Assessment of robotic patient simulators for training in manual physical therapy examination techniques

• Published in: PloS one 2015-04, Vol.10 (4), p.e0126392-e0126392
• Main Authors: Ishikawa, Shun, Okamoto, Shogo, Isogai, Kaoru, Akiyama, Yasuhiro, Yanagihara, Naomi, Yamada, Yoji
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Appraisals; Biomechanics; Cerebral palsy; Education, Medical, Continuing - methods; Engineering schools; Evaluation; Female; Humans; International conferences; Judgments; Knee; Male; Methods; Neurology; Patient assessment; Patient Simulation; Patients; Physical therapists; Physical therapy; Physical Therapy Modalities - education; Physical training; Realism; Rehabilitation; Robotics; Robots; Science; Simulation; Simulation Training - methods; Simulators; Stroke; Studies; Training; Traumatic brain injury
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126392

Robots that simulate patients suffering from joint resistance caused by biomechanical and neural impairments are used to aid the training of physical therapists in manual examination techniques. However, there are few methods for assessing such robots. This article proposes two types of assessment measures based on typical judgments of clinicians. One of the measures involves the evaluation of how well the simulator presents different severities of a specified disease. Experienced clinicians were requested to rate the simulated symptoms in terms of severity, and the consistency of their ratings was used as a performance measure. The other measure involves the evaluation of how well the simulator presents different types of symptoms. In this case, the clinicians were requested to classify the simulated resistances in terms of symptom type, and the average ratios of their answers were used as performance measures. For both types of assessment measures, a higher index implied higher agreement among the experienced clinicians that subjectively assessed the symptoms based on typical symptom features. We applied these two assessment methods to a patient knee robot and achieved positive appraisals. The assessment measures have potential for use in comparing several patient simulators for training physical therapists, rather than as absolute indices for developing a standard.