Take Only Photographs, Leave Only Footprints: Novel Applications of Non-Invasive Survey Methods for Rapid Detection of Small, Arboreal Animals

• Published in: PloS one 2016-01, Vol.11 (1), p.e0146142-e0146142
• Main Authors: Mills, Cheryl A, Godley, Brendan J, Hodgson, David J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Animals; Biological monitoring; Conservation; Development projects; Ecological monitoring; Ecological surveys; Ecosystem; Environmental Monitoring - instrumentation; Environmental Monitoring - methods; Footprints; Habitats; Hazel; Image quality; Mammals; Methods; Mitigation; Muscardinus avellanarius; Myoxidae; Myoxidae - physiology; Polls & surveys; Protection and preservation; Rodents; Small mammals; Species; Studies; Surveys; Sympatric populations; Terrestrial environments; Tracking devices; Tracking equipment; Traps; Wildlife; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife habitats
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146142

The development of appropriate wildlife survey techniques is essential to promote effective and efficient monitoring of species of conservation concern. Here, we demonstrate the utility of two rapid-assessment, non-invasive methods to detect the presence of elusive, small, arboreal animals. We use the hazel dormouse, Muscardinus avellanarius, a rodent of conservation concern, as our focal species. Prevailing hazel dormouse survey methods are prolonged (often taking months to years to detect dormice), dependent on season and habitat, and/or have low detection rates. Alternatives would be of great use to ecologists who undertake dormouse surveys, especially those assessing the need for mitigation measures, as legally required for building development projects. Camera traps and footprint tracking are well-established tools for monitoring elusive large terrestrial mammals, but are rarely used for small species such as rodents, or in arboreal habitats. In trials of these adapted methods, hazel dormice visited bait stations and were successfully detected by both camera traps and tracking equipment at each of two woodland study sites, within days to weeks of installation. Camera trap images and footprints were of adequate quality to allow discrimination between two sympatric small mammal species (hazel dormouse and wood mouse, Apodemus sylvaticus). We discuss the relative merits of these methods with respect to research aims, funds, time available and habitat.