Implicit Attitudes towards People with Intellectual Disabilities: Their Relationship with Explicit Attitudes, Social Distance, Emotions and Contact

• Published in: PloS one 2015-09, Vol.10 (9), p.e0137902
• Main Authors: Wilson, Michelle Clare, Scior, Katrina
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Attitude; Attitudes; Behavior; Bias; Demographics; Demography; Developmental disabilities; Disabilities; Disabled people; Emotions; Female; Handicapped accessibility; Humans; Influence; Information processing; Intellectual disabilities; Intellectual Disability; Learning disabilities; Male; Memory; Middle Aged; People with disabilities; Pilot Projects; Research methodology; Researchers; Social desirability; Social psychology; Socioeconomic Factors
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137902

Implicit attitude research has expanded rapidly over the last decade and is seen as very promising as it counters biases present in much attitude research such as social desirability. However, most research in the area of intellectual disabilities has focused on explicit attitudes alone. This study examined implicit attitudes to this population and also examined their association with emotional reactions and contact, which have previously been found to have a significant influence on attitudes and stigma. A web based survey consisting of a single target Implicit Association Test, measures of explicit attitudes, social distance, and emotional reactions towards and contact with individuals with intellectual disabilities was completed by 326 adult UK residents. Implicit attitudes were not significantly associated with explicit attitudes, social distance or emotional reactions. Instead there were small to moderate associations between emotional reactions and explicit attitudes and social distance. Implicit attitudes did not vary according to participants' level of contact with individuals with intellectual disabilities, type of the contact relationship (voluntary versus involuntary), gender or educational attainment. In contrast, these participant characteristics did affect explicit attitudes and social distance. Implicit attitudes towards individuals with intellectual disabilities were somewhat negative and, unlike explicit attitudes and stigma, did not vary according to participant demographics or contact. As they may have a negative impact on the lives of people with intellectual disabilities, implicit attitudes merit increased attention in research and interventions in the intellectual disabilities field.