Loading…
Trends in the Use of Nephron-Sparing Surgery over 7 Years: An Analysis Using the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Scoring System
To analyze trends in the use of partial nephrectomy, we evaluated which individual factors of renal nephrometry score (RNS) influenced the operative approach bi-annually from 2008 to 2014. We performed a retrospective review of renal cell carcinoma treated by surgery in 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014. T...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2015-11, Vol.10 (11), p.e0141709 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-c8bbb83b491d1aa18cc706751355db3353fa0bed5593b6ef032ea41ca55d2e483 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-c8bbb83b491d1aa18cc706751355db3353fa0bed5593b6ef032ea41ca55d2e483 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e0141709 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Shin, Seung Jea Ko, Kwang Jin Kim, Tae Sun Ryoo, Hyun Soo Sung, Hyun Hwan Jeon, Hwang Gyun Jeong, Byong Chang Seo, Seong Il Lee, Hyun Moo Choi, Han Yong Jeon, Seong Soo |
description | To analyze trends in the use of partial nephrectomy, we evaluated which individual factors of renal nephrometry score (RNS) influenced the operative approach bi-annually from 2008 to 2014.
We performed a retrospective review of renal cell carcinoma treated by surgery in 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014. The complexity of renal masses was measured using the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system with CT or MRI. Group comparison in terms of operation year and surgical type (partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy) was performed. We developed a nomogram to quantitate the likelihood of selecting partial nephrectomy over radical nephrectomy.
A total of 1106 cases (237 in 2008, 225 in 2010, 292 in 2012, and 352 in 2014) were available for the study. Over the study period, the proportion of partial nephrectomies performed increased steadily from 21.5% in 2008 to 66.5% in 2014 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, use of partial nephrectomy increased steadily in all RNS complexity groups (low, moderate, and high) (p < 0.05). In the analysis of individual components of RNS, values of the R and N components increased statistically by year in the partial nephrectomy group (p < 0.05). Average AUC was 0.920.
The proportion of partial nephrectomies performed sharply increased over the study period. Additionally, over the study period, more partial nephrectomies were performed for renal masses of larger size and closer to the collecting system and main renal vessels. A nomogram developed based on this recent data set provides significant predictive value for surgical decision making. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0141709 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1735910726</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A435602034</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_40002b26bd24486c8e7ab9a4b21b03a3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A435602034</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-c8bbb83b491d1aa18cc706751355db3353fa0bed5593b6ef032ea41ca55d2e483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2BshsHYLuLpy7K9i0Eo3RYILTTtYFdCko8dB9tKJTss_35y45Z49GJIICE97yudI50geItRhGmCv2xMb1tZR1vTQoQwwwnKngWnOKNkxgmiz4_mJ8Er5zYIxTTl_GVwQnicZYzy02B3Y6HNXVi1YbeG8NZBaIrwErZra9rZaitt1Zbhqrcl2H1odmDDJPwN0rqv4bz1XdZ7VzkvHLjB4jq6iC6jebSMRpsGOi9daXOw2rsOmtfBi0LWDt6M41lw-_3i5vznbHn1Y3E-X840J6Sb6VQplVLFMpxjKXGqdYJ4EmMax7miNKaFRAryOM6o4lAgSkAyrKXfJsBSeha8P_hua-PEmDIncELjDKOEcE8sDkRu5EZsbdVIuxdGVuJ-wdhSSNtVugbBEEJEEa5ywljKdQqJVJlkimCFqKTe69t4Wq8ayDW0nZX1xHS601ZrUZqdYDxOMpp4g0-jgTV3PbhONJXTUNeyBdPf35vzJEvIENmHf9CnoxupUvoAqrYw_lw9mIo5ozFH_nMwT0VPUL7l0FTa_6-i8usTweeJwDMd_OlK2TsnFqvr_2evfk3Zj0fsGmTdrZ2p-64yrZuC7ABqa5yzUDwmGSMxlMdDNsRQHmIsDy97d_xAj6KHeqB_AUNzCDE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1735910726</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trends in the Use of Nephron-Sparing Surgery over 7 Years: An Analysis Using the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Scoring System</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><creator>Shin, Seung Jea ; Ko, Kwang Jin ; Kim, Tae Sun ; Ryoo, Hyun Soo ; Sung, Hyun Hwan ; Jeon, Hwang Gyun ; Jeong, Byong Chang ; Seo, Seong Il ; Lee, Hyun Moo ; Choi, Han Yong ; Jeon, Seong Soo</creator><contributor>Gao, Xin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shin, Seung Jea ; Ko, Kwang Jin ; Kim, Tae Sun ; Ryoo, Hyun Soo ; Sung, Hyun Hwan ; Jeon, Hwang Gyun ; Jeong, Byong Chang ; Seo, Seong Il ; Lee, Hyun Moo ; Choi, Han Yong ; Jeon, Seong Soo ; Gao, Xin</creatorcontrib><description>To analyze trends in the use of partial nephrectomy, we evaluated which individual factors of renal nephrometry score (RNS) influenced the operative approach bi-annually from 2008 to 2014.
