Responders to Wide-Pulse, High-Frequency Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Show Reduced Metabolic Demand: A 31P-MRS Study in Humans

• Published in: PloS one 2015, Vol.10 (11), p.e0143972-e0143972
• Main Authors: Wegrzyk, Jennifer, Fouré, Alexandre, Le Fur, Yann, Maffiuletti, Nicola A, Vilmen, Christophe, Guye, Maxime, Mattei, Jean-Pierre, Place, Nicolas, Bendahan, David, Gondin, Julien
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Activation; Adult; Biomechanics; Cluster analysis; Clustering; Contraction; Electric Stimulation - methods; Electrical stimuli; Engineering Sciences; Fatigue; Female; Human health and pathology; Humans; Hypotheses; Isometric Contraction; Life Sciences; Magnetic resonance; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Male; Mechanics; Metabolism; Metabolites; Muscle contraction; Muscle Fatigue; Muscles; Phosphocreatine; Phosphocreatine - analysis; Pulse duration; Spectroscopy; Spectrum analysis; Stimulation; Subgroups; Tissues and Organs; Vector quantization; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143972

Conventional (CONV) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) (i.e., short pulse duration, low frequencies) induces a higher energetic response as compared to voluntary contractions (VOL). In contrast, wide-pulse, high-frequency (WPHF) NMES might elicit--at least in some subjects (i.e., responders)--a different motor unit recruitment compared to CONV that resembles the physiological muscle activation pattern of VOL. We therefore hypothesized that for these responder subjects, the metabolic demand of WPHF would be lower than CONV and comparable to VOL. 18 healthy subjects performed isometric plantar flexions at 10% of their maximal voluntary contraction force for CONV (25 Hz, 0.05 ms), WPHF (100 Hz, 1 ms) and VOL protocols. For each protocol, force time integral (FTI) was quantified and subjects were classified as responders and non-responders to WPHF based on k-means clustering analysis. Furthermore, a fatigue index based on FTI loss at the end of each protocol compared with the beginning of the protocol was calculated. Phosphocreatine depletion (ΔPCr) was assessed using 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Responders developed four times higher FTI's during WPHF (99 ± 37 × 10(3) N.s) than non-responders (26 ± 12 × 10(3) N.s). For both responders and non-responders, CONV was metabolically more demanding than VOL when ΔPCr was expressed relative to the FTI. Only for the responder group, the ∆PCr/FTI ratio of WPHF (0.74 ± 0.19 M/N.s) was significantly lower compared to CONV (1.48 ± 0.46 M/N.s) but similar to VOL (0.65 ± 0.21 M/N.s). Moreover, the fatigue index was not different between WPHF (-16%) and CONV (-25%) for the responders. WPHF could therefore be considered as the less demanding NMES modality--at least in this subgroup of subjects--by possibly exhibiting a muscle activation pattern similar to VOL contractions.