Loading…
Reference gene selection for qPCR is dependent on cell type rather than treatment in colonic and vaginal human epithelial cell lines
The ability of commensal bacteria to influence gene expression in host cells under the influence of pathogenic bacteria has previously been demonstrated, however the extent of this interaction is important for understanding how bacteria can be used as probiotics. Real-time quantitative polymerase ch...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2014-12, Vol.9 (12), p.e115592-e115592 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c729t-b75c910c8e58243965e6819e5159af475c168435d6f4adcd663c724786cbfdb83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c729t-b75c910c8e58243965e6819e5159af475c168435d6f4adcd663c724786cbfdb83 |
container_end_page | e115592 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e115592 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Jacobsen, Annette V Yemaneab, Bisrat T Jass, Jana Scherbak, Nikolai |
description | The ability of commensal bacteria to influence gene expression in host cells under the influence of pathogenic bacteria has previously been demonstrated, however the extent of this interaction is important for understanding how bacteria can be used as probiotics. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction is the most sensitive tool for evaluating relative changes to gene expression levels. However as a result of its sensitivity an appropriate method of normalisation should be used to account for any variation incurred in preparatory experimental procedures. These variations may result from differences in the amount of starting material, quality of extracted RNA, or in the efficiency of the reverse transcriptase or polymerase enzymes. Selection of an endogenous control gene is the preferred method of normalisation, and ideally a proper validation of the gene's appropriateness for the study in question should be performed. In this study we used quantitative polymerase chain reaction data and applied four different algorithms (geNorm, BestKeeper, NormFinder, and comparative ΔCq) to evaluate eleven different genes as to their suitability as endogenous controls for use in studies involving colonic (HT-29) and vaginal (VK2/E6E7) human mucosal epithelial cells treated with probiotic and pathogenic bacteria. We found phosphoglycerate kinase 1 to be most appropriate for HT-29 cells, and ribosomal protein large P0 to be the best choice for VK2/E6E7 cells. We also showed that use of less stable reference genes can lead to less accurate quantification of expression levels of gene of interest (GOI) and also can result in decreased statistical significance for GOI expression levels when compared to control. Additionally, we found the cell type being analysed had greater influence on reference gene selection than the treatment performed. This study provides recommendations for stable endogenous control genes for use in further studies involving colonic and vaginal cell lines after bacterial challenge. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0115592 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1638540807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A418138371</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_181cdc11d97f484fb4ddd5df5f351f98</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A418138371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c729t-b75c910c8e58243965e6819e5159af475c168435d6f4adcd663c724786cbfdb83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk01v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBYQkIgsUsc20l8QarKV6VKRQV6tbz2eNdV1k5tp9A7Pxxnd1s1qAeUQ6KZ5309M_EUxXNczjFp8PsLPwQnu3nvHcxLjBnj1YNiH3NSzeqqJA_vfO8VT2K8KEtG2rp-XOxVjFU14XS_-HMGBgI4BWgJDlCEDlSy3iHjA7r8dnSGbEQaenAaXEI5oaDrULruAQWZVhBQWkmHUgCZ1iNiM-I776xC0ml0JZc214lWwzpj0Nus6WwObHw66yA-LR4Z2UV4tnsfFD8_f_px9HV2cvrl-OjwZKaaiqfZomGK41K1wNqKEl4zqFvMgWHGpaE5i-uWEqZrQ6VWuq5JFtKmrdXC6EVLDoqXW9--81HsBhgFrknLaNmWTSaOt4T28kL0wa5luBZeWrEJ-LAUMiSrOhC4xUorjDVvDG2pWVCtNdOGGcKw4eNp77Ze8Rf0w2Li9tGeH27cfBgE4bymGf-wK25YrEGrPMogu4lqmnF2JZb-StCqqapmrP3NziD4ywFiEmsbxyFLB34Y26QlIRVteUZf_YPeP4wdtZS5X-uMz-eq0VQc0tw-afM9zNT8Hio_GtZW5ctpbI5PBG8ngswk-J2WcohRHH8_-3_29HzKvr7DrkB2aRV9N4y3OU5BugVV8DEGMLdDxqUYd-tmGmLcLbHbrSx7cfcH3Ypulon8BYqwH9s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1638540807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reference gene selection for qPCR is dependent on cell type rather than treatment in colonic and vaginal human epithelial cell lines</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Jacobsen, Annette V ; Yemaneab, Bisrat T ; Jass, Jana ; Scherbak, Nikolai</creator><contributor>Ho, Yuan-Soon</contributor><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Annette V ; Yemaneab, Bisrat T ; Jass, Jana ; Scherbak, Nikolai ; Ho, Yuan-Soon</creatorcontrib><description>The ability of commensal bacteria to influence gene expression in host cells under the influence of pathogenic bacteria has previously been demonstrated, however the extent of this interaction is important for understanding how bacteria can be used as probiotics. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction is the most sensitive tool for evaluating relative changes to gene expression levels. However as a result of its sensitivity an appropriate method of normalisation should be used to account for any variation incurred in preparatory experimental procedures. These variations may result from differences in the amount of starting material, quality of extracted RNA, or in the efficiency of the reverse transcriptase or polymerase enzymes. Selection of an endogenous control gene is the preferred method of normalisation, and ideally a proper validation of the gene's appropriateness for the study in question should be performed. In this study we used quantitative polymerase chain reaction data and applied four different algorithms (geNorm, BestKeeper, NormFinder, and comparative ΔCq) to evaluate eleven different genes as to their suitability as endogenous controls for use in studies involving colonic (HT-29) and vaginal (VK2/E6E7) human mucosal epithelial cells treated with probiotic and pathogenic bacteria. We found phosphoglycerate kinase 1 to be most appropriate for HT-29 cells, and ribosomal protein large P0 to be the best choice for VK2/E6E7 cells. We also showed that use of less stable reference genes can lead to less accurate quantification of expression levels of gene of interest (GOI) and also can result in decreased statistical significance for GOI expression levels when compared to control. Additionally, we found the cell type being analysed had greater influence on reference gene selection than the treatment performed. This study provides recommendations for stable endogenous control genes for use in further studies involving colonic and vaginal cell lines after bacterial challenge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115592</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25526394</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Bacteria ; Bioinformatics ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Biotechnology ; Cancer ; Cell Line ; Cell lines ; Colon - cytology ; DNA polymerases ; Epithelial cells ; Epithelial Cells - cytology ; Epithelial Cells - microbiology ; Female ; Gene expression ; Gene Expression Profiling - standards ; Genes ; Genomes ; Genomics ; HT29 Cells ; Humans ; Kinases ; lactobacillus ; microbial pathogens ; Molecular Cellbiology ; Molekylär cellbiologi ; Mucosa ; Phosphoglycerate kinase ; Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards ; Probiotics ; Reference Standards ; Ribonucleic acid ; RNA ; RNA-directed DNA polymerase ; Science ; Studies ; Vagina ; Vagina - cytology</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-12, Vol.9 (12), p.e115592-e115592</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Jacobsen et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Jacobsen et al 2014 Jacobsen et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c729t-b75c910c8e58243965e6819e5159af475c168435d6f4adcd663c724786cbfdb83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c729t-b75c910c8e58243965e6819e5159af475c168435d6f4adcd663c724786cbfdb83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1638540807/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1638540807?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,25734,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571,53772,53774,74875</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25526394$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-39964$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Ho, Yuan-Soon</contributor><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Annette V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yemaneab, Bisrat T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jass, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherbak, Nikolai</creatorcontrib><title>Reference gene selection for qPCR is dependent on cell type rather than treatment in colonic and vaginal human epithelial cell lines</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The ability of commensal bacteria to influence gene expression in host cells under the influence of pathogenic bacteria has previously been demonstrated, however the extent of this interaction is important for understanding how bacteria can be used as probiotics. