Loading…

Multimodal holographic microscopy: distinction between apoptosis and oncosis

Identification of specific cell death is of a great value for many scientists. Predominant types of cell death can be detected by flow-cytometry (FCM). Nevertheless, the absence of cellular morphology analysis leads to the misclassification of cell death type due to underestimated oncosis. However,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2015-03, Vol.10 (3), p.e0121674-e0121674
Main Authors: Balvan, Jan, Krizova, Aneta, Gumulec, Jaromir, Raudenska, Martina, Sladek, Zbysek, Sedlackova, Miroslava, Babula, Petr, Sztalmachova, Marketa, Kizek, Rene, Chmelik, Radim, Masarik, Michal
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Identification of specific cell death is of a great value for many scientists. Predominant types of cell death can be detected by flow-cytometry (FCM). Nevertheless, the absence of cellular morphology analysis leads to the misclassification of cell death type due to underestimated oncosis. However, the definition of the oncosis is important because of its potential reversibility. Therefore, FCM analysis of cell death using annexin V/propidium iodide assay was compared with holographic microscopy coupled with fluorescence detection - "Multimodal holographic microscopy (MHM)". The aim was to highlight FCM limitations and to point out MHM advantages. It was shown that the annexin V+/PI- phenotype is not specific of early apoptotic cells, as previously believed, and that morphological criteria have to be necessarily combined with annexin V/PI for the cell death type to be ascertained precisely. MHM makes it possible to distinguish oncosis clearly from apoptosis and to stratify the progression of oncosis.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0121674