Loading…
Comparison of long-term survival of patients with solitary large hepatocellular carcinoma of BCLC stage A after liver resection or transarterial chemoembolization: a propensity score analysis
The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcome of patients with a solitary large (> 5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A who received liver resection (LR) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Our study examined 128 patients treated...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2014-12, Vol.9 (12), p.e115834-e115834 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7701449ca79030edca1c0546bd16dad08a52d6fb310bd5ec5eb0a258c66749263 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7701449ca79030edca1c0546bd16dad08a52d6fb310bd5ec5eb0a258c66749263 |
container_end_page | e115834 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e115834 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Zhu, Shao-Liang Ke, Yang Peng, Yu-Chong Ma, Liang Li, Hang Li, Le-Qun Zhong, Jian-Hong |
description | The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcome of patients with a solitary large (> 5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A who received liver resection (LR) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).
Our study examined 128 patients treated by LR and 90 treated by TACE. To reduce bias in patient selection, we conducted propensity score analysis in the present study and 54 pairs of patients after propensity score matching were generated, their long-term survival was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent predictors of survival were identified by multivariate analysis.
Long-term survival was significantly better for the LR group by log-rank test (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, tumor size, serum ALT level and TACE independently predicted survival. Despite similar baseline characteristics after propensity score matching, LR group still had significantly better survival (1 year, 68.5 vs. 55.0%; 3 years, 47.6 vs. 21.2%; 5 years, 41.3 vs. 18.5%; P = 0.007) than TACE group. The LR and TACE groups had comparable 30- and 90-day post-treatment mortality. Multivariate analysis showed that serum ALT level, serum AFP level and TACE independently predicted survival by multivariate analysis after propensity score matching.
Our propensity-score-matched study suggested that LR provided significantly better long-term survival than TACE for a solitary large HCC of the BCLC stage A, regardless of tumor size. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0115834 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1640559835</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A417793371</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d4012718b4ac4e5ea7d284ac95bc28d8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A417793371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7701449ca79030edca1c0546bd16dad08a52d6fb310bd5ec5eb0a258c66749263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk22L1DAQx4so3nn6DUQDguiLXZM26YMvhHXx4WDhwKe3YZqmuznSppekq-eX86s5vds7duVeSCENk9_8JzOZSZKnjM5ZVrA35270Pdj54Ho9p4yJMuP3kmNWZeksT2l2f29_lDwK4ZxSkZV5_jA5SoXgLC_5cfJn6boBvAmuJ64l1vXrWdS-I2H0W7MFO1kHiEb3MZCfJm5IcNZE8JfEgl9rstF47JS2dkQDUeCV6V0Hk-P75WpJQgTEFgRaFCbWbHH1OmgVzRTUk-ihD-Dx1GA8tdGd012NUX7DhLwlQAbvBt0HEy9JUM5rApj6ZTDhcfKgBRv0k93_JPn-8cO35efZ6uzT6XKxmqm8SuOsKCjjvFJQVDSjulHAFBU8rxuWN9DQEkTa5G2dMVo3QiuhawqpKFWeF7xK8-wkeX6tO1gX5K72QbKcUyGqMhNInF4TjYNzOXjTYY2kAyOvDM6vJeZolNWy4ZSlBStrDoproaFo0hL3lahVWjYlar3bRRvrDm-LxfdgD0QPT3qzkWu3lTwtCk4zFHi1E_DuYtQhys6E6Y2g1268ujejrOBpheiLf9C7s9tRa8AETN86jKsmUbngrCiqDHsSqfkdFH6N7ozCRm0N2g8cXh84IBP1r7iGMQR5-vXL_7NnPw7Zl3vsRoONG-zbceqncAjya1B5F4LX7W2RGZXTnN1UQ05zJndzhm7P9h_o1ulmsLK_uuontg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1640559835</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of long-term survival of patients with solitary large hepatocellular carcinoma of BCLC stage A after liver resection or transarterial chemoembolization: a propensity score analysis</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Zhu, Shao-Liang ; Ke, Yang ; Peng, Yu-Chong ; Ma, Liang ; Li, Hang ; Li, Le-Qun ; Zhong, Jian-Hong</creator><contributor>Yang, Lian-Yue</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Shao-Liang ; Ke, Yang ; Peng, Yu-Chong ; Ma, Liang ; Li, Hang ; Li, Le-Qun ; Zhong, Jian-Hong ; Yang, Lian-Yue</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcome of patients with a solitary large (> 5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A who received liver resection (LR) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).
Our study examined 128 patients treated by LR and 90 treated by TACE. To reduce bias in patient selection, we conducted propensity score analysis in the present study and 54 pairs of patients after propensity score matching were generated, their long-term survival was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent predictors of survival were identified by multivariate analysis.