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction is the most sensitive tool for evaluating relative changes to gene expression levels. However as a result of its sensitivity an appropriate method of normalisation should be used to account for any variation incurred in preparatory experimental procedures. These variations may result from differences in the amount of starting material, quality of extracted RNA, or in the efficiency of the reverse transcriptase or polymerase enzymes. Selection of an endogenous control gene is the preferred method of normalisation, and ideally a proper validation of the gene's appropriateness for the study in question should be performed. In this study we used quantitative polymerase chain reaction data and applied four different algorithms (geNorm, BestKeeper, NormFinder, and comparative ΔCq) to evaluate eleven different genes as to their suitability as endogenous controls for use in studies involving colonic (HT-29) and vaginal (VK2/E6E7) human mucosal epithelial cells treated with probiotic and pathogenic bacteria. We found phosphoglycerate kinase 1 to be most appropriate for HT-29 cells, and ribosomal protein large P0 to be the best choice for VK2/E6E7 cells. We also showed that use of less stable reference genes can lead to less accurate quantification of expression levels of gene of interest (GOI) and also can result in decreased statistical significance for GOI expression levels when compared to control. Additionally, we found the cell type being analysed had greater influence on reference gene selection than the treatment performed. This study provides recommendations for stable endogenous control genes for use in further studies involving colonic and vaginal cell lines after bacterial challenge.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Cell lines</subject><subject>Colon - cytology</subject><subject>DNA polymerases</subject><subject>Epithelial cells</subject><subject>Epithelial Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Epithelial Cells - microbiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Gene Expression Profiling - standards</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>HT29 Cells</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinases</subject><subject>lactobacillus</subject><subject>microbial pathogens</subject><subject>Molecular Cellbiology</subject><subject>Molekylär cellbiologi</subject><subject>Mucosa</subject><subject>Phosphoglycerate kinase</subject><subject>Phosphoglycerate kinase 1</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Ribonucleic acid</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>RNA-directed DNA polymerase</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>Vagina - cytology</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk01v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBYQkIgsUsc20l8QarKV6VKRQV6tbz2eNdV1k5tp9A7Pxxnd1s1qAeUQ6KZ5309M_EUxXNczjFp8PsLPwQnu3nvHcxLjBnj1YNiH3NSzeqqJA_vfO8VT2K8KEtG2rp-XOxVjFU14XS_-HMGBgI4BWgJDlCEDlSy3iHjA7r8dnSGbEQaenAaXEI5oaDrULruAQWZVhBQWkmHUgCZ1iNiM-I776xC0ml0JZc214lWwzpj0Nus6WwObHw66yA-LR4Z2UV4tnsfFD8_f_px9HV2cvrl-OjwZKaaiqfZomGK41K1wNqKEl4zqFvMgWHGpaE5i-uWEqZrQ6VWuq5JFtKmrdXC6EVLDoqXW9--81HsBhgFrknLaNmWTSaOt4T28kL0wa5luBZeWrEJ-LAUMiSrOhC4xUorjDVvDG2pWVCtNdOGGcKw4eNp77Ze8Rf0w2Li9tGeH27cfBgE4bymGf-wK25YrEGrPMogu4lqmnF2JZb-StCqqapmrP3NziD4ywFiEmsbxyFLB34Y26QlIRVteUZf_YPeP4wdtZS5X-uMz-eq0VQc0tw-afM9zNT8Hio_GtZW5ctpbI5PBG8ngswk-J2WcohRHH8_-3_29HzKvr7DrkB2aRV9N4y3OU5BugVV8DEGMLdDxqUYd-tmGmLcLbHbrSx7cfcH3Ypulon8BYqwH9s</recordid><startdate>20141219</startdate><enddate>20141219</enddate><creator>Jacobsen, Annette V</creator><creator>Yemaneab, Bisrat T</creator><creator>Jass, Jana</creator><creator>Scherbak, Nikolai</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>AABEP</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>D91</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141219</creationdate><title>Reference gene selection for qPCR is dependent on cell type rather than treatment in colonic and vaginal human epithelial cell lines</title><author>Jacobsen, Annette V ; Yemaneab, Bisrat T ; Jass, Jana ; Scherbak, Nikolai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c729t-b75c910c8e58243965e6819e5159af475c168435d6f4adcd663c724786cbfdb83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Cell lines</topic><topic>Colon - cytology</topic><topic>DNA polymerases</topic><topic>Epithelial cells</topic><topic>Epithelial Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Epithelial Cells - microbiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Gene Expression Profiling - standards</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>HT29 Cells</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinases</topic><topic>lactobacillus</topic><topic>microbial pathogens</topic><topic>Molecular Cellbiology</topic><topic>Molekylär cellbiologi</topic><topic>Mucosa</topic><topic>Phosphoglycerate kinase</topic><topic>Phosphoglycerate kinase 1</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Ribonucleic acid</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>RNA-directed DNA polymerase</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>Vagina - cytology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Annette V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yemaneab, Bisrat