Loading…

A Haptic Feedback Scheme to Accurately Position a Virtual Wrist Prosthesis Using a Three-Node Tactor Array

In this paper, a novel haptic feedback scheme, used for accurately positioning a 1DOF virtual wrist prosthesis through sensory substitution, is presented. The scheme employs a three-node tactor array and discretely and selectively modulates the stimulation frequency of each tactor to relay 11 discre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2015-08, Vol.10 (8), p.e0134095-e0134095
Main Authors: Erwin, Andrew, Sup, 4th, Frank C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-e9e032f62d962a305d16d981037b685727cdda1a60730872e9546b1d8fa6a5b93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-e9e032f62d962a305d16d981037b685727cdda1a60730872e9546b1d8fa6a5b93
container_end_page e0134095
container_issue 8
container_start_page e0134095
container_title PloS one
container_volume 10
creator Erwin, Andrew
Sup, 4th, Frank C
description In this paper, a novel haptic feedback scheme, used for accurately positioning a 1DOF virtual wrist prosthesis through sensory substitution, is presented. The scheme employs a three-node tactor array and discretely and selectively modulates the stimulation frequency of each tactor to relay 11 discrete haptic stimuli to the user. Able-bodied participants were able to move the virtual wrist prosthesis via a surface electromyography based controller. The participants evaluated the feedback scheme without visual or audio feedback and relied solely on the haptic feedback alone to correctly position the hand. The scheme was evaluated through both normal (perpendicular) and shear (lateral) stimulations applied on the forearm. Normal stimulations were applied through a prototype device previously developed by the authors while shear stimulations were generated using an ubiquitous coin motor vibrotactor. Trials with no feedback served as a baseline to compare results within the study and to the literature. The results indicated that using normal and shear stimulations resulted in accurately positioning the virtual wrist, but were not significantly different. Using haptic feedback was substantially better than no feedback. The results found in this study are significant since the feedback scheme allows for using relatively few tactors to relay rich haptic information to the user and can be learned easily despite a relatively short amount of training. Additionally, the results are important for the haptic community since they contradict the common conception in the literature that normal stimulation is inferior to shear. From an ergonomic perspective normal stimulation has the potential to benefit upper limb amputees since it can operate at lower frequencies than shear-based vibrotactors while also generating less noise. Through further tuning of the novel haptic feedback scheme and normal stimulation device, a compact and comfortable sensory substitution device for upper limb amputees might be created.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0134095
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1703232323</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0215f2bf55be40c89e1761c98da4a3b5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3774766971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-e9e032f62d962a305d16d981037b685727cdda1a60730872e9546b1d8fa6a5b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUl1v0zAUjRCIjcI_QGCJF15S_BE7yQtSNTE2aYJJdPBo3dg3rUsad7aD1H9PumbThpAfbNnnnHvP9cmyt4zOmSjZp40fQg_dfOd7nFMmClrLZ9kpqwXPFafi-aPzSfYqxg2lUlRKvcxOuOJKUCZPs82CXMAuOUPOEW0D5jf5Yda4RZI8WRgzBEjY7cm1jy453xMgP11IA3TkV3AxkevgY1pjdJHcRNevRsByHRDzb94iWYJJPpBFCLB_nb1ooYv4Ztpn2c35l-XZRX71_evl2eIqN5KrlGONVPBWcVsrDoJKy5StK0ZF2ahKlrw01gIDRUtBq5JjLQvVMFu1oEA2tZhl74-6u85HPY0palaOsndrRFweEdbDRu-C20LYaw9O3134sNIQxpl0qClnsuVNK2WDBTVVjaxUzNSVhQJEI0etz1O1odmiNdinAN0T0acvvVvrlf-jCyl4MbqaZR8ngeBvB4xJb1002HXQox-OfZecVvRQ68M_0P-7K44oM35NDNg-NMOoPkTnnqUP0dFTdEbau8dGHkj3WRF_AYVwwK0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1703232323</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Haptic Feedback Scheme to Accurately Position a Virtual Wrist Prosthesis Using a Three-Node Tactor Array</title><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Erwin, Andrew ; Sup, 4th, Frank C</creator><contributor>Bensmaia, Sliman J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Erwin, Andrew ; Sup, 4th, Frank C ; Bensmaia, Sliman J.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, a novel haptic feedback scheme, used for accurately positioning a 1DOF virtual wrist prosthesis through sensory substitution, is presented. The scheme employs a three-node tactor array and discretely and selectively modulates the stimulation frequency of each tactor to relay 11 discrete haptic stimuli to the user. Able-bodied participants were able to move the virtual wrist prosthesis via a surface electromyography based controller. The participants evaluated the feedback scheme without visual or audio feedback and relied solely on the haptic feedback alone to correctly position the hand. The scheme was evaluated through both normal (perpendicular) and shear (lateral) stimulations applied on the forearm. Normal stimulations were applied through a prototype device previously developed by the authors while shear stimulations were generated using an ubiquitous coin motor vibrotactor. Trials with no feedback served as a baseline to compare results within the study and to the literature. The results indicated that using normal and shear stimulations resulted in accurately positioning