Long-term survival was significantly better for the LR group by log-rank test (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, tumor size, serum ALT level and TACE independently predicted survival. Despite similar baseline characteristics after propensity score matching, LR group still had significantly better survival (1 year, 68.5 vs. 55.0%; 3 years, 47.6 vs. 21.2%; 5 years, 41.3 vs. 18.5%; P = 0.007) than TACE group. The LR and TACE groups had comparable 30- and 90-day post-treatment mortality. Multivariate analysis showed that serum ALT level, serum AFP level and TACE independently predicted survival by multivariate analysis after propensity score matching.
Our propensity-score-matched study suggested that LR provided significantly better long-term survival than TACE for a solitary large HCC of the BCLC stage A, regardless of tumor size.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115834</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25541684</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biopsy ; Cancer therapies ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - therapy ; Care and treatment ; Chemoembolization ; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic ; Female ; Hepatectomy ; Hepatocellular carcinoma ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Liver ; Liver - pathology ; Liver - surgery ; Liver cancer ; Liver Neoplasms - pathology ; Liver Neoplasms - surgery ; Liver Neoplasms - therapy ; Male ; Matching ; Medical imaging ; Medical prognosis ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Multivariate Analysis ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Prognosis ; Propensity Score ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Studies ; Surgery ; Survival ; Tomography ; Treatment Outcome ; Veins & arteries</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2014-12, Vol.9 (12), p.e115834-e115834</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2014 Zhu et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2014 Zhu et al 2014 Zhu et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7701449ca79030edca1c0546bd16dad08a52d6fb310bd5ec5eb0a258c66749263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7701449ca79030edca1c0546bd16dad08a52d6fb310bd5ec5eb0a258c66749263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1640559835/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1640559835?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25541684$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Yang, Lian-Yue</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Shao-Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Yu-Chong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Le-Qun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Jian-Hong</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of long-term survival of patients with solitary large hepatocellular carcinoma of BCLC stage A after liver resection or transarterial chemoembolization: a propensity score analysis</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcome of patients with a solitary large (> 5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A who received liver resection (LR) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).
Our study examined 128 patients treated by LR and 90 treated by TACE. To reduce bias in patient selection, we conducted propensity score analysis in the present study and 54 pairs of patients after propensity score matching were generated, their long-term survival was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent predictors of survival were identified by multivariate analysis.
Long-term survival was significantly better for the LR group by log-rank test (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, tumor size, serum ALT level and TACE independently predicted survival. Despite similar baseline characteristics after propensity score matching, LR group still had significantly better survival (1 year, 68.5 vs. 55.0%; 3 years, 47.6 vs. 21.2%; 5 years, 41.3 vs. 18.5%; P = 0.007) than TACE group. The LR and TACE groups had comparable 30- and 90-day post-treatment mortality. Multivariate analysis showed that serum ALT level, serum AFP level and TACE independently predicted survival by multivariate analysis after propensity score matching.
Our propensity-score-matched study suggested that LR provided significantly better long-term survival than TACE for a solitary large HCC of the BCLC stage A, regardless of tumor size.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - therapy</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chemoembolization</subject><subject>Chemoembolization, Therapeutic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hepatectomy</subject><subject>Hepatocellular carcinoma</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Liver - pathology</subject><subject>Liver - surgery</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Matching</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Veins & arteries</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk22L1DAQx4so3nn6DUQDguiLXZM26YMvhHXx4WDhwKe3YZqmuznSppekq-eX86s5vds7duVeSCENk9_8JzOZSZKnjM5ZVrA35270Pdj54Ho9p4yJMuP3kmNWZeksT2l2f29_lDwK4ZxSkZV5_jA5SoXgLC_5cfJn6boBvAmuJ64l1vXrWdS-I2H0W7MFO1kHiEb3MZCfJm5IcNZE8JfEgl9rstF47JS2dkQDUeCV6V0Hk-P75WpJQgTEFgRaFCbWbHH1OmgVzRTUk-ihD-Dx1GA8tdGd012NUX7DhLwlQAbvBt0HEy9JUM5rApj6ZTDhcfKgBRv0k93_JPn-8cO35efZ6uzT6XKxmqm8SuOsKCjjvFJQVDSjulHAFBU8rxuWN9DQEkTa5G2dMVo3QiuhawqpKFWeF7xK8-wkeX6tO1gX5K72QbKcUyGqMhNInF4TjYNzOXjTYY2kAyOvDM6vJeZolNWy4ZSlBStrDoproaFo0hL3lahVWjYlar3bRRvrDm-LxfdgD0QPT3qzkWu3lTwtCk4zFHi1E_DuYtQhys6E6Y2g1268ujejrOBpheiLf9C7s9tRa8AETN86jKsmUbngrCiqDHsSqfkdFH6N7ozCRm0N2g8cXh84IBP1r7iGMQR5-vXL_7NnPw7Zl3vsRoONG-zbceqncAjya1B5F4LX7W2RGZXTnN1UQ05zJndzhm7P9h_o1ulmsLK_uuontg</recordid><startdate>20141226</startdate><enddate>20141226</enddate><creator>Zhu, Shao-Liang</creator><creator>Ke, Yang</creator><creator>Peng, Yu-Chong</creator><creator>Ma, Liang</creator><creator>Li, Hang</creator><creator>Li, Le-Qun</creator><creator>Zhong, Jian-Hong</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141226</creationdate><title>Comparison