Loading…

Trends in the Use of Nephron-Sparing Surgery over 7 Years: An Analysis Using the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Scoring System

To analyze trends in the use of partial nephrectomy, we evaluated which individual factors of renal nephrometry score (RNS) influenced the operative approach bi-annually from 2008 to 2014. We performed a retrospective review of renal cell carcinoma treated by surgery in 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2015-11, Vol.10 (11), p.e0141709
Main Authors: Shin, Seung Jea, Ko, Kwang Jin, Kim, Tae Sun, Ryoo, Hyun Soo, Sung, Hyun Hwan, Jeon, Hwang Gyun, Jeong, Byong Chang, Seo, Seong Il, Lee, Hyun Moo, Choi, Han Yong, Jeon, Seong Soo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-c8bbb83b491d1aa18cc706751355db3353fa0bed5593b6ef032ea41ca55d2e483
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-c8bbb83b491d1aa18cc706751355db3353fa0bed5593b6ef032ea41ca55d2e483
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page e0141709
container_title PloS one
container_volume 10
creator Shin, Seung Jea
Ko, Kwang Jin
Kim, Tae Sun
Ryoo, Hyun Soo
Sung, Hyun Hwan
Jeon, Hwang Gyun
Jeong, Byong Chang
Seo, Seong Il
Lee, Hyun Moo
Choi, Han Yong
Jeon, Seong Soo
description To analyze trends in the use of partial nephrectomy, we evaluated which individual factors of renal nephrometry score (RNS) influenced the operative approach bi-annually from 2008 to 2014. We performed a retrospective review of renal cell carcinoma treated by surgery in 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014. The complexity of renal masses was measured using the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system with CT or MRI. Group comparison in terms of operation year and surgical type (partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy) was performed. We developed a nomogram to quantitate the likelihood of selecting partial nephrectomy over radical nephrectomy. A total of 1106 cases (237 in 2008, 225 in 2010, 292 in 2012, and 352 in 2014) were available for the study. Over the study period, the proportion of partial nephrectomies performed increased steadily from 21.5% in 2008 to 66.5% in 2014 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, use of partial nephrectomy increased steadily in all RNS complexity groups (low, moderate, and high) (p < 0.05). In the analysis of individual components of RNS, values of the R and N components increased statistically by year in the partial nephrectomy group (p < 0.05). Average AUC was 0.920. The proportion of partial nephrectomies performed sharply increased over the study period. Additionally, over the study period, more partial nephrectomies were performed for renal masses of larger size and closer to the collecting system and main renal vessels. A nomogram developed based on this recent data set provides significant predictive value for surgical decision making.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0141709
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1735910726</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A435602034</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_40002b26bd24486c8e7ab9a4b21b03a3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A435602034</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-c8bbb83b491d1aa18cc706751355db3353fa0bed5593b6ef032ea41ca55d2e483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2BshsHYLuLpy7K9i0Eo3RYILTTtYFdCko8dB9tKJTss_35y45Z49GJIICE97yudI50geItRhGmCv2xMb1tZR1vTQoQwwwnKngWnOKNkxgmiz4_mJ8Er5zYIxTTl_GVwQnicZYzy02B3Y6HNXVi1YbeG8NZBaIrwErZra9rZaitt1Zbhqrcl2H1odmDDJPwN0rqv4bz1XdZ7VzkvHLjB4jq6iC6jebSMRpsGOi9daXOw2rsOmtfBi0LWDt6M41lw-_3i5vznbHn1Y3E-X840J6Sb6VQplVLFMpxjKXGqdYJ4EmMax7miNKaFRAryOM6o4lAgSkAyrKXfJsBSeha8P_hua-PEmDIncELjDKOEcE8sDkRu5EZsbdVIuxdGVuJ-wdhSSNtVugbBEEJEEa5ywljKdQqJVJlkimCFqKTe69t4Wq8ayDW0nZX1xHS601ZrUZqdYDxOMpp4g0-jgTV3PbhONJXTUNeyBdPf35vzJEvIENmHf9CnoxupUvoAqrYw_lw9mIo5ozFH_nMwT0VPUL7l0FTa_6-i8usTweeJwDMd_OlK2TsnFqvr_2evfk3Zj0fsGmTdrZ2p-64yrZuC7ABqa5yzUDwmGSMxlMdDNsRQHmIsDy97d_xAj6KHeqB_AUNzCDE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1735910726</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trends in the Use of Nephron-Sparing Surgery over 7 Years: An Analysis Using the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Scoring System</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><creator>Shin, Seung Jea ; Ko, Kwang Jin ; Kim, Tae Sun ; Ryoo, Hyun Soo ; Sung, Hyun Hwan ; Jeon, Hwang Gyun ; Jeong, Byong Chang ; Seo, Seong