Loading…
Contact Patterns in a High School: A Comparison between Data Collected Using Wearable Sensors, Contact Diaries and Friendship Surveys
Given their importance in shaping social networks and determining how information or transmissible diseases propagate in a population, interactions between individuals are the subject of many data collection efforts. To this aim, different methods are commonly used, ranging from diaries and surveys...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2015-09, Vol.10 (9), p.e0136497-e0136497 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c792t-e6293a1cb7389f332c87bcd04847b7627647880d4c7262a126a38c6d5ca9eab93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c792t-e6293a1cb7389f332c87bcd04847b7627647880d4c7262a126a38c6d5ca9eab93 |
container_end_page | e0136497 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e0136497 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Mastrandrea, Rossana Fournet, Julie Barrat, Alain |
description | Given their importance in shaping social networks and determining how information or transmissible diseases propagate in a population, interactions between individuals are the subject of many data collection efforts. To this aim, different methods are commonly used, ranging from diaries and surveys to decentralised infrastructures based on wearable sensors. These methods have each advantages and limitations but are rarely compared in a given setting. Moreover, as surveys targeting friendship relations might suffer less from memory biases than contact diaries, it is interesting to explore how actual contact patterns occurring in day-to-day life compare with friendship relations and with online social links. Here we make progresses in these directions by leveraging data collected in a French high school and concerning (i) face-to-face contacts measured by two concurrent methods, namely wearable sensors and contact diaries, (ii) self-reported friendship surveys, and (iii) online social links. We compare the resulting data sets and find that most short contacts are not reported in diaries while long contacts have a large reporting probability, and that the durations of contacts tend to be overestimated in the diaries. Moreover, measured contacts corresponding to reported friendship can have durations of any length but all long contacts do correspond to a reported friendship. On the contrary, online links that are not also reported in the friendship survey correspond to short face-to-face contacts, highlighting the difference of nature between reported friendships and online links. Diaries and surveys suffer moreover from a low sampling rate, as many students did not fill them, showing that the sensor-based platform had a higher acceptability. We also show that, despite the biases of diaries and surveys, the overall structure of the contact network, as quantified by the mixing patterns between classes, is correctly captured by both networks of self-reported contacts and of friendships, and we investigate the correlations between the number of neighbors of individuals in the three networks. Overall, diaries and surveys tend to yield a correct picture of the global structural organization of the contact network, albeit with much less links, and give access to a sort of backbone of the contact network corresponding to the strongest links, i.e., the contacts of longest cumulative durations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0136497 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1708925396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A427622996</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1cc62a445fef41bea8e4274974240664</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A427622996</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c792t-e6293a1cb7389f332c87bcd04847b7627647880d4c7262a126a38c6d5ca9eab93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99qFDEUxgdRbK2-gWhAEAvuOpNkkhkvhGVrbaFQca1ehkzmzE5KNlmTTLUP4Hub_dPSLb2QXEw48_u-k3OSk2Uvi3xcEF58uHSDt9KMl87COC8IozV_lO0XNcEjhnPy-M5-L3sWwmWel6Ri7Gm2hxnBJa7q_ezv1NkoVURfZYzgbUDaIolO9LxHM9U7Zz6iCZq6xVJ6HZxFDcTfABYdyShT3BhQEVp0EbSdo58gvWwMoBnY4Hx4j27sj3TSQ0DStug47Wwber1Es8FfwXV4nj3ppAnwYvs9yC6OP3-fnozOzr-cTidnI8VrHEfAcE1koRpOqrojBKuKN6rNaUV5wxnmjPKqyluqOGZYFphJUinWlkrWIJuaHGSvN75L44LYdjCIgudVjUtSs0ScbojWyUux9Hoh_bVwUot1wPm5kD5qZUAUSqUklJYddLRoQFZAMU-3QDHNGaPJ69M229AsoFVgo5dmx3T3j9W9mLsrQcuSsbJMBocbg_6e7GRyJlaxvMCkInl1VST23TaZd78GCFEsdFBgjLTghnWNNalLRnhC39xDH-7ElprLVKy2nUtnVCtTMUl1MozrNTV-gEqrhYVW6Wl2OsV3BIc7gsRE-BPncghBnM6-_T97_mOXfXuH7UGa2AdnhqidDbsg3YDKuxA8dLedLXKxmqybbojVZIntZCXZq7uXeSu6GSXyDwctHFc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1708925396</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contact Patterns in a High School: A Comparison between Data Collected Using Wearable Sensors, Contact Diaries and Friendship Surveys</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mastrandrea, Rossana ; Fournet, Julie ; Barrat, Alain</creator><contributor>Viboud, Cecile</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mastrandrea, Rossana ; Fournet, Julie ; Barrat, Alain ; Viboud, Cecile</creatorcontrib><description>Given their importance in shaping social networks and determining how information or transmissible diseases propagate in a population, interactions between individuals are the subject of many data collection efforts. To this aim, different methods are commonly used, ranging from diaries and surveys to decentralised infrastructures based on wearable sensors. These methods have each advantages and limitations but are rarely compared in a given setting. Moreover, as surveys targeting friendship relations might suffer less from memory biases than contact diaries, it is interesting to explore how actual contact patterns occurring in day-to-day life compare with friendship relations and with online social links. Here we make progresses in these directions by leveraging data collected in a French high school and concerning (i) face-to-face contacts measured by two concurrent methods, namely wearable sensors and contact diaries, (ii) self-reported friendship surveys, and (iii) online social links. We compare the resulting data sets and find that most short contacts are not reported in diaries while long contacts have a large reporting probability, and that the durations of contacts tend to be overestimated in the diaries. Moreover, measured contacts corresponding to reported friendship can have durations of any length but all long contacts do correspond to a reported friendship. On the contrary, online links that are not also reported in the friendship survey correspond to short face-to-face contacts, highlighting the difference of nature between reported friendships and online links. Diaries and surveys suffer moreover from a low sampling rate, as many students did not fill them, showing that the sensor-based platform had a higher acceptability. We also show that, despite the biases of diaries and surveys, the overall structure of the contact network, as quantified by the mixing patterns between classes, is correctly captured by both networks of self-reported contacts and of friendships, and we investigate the correlations between the number of neighbors of individuals in the three networks. Overall, diaries and surveys tend to yield a correct picture of the global structural organization of the contact network, albeit with much less links, and give access to a sort of backbone of the contact network corresponding to the strongest links, i.e., the contacts of longest cumulative durations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136497</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26325289</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Communicable diseases ; Condensed Matter ; Data collection ; Data Collection - methods ; Datasets ; Diaries ; Disease transmission ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Friends - psychology ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Influenza ; Internet ; Interpersonal relations ; Links ; Male ; Networks ; Physics ; Physiological aspects ; Polls & surveys ; Questionnaires ; Risk factors ; Schools - statistics & numerical data ; Science ; Secondary schools ; Semantic web ; Sensors ; Social Media ; Social networks ; Social organization ; Social sciences ; Social Support ; Statistical Mechanics ; Students - psychology ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Wearable technology</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-09, Vol.10 (9), p.e0136497-e0136497</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2015 Mastrandrea et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>2015 Mastrandrea et al 2015 Mastrandrea et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c792t-e6293a1cb7389f332c87bcd04847b7627647880d4c7262a126a38c6d5ca9eab93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c792t-e6293a1cb7389f332c87bcd04847b7627647880d4c7262a126a38c6d5ca9eab93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8683-269X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1708925396/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1708925396?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25751,27922,27923,37010,37011,44588,53789,53791,74896</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26325289$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://amu.hal.science/hal-01238308$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Viboud, Cecile</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mastrandrea, Rossana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fournet, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrat, Alain</creatorcontrib><title>Contact Patterns in a High School: A Comparison between Data Collected Using Wearable Sensors, Contact Diaries and Friendship Surveys</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Given their importance in shaping social networks and determining how information or transmissible diseases propagate in a population, interactions between individuals are the subject of many data collection efforts. To this aim, different methods are commonly used, ranging from