T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jass, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherbak, Nikolai</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SWEPUB Örebro universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Örebro universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jacobsen, Annette V</au><au>Yemaneab, Bisrat T</au><au>Jass, Jana</au><au>Scherbak, Nikolai</au><au>Ho, Yuan-Soon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reference gene selection for qPCR is dependent on cell type rather than treatment in colonic and vaginal human epithelial cell lines</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-12-19</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e115592</spage><epage>e115592</epage><pages>e115592-e115592</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The ability of commensal bacteria to influence gene expression in host cells under the influence of pathogenic bacteria has previously been demonstrated, however the extent of this interaction is important for understanding how bacteria can be used as probiotics. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction is the most sensitive tool for evaluating relative changes to gene expression levels. However as a result of its sensitivity an appropriate method of normalisation should be used to account for any variation incurred in preparatory experimental procedures. These variations may result from differences in the amount of starting material, quality of extracted RNA, or in the efficiency of the reverse transcriptase or polymerase enzymes. Selection of an endogenous control gene is the preferred method of normalisation, and ideally a proper validation of the gene's appropriateness for the study in question should be performed. In this study we used quantitative polymerase chain reaction data and applied four different algorithms (geNorm, BestKeeper, NormFinder, and comparative ΔCq) to evaluate eleven different genes as to their suitability as endogenous controls for use in studies involving colonic (HT-29) and vaginal (VK2/E6E7) human mucosal epithelial cells treated with probiotic and pathogenic bacteria. We found phosphoglycerate kinase 1 to be most appropriate for HT-29 cells, and ribosomal protein large P0 to be the best choice for VK2/E6E7 cells. We also showed that use of less stable reference genes can lead to less accurate quantification of expression levels of gene of interest (GOI) and also can result in decreased statistical significance for GOI expression levels when compared to control. Additionally, we found the cell type being analysed had greater influence on reference gene selection than the treatment performed. This study provides recommendations for stable endogenous control genes for use in further studies involving colonic and vaginal cell lines after bacterial challenge.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>25526394</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0115592</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2014-12, Vol.9 (12), p.e115592-e115592 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1638540807 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central |
subjects | Algorithms Bacteria Bioinformatics Biology and Life Sciences Biotechnology Cancer Cell Line Cell lines Colon - cytology DNA polymerases Epithelial cells Epithelial Cells - cytology Epithelial Cells - microbiology Female Gene expression Gene Expression Profiling - standards Genes Genomes Genomics HT29 Cells Humans Kinases lactobacillus microbial pathogens Molecular Cellbiology Molekylär cellbiologi Mucosa Phosphoglycerate kinase Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 Polymerase chain reaction Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards Probiotics Reference Standards Ribonucleic acid RNA RNA-directed DNA polymerase Science Studies Vagina Vagina - cytology |
title | Reference gene selection for qPCR is dependent on cell type rather than treatment in colonic and vaginal human epithelial cell lines |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T13%3A52%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reference%20gene%20selection%20for%20qPCR%20is%20dependent%20on%20cell%20type%20rather%20than%20treatment%20in%20colonic%20and%20vaginal%20human%20epithelial%20cell%20lines&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Jacobsen,%20Annette%20V&rft.date=2014-12-19&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e115592&rft.epage=e115592&rft.pages=e115592-e115592&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0115592&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA418138371%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c729t-b75c910c8e58243965e6819e5159af475c168435d6f4adcd663c724786cbfdb83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1638540807&rft_id=info:pmid/25526394&rft_galeid=A418138371&rfr_iscdi=true |