Loading…

Predicting VO2peak from Submaximal- and Peak Exercise Models: The HUNT 3 Fitness Study, Norway

Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) is seldom assessed in health care settings although being inversely linked to cardiovascular risk and all-cause mortality. The aim of this study was to develop VO2peak prediction models for men and women based on directly measured VO2peak from a large healthy population....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2016-01, Vol.11 (1), p.e0144873-e0144873
Main Authors: Loe, Henrik, Nes, Bjarne M, Wisløff, Ulrik
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-ab88ad84a1ebeb77efb58b9ea99be5a6a4dcc5984db8db0bb3fecda96ad66d803
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-ab88ad84a1ebeb77efb58b9ea99be5a6a4dcc5984db8db0bb3fecda96ad66d803
container_end_page e0144873
container_issue 1
container_start_page e0144873
container_title PloS one
container_volume 11
creator Loe, Henrik
Nes, Bjarne M
Wisløff, Ulrik
description Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) is seldom assessed in health care settings although being inversely linked to cardiovascular risk and all-cause mortality. The aim of this study was to develop VO2peak prediction models for men and women based on directly measured VO2peak from a large healthy population. VO2peak prediction models based on submaximal- and peak performance treadmill work were derived from multiple regression analysis. 4637 healthy men and women aged 20-90 years were included. Data splitting was used to generate validation and cross-validation samples. The accuracy for the peak performance models were 10.5% (SEE = 4.63 mL⋅kg(-1)⋅min(-1)) and 11.5% (SEE = 4.11 mL⋅kg(-1)⋅min(-1)) for men and women, respectively, with 75% and 72% of the variance explained. For the submaximal performance models accuracy were 14.1% (SEE = 6.24 mL⋅kg(-1)⋅min(-1)) and 14.4% (SEE = 5.17 mL⋅kg(-1)⋅min(-1)) for men and women, respectively, with 55% and 56% of the variance explained. The validation and cross-validation samples displayed SEE and variance explained in agreement with the total sample. Cross-classification between measured and predicted VO2peak accurately classified 91% of the participants within the correct or nearest quintile of measured VO2peak. Judicious use of the exercise prediction models presented in this study offers valuable information in providing a fairly accurate assessment of VO2peak, which may be beneficial for risk stratification in health care settings.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0144873
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1758975453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5f597ae0d49f414aac025569feb7ec39</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3929105551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-ab88ad84a1ebeb77efb58b9ea99be5a6a4dcc5984db8db0bb3fecda96ad66d803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1vEzEUXCEQ_YB_gMASlx5IsNdf6x6QUNXSSqWt1JQj1rP9Nt2wWQd7A82_Z0PSqkWcbPnNjGeepijeMDpmXLOPs7hMHbTjRexwTJkQlebPil1meDlSJeXPH913ir2cZ5RKXin1stgplTZCab1bfL9KGBrfN92UfLssFwg_SJ3inFwv3Rzumjm0IwJdIFfryfEdJt9kJF9jwDYfksktktObiwnh5KTpO8yZXPfLsPpALmL6DatXxYsa2oyvt-d-cXNyPDk6HZ1ffjk7-nw-8rJU_QhcVUGoBDB06LTG2snKGQRjHEpQIIL30lQiuCo46hyv0QcwCoJSoaJ8v3i30V20MdvtarJlWlZGSyH5gDjbIEKEmV2kIVla2QiN_fsQ09RC6hvfopW1NBqQBmFqwQSAp6WUytSDNfTcDFqftr8NS8LgsesTtE9En0665tZO4y8rdMmkUYPAwVYgxZ9LzL2dN9lj20KHcbn2rahh3JRr6Pt_oP9PJzYon2LOCesHM4zadV3uWXZdF7uty0B7-zjIA-m-H_wPy2m_Gw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1758975453</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting VO2peak from Submaximal- and Peak Exercise Models: The HUNT 3 Fitness Study, Norway</title><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Loe, Henrik ; Nes, Bjarne M ; Wisløff, Ulrik</creator><contributor>Piacentini, Maria Francesca</contributor><creatorcontrib>Loe, Henrik ; Nes, Bjarne M ; Wisløff, Ulrik ; Piacentini, Maria Francesca</creatorcontrib><description>Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) is seldom assessed in health care settings although being inversely linked to cardiovascular risk and all-cause mortality. The aim of this study was to develop VO2peak prediction models for men and women based on directly measured VO2peak from a large healthy population. VO2peak prediction models based on submaximal- and peak performance treadmill work were derived from multiple regression analysis. 