Loading…
The Role of Scent Marking in Mate Selection by Female Pumas (Puma concolor)
Mate selection influences individual fitness, is often based on complex cues and behaviours, and can be difficult to study in solitary species including carnivores. We used motion-triggered cameras at 29 community scrapes (i.e. scent marking locations used by multiple individuals) and home range dat...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2015-10, Vol.10 (10), p.e0139087-e0139087 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c594cc2420023b269d7a9f085ccd3ffe0242a2f30df4011aa7637fcd87523db73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c594cc2420023b269d7a9f085ccd3ffe0242a2f30df4011aa7637fcd87523db73 |
container_end_page | e0139087 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e0139087 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Allen, Maximilian L Wittmer, Heiko U Houghtaling, Paul Smith, Justine Elbroch, L Mark Wilmers, Christopher C |
description | Mate selection influences individual fitness, is often based on complex cues and behaviours, and can be difficult to study in solitary species including carnivores. We used motion-triggered cameras at 29 community scrapes (i.e. scent marking locations used by multiple individuals) and home range data from 39 GPS-collared pumas (Puma concolor) to assess the relevance of communication behaviours for mate selection by female pumas in California. Female pumas visited community scrapes irregularly and visitation bouts appeared to be correlated with oestrus. Female pumas on average selected from 1.7 collared males, and selection was based on multiple cues that varied among the different time periods measured (i.e. the female's visitation bout and in 90 days previous to the consorting event). Female mate selection over the course of a visitation bout was based on frequency of the male visitation, mass, and age. In the 90 days previous to consorting, the number of scrapes a male created was the most important contributor to selection, which was likely related to his residency status. We also found that at least 14% of females mated with multiple males, thus possibly confusing paternity. Our findings provide a mechanistic understanding of how female pumas use scent and auditory communication at community scrapes to select dominant resident males to mate with. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0139087 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1725018271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A432225208</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4c99597027c44579acf190da93c4fbfe</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A432225208</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c594cc2420023b269d7a9f085ccd3ffe0242a2f30df4011aa7637fcd87523db73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBYQkLtYRd_JY4vlaqKwoqiom7hajmOvevFiRc7QfTf43TTaoN6QD6M5XnmtT3zZtlrBOeIMPRh4_vQSjff-lbPISIcluxJdog4wbMCQ_J0b3-QvYhxA2FOyqJ4nh3ggpYcwvIw-3Kz1uDaOw28AUul2w58leGnbVfAtmnbabDUTqvO-hZUt-BCNzLB3_pGRnA8BKB8q7zz4eRl9sxIF_WrMR5l3y8-3px_nl1efVqcn13OVMFxN1M5p0phiiHEpMIFr5nkBpa5UjUxRsOUktgQWBsKEZKSFYQZVZcsx6SuGDnK3u50t85HMfYhCsRwDlGJGUrEYkfUXm7ENthGhlvhpRV3Bz6shAydVU4LqjjPOYOYKUpzxqUyiMNacqKoqYxOWqfjbX3V6HpoUZBuIjrNtHYtVv63oAXiOaRJ4HgUCP5Xr2MnGhuVdk622vd372aUMIxgQt_9gz7-u5FapVEI2xqf7lWDqDijBGOcY1gmav4IlVatG5tmpo1N55OCk0lBYjr9p1vJPkaxWF7_P3v1Y8q-32PXWrpuHb3rB0vFKUh3oAo-xqDNQ5MRFIPn77shBs-L0fOp7M3-gB6K7k1O_gIW0fjn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1725018271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of Scent Marking in Mate Selection by Female Pumas (Puma concolor)</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central (Open access)</source><creator>Allen, Maximilian L ; Wittmer, Heiko U ; Houghtaling, Paul ; Smith, Justine ; Elbroch, L Mark ; Wilmers, Christopher C</creator><contributor>Rosenfeld, Cheryl S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Allen, Maximilian L ; Wittmer, Heiko U ; Houghtaling, Paul ; Smith, Justine ; Elbroch, L Mark ; Wilmers, Christopher C ; Rosenfeld, Cheryl S.</creatorcontrib><description>Mate selection influences individual fitness, is often based on complex cues and behaviours, and can be difficult to study in solitary species including carnivores. We used motion-triggered cameras at 29 community scrapes (i.e. scent marking locations used by multiple individuals) and home range data from 39 GPS-collared pumas (Puma concolor) to assess the relevance of communication behaviours for mate selection by female pumas in California. Female pumas visited community scrapes irregularly and visitation bouts appeared to be correlated with oestrus. Female pumas on average selected from 1.7 collared males, and selection was based on multiple cues that varied among the different time periods measured (i.e. the female's visitation bout and in 90 days previous to the consorting event). Female mate selection over the course of a visitation bout was based on frequency of the male visitation, mass, and age. In the 90 days previous to consorting, the number of scrapes a male created was the most important contributor to selection, which was likely related to his residency status. We also found that at least 14% of females mated with multiple males, thus possibly confusing paternity. Our findings provide a mechanistic understanding of how female pumas use scent and auditory communication at community scrapes to select dominant resident males to mate with.