Pelvic belt effects on pelvic morphometry, muscle activity and body balance in patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction

• Published in: PloS one 2015-03, Vol.10 (3), p.e0116739-e0116739
• Main Authors: Soisson, Odette, Lube, Juliane, Germano, Andresa, Hammer, Karl-Heinz, Josten, Christoph, Sichting, Freddy, Winkler, Dirk, Milani, Thomas L, Hammer, Niels
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Arthralgia - physiopathology; Arthralgia - therapy; Back pain; Biomechanics; Braces; Case-Control Studies; Center of pressure; Data processing; Electromyography; EMG; Female; Humans; Kinesiology; Leg; Ligaments; Lumbar Vertebrae; Magnetic resonance; Magnetic resonance imaging; Male; Medicine; Morphometry; Muscle function; Muscles; Muscles - physiopathology; Pain; Patients; Pelvis; Plastic surgery; Population (statistical); Postural Balance; Pressure; Pressure distribution; Sacroiliac Joint - physiopathology; Spine; Spine (lumbar); Statistical analysis; Time Factors
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116739

The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is frequently involved in low back and pelvic girdle pain. However, morphometrical and functional characteristics related to SIJ pain are poorly defined. Pelvic belts represent one treatment option, but evidence still lacks as to their pain-reducing effects and the mechanisms involved. Addressing these two issues, this case-controlled study compares morphometric, functional and clinical data in SIJ patients and healthy controls and evaluates the effects of short-term pelvic belt application. Morphometric and functional data pertaining to pelvic belt effects were compared in 17 SIJ patients and 17 controls. Lumbar spine and pelvis morphometries were obtained from 3T magnetic resonance imaging. Functional electromyography data of pelvis and leg muscles and center of pressure excursions were measured in one-leg stance. The numerical rating scale was used to evaluate immediate pain-reducing effects. Pelvic morphometry was largely unaltered in SIJ patients and also by pelvic belt application. The angle of lumbar lateral flexion was significantly larger in SIJ patients without belt application. Muscle activity and center of pressure were unaffected by SIJ pain or by belt application in one-leg stance. Nine of 17 patients reported decreased pain intensities under moderate belt application, four reported no change and four reported increased pain intensity. For the entire population investigated here, this qualitative description was not confirmed on a statistical significant level. Minute changes were observed in the alignment of the lumbar spine in the frontal plane in SIJ patients. The potential pain-decreasing effects of pelvic belts could not be attributed to altered muscle activity, pelvic morphometry or body balance in a static short-term application. Long-term belt effects will therefore be of prospective interest.