Loading…
M2 Polarization of Human Macrophages Favors Survival of the Intracellular Pathogen Chlamydia pneumoniae
Intracellular pathogens have developed various strategies to escape immunity to enable their survival in host cells, and many bacterial pathogens preferentially reside inside macrophages, using diverse mechanisms to penetrate their defenses and to exploit their high degree of metabolic diversity and...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2015-11, Vol.10 (11), p.e0143593-e0143593 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c762t-424f6de2586a4e8da9d0a320e13c1352e9f857bc0a22188be3733c4c7789197d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c762t-424f6de2586a4e8da9d0a320e13c1352e9f857bc0a22188be3733c4c7789197d3 |
container_end_page | e0143593 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e0143593 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Buchacher, Tanja Ohradanova-Repic, Anna Stockinger, Hannes Fischer, Michael B Weber, Viktoria |
description | Intracellular pathogens have developed various strategies to escape immunity to enable their survival in host cells, and many bacterial pathogens preferentially reside inside macrophages, using diverse mechanisms to penetrate their defenses and to exploit their high degree of metabolic diversity and plasticity. Here, we characterized the interactions of the intracellular pathogen Chlamydia pneumoniae with polarized human macrophages. Primary human monocytes were pre-differentiated with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor or macrophage colony-stimulating factor for 7 days to yield M1-like and M2-like macrophages, which were further treated with interferon-γ and lipopolysaccharide or with interleukin-4 for 48 h to obtain fully polarized M1 and M2 macrophages. M1 and M2 cells exhibited distinct morphology with round or spindle-shaped appearance for M1 and M2, respectively, distinct surface marker profiles, as well as different cytokine and chemokine secretion. Macrophage polarization did not influence uptake of C. pneumoniae, since comparable copy numbers of chlamydial DNA were detected in M1 and M2 at 6 h post infection, but an increase in chlamydial DNA over time indicating proliferation was only observed in M2. Accordingly, 72±5% of M2 vs. 48±7% of M1 stained positive for chlamydial lipopolysaccharide, with large perinuclear inclusions in M2 and less clearly bordered inclusions for M1. Viable C. pneumoniae was present in lysates from M2, but not from M1 macrophages. The ability of M1 to restrict chlamydial replication was not observed in M1-like macrophages, since chlamydial load showed an equal increase over time for M1-like and M2-like macrophages. Our findings support the importance of macrophage polarization for the control of intracellular infection, and show that M2 are the preferred survival niche for C. pneumoniae. M1 did not allow for chlamydial proliferation, but failed to completely eliminate chlamydial infection, giving further evidence for the ability of C. pneumoniae to evade cellular defense and to persist in human macrophages. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0143593 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1736408312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A435601897</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8b8ec4f9a1a84b25b4dd88b248b4c82a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A435601897</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c762t-424f6de2586a4e8da9d0a320e13c1352e9f857bc0a22188be3733c4c7789197d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk01v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBEQkJw2MVfcZwLUrWidKVWrShwtSaJk3jlxIudrCi_HqebVhvUA_LBlv3MO_brmSh6jdES0xR_2tjBdWCWW9upJcKMJhl9Eh3jjJIFJ4g-PVgfRS-83yCUUMH58-iIcI44SrLjqL4k8bU14PQf6LXtYlvF50MLXXwJhbPbBmrl4zPYWefjm8Ht9A7MCPWNitdd76BQxgxBIL6GvrG16uJVY6C9LTXE204Nre00qJfRswqMV6-m-ST6cfbl--p8cXH1db06vVgUKSf9ghFW8VKRRHBgSpSQlQgoQQrTAtOEqKwSSZoXCAjBQuSKppQWrEhTkeEsLelJ9HavuzXWy8kjL3FKOUOCYhKI9Z4oLWzk1ukW3K20oOXdhnW1BNfrwigpcqEKVmWAQbCcJDkry5CUMJGzQhAIWp-nbEPeqrJQoyFmJjo_6XQja7uTjCdZwngQ-DAJOPtrUL6Xrfajo9ApO9zdWzBBMEkD-u4f9PHXTVQN4QG6q-z4RaOoPA0lwhEW2ai1fIQKo1StLkJBVTrszwI-zgIC06vffQ2D93J98-3_2aufc_b9AdsoMH3jrRnGUvRzkO3BUJTeO1U9mIyRHPvh3g059oOc-iGEvTn8oIeg-wagfwFNyAVc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1736408312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>M2 