diaries and surveys to decentralised infrastructures based on wearable sensors. These methods have each advantages and limitations but are rarely compared in a given setting. Moreover, as surveys targeting friendship relations might suffer less from memory biases than contact diaries, it is interesting to explore how actual contact patterns occurring in day-to-day life compare with friendship relations and with online social links. Here we make progresses in these directions by leveraging data collected in a French high school and concerning (i) face-to-face contacts measured by two concurrent methods, namely wearable sensors and contact diaries, (ii) self-reported friendship surveys, and (iii) online social links. We compare the resulting data sets and find that most short contacts are not reported in diaries while long contacts have a large reporting probability, and that the durations of contacts tend to be overestimated in the diaries. Moreover, measured contacts corresponding to reported friendship can have durations of any length but all long contacts do correspond to a reported friendship. On the contrary, online links that are not also reported in the friendship survey correspond to short face-to-face contacts, highlighting the difference of nature between reported friendships and online links. Diaries and surveys suffer moreover from a low sampling rate, as many students did not fill them, showing that the sensor-based platform had a higher acceptability. We also show that, despite the biases of diaries and surveys, the overall structure of the contact network, as quantified by the mixing patterns between classes, is correctly captured by both networks of self-reported contacts and of friendships, and we investigate the correlations between the number of neighbors of individuals in the three networks. Overall, diaries and surveys tend to yield a correct picture of the global structural organization of the contact network, albeit with much less links, and give access to a sort of backbone of the contact network corresponding to the strongest links, i.e., the contacts of longest cumulative durations.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Communicable diseases</subject><subject>Condensed Matter</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Data Collection - methods</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Diaries</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Friends - psychology</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Interpersonal relations</subject><subject>Links</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Schools - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Secondary schools</subject><subject>Semantic web</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social organization</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Statistical Mechanics</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Wearable technology</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99qFDEUxgdRbK2-gWhAEAvuOpNkkhkvhGVrbaFQca1ehkzmzE5KNlmTTLUP4Hub_dPSLb2QXEw48_u-k3OSk2Uvi3xcEF58uHSDt9KMl87COC8IozV_lO0XNcEjhnPy-M5-L3sWwmWel6Ri7Gm2hxnBJa7q_ezv1NkoVURfZYzgbUDaIolO9LxHM9U7Zz6iCZq6xVJ6HZxFDcTfABYdyShT3BhQEVp0EbSdo58gvWwMoBnY4Hx4j27sj3TSQ0DStug47Wwber1Es8FfwXV4nj3ppAnwYvs9yC6OP3-fnozOzr-cTidnI8VrHEfAcE1koRpOqrojBKuKN6rNaUV5wxnmjPKqyluqOGZYFphJUinWlkrWIJuaHGSvN75L44LYdjCIgudVjUtSs0ScbojWyUux9Hoh_bVwUot1wPm5kD5qZUAUSqUklJYddLRoQFZAMU-3QDHNGaPJ69M229AsoFVgo5dmx3T3j9W9mLsrQcuSsbJMBocbg_6e7GRyJlaxvMCkInl1VST23TaZd78GCFEsdFBgjLTghnWNNalLRnhC39xDH-7ElprLVKy2nUtnVCtTMUl1MozrNTV-gEqrhYVW6Wl2OsV3BIc7gsRE-BPncghBnM6-_T97_mOXfXuH7UGa2AdnhqidDbsg3YDKuxA8dLedLXKxmqybbojVZIntZCXZq7uXeSu6GSXyDwctHFc</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Mastrandrea, Rossana</creator><creator>Fournet, Julie</creator><creator>Barrat, Alain</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8683-269X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Contact Patterns in a High School: A Comparison between Data Collected Using Wearable Sensors, Contact Diaries and Friendship Surveys</title><author>Mastrandrea, Rossana ; Fournet, Julie ; Barrat, Alain</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c792t-e6293a1cb7389f332c87bcd04847b7627647880d4c7262a126a38c6d5ca9eab93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Communicable diseases</topic><topic>Condensed Matter</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Data Collection - methods</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Diaries</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Friends - psychology</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Interpersonal relations</topic><topic>Links</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Schools - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Secondary schools</topic><topic>Semantic web</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social organization</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Statistical Mechanics</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Wearable technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mastrandrea, Rossana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fournet, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrat, Alain</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mastrandrea, Rossana</au><au>Fournet, Julie</au><au>Barrat, Alain</au><au>Viboud, Cecile</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contact Patterns in a High School: A Comparison between Data Collected Using Wearable Sensors, Contact Diaries and Friendship Surveys</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0136497</spage><epage>e0136497</epage><pages>e0136497-e0136497</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Given their importance in shaping social networks and determining how information or transmissible diseases propagate in a population, interactions between individuals are the subject of many data collection efforts. To this aim, different methods are commonly used, ranging from diaries and surveys to decentralised infrastructures based on wearable sensors. These methods have each advantages and limitations but are rarely compared in a given setting. Moreover, as surveys targeting friendship relations might suffer less from memory biases than contact diaries, it is interesting to explore how actual contact patterns occurring in day-to-day life compare with friendship relations and with online social links. Here we make progresses in these directions by leveraging data collected in a French high school and concerning (i) face-to-face contacts measured by two concurrent methods, namely wearable sensors and contact diaries, (ii) self-reported friendship surveys, and (iii) online social links. We compare the resulting data sets and find that most short contacts are not reported in diaries while long contacts have a large reporting probability, and that the durations of contacts tend to be overestimated in the diaries. Moreover, measured contacts corresponding to reported friendship can have durations of any length but all long contacts do correspond to a reported friendship. On the contrary, online links that are not also reported in the friendship survey correspond to short face-to-face contacts, highlighting the difference of nature between reported friendships and online links. Diaries and surveys suffer moreover from a low sampling rate, as many students did not fill them, showing that the sensor-based platform had a higher acceptability. We also show that, despite the biases of diaries and surveys, the overall structure of the contact network, as quantified by the mixing patterns between classes, is correctly captured by both networks of self-reported contacts and of friendships, and we investigate the correlations between the number of neighbors of individuals in the three networks. Overall, diaries and surveys tend to yield a correct picture of the global structural organization of the contact network, albeit with much less links, and give access to a sort of backbone of the contact network corresponding to the strongest links, i.e., the contacts of longest cumulative durations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26325289</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0136497</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8683-269X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2015-09, Vol.10 (9), p.e0136497-e0136497 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1708925396 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adolescent Communicable diseases Condensed Matter Data collection Data Collection - methods Datasets Diaries Disease transmission Epidemiology Female Friends - psychology Health aspects Humans Infectious diseases Influenza Internet Interpersonal relations Links Male Networks Physics Physiological aspects Polls & surveys Questionnaires Risk factors Schools - statistics & numerical data Science Secondary schools Semantic web Sensors Social Media Social networks Social organization Social sciences Social Support Statistical Mechanics Students - psychology Studies Surveys and Questionnaires Wearable technology |
title | Contact Patterns in a High School: A Comparison between Data Collected Using Wearable Sensors, Contact Diaries and Friendship Surveys |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A37%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contact%20Patterns%20in%20a%20High%20School:%20A%20Comparison%20between%20Data%20Collected%20Using%20Wearable%20Sensors,%20Contact%20Diaries%20and%20Friendship%20Surveys&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Mastrandrea,%20Rossana&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0136497&rft.epage=e0136497&rft.pages=e0136497-e0136497&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0136497&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA427622996%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c792t-e6293a1cb7389f332c87bcd04847b7627647880d4c7262a126a38c6d5ca9eab93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1708925396&rft_id=info:pmid/26325289&rft_galeid=A427622996&rfr_iscdi=true |