Loading…
Forest Loss in Protected Areas and Intact Forest Landscapes: A Global Analysis
In spite of the high importance of forests, global forest loss has remained alarmingly high during the last decades. Forest loss at a global scale has been unveiled with increasingly finer spatial resolution, but the forest extent and loss in protected areas (PAs) and in large intact forest landscap...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2015-10, Vol.10 (10), p.e0138918-e0138918 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-e8a43d5851730f39641f9bdc20192a76101243782936df8fbecd89815f11699f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-e8a43d5851730f39641f9bdc20192a76101243782936df8fbecd89815f11699f3 |
container_end_page | e0138918 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e0138918 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Heino, Matias Kummu, Matti Makkonen, Marika Mulligan, Mark Verburg, Peter H Jalava, Mika Räsänen, Timo A |
description | In spite of the high importance of forests, global forest loss has remained alarmingly high during the last decades. Forest loss at a global scale has been unveiled with increasingly finer spatial resolution, but the forest extent and loss in protected areas (PAs) and in large intact forest landscapes (IFLs) have not so far been systematically assessed. Moreover, the impact of protection on preserving the IFLs is not well understood. In this study we conducted a consistent assessment of the global forest loss in PAs and IFLs over the period 2000-2012. We used recently published global remote sensing based spatial forest cover change data, being a uniform and consistent dataset over space and time, together with global datasets on PAs' and IFLs' locations. Our analyses revealed that on a global scale 3% of the protected forest, 2.5% of the intact forest, and 1.5% of the protected intact forest were lost during the study period. These forest loss rates are relatively high compared to global total forest loss of 5% for the same time period. The variation in forest losses and in protection effect was large among geographical regions and countries. In some regions the loss in protected forests exceeded 5% (e.g. in Australia and Oceania, and North America) and the relative forest loss was higher inside protected areas than outside those areas (e.g. in Mongolia and parts of Africa, Central Asia, and Europe). At the same time, protection was found to prevent forest loss in several countries (e.g. in South America and Southeast Asia). Globally, high area-weighted forest loss rates of protected and intact forests were associated with high gross domestic product and in the case of protected forests also with high proportions of agricultural land. Our findings reinforce the need for improved understanding of the reasons for the high forest losses in PAs and IFLs and strategies to prevent further losses. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0138918 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1722166351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A431582961</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_33e1b459a74f41d5b903509fb011c591</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A431582961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-e8a43d5851730f39641f9bdc20192a76101243782936df8fbecd89815f11699f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkuP0zAUhSMEYobCP0AQCQnBosU3fiRmgVSNmKFSxSBeW8tx7NZVGndsBzH_HpemowbNAmXh6Pq7x77HJ8ueA5oBLuHdxvW-k-1s5zo9Q4ArDtWD7Bw4LqasQPjhyf9Z9iSEDUIUV4w9zs4KRhjDpDrPPl86r0PMly6E3Hb5F--iVlE3-dxrGXLZNfmii1LF_EimUlByp8P7fJ5fta6WbT5PN7kNNjzNHhnZBv1sWCfZj8uP3y8-TZfXV4uL-XKqSlrFqa4kwQ2tKJQYGcwZAcPrRhUIeCFLBggKgsuq4Jg1pjK1Vk3FK6AGgHFu8CR7edDdtS6IwYogoCwKSJNRSMTiQDRObsTO2630t8JJK_4WnF8J6aNVrRYYa6gJ5bIkhkBDa44wRdzUCEBRvtf6MJzW11vdKN1FL9uR6Hins2uxcr8EYYiyNMQkezMIeHfTJxfF1gal21Z22vWHe_OiJJQk9NU_6P3TDdRKpgFsZ1w6V-1FxZxgoMk5tqdm91Dpa_TWqpQbY1N91PB21JCYqH_HlexDEItvX_-fvf45Zl-fsGst27gOru2jdV0Yg-QAKp8C6bW5MxmQ2Mf-6IbYx14MsU9tL04f6K7pmHP8Byhm-VE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1722166351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forest Loss in Protected Areas and Intact Forest Landscapes: A Global Analysis</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Heino, Matias ; Kummu, Matti ; Makkonen, Marika ; Mulligan, Mark ; Verburg, Peter H ; Jalava, Mika ; Räsänen, Timo A</creator><contributor>Anand, Madhur</contributor><creatorcontrib>Heino, Matias ; Kummu, Matti ; Makkonen, Marika ; Mulligan, Mark ; Verburg, Peter H ; Jalava, Mika ; Räsänen, Timo A ; Anand, Madhur</creatorcontrib><description>In spite of the high importance of forests, global forest loss has remained alarmingly high during the last decades. Forest loss at a global scale has been unveiled with increasingly finer spatial resolution, but the forest extent and loss in protected areas (PAs) and in large intact forest landscapes (IFLs) have not so far been systematically assessed. Moreover, the impact of protection on preserving the IFLs is not well understood. In this study we conducted a consistent assessment of the global forest loss in PAs and IFLs over the period 2000-2012. We used recently published global remote sensing based spatial forest cover change data, being a uniform and consistent dataset over space and time, together with global datasets on PAs' and IFLs' locations. Our analyses revealed that on a global scale 3% of the protected forest, 2.5% of the intact forest, and 1.5% of the protected intact forest were lost during the study period. These forest loss rates are relatively high compared to global total forest loss of 5% for the same time period. The variation in forest losses and in protection effect was large among geographical regions and countries. In some regions the loss in protected forests exceeded 5% (e.g. in Australia and Oceania, and North America) and the relative forest loss was higher inside protected areas than outside those areas (e.g. in Mongolia and parts