We performed a retrospective review of renal cell carcinoma treated by surgery in 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014. The complexity of renal masses was measured using the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system with CT or MRI. Group comparison in terms of operation year and surgical type (partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy) was performed. We developed a nomogram to quantitate the likelihood of selecting partial nephrectomy over radical nephrectomy.
A total of 1106 cases (237 in 2008, 225 in 2010, 292 in 2012, and 352 in 2014) were available for the study. Over the study period, the proportion of partial nephrectomies performed increased steadily from 21.5% in 2008 to 66.5% in 2014 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, use of partial nephrectomy increased steadily in all RNS complexity groups (low, moderate, and high) (p < 0.05). In the analysis of individual components of RNS, values of the R and N components increased statistically by year in the partial nephrectomy group (p < 0.05). Average AUC was 0.920.
The proportion of partial nephrectomies performed sharply increased over the study period. Additionally, over the study period, more partial nephrectomies were performed for renal masses of larger size and closer to the collecting system and main renal vessels. A nomogram developed based on this recent data set provides significant predictive value for surgical decision making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141709</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26599436</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Analysis ; Blood vessels ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery ; Care and treatment ; Complexity ; Complications and side effects ; Decision Making ; Female ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Kidney cancer ; Kidney diseases ; Kidney Neoplasms - pathology ; Kidney Neoplasms - surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Male ; Medicine ; Middle Aged ; Nephrectomy ; Nephrectomy - methods ; Nephrectomy - trends ; Nephrons - pathology ; Nephrons - surgery ; Nomograms ; Patients ; Renal cell carcinoma ; Retrospective Studies ; Studies ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surveillance ; Systematic review ; Trends ; Tumors ; Urology</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-11, Vol.10 (11), p.e0141709</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2015 Shin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Shin et al 2015 Shin et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-c8bbb83b491d1aa18cc706751355db3353fa0bed5593b6ef032ea41ca55d2e483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-c8bbb83b491d1aa18cc706751355db3353fa0bed5593b6ef032ea41ca55d2e483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1735910726/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1735910726?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26599436$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gao, Xin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shin, Seung Jea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Kwang Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryoo, Hyun Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Hyun Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Hwang Gyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Byong Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Seong Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyun Moo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Han Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Seong Soo</creatorcontrib><title>Trends in the Use of Nephron-Sparing Surgery over 7 Years: An Analysis Using the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Scoring System</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>To analyze trends in the use of partial nephrectomy, we evaluated which individual factors of renal nephrometry score (RNS) influenced the operative approach bi-annually from 2008 to 2014.