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139087</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26489008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal Communication ; Animal reproduction ; Animals ; Auditory communication ; California ; Cameras ; Carnivores ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Communication ; Communities ; Environmental studies ; Evaluation ; Evolution ; Females ; Fitness ; Geography ; Home range ; Males ; Marking ; Mate selection ; Paternity ; Pheromones - chemistry ; Puma ; Puma - physiology ; Puma concolor ; Reproduction (Biology) ; Scent marking behavior ; Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Sperm ; Videotape Recording</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-10, Vol.10 (10), p.e0139087-e0139087</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2015 Allen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Allen et al 2015 Allen et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c594cc2420023b269d7a9f085ccd3ffe0242a2f30df4011aa7637fcd87523db73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c594cc2420023b269d7a9f085ccd3ffe0242a2f30df4011aa7637fcd87523db73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1725018271/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1725018271?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26489008$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Rosenfeld, Cheryl S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Allen, Maximilian L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittmer, Heiko U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houghtaling, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Justine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elbroch, L Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilmers, Christopher C</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of Scent Marking in Mate Selection by Female Pumas (Puma concolor)</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Mate selection influences individual fitness, is often based on complex cues and behaviours, and can be difficult to study in solitary species including carnivores. We used motion-triggered cameras at 29 community scrapes (i.e. scent marking locations used by multiple individuals) and home range data from 39 GPS-collared pumas (Puma concolor) to assess the relevance of communication behaviours for mate selection by female pumas in California. Female pumas visited community scrapes irregularly and visitation bouts appeared to be correlated with oestrus. Female pumas on average selected from 1.7 collared males, and selection was based on multiple cues that varied among the different time periods measured (i.e. the female's visitation bout and in 90 days previous to the consorting event). Female mate selection over the course of a visitation bout was based on frequency of the male visitation, mass, and age. In the 90 days previous to consorting, the number of scrapes a male created was the most important contributor to selection, which was likely related to his residency status. We also found that at least 14% of females mated with multiple males, thus possibly confusing paternity. Our findings provide a mechanistic understanding of how female pumas use scent and auditory communication at community scrapes to select dominant resident males to mate with.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal Communication</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Auditory communication</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Carnivores</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Environmental studies</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Home range</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Marking</subject><subject>Mate selection</subject><subject>Paternity</subject><subject>Pheromones - chemistry</subject><subject>Puma</subject><subject>Puma - physiology</subject><subject>Puma concolor</subject><subject>Reproduction (Biology)</subject><subject>Scent marking behavior</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Sperm</subject><subject>Videotape Recording</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBYQkLtYRd_JY4vlaqKwoqiom7hajmOvevFiRc7QfTf43TTaoN6QD6M5XnmtT3zZtlrBOeIMPRh4_vQSjff-lbPISIcluxJdog4wbMCQ_J0b3-QvYhxA2FOyqJ4nh3ggpYcwvIw-3Kz1uDaOw28AUul2w58leGnbVfAtmnbabDUTqvO-hZUt-BCNzLB3_pGRnA8BKB8q7zz4eRl9sxIF_WrMR5l3y8-3px_nl1efVqcn13OVMFxN1M5p0phiiHEpMIFr5nkBpa5UjUxRsOUktgQWBsKEZKSFYQZVZcsx6SuGDnK3u50t85HMfYhCsRwDlGJGUrEYkfUXm7ENthGhlvhpRV3Bz6shAydVU4LqjjPOYOYKUpzxqUyiMNacqKoqYxOWqfjbX3V6HpoUZBuIjrNtHYtVv63oAXiOaRJ4HgUCP5Xr2MnGhuVdk622vd372aUMIxgQt_9gz7-u5FapVEI2xqf7lWDqDijBGOcY1gmav4IlVatG5tmpo1N55OCk0lBYjr9p1vJPkaxWF7_P3v1Y8q-32PXWrpuHb3rB0vFKUh3oAo-xqDNQ5MRFIPn77shBs-L0fOp7M3-gB6K7k1O_gIW0fjn</recordid><startdate>20151021</startdate><enddate>20151021</enddate><creator>Allen, Maximilian L</creator><creator>Wittmer, Heiko U</creator><creator>Houghtaling, Paul</creator><creator>Smith, Justine</creator><creator>Elbroch, L Mark</creator><creator>Wilmers, Christopher C</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151021</creationdate><title>The