4637 healthy men and women aged 20-90 years were included. Data splitting was used to generate validation and cross-validation samples. The accuracy for the peak performance models were 10.5% (SEE = 4.63 mL⋅kg(-1)⋅min(-1)) and 11.5% (SEE = 4.11 mL⋅kg(-1)⋅min(-1)) for men and women, respectively, with 75% and 72% of the variance explained. For the submaximal performance models accuracy were 14.1% (SEE = 6.24 mL⋅kg(-1)⋅min(-1)) and 14.4% (SEE = 5.17 mL⋅kg(-1)⋅min(-1)) for men and women, respectively, with 55% and 56% of the variance explained. The validation and cross-validation samples displayed SEE and variance explained in agreement with the total sample. Cross-classification between measured and predicted VO2peak accurately classified 91% of the participants within the correct or nearest quintile of measured VO2peak. Judicious use of the exercise prediction models presented in this study offers valuable information in providing a fairly accurate assessment of VO2peak, which may be beneficial for risk stratification in health care settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144873</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26794677</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bicycling ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Body Weight ; Cardiovascular disease ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Exercise ; Exercise Test ; Female ; Fitness equipment ; Health care ; Health risks ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Male ; Mathematical models ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Men ; Mens health ; Metabolism ; Middle Aged ; Model accuracy ; Models, Biological ; Mortality ; Multiple regression analysis ; Norway ; Oxygen ; Oxygen Consumption - physiology ; Oxygen uptake ; Physical fitness ; Physical Sciences ; Population ; Prediction models ; Regression analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Running ; Splitting ; Velocity ; Walking ; Womens health ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-01, Vol.11 (1), p.e0144873-e0144873</ispartof><rights>2016 Loe et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Loe et al 2016 Loe et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-ab88ad84a1ebeb77efb58b9ea99be5a6a4dcc5984db8db0bb3fecda96ad66d803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-ab88ad84a1ebeb77efb58b9ea99be5a6a4dcc5984db8db0bb3fecda96ad66d803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1758975453/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1758975453?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26794677$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Piacentini, Maria Francesca</contributor><creatorcontrib>Loe, Henrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nes, Bjarne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisløff, Ulrik</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting VO2peak from Submaximal- and Peak Exercise Models: The HUNT 3 Fitness Study, Norway</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) is seldom assessed in health care settings although being inversely linked to cardiovascular risk and all-cause mortality. The aim of this study was to develop VO2peak prediction models for men and women based on directly measured VO2peak from a large healthy population. VO2peak prediction models based on submaximal- and peak performance treadmill work were derived from multiple regression analysis. 4637 healthy men and women aged 20-90 years were included. Data splitting was used to generate validation and cross-validation samples. The accuracy for the peak performance models were 10.5% (SEE = 4.63 mL⋅kg(-1)⋅min(-1)) and 11.5% (SEE = 4.11 mL⋅kg(-1)⋅min(-1)) for men and women, respectively, with 75% and 72% of the variance explained. For the submaximal performance models accuracy were 14.1% (SEE = 6.24 mL⋅kg(-1)⋅min(-1)) and 14.4% (SEE = 5.17 mL⋅kg(-1)⋅min(-1)) for men and women, respectively, with 55% and 56% of the variance explained. The validation and cross-validation samples displayed SEE and variance explained in agreement with the total sample. Cross-classification between measured and predicted VO2peak accurately classified 91% of the participants within the correct or nearest quintile of measured VO2peak. Judicious use of the exercise prediction models presented in this study offers valuable information in providing a fairly accurate assessment of VO2peak, which may be beneficial for risk stratification in health care settings.