We performed a retrospective review of renal cell carcinoma treated by surgery in 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014. The complexity of renal masses was measured using the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system with CT or MRI. Group comparison in terms of operation year and surgical type (partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy) was performed. We developed a nomogram to quantitate the likelihood of selecting partial nephrectomy over radical nephrectomy.
A total of 1106 cases (237 in 2008, 225 in 2010, 292 in 2012, and 352 in 2014) were available for the study. Over the study period, the proportion of partial nephrectomies performed increased steadily from 21.5% in 2008 to 66.5% in 2014 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, use of partial nephrectomy increased steadily in all RNS complexity groups (low, moderate, and high) (p < 0.05). In the analysis of individual components of RNS, values of the R and N components increased statistically by year in the partial nephrectomy group (p < 0.05). Average AUC was 0.920.
The proportion of partial nephrectomies performed sharply increased over the study period. Additionally, over the study period, more partial nephrectomies were performed for renal masses of larger size and closer to the collecting system and main renal vessels. A nomogram developed based on this recent data set provides significant predictive value for surgical decision making.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Blood vessels</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney cancer</subject><subject>Kidney diseases</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrectomy</subject><subject>Nephrectomy - methods</subject><subject>Nephrectomy - trends</subject><subject>Nephrons - pathology</subject><subject>Nephrons - surgery</subject><subject>Nomograms</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Renal cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2BshsHYLuLpy7K9i0Eo3RYILTTtYFdCko8dB9tKJTss_35y45Z49GJIICE97yudI50geItRhGmCv2xMb1tZR1vTQoQwwwnKngWnOKNkxgmiz4_mJ8Er5zYIxTTl_GVwQnicZYzy02B3Y6HNXVi1YbeG8NZBaIrwErZra9rZaitt1Zbhqrcl2H1odmDDJPwN0rqv4bz1XdZ7VzkvHLjB4jq6iC6jebSMRpsGOi9daXOw2rsOmtfBi0LWDt6M41lw-_3i5vznbHn1Y3E-X840J6Sb6VQplVLFMpxjKXGqdYJ4EmMax7miNKaFRAryOM6o4lAgSkAyrKXfJsBSeha8P_hua-PEmDIncELjDKOEcE8sDkRu5EZsbdVIuxdGVuJ-wdhSSNtVugbBEEJEEa5ywljKdQqJVJlkimCFqKTe69t4Wq8ayDW0nZX1xHS601ZrUZqdYDxOMpp4g0-jgTV3PbhONJXTUNeyBdPf35vzJEvIENmHf9CnoxupUvoAqrYw_lw9mIo5ozFH_nMwT0VPUL7l0FTa_6-i8usTweeJwDMd_OlK2TsnFqvr_2evfk3Zj0fsGmTdrZ2p-64yrZuC7ABqa5yzUDwmGSMxlMdDNsRQHmIsDy97d_xAj6KHeqB_AUNzCDE</recordid><startdate>20151124</startdate><enddate>20151124</enddate><creator>Shin, Seung Jea</creator><creator>Ko, Kwang Jin</creator><creator>Kim, Tae Sun</creator><creator>Ryoo, Hyun Soo</creator><creator>Sung, Hyun Hwan</creator><creator>Jeon, Hwang Gyun</creator><creator>Jeong, Byong Chang</creator><creator>Seo, Seong Il</creator><creator>Lee, Hyun Moo</creator><creator>Choi, Han Yong</creator><creator>Jeon, Seong Soo</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151124</creationdate><title>Trends in the Use of Nephron-Sparing Surgery over 7 Years: An Analysis Using the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Scoring System</title><author>Shin, Seung Jea ; Ko, Kwang Jin ; Kim, Tae Sun ; Ryoo, Hyun Soo ; Sung, Hyun Hwan ; Jeon, Hwang Gyun ; Jeong, Byong Chang ; Seo, Seong Il ; Lee, Hyun Moo ; Choi, Han Yong ; Jeon, Seong Soo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-c8bbb83b491d1aa18cc706751355db3353fa0bed5593b6ef032ea41ca55d2e483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Blood vessels</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney cancer</topic><topic>Kidney diseases</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrectomy</topic><topic>Nephrectomy - methods</topic><topic>Nephrectomy - trends</topic><topic>Nephrons - pathology</topic><topic>Nephrons - surgery</topic><topic>Nomograms</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Renal cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shin, Seung Jea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Kwang Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryoo, Hyun Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Hyun Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Hwang Gyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Byong Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Seong Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyun Moo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Han Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Seong Soo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shin, Seung Jea</au><au>Ko, Kwang Jin</au><au>Kim, Tae Sun</au><au>Ryoo, Hyun Soo</au><au>Sung, Hyun Hwan</au><au>Jeon, Hwang Gyun</au><au>Jeong, Byong Chang</au><au>Seo, Seong Il</au><au>Lee, Hyun Moo</au><au>Choi, Han Yong</au><au>Jeon, Seong Soo</au><au>Gao, Xin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trends in the Use of Nephron-Sparing Surgery over 7 Years: An Analysis Using the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Scoring System</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-11-24</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0141709</spage><pages>e0141709-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>To analyze trends in the use of partial nephrectomy, we evaluated which individual factors of renal nephrometry score (RNS) influenced the operative approach bi-annually from 2008 to 2014.
We performed a retrospective review of renal cell carcinoma treated by surgery in 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014. The complexity of renal masses was measured using the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system with CT or MRI. Group comparison in terms of operation year and surgical type (partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy) was performed. We developed a nomogram to quantitate the likelihood of selecting partial nephrectomy over radical nephrectomy.
A total of 1106 cases (237 in 2008, 225 in 2010, 292 in 2012, and 352 in 2014) were available for the study. Over the study period, the proportion of partial nephrectomies performed increased steadily from 21.5% in 2008 to 66.5% in 2014 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, use of partial nephrectomy increased steadily in all RNS complexity groups (low, moderate, and high) (p < 0.05). In the analysis of individual components of RNS, values of the R and N components increased statistically by year in the partial nephrectomy group (p < 0.05). Average AUC was 0.920.
The proportion of partial nephrectomies performed sharply increased over the study period. Additionally, over the study period, more partial nephrectomies were performed for renal masses of larger size and closer to the collecting system and main renal vessels. A nomogram developed based on this recent data set provides significant predictive value for surgical decision making.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26599436</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0141709</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2015-11, Vol.10 (11), p.e0141709 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1735910726 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); NCBI_PubMed Central(免费) |
subjects | Adult Aged Analysis Blood vessels Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery Care and treatment Complexity Complications and side effects Decision Making Female Health aspects Humans Kidney cancer Kidney diseases Kidney Neoplasms - pathology Kidney Neoplasms - surgery Laparoscopy Laparoscopy - methods Magnetic resonance imaging Male Medicine Middle Aged Nephrectomy Nephrectomy - methods Nephrectomy - trends Nephrons - pathology Nephrons - surgery Nomograms Patients Renal cell carcinoma Retrospective Studies Studies Surgeons Surgery Surveillance Systematic review Trends Tumors Urology |
title | Trends in the Use of Nephron-Sparing Surgery over 7 Years: An Analysis Using the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Scoring System |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A46%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends%20in%20the%20Use%20of%20Nephron-Sparing%20Surgery%20over%207%20Years:%20An%20Analysis%20Using%20the%20R.E.N.A.L.%20Nephrometry%20Scoring%20System&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Shin,%20Seung%20Jea&rft.date=2015-11-24&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0141709&rft.pages=e0141709-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0141709&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA435602034%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-c8bbb83b491d1aa18cc706751355db3353fa0bed5593b6ef032ea41ca55d2e483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1735910726&rft_id=info:pmid/26599436&rft_galeid=A435602034&rfr_iscdi=true |