of long-term survival of patients with solitary large hepatocellular carcinoma of BCLC stage A after liver resection or transarterial chemoembolization: a propensity score analysis</title><author>Zhu, Shao-Liang ; Ke, Yang ; Peng, Yu-Chong ; Ma, Liang ; Li, Hang ; Li, Le-Qun ; Zhong, Jian-Hong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7701449ca79030edca1c0546bd16dad08a52d6fb310bd5ec5eb0a258c66749263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - therapy</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chemoembolization</topic><topic>Chemoembolization, Therapeutic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hepatectomy</topic><topic>Hepatocellular carcinoma</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Liver - pathology</topic><topic>Liver - surgery</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Matching</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Veins & arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Shao-Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Yu-Chong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Le-Qun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Jian-Hong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhu, Shao-Liang</au><au>Ke, Yang</au><au>Peng, Yu-Chong</au><au>Ma, Liang</au><au>Li, Hang</au><au>Li, Le-Qun</au><au>Zhong, Jian-Hong</au><au>Yang, Lian-Yue</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of long-term survival of patients with solitary large hepatocellular carcinoma of BCLC stage A after liver resection or transarterial chemoembolization: a propensity score analysis</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2014-12-26</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e115834</spage><epage>e115834</epage><pages>e115834-e115834</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcome of patients with a solitary large (> 5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A who received liver resection (LR) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).
Our study examined 128 patients treated by LR and 90 treated by TACE. To reduce bias in patient selection, we conducted propensity score analysis in the present study and 54 pairs of patients after propensity score matching were generated, their long-term survival was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Independent predictors of survival were identified by multivariate analysis.
Long-term survival was significantly better for the LR group by log-rank test (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, tumor size, serum ALT level and TACE independently predicted survival. Despite similar baseline characteristics after propensity score matching, LR group still had significantly better survival (1 year, 68.5 vs. 55.0%; 3 years, 47.6 vs. 21.2%; 5 years, 41.3 vs. 18.5%; P = 0.007) than TACE group. The LR and TACE groups had comparable 30- and 90-day post-treatment mortality. Multivariate analysis showed that serum ALT level, serum AFP level and TACE independently predicted survival by multivariate analysis after propensity score matching.
Our propensity-score-matched study suggested that LR provided significantly better long-term survival than TACE for a solitary large HCC of the BCLC stage A, regardless of tumor size.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>25541684</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0115834</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2014-12, Vol.9 (12), p.e115834-e115834 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1640559835 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central Free |
subjects | Adult Biopsy Cancer therapies Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - surgery Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - therapy Care and treatment Chemoembolization Chemoembolization, Therapeutic Female Hepatectomy Hepatocellular carcinoma Hepatology Humans Kaplan-Meier Estimate Liver Liver - pathology Liver - surgery Liver cancer Liver Neoplasms - pathology Liver Neoplasms - surgery Liver Neoplasms - therapy Male Matching Medical imaging Medical prognosis Medicine and Health Sciences Middle Aged Mortality Multivariate Analysis Patient outcomes Patients Prognosis Propensity Score Research and Analysis Methods Studies Surgery Survival Tomography Treatment Outcome Veins & arteries |
title | Comparison of long-term survival of patients with solitary large hepatocellular carcinoma of BCLC stage A after liver resection or transarterial chemoembolization: a propensity score analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T19%3A18%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20long-term%20survival%20of%20patients%20with%20solitary%20large%20hepatocellular%20carcinoma%20of%20BCLC%20stage%20A%20after%20liver%20resection%20or%20transarterial%20chemoembolization:%20a%20propensity%20score%20analysis&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Zhu,%20Shao-Liang&rft.date=2014-12-26&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e115834&rft.epage=e115834&rft.pages=e115834-e115834&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0115834&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA417793371%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7701449ca79030edca1c0546bd16dad08a52d6fb310bd5ec5eb0a258c66749263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1640559835&rft_id=info:pmid/25541684&rft_galeid=A417793371&rfr_iscdi=true |