Role of Scent Marking in Mate Selection by Female Pumas (Puma concolor)</title><author>Allen, Maximilian L ; Wittmer, Heiko U ; Houghtaling, Paul ; Smith, Justine ; Elbroch, L Mark ; Wilmers, Christopher C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c594cc2420023b269d7a9f085ccd3ffe0242a2f30df4011aa7637fcd87523db73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal Communication</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Auditory communication</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Carnivores</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Environmental studies</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Home range</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Marking</topic><topic>Mate selection</topic><topic>Paternity</topic><topic>Pheromones - chemistry</topic><topic>Puma</topic><topic>Puma - physiology</topic><topic>Puma concolor</topic><topic>Reproduction (Biology)</topic><topic>Scent marking behavior</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Sperm</topic><topic>Videotape Recording</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allen, Maximilian L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittmer, Heiko U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houghtaling, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Justine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elbroch, L Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilmers, Christopher C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale in Context : Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Science (Gale in Context)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allen, Maximilian L</au><au>Wittmer, Heiko U</au><au>Houghtaling, Paul</au><au>Smith, Justine</au><au>Elbroch, L Mark</au><au>Wilmers, Christopher C</au><au>Rosenfeld, Cheryl S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Role of Scent Marking in Mate Selection by Female Pumas (Puma concolor)</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-10-21</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0139087</spage><epage>e0139087</epage><pages>e0139087-e0139087</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Mate selection influences individual fitness, is often based on complex cues and behaviours, and can be difficult to study in solitary species including carnivores. We used motion-triggered cameras at 29 community scrapes (i.e. scent marking locations used by multiple individuals) and home range data from 39 GPS-collared pumas (Puma concolor) to assess the relevance of communication behaviours for mate selection by female pumas in California. Female pumas visited community scrapes irregularly and visitation bouts appeared to be correlated with oestrus. Female pumas on average selected from 1.7 collared males, and selection was based on multiple cues that varied among the different time periods measured (i.e. the female's visitation bout and in 90 days previous to the consorting event). Female mate selection over the course of a visitation bout was based on frequency of the male visitation, mass, and age. In the 90 days previous to consorting, the number of scrapes a male created was the most important contributor to selection, which was likely related to his residency status. We also found that at least 14% of females mated with multiple males, thus possibly confusing paternity. Our findings provide a mechanistic understanding of how female pumas use scent and auditory communication at community scrapes to select dominant resident males to mate with.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26489008</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0139087</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2015-10, Vol.10 (10), p.e0139087-e0139087 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1725018271 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central (Open access) |
subjects | Animal behavior Animal Communication Animal reproduction Animals Auditory communication California Cameras Carnivores Choice Behavior - physiology Communication Communities Environmental studies Evaluation Evolution Females Fitness Geography Home range Males Marking Mate selection Paternity Pheromones - chemistry Puma Puma - physiology Puma concolor Reproduction (Biology) Scent marking behavior Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology Sperm Videotape Recording |
title | The Role of Scent Marking in Mate Selection by Female Pumas (Puma concolor) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T13%3A00%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20Scent%20Marking%20in%20Mate%20Selection%20by%20Female%20Pumas%20(Puma%20concolor)&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Allen,%20Maximilian%20L&rft.date=2015-10-21&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0139087&rft.epage=e0139087&rft.pages=e0139087-e0139087&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0139087&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA432225208%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-c594cc2420023b269d7a9f085ccd3ffe0242a2f30df4011aa7637fcd87523db73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1725018271&rft_id=info:pmid/26489008&rft_galeid=A432225208&rfr_iscdi=true |