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bicycling</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fitness equipment</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Heart Rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Mens health</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Multiple regression analysis</subject><subject>Norway</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</subject><subject>Oxygen uptake</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Running</subject><subject>Splitting</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Walking</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1vEzEUXCEQ_YB_gMASlx5IsNdf6x6QUNXSSqWt1JQj1rP9Nt2wWQd7A82_Z0PSqkWcbPnNjGeepijeMDpmXLOPs7hMHbTjRexwTJkQlebPil1meDlSJeXPH913ir2cZ5RKXin1stgplTZCab1bfL9KGBrfN92UfLssFwg_SJ3inFwv3Rzumjm0IwJdIFfryfEdJt9kJF9jwDYfksktktObiwnh5KTpO8yZXPfLsPpALmL6DatXxYsa2oyvt-d-cXNyPDk6HZ1ffjk7-nw-8rJU_QhcVUGoBDB06LTG2snKGQRjHEpQIIL30lQiuCo46hyv0QcwCoJSoaJ8v3i30V20MdvtarJlWlZGSyH5gDjbIEKEmV2kIVla2QiN_fsQ09RC6hvfopW1NBqQBmFqwQSAp6WUytSDNfTcDFqftr8NS8LgsesTtE9En0665tZO4y8rdMmkUYPAwVYgxZ9LzL2dN9lj20KHcbn2rahh3JRr6Pt_oP9PJzYon2LOCesHM4zadV3uWXZdF7uty0B7-zjIA-m-H_wPy2m_Gw</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Loe, Henrik</creator><creator>Nes, Bjarne M</creator><creator>Wisløff, Ulrik</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Predicting VO2peak from Submaximal- and Peak Exercise Models: The HUNT 3 Fitness Study, Norway</title><author>Loe, Henrik ; Nes, Bjarne M ; Wisløff, Ulrik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-ab88ad84a1ebeb77efb58b9ea99be5a6a4dcc5984db8db0bb3fecda96ad66d803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bicycling</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fitness equipment</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Heart Rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Mens health</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Multiple regression analysis</topic><topic>Norway</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</topic><topic>Oxygen uptake</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Running</topic><topic>Splitting</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Walking</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loe, Henrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nes, Bjarne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisløff, Ulrik</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loe, Henrik</au><au>Nes, Bjarne M</au><au>Wisløff, Ulrik</au><au>Piacentini, Maria Francesca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting VO2peak from Submaximal- and Peak Exercise Models: The HUNT 3 Fitness Study, Norway</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0144873</spage><epage>e0144873</epage><pages>e0144873-e0144873</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) is seldom assessed in health care settings although being inversely linked to cardiovascular risk and all-cause mortality. The aim of this study was to develop VO2peak prediction models for men and women based on directly measured VO2peak from a large healthy population. VO2peak prediction models based on submaximal- and peak performance treadmill work were derived from multiple regression analysis. 4637 healthy men and women aged 20-90 years were included. Data splitting was used to generate validation and cross-validation samples. The accuracy for the peak performance models were 10.5% (SEE = 4.63 mL⋅kg(-1)⋅min(-1)) and 11.5% (SEE = 4.11 mL⋅kg(-1)⋅min(-1)) for men and women, respectively, with 75% and 72% of the variance explained. For the submaximal performance models accuracy were 14.1% (SEE = 6.24 mL⋅kg(-1)⋅min(-1)) and 14.4% (SEE = 5.17 mL⋅kg(-1)⋅min(-1)) for men and women, respectively, with 55% and 56% of the variance explained. The validation and cross-validation samples displayed SEE and variance explained in agreement with the total sample. Cross-classification between measured and predicted VO2peak accurