.49 ± 0.35 (mean ± standard error) and -2.63 ± 0.37, respectively. The lower limit of the 95% two-sided CI of the comparison of the two group means was -1.14, which is smaller than the -0.8 margin of clinical equivalence. The two groups did not differ in improvement in PPBC, OABSS, or BSW scores. Both tolerated the treatment well.
It was not possible to verify that the solifenacin efficacy for frequency alone was non-inferior to its efficacy for OAB. Nevertheless, solifenacin tended to be effective for frequency regardless of urgency.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00979472.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>25401784</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0112063</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2014-11, Vol.9 (11), p.e112063-e112063 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1625585853 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biology and Life Sciences Bladder Care and treatment Comparative analysis Comparative studies Diaries Effectiveness Empirical analysis Female Humans Male Medical research Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Middle Aged Muscarinic Antagonists - administration & dosage Muscarinic Antagonists - adverse effects Muscarinic Antagonists - therapeutic use Patients Quinuclidines - administration & dosage Quinuclidines - adverse effects Quinuclidines - therapeutic use Research and Analysis Methods Solifenacin Succinate Standard error Systematic review Tetrahydroisoquinolines - administration & dosage Tetrahydroisoquinolines - adverse effects Tetrahydroisoquinolines - therapeutic use Treatment Outcome Urinary bladder Urinary Bladder, Overactive - drug therapy Urinary Bladder, Overactive - physiopathology Urinary incontinence Urinary tract diseases Urinary tract infections Urination Urine Urogenital system Urology |
title | A comparative study on the efficacy of solifenacin succinate in patients with urinary frequency with or without urgency |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A24%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20on%20the%20efficacy%20of%20solifenacin%20succinate%20in%20patients%20with%20urinary%20frequency%20with%20or%20without%20urgency&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Han,%20Ji-Yeon&rft.date=2014-11-17&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e112063&rft.epage=e112063&rft.pages=e112063-e112063&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0112063&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA418424750%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c641t-a82140c5aaba027588a46efaad3b2d3db82421d932ff31cd84c6c1714fa0e1113%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1625585853&rft_id=info:pmid/25401784&rft_galeid=A418424750&rfr_iscdi=true |