the virtual wrist, but were not significantly different. Using haptic feedback was substantially better than no feedback. The results found in this study are significant since the feedback scheme allows for using relatively few tactors to relay rich haptic information to the user and can be learned easily despite a relatively short amount of training. Additionally, the results are important for the haptic community since they contradict the common conception in the literature that normal stimulation is inferior to shear. From an ergonomic perspective normal stimulation has the potential to benefit upper limb amputees since it can operate at lower frequencies than shear-based vibrotactors while also generating less noise. Through further tuning of the novel haptic feedback scheme and normal stimulation device, a compact and comfortable sensory substitution device for upper limb amputees might be created.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134095</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26263015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Amputation ; Artificial Limbs ; Biomedical engineering ; Computer Simulation ; Electromyography ; Feedback ; Feedback, Sensory ; Female ; Forearm ; Humans ; International conferences ; Male ; Mechanical engineering ; Prostheses ; Prosthesis Design ; Robots ; Sensor arrays ; Shear ; Skin ; Stimulation ; Substitutes ; Surgery ; User-Computer Interface ; Wrist ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-08, Vol.10 (8), p.e0134095-e0134095</ispartof><rights>2015 Erwin, Sup. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Erwin, Sup 2015 Erwin, Sup</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-e9e032f62d962a305d16d981037b685727cdda1a60730872e9546b1d8fa6a5b93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-e9e032f62d962a305d16d981037b685727cdda1a60730872e9546b1d8fa6a5b93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1703232323/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1703232323?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26263015$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Bensmaia, Sliman J.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Erwin, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sup, 4th, Frank C</creatorcontrib><title>A Haptic Feedback Scheme to Accurately Position a Virtual Wrist Prosthesis Using a Three-Node Tactor Array</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>In this paper, a novel haptic feedback scheme, used for accurately positioning a 1DOF virtual wrist prosthesis through sensory substitution, is presented. The scheme employs a three-node tactor array and discretely and selectively modulates the stimulation frequency of each tactor to relay 11 discrete haptic stimuli to the user. Able-bodied participants were able to move the virtual wrist prosthesis via a surface electromyography based controller. The participants evaluated the feedback scheme without visual or audio feedback and relied solely on the haptic feedback alone to correctly position the hand. The scheme was evaluated through both normal (perpendicular) and shear (lateral) stimulations applied on the forearm. Normal stimulations were applied through a prototype device previously developed by the authors while shear stimulations were generated using an ubiquitous coin motor vibrotactor. Trials with no feedback served as a baseline to compare results within the study and to the literature. The results indicated that using normal and shear stimulations resulted in accurately positioning the virtual wrist, but were not significantly different. Using haptic feedback was substantially better than no feedback. The results found in this study are significant since the feedback scheme allows for using relatively few tactors to relay rich haptic information to the user and can be learned easily despite a relatively short amount of training. Additionally, the results are important for the haptic community since they contradict the common conception in the literature that normal stimulation is inferior to shear. From an ergonomic perspective normal stimulation has the potential to benefit upper limb amputees since it can operate at lower frequencies than shear-based vibrotactors while also generating less noise. Through further tuning of the novel haptic feedback scheme and normal stimulation device, a compact and comfortable sensory substitution device for upper limb amputees might be created.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Amputation</subject><subject>Artificial Limbs</subject><subject>Biomedical engineering</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Feedback, Sensory</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forearm</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>International conferences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mechanical engineering</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Sensor arrays</subject><subject>Shear</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Stimulation</subject><subject>Substitutes</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><subject>Wrist</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUl1v0zAUjRCIjcI_QGCJF15S_BE7yQtSNTE2aYJJdPBo3dg3rUsad7aD1H9PumbThpAfbNnnnHvP9cmyt4zOmSjZp40fQg_dfOd7nFMmClrLZ9kpqwXPFafi-aPzSfYqxg2lUlRKvcxOuOJKUCZPs82CXMAuOUPOEW0D5jf5Yda4RZI8WRgzBEjY7cm1jy453xMgP11IA3TkV3AxkevgY1pjdJHcRNevRsByHRDzb94iWYJJPpBFCLB_nb1ooYv4Ztpn2c35l-XZRX71_evl2eIqN5KrlGONVPBWcVsrDoJKy5StK0ZF2ahKlrw01gIDRUtBq5JjLQvVMFu1oEA2tZhl74-6u85HPY0palaOsndrRFweEdbDRu-C20LYaw9O3134sNIQxpl0qClnsuVNK2WDBTVVjaxUzNSVhQJEI0etz1O1odmiNdinAN0T0acvvVvrlf-jCyl4MbqaZR8ngeBvB4xJb1002HXQox-OfZecVvRQ68M_0P-7K44oM35NDNg-NMOoPkTnnqUP0dFTdEbau8dGHkj3WRF_AYVwwK0</recordid><startdate>20150811</startdate><enddate>20150811</enddate><creator>Erwin, Andrew</creator><creator>Sup, 