Il ; Lee, Hyun Moo ; Choi, Han Yong ; Jeon, Seong Soo</creator><contributor>Gao, Xin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shin, Seung Jea ; Ko, Kwang Jin ; Kim, Tae Sun ; Ryoo, Hyun Soo ; Sung, Hyun Hwan ; Jeon, Hwang Gyun ; Jeong, Byong Chang ; Seo, Seong Il ; Lee, Hyun Moo ; Choi, Han Yong ; Jeon, Seong Soo ; Gao, Xin</creatorcontrib><description>To analyze trends in the use of partial nephrectomy, we evaluated which individual factors of renal nephrometry score (RNS) influenced the operative approach bi-annually from 2008 to 2014. We performed a retrospective review of renal cell carcinoma treated by surgery in 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014. The complexity of renal masses was measured using the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system with CT or MRI. Group comparison in terms of operation year and surgical type (partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy) was performed. We developed a nomogram to quantitate the likelihood of selecting partial nephrectomy over radical nephrectomy. A total of 1106 cases (237 in 2008, 225 in 2010, 292 in 2012, and 352 in 2014) were available for the study. Over the study period, the proportion of partial nephrectomies performed increased steadily from 21.5% in 2008 to 66.5% in 2014 (p &lt; 0.05). Furthermore, use of partial nephrectomy increased steadily in all RNS complexity groups (low, moderate, and high) (p &lt; 0.05). In the analysis of individual components of RNS, values of the R and N components increased statistically by year in the partial nephrectomy group (p &lt; 0.05). Average AUC was 0.920. The proportion of partial nephrectomies performed sharply increased over the study period. Additionally, over the study period, more partial nephrectomies were performed for renal masses of larger size and closer to the collecting system and main renal vessels. A nomogram developed based on this recent data set provides significant predictive value for surgical decision making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141709</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26599436</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Analysis ; Blood vessels ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery ; Care and treatment ; Complexity ; Complications and side effects ; Decision Making ; Female ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Kidney cancer ; Kidney diseases ; Kidney Neoplasms - pathology ; Kidney Neoplasms - surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Male ; Medicine ; Middle Aged ; Nephrectomy ; Nephrectomy - methods ; Nephrectomy - trends ; Nephrons - pathology ; Nephrons - surgery ; Nomograms ; Patients ; Renal cell carcinoma ; Retrospective Studies ; Studies ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surveillance ; Systematic review ; Trends ; Tumors ; Urology</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-11, Vol.10 (11), p.e0141709</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2015 Shin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Shin et al 2015 Shin et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-c8bbb83b491d1aa18cc706751355db3353fa0bed5593b6ef032ea41ca55d2e483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-c8bbb83b491d1aa18cc706751355db3353fa0bed5593b6ef032ea41ca55d2e483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1735910726/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1735910726?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26599436$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gao, Xin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shin, Seung Jea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Kwang Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryoo, Hyun Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Hyun Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Hwang Gyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Byong Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Seong Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyun Moo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Han Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Seong Soo</creatorcontrib><title>Trends in the Use of Nephron-Sparing Surgery over 7 Years: An Analysis Using the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Scoring System</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>To analyze trends in the use of partial nephrectomy, we evaluated which individual factors of renal nephrometry score (RNS) influenced the operative approach bi-annually from 2008 to 2014. We performed a retrospective review of renal cell carcinoma treated by surgery in 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014. The complexity of renal masses was measured using the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system with CT or MRI. Group comparison in terms of operation year and surgical type (partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy) was performed. We developed a nomogram to quantitate the likelihood of selecting partial nephrectomy over radical nephrectomy. A total of 1106 cases (237 in 2008, 225 in 2010, 292 in 2012, and 352 in 2014) were available for the study. Over the study period, the proportion of partial nephrectomies performed increased steadily from 21.5% in 2008 to 66.5% in 2014 (p &lt; 0.05). Furthermore, use of partial nephrectomy increased steadily in all RNS complexity groups (low, moderate, and high) (p &lt; 0.05). In the analysis of individual components of RNS, values of the R and N components increased statistically by year in the partial nephrectomy group (p &lt; 0.05). Average AUC was 0.920. The proportion of partial nephrectomies performed sharply increased over the study period. Additionally, over the study period, more partial nephrectomies were performed for renal masses of larger size and closer to the collecting system and main renal vessels. A nomogram developed based on this recent data set provides significant predictive value for surgical decision making.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Blood vessels</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney cancer</subject><subject>Kidney diseases</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrectomy</subject><subject>Nephrectomy - methods</subject><subject>Nephrectomy - trends</subject><subject>Nephrons - pathology</subject><subject>Nephrons - surgery</subject><subject>Nomograms</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Renal cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLtu_2BshsHYLuLpy7K9i0Eo3RYILTTtYFdCko8dB9tKJTss_35y45Z49GJIICE97yudI50geItRhGmCv2xMb1tZR1vTQoQwwwnKngWnOKNkxgmiz4_mJ8Er5zYIxTTl_GVwQnicZYzy02B3Y6HNXVi1YbeG8NZBaIrwErZra9rZaitt1Zbhqrcl2H1odmDDJPwN0rqv4bz1XdZ7VzkvHLjB4jq6iC6jebSMRpsGOi9daXOw2rsOmtfBi0LWDt6M41lw-_3i5vznbHn1Y3E-X840J6Sb6VQplVLFMpxjKXGqdYJ4EmMax7miNKaFRAryOM6o4lAgSkAyrKXfJsBSeha8P_hua-PEmDIncELjDKOEcE8sDkRu5EZsbdVIuxdGVuJ-wdhSSNtVugbBEEJEEa5ywljKdQqJVJlkimCFqKTe69t4Wq8ayDW0nZX1xHS601ZrUZqdYDxOMpp4g0-jgTV3PbhONJXTUNeyBdPf35vzJEvIENmHf9CnoxupUvoAqrYw_lw9mIo5ozFH_nMwT0VPUL7l0FTa_6-i8usTweeJwDMd_OlK2TsnFqvr_2evfk3Zj0fsGmTdrZ2p-64yrZuC7ABqa5yzUDwmGSMxlMdDNsRQHmIsDy97d_xAj6KHeqB_AUNzCDE</recordid><startdate>20151124</startdate><enddate>20151124</enddate><creator>Shin, Seung Jea</creator><creator>Ko, Kwang Jin</creator><creator>Kim, Tae Sun</creator><creator>Ryoo, Hyun Soo</creator><creator>Sung, Hyun Hwan</creator><creator>Jeon, Hwang Gyun</creator><creator>Jeong, Byong Chang</creator><creator>Seo, Seong Il</creator><creator>Lee, Hyun Moo</creator><creator>Choi, Han Yong</creator><creator>Jeon, Seong Soo</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151124</creationdate><title>Trends in the Use of Nephron-Sparing Surgery over 7 Years: An Analysis Using the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Scoring System</title><author>Shin, Seung Jea ; Ko, Kwang Jin ; Kim, Tae Sun ; Ryoo, Hyun Soo ; Sung, Hyun Hwan ; Jeon, Hwang Gyun ; Jeong, Byong Chang ; Seo, Seong Il ; Lee, Hyun Moo ; Choi, Han Yong ; Jeon, Seong Soo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-c8bbb83b491d1aa18cc706751355db3353fa0bed5593b6ef032ea41ca55d2e483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Blood vessels</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney cancer</topic><topic>Kidney diseases</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrectomy</topic><topic>Nephrectomy - methods</topic><topic>Nephrectomy - trends</topic><topic>Nephrons - pathology</topic><topic>Nephrons - surgery</topic><topic>Nomograms</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Renal cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shin, Seung Jea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Kwang Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryoo, Hyun Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Hyun Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Hwang Gyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Byong Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Seong Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyun Moo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Han Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Seong Soo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shin, Seung Jea</au><au>Ko, Kwang Jin</au><au>Kim, Tae Sun</au><au>Ryoo, Hyun Soo</au><au>Sung, Hyun Hwan</au><au>Jeon, Hwang Gyun</au><au>Jeong, Byong Chang</au><au>Seo, Seong Il</au><au>Lee, Hyun Moo</au><au>Choi, Han Yong</au><au>Jeon, Seong Soo</au><au>Gao, Xin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trends in the Use of Nephron-Sparing Surgery over 7 Years: An Analysis Using the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Scoring System</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-11-24</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0141709</spage><pages>e0141709-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>To analyze trends in the use of partial nephrectomy, we evaluated which individual factors of renal nephrometry score (RNS) influenced the operative approach bi-annually from 2008 to 2014. We performed a retrospective review of renal cell carcinoma treated by surgery in 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014. The complexity of renal masses was measured using the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system with CT or MRI. Group comparison in terms of operation year and surgical type (partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy) was performed. We developed a nomogram to quantitate the likelihood of selecting partial nephrectomy over radical nephrectomy. A total of 1106 cases (237 in 2008, 225 in 2010, 292 in 2012, and 352 in 2014) were available for the study. Over the study period, the proportion of partial nephrectomies performed increased steadily from 21.5% in 2008 to 66.5% in 2014 (p &lt; 0.05). Furthermore, use of partial nephrectomy increased steadily in all RNS complexity groups (low, moderate, and high) (p &lt; 0.05). In the analysis of individual components of RNS, values of the R and N components increased statistically by year in the partial nephrectomy group (p &lt; 0.05). Average AUC was 0.920. The proportion of partial nephrectomies performed sharply increased over the study period. Additionally, over the study period, more partial nephrectomies were performed for renal masses of larger size and closer to the collecting system and main renal vessels. A nomogram developed based on this recent data set provides significant predictive value for surgical decision making.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26599436</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0141709</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2015-11, Vol.10 (11), p.e0141709
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1735910726
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)
subjects Adult
Aged
Analysis
Blood vessels
Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology
Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery
Care and treatment
Complexity
Complications and side effects
Decision Making
Female
Health aspects
Humans
Kidney cancer
Kidney diseases
Kidney Neoplasms - pathology
Kidney Neoplasms - surgery
Laparoscopy
Laparoscopy - methods
Magnetic resonance imaging
Male
Medicine
Middle Aged
Nephrectomy
Nephrectomy - methods
Nephrectomy - trends
Nephrons - pathology
Nephrons - surgery
Nomograms
Patients
Renal cell carcinoma
Retrospective Studies
Studies
Surgeons
Surgery
Surveillance
Systematic review
Trends
Tumors
Urology
title Trends in the Use of Nephron-Sparing Surgery over 7 Years: An Analysis Using the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Scoring System
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A46%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends%20in%20the%20Use%20of%20Nephron-Sparing%20Surgery%20over%207%20Years:%20An%20Analysis%20Using%20the%20R.E.N.A.L.%20Nephrometry%20Scoring%20System&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Shin,%20Seung%20Jea&rft.date=2015-11-24&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0141709&rft.pages=e0141709-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0141709&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA435602034%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-c8bbb83b491d1aa18cc706751355db3353fa0bed5593b6ef032ea41ca55d2e483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1735910726&rft_id=info:pmid/26599436&rft_galeid=A435602034&rfr_iscdi=true