of Africa, Central Asia, and Europe). At the same time, protection was found to prevent forest loss in several countries (e.g. in South America and Southeast Asia). Globally, high area-weighted forest loss rates of protected and intact forests were associated with high gross domestic product and in the case of protected forests also with high proportions of agricultural land. Our findings reinforce the need for improved understanding of the reasons for the high forest losses in PAs and IFLs and strategies to prevent further losses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138918</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26466348</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Africa ; Agricultural land ; Agriculture - statistics & numerical data ; Americas ; Asia ; Australia ; Biodiversity ; Conservation of Natural Resources - statistics & numerical data ; Deforestation ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Environmental aspects ; Estimates ; Europe ; Forest protection ; Forestry - statistics & numerical data ; Forests ; Geographic Information Systems ; Geography ; Humans ; Landscape ; Netherlands ; Population growth ; Protected areas ; Protection and preservation ; Remote sensing ; Remote Sensing Technology ; Spatial data ; Spatial discrimination ; Spatial resolution ; Trees - growth & development ; Trends</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-10, Vol.10 (10), p.e0138918-e0138918</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2015 Heino et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Heino et al 2015 Heino et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-e8a43d5851730f39641f9bdc20192a76101243782936df8fbecd89815f11699f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-e8a43d5851730f39641f9bdc20192a76101243782936df8fbecd89815f11699f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1722166351/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1722166351?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26466348$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Anand, Madhur</contributor><creatorcontrib>Heino, Matias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kummu, Matti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makkonen, Marika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verburg, Peter H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalava, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Räsänen, Timo A</creatorcontrib><title>Forest Loss in Protected Areas and Intact Forest Landscapes: A Global Analysis</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>In spite of the high importance of forests, global forest loss has remained alarmingly high during the last decades. Forest loss at a global scale has been unveiled with increasingly finer spatial resolution, but the forest extent and loss in protected areas (PAs) and in large intact forest landscapes (IFLs) have not so far been systematically assessed. Moreover, the impact of protection on preserving the IFLs is not well understood. In this study we conducted a consistent assessment of the global forest loss in PAs and IFLs over the period 2000-2012. We used recently published global remote sensing based spatial forest cover change data, being a uniform and consistent dataset over space and time, together with global datasets on PAs' and IFLs' locations. Our analyses revealed that on a global scale 3% of the protected forest, 2.5% of the intact forest, and 1.5% of the protected intact forest were lost during the study period. These forest loss rates are relatively high compared to global total forest loss of 5% for the same time period. The variation in forest losses and in protection effect was large among geographical regions and countries. In some regions the loss in protected forests exceeded 5% (e.g. in Australia and Oceania, and North America) and the relative forest loss was higher inside protected areas than outside those areas (e.g. in Mongolia and parts of Africa, Central Asia, and Europe). At the same time, protection was found to prevent forest loss in several countries (e.g. in South America and Southeast Asia). Globally, high area-weighted forest loss rates of protected and intact forests were associated with high gross domestic product and in the case of protected forests also with high proportions of agricultural land. Our findings reinforce the need for improved understanding of the reasons for the high forest losses in PAs and IFLs and strategies to prevent further losses.</description><subject>Africa</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agriculture - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Americas</subject><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Forest protection</subject><subject>Forestry - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Geographic Information Systems</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Protection and preservation</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Remote Sensing Technology</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Spatial discrimination</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>Trees - growth & development</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkuP0zAUhSMEYobCP0AQCQnBosU3fiRmgVSNmKFSxSBeW8tx7NZVGndsBzH_HpemowbNAmXh6Pq7x77HJ8ueA5oBLuHdxvW-k-1s5zo9Q4ArDtWD7Bw4LqasQPjhyf9Z9iSEDUIUV4w9zs4KRhjDpDrPPl86r0PMly6E3Hb5F--iVlE3-dxrGXLZNfmii1LF_EimUlByp8P7fJ5fta6WbT5PN7kNNjzNHhnZBv1sWCfZj8uP3y8-TZfXV4uL-XKqSlrFqa4kwQ2tKJQYGcwZAcPrRhUIeCFLBggKgsuq4Jg1pjK1Vk3FK6AGgHFu8CR7edDdtS6IwYogoCwKSJNRSMTiQDRObsTO2630t8JJK_4WnF8J6aNVrRYYa6gJ5bIkhkBDa44wRdzUCEBRvtf6MJzW11vdKN1FL9uR6Hins2uxcr8EYYiyNMQkezMIeHfTJxfF1gal21Z22vWHe_OiJJQk9NU_6P3TDdRKpgFsZ1w6V-1FxZxgoMk5tqdm91Dpa_TWqpQbY1N91PB21JCYqH_HlexDEItvX_-fvf45Zl-fsGst27gOru2jdV0Yg-QAKp8C6bW5MxmQ2Mf-6IbYx14MsU9tL04f6K7pmHP8Byhm-VE</recordid><startdate>20151014</startdate><enddate>20151014</enddate><creator>Heino, Matias</creator><creator>Kummu, Matti</creator><creator>Makkonen, Marika</creator><creator>Mulligan, Mark</creator><creator>Verburg, Peter