Polarization of Human Macrophages Favors Survival of the Intracellular Pathogen Chlamydia pneumoniae</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Buchacher, Tanja ; Ohradanova-Repic, Anna ; Stockinger, Hannes ; Fischer, Michael B ; Weber, Viktoria</creator><contributor>Murthy, Ashlesh K</contributor><creatorcontrib>Buchacher, Tanja ; Ohradanova-Repic, Anna ; Stockinger, Hannes ; Fischer, Michael B ; Weber, Viktoria ; Murthy, Ashlesh K</creatorcontrib><description>Intracellular pathogens have developed various strategies to escape immunity to enable their survival in host cells, and many bacterial pathogens preferentially reside inside macrophages, using diverse mechanisms to penetrate their defenses and to exploit their high degree of metabolic diversity and plasticity. Here, we characterized the interactions of the intracellular pathogen Chlamydia pneumoniae with polarized human macrophages. Primary human monocytes were pre-differentiated with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor or macrophage colony-stimulating factor for 7 days to yield M1-like and M2-like macrophages, which were further treated with interferon-γ and lipopolysaccharide or with interleukin-4 for 48 h to obtain fully polarized M1 and M2 macrophages. M1 and M2 cells exhibited distinct morphology with round or spindle-shaped appearance for M1 and M2, respectively, distinct surface marker profiles, as well as different cytokine and chemokine secretion. Macrophage polarization did not influence uptake of C. pneumoniae, since comparable copy numbers of chlamydial DNA were detected in M1 and M2 at 6 h post infection, but an increase in chlamydial DNA over time indicating proliferation was only observed in M2. Accordingly, 72±5% of M2 vs. 48±7% of M1 stained positive for chlamydial lipopolysaccharide, with large perinuclear inclusions in M2 and less clearly bordered inclusions for M1. Viable C. pneumoniae was present in lysates from M2, but not from M1 macrophages. The ability of M1 to restrict chlamydial replication was not observed in M1-like macrophages, since chlamydial load showed an equal increase over time for M1-like and M2-like macrophages. Our findings support the importance of macrophage polarization for the control of intracellular infection, and show that M2 are the preferred survival niche for C. pneumoniae. M1 did not allow for chlamydial proliferation, but failed to completely eliminate chlamydial infection, giving further evidence for the ability of C. pneumoniae to evade cellular defense and to persist in human macrophages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143593</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26606059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Biological response modifiers ; Biomarkers ; Cell culture ; Cell Differentiation ; Cell survival ; Chlamydia ; Chlamydia infections ; Chlamydia pneumoniae ; Chlamydiae ; Chlamydophila Infections - immunology ; Chlamydophila Infections - microbiology ; Chlamydophila pneumoniae - physiology ; Chronic illnesses ; Colonies ; Colony-stimulating factor ; Cytokines - biosynthesis ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Gene expression ; Genotype & phenotype ; Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor ; Health sciences ; Humans ; Immunity ; Immunology ; Immunophenotyping ; Inclusions ; Infections ; Inflammation ; Interferon ; Interleukin ; Interleukin 4 ; Interleukins ; Intracellular ; Laboratories ; Leukocytes, Mononuclear ; Lipopolysaccharides ; Lysates ; Macrophage Activation - immunology ; Macrophage colony stimulating factor ; Macrophages ; Macrophages - cytology ; Macrophages - microbiology ; Macrophages - physiology ; Microbial Viability - immunology ; Mitogens ; Monocytes ; Pathogens ; Phenotype ; Pneumonia ; Polarization ; Sepsis ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; STD ; Surface markers ; Survival</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2015-11, Vol.10 (11), p.e0143593-e0143593</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2015 Buchacher et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Buchacher et al 2015 Buchacher et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c762t-424f6de2586a4e8da9d0a320e13c1352e9f857bc0a22188be3733c4c7789197d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c762t-424f6de2586a4e8da9d0a320e13c1352e9f857bc0a22188be3733c4c7789197d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1736408312/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1736408312?