4th, Frank C</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150811</creationdate><title>A Haptic Feedback Scheme to Accurately Position a Virtual Wrist Prosthesis Using a Three-Node Tactor Array</title><author>Erwin, Andrew ; Sup, 4th, Frank C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-e9e032f62d962a305d16d981037b685727cdda1a60730872e9546b1d8fa6a5b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Amputation</topic><topic>Artificial Limbs</topic><topic>Biomedical engineering</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Feedback, Sensory</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forearm</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>International conferences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mechanical engineering</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Sensor arrays</topic><topic>Shear</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Stimulation</topic><topic>Substitutes</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><topic>Wrist</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erwin, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sup, 4th, Frank C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erwin, Andrew</au><au>Sup, 4th, Frank C</au><au>Bensmaia, Sliman J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Haptic Feedback Scheme to Accurately Position a Virtual Wrist Prosthesis Using a Three-Node Tactor Array</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-08-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0134095</spage><epage>e0134095</epage><pages>e0134095-e0134095</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>In this paper, a novel haptic feedback scheme, used for accurately positioning a 1DOF virtual wrist prosthesis through sensory substitution, is presented. The scheme employs a three-node tactor array and discretely and selectively modulates the stimulation frequency of each tactor to relay 11 discrete haptic stimuli to the user. Able-bodied participants were able to move the virtual wrist prosthesis via a surface electromyography based controller. The participants evaluated the feedback scheme without visual or audio feedback and relied solely on the haptic feedback alone to correctly position the hand. The scheme was evaluated through both normal (perpendicular) and shear (lateral) stimulations applied on the forearm. Normal stimulations were applied through a prototype device previously developed by the authors while shear stimulations were generated using an ubiquitous coin motor vibrotactor. Trials with no feedback served as a baseline to compare results within the study and to the literature. The results indicated that using normal and shear stimulations resulted in accurately positioning the virtual wrist, but were not significantly different. Using haptic feedback was substantially better than no feedback. The results found in this study are significant since the feedback scheme allows for using relatively few tactors to relay rich haptic information to the user and can be learned easily despite a relatively short amount of training. Additionally, the results are important for the haptic community since they contradict the common conception in the literature that normal stimulation is inferior to shear. From an ergonomic perspective normal stimulation has the potential to benefit upper limb amputees since it can operate at lower frequencies than shear-based vibrotactors while also generating less noise. Through further tuning of the novel haptic feedback scheme and normal stimulation device, a compact and comfortable sensory substitution device for upper limb amputees might be created.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26263015</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0134095</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2015-08, Vol.10 (8), p.e0134095-e0134095
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1703232323
source PubMed Central(OpenAccess); ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Adult
Amputation
Artificial Limbs
Biomedical engineering
Computer Simulation
Electromyography
Feedback
Feedback, Sensory
Female
Forearm
Humans
International conferences
Male
Mechanical engineering
Prostheses
Prosthesis Design
Robots
Sensor arrays
Shear
Skin
Stimulation
Substitutes
Surgery
User-Computer Interface
Wrist
Young Adult
title A Haptic Feedback Scheme to Accurately Position a Virtual Wrist Prosthesis Using a Three-Node Tactor Array
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T08%3A27%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Haptic%20Feedback%20Scheme%20to%20Accurately%20Position%20a%20Virtual%20Wrist%20Prosthesis%20Using%20a%20Three-Node%20Tactor%20Array&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Erwin,%20Andrew&rft.date=2015-08-11&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0134095&rft.epage=e0134095&rft.pages=e0134095-e0134095&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0134095&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E3774766971%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-e9e032f62d962a305d16d981037b685727cdda1a60730872e9546b1d8fa6a5b93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1703232323&rft_id=info:pmid/26263015&rfr_iscdi=true