H</creator><creator>Jalava, Mika</creator><creator>Räsänen, Timo A</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151014</creationdate><title>Forest Loss in Protected Areas and Intact Forest Landscapes: A Global Analysis</title><author>Heino, Matias ; Kummu, Matti ; Makkonen, Marika ; Mulligan, Mark ; Verburg, Peter H ; Jalava, Mika ; Räsänen, Timo A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-e8a43d5851730f39641f9bdc20192a76101243782936df8fbecd89815f11699f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Africa</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agriculture - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Americas</topic><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Forest protection</topic><topic>Forestry - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Geographic Information Systems</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Protection and preservation</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Remote Sensing Technology</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Spatial discrimination</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>Trees - growth & development</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heino, Matias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kummu, Matti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makkonen, Marika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulligan, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verburg, Peter H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalava, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Räsänen, Timo A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heino, Matias</au><au>Kummu, Matti</au><au>Makkonen, Marika</au><au>Mulligan, Mark</au><au>Verburg, Peter H</au><au>Jalava, Mika</au><au>Räsänen, Timo A</au><au>Anand, Madhur</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forest Loss in Protected Areas and Intact Forest Landscapes: A Global Analysis</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-10-14</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0138918</spage><epage>e0138918</epage><pages>e0138918-e0138918</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>In spite of the high importance of forests, global forest loss has remained alarmingly high during the last decades. Forest loss at a global scale has been unveiled with increasingly finer spatial resolution, but the forest extent and loss in protected areas (PAs) and in large intact forest landscapes (IFLs) have not so far been systematically assessed. Moreover, the impact of protection on preserving the IFLs is not well understood. In this study we conducted a consistent assessment of the global forest loss in PAs and IFLs over the period 2000-2012. We used recently published global remote sensing based spatial forest cover change data, being a uniform and consistent dataset over space and time, together with global datasets on PAs' and IFLs' locations. Our analyses revealed that on a global scale 3% of the protected forest, 2.5% of the intact forest, and 1.5% of the protected intact forest were lost during the study period. These forest loss rates are relatively high compared to global total forest loss of 5% for the same time period. The variation in forest losses and in protection effect was large among geographical regions and countries. In some regions the loss in protected forests exceeded 5% (e.g. in Australia and Oceania, and North America) and the relative forest loss was higher inside protected areas than outside those areas (e.g. in Mongolia and parts of Africa, Central Asia, and Europe). At the same time, protection was found to prevent forest loss in several countries (e.g. in South America and Southeast Asia). Globally, high area-weighted forest loss rates of protected and intact forests were associated with high gross domestic product and in the case of protected forests also with high proportions of agricultural land. Our findings reinforce the need for improved understanding of the reasons for the high forest losses in PAs and IFLs and strategies to prevent further losses.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26466348</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0138918</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2015-10, Vol.10 (10), p.e0138918-e0138918 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1722166351 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Africa Agricultural land Agriculture - statistics & numerical data Americas Asia Australia Biodiversity Conservation of Natural Resources - statistics & numerical data Deforestation Ecology Ecosystems Environmental aspects Estimates Europe Forest protection Forestry - statistics & numerical data Forests Geographic Information Systems Geography Humans Landscape Netherlands Population growth Protected areas Protection and preservation Remote sensing Remote Sensing Technology Spatial data Spatial discrimination Spatial resolution Trees - growth & development Trends |
title | Forest Loss in Protected Areas and Intact Forest Landscapes: A Global Analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T09%3A25%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forest%20Loss%20in%20Protected%20Areas%20and%20Intact%20Forest%20Landscapes:%20A%20Global%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Heino,%20Matias&rft.date=2015-10-14&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0138918&rft.epage=e0138918&rft.pages=e0138918-e0138918&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0138918&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA431582961%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c758t-e8a43d5851730f39641f9bdc20192a76101243782936df8fbecd89815f11699f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1722166351&rft_id=info:pmid/26466348&rft_galeid=A431582961&rfr_iscdi=true |