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26606059$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Murthy, Ashlesh K</contributor><creatorcontrib>Buchacher, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohradanova-Repic, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stockinger, Hannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Michael B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Viktoria</creatorcontrib><title>M2 Polarization of Human Macrophages Favors Survival of the Intracellular Pathogen Chlamydia pneumoniae</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Intracellular pathogens have developed various strategies to escape immunity to enable their survival in host cells, and many bacterial pathogens preferentially reside inside macrophages, using diverse mechanisms to penetrate their defenses and to exploit their high degree of metabolic diversity and plasticity. Here, we characterized the interactions of the intracellular pathogen Chlamydia pneumoniae with polarized human macrophages. Primary human monocytes were pre-differentiated with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor or macrophage colony-stimulating factor for 7 days to yield M1-like and M2-like macrophages, which were further treated with interferon-γ and lipopolysaccharide or with interleukin-4 for 48 h to obtain fully polarized M1 and M2 macrophages. M1 and M2 cells exhibited distinct morphology with round or spindle-shaped appearance for M1 and M2, respectively, distinct surface marker profiles, as well as different cytokine and chemokine secretion. Macrophage polarization did not influence uptake of C. pneumoniae, since comparable copy numbers of chlamydial DNA were detected in M1 and M2 at 6 h post infection, but an increase in chlamydial DNA over time indicating proliferation was only observed in M2. Accordingly, 72±5% of M2 vs. 48±7% of M1 stained positive for chlamydial lipopolysaccharide, with large perinuclear inclusions in M2 and less clearly bordered inclusions for M1. Viable C. pneumoniae was present in lysates from M2, but not from M1 macrophages. The ability of M1 to restrict chlamydial replication was not observed in M1-like macrophages, since chlamydial load showed an equal increase over time for M1-like and M2-like macrophages. Our findings support the importance of macrophage polarization for the control of intracellular infection, and show that M2 are the preferred survival niche for C. pneumoniae. M1 did not allow for chlamydial proliferation, but failed to completely eliminate chlamydial infection, giving further evidence for the ability of C. pneumoniae to evade cellular defense and to persist in human macrophages.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biological response modifiers</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Cell Differentiation</subject><subject>Cell survival</subject><subject>Chlamydia</subject><subject>Chlamydia infections</subject><subject>Chlamydia pneumoniae</subject><subject>Chlamydiae</subject><subject>Chlamydophila Infections - immunology</subject><subject>Chlamydophila Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Chlamydophila pneumoniae - physiology</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Colonies</subject><subject>Colony-stimulating factor</subject><subject>Cytokines - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Genotype & phenotype</subject><subject>Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunity</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Immunophenotyping</subject><subject>Inclusions</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Interferon</subject><subject>Interleukin</subject><subject>Interleukin 4</subject><subject>Interleukins</subject><subject>Intracellular</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Leukocytes, Mononuclear</subject><subject>Lipopolysaccharides</subject><subject>Lysates</subject><subject>Macrophage Activation - immunology</subject><subject>Macrophage colony stimulating factor</subject><subject>Macrophages</subject><subject>Macrophages - cytology</subject><subject>Macrophages - microbiology</subject><subject>Macrophages - physiology</subject><subject>Microbial Viability - immunology</subject><subject>Mitogens</subject><subject>Monocytes</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>Surface markers</subject><subject>Survival</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk01v1DAQhiMEoqXwDxBEQkJw2MVfcZwLUrWidKVWrShwtSaJk3jlxIudrCi_HqebVhvUA_LBlv3MO_brmSh6jdES0xR_2tjBdWCWW9upJcKMJhl9Eh3jjJIFJ4g-PVgfRS-83yCUUMH58-iIcI44SrLjqL4k8bU14PQf6LXtYlvF50MLXXwJhbPbBmrl4zPYWefjm8Ht9A7MCPWNitdd76BQxgxBIL6GvrG16uJVY6C9LTXE204Nre00qJfRswqMV6-m-ST6cfbl--p8cXH1db06vVgUKSf9ghFW8VKRRHBgSpSQlQgoQQrTAtOEqKwSSZoXCAjBQuSKppQWrEhTkeEsLelJ9HavuzXWy8kjL3FKOUOCYhKI9Z4oLWzk1ukW3K20oOXdhnW1BNfrwigpcqEKVmWAQbCcJDkry5CUMJGzQhAIWp-nbEPeqrJQoyFmJjo_6XQja7uTjCdZwngQ-DAJOPtrUL6Xrfajo9ApO9zdWzBBMEkD-u4f9PHXTVQN4QG6q-z4RaOoPA0lwhEW2ai1fIQKo1StLkJBVTrszwI-zgIC06vffQ2D93J98-3_2aufc_b9AdsoMH3jrRnGUvRzkO3BUJTeO1U9mIyRHPvh3g059oOc-iGEvTn8oIeg-wagfwFNyAVc</recordid><startdate>20151125</startdate><enddate>20151125</enddate><creator>Buchacher, Tanja</creator><creator>Ohradanova-Repic, Anna</creator><creator>Stockinger, Hannes</creator><creator>Fischer, Michael B</creator><creator>Weber, Viktoria</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151125</creationdate><title>M2 Polarization of Human Macrophages Favors Survival of the Intracellular Pathogen Chlamydia pneumoniae</title><author>Buchacher, Tanja ; Ohradanova-Repic, Anna ; Stockinger, Hannes ; Fischer, Michael B ; Weber, Viktoria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c762t-424f6de2586a4e8da9d0a320e13c1352e9f857bc0a22188be3733c4c7789197d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biological response modifiers</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Cell Differentiation</topic><topic>Cell survival</topic><topic>Chlamydia</topic><topic>Chlamydia infections</topic><topic>Chlamydia pneumoniae</topic><topic>Chlamydiae</topic><topic>Chlamydophila Infections - immunology</topic><topic>Chlamydophila Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Chlamydophila pneumoniae - physiology</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Colonies</topic><topic>Colony-stimulating factor</topic><topic>Cytokines - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Genotype & phenotype</topic><topic>Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunity</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Immunophenotyping</topic><topic>Inclusions</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Interferon</topic><topic>Interleukin</topic><topic>Interleukin 4</topic><topic>Interleukins</topic><topic>Intracellular</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Leukocytes, Mononuclear</topic><topic>Lipopolysaccharides</topic><topic>Lysates</topic><topic>Macrophage Activation - immunology</topic><topic>Macrophage colony stimulating factor</topic><topic>Macrophages</topic><topic>Macrophages - cytology</topic><topic>Macrophages - microbiology</topic><topic>Macrophages - physiology</topic><topic>Microbial Viability - immunology</topic><topic>Mitogens</topic><topic>Monocytes</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>Surface markers</topic><topic>Survival</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buchacher, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohradanova-Repic, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stockinger, Hannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Michael B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Viktoria</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale in Context : Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buchacher, Tanja</au><au>Ohradanova-Repic, Anna</au><au>Stockinger, Hannes</au><au>Fischer, Michael B</au><au>Weber, Viktoria</au><au>Murthy, Ashlesh K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>M2 Polarization of Human Macrophages Favors Survival of the Intracellular Pathogen Chlamydia pneumoniae</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2015-11-25</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0143593</spage><epage>e0143593</epage><pages>e0143593-e0143593</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Intracellular pathogens have developed various strategies to escape immunity to enable their survival in host cells, and many bacterial pathogens preferentially reside inside macrophages, using diverse mechanisms to penetrate their defenses and to exploit their high degree of metabolic diversity and plasticity. Here, we characterized the interactions of the intracellular pathogen Chlamydia pneumoniae with polarized human macrophages. Primary human monocytes were pre-differentiated with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor or macrophage colony-stimulating factor for 7 days to yield M1-like and M2-like macrophages, which were further treated with interferon-γ and lipopolysaccharide or with interleukin-4 for 48 h to obtain fully polarized M1 and M2 macrophages. M1 and M2 cells exhibited distinct morphology with round or spindle-shaped appearance for M1 and M2, respectively, distinct surface marker profiles, as well as different cytokine and chemokine secretion. Macrophage polarization did not influence uptake of C. pneumoniae, since comparable copy numbers of chlamydial DNA were detected in M1 and M2 at 6 h post infection, but an increase in chlamydial DNA over time indicating proliferation was only observed in M2. Accordingly, 72±5% of M2 vs. 48±7% of M1 stained positive for chlamydial lipopolysaccharide, with large perinuclear inclusions in M2 and less clearly bordered inclusions for M1. Viable C. pneumoniae was present in lysates from M2, but not from M1 macrophages. The ability of M1 to restrict chlamydial replication was not observed in M1-like macrophages, since chlamydial load showed an equal increase over time for M1-like and M2-like macrophages. Our findings support the importance of macrophage polarization for the control of intracellular infection, and show that M2 are the preferred survival niche for C. pneumoniae. M1 did not allow for chlamydial proliferation, but failed to completely eliminate chlamydial infection, giving further evidence for the ability of C. pneumoniae to evade cellular defense and to persist in human macrophages.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26606059</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0143593</doi><tpages>e0143593</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2015-11, Vol.10 (11), p.e0143593-e0143593 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1736408312 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Bacteria Biological response modifiers Biomarkers Cell culture Cell Differentiation Cell survival Chlamydia Chlamydia infections Chlamydia pneumoniae Chlamydiae Chlamydophila Infections - immunology Chlamydophila Infections - microbiology Chlamydophila pneumoniae - physiology Chronic illnesses Colonies Colony-stimulating factor Cytokines - biosynthesis Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA Gene expression Genotype & phenotype Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor Health sciences Humans Immunity Immunology Immunophenotyping Inclusions Infections Inflammation Interferon Interleukin Interleukin 4 Interleukins Intracellular Laboratories Leukocytes, Mononuclear Lipopolysaccharides Lysates Macrophage Activation - immunology Macrophage colony stimulating factor Macrophages Macrophages - cytology Macrophages - microbiology Macrophages - physiology Microbial Viability - immunology Mitogens Monocytes Pathogens Phenotype Pneumonia Polarization Sepsis Sexually transmitted diseases STD Surface markers Survival |
title | M2 Polarization of Human Macrophages Favors Survival of the Intracellular Pathogen Chlamydia pneumoniae |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A10%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=M2%20Polarization%20of%20Human%20Macrophages%20Favors%20Survival%20of%20the%20Intracellular%20Pathogen%20Chlamydia%20pneumoniae&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Buchacher,%20Tanja&rft.date=2015-11-25&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0143593&rft.epage=e0143593&rft.pages=e0143593-e0143593&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0143593&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA435601897%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c762t-424f6de2586a4e8da9d0a320e13c1352e9f857bc0a22188be3733c4c7789197d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1736408312&rft_id=info:pmid/26606059&rft_galeid=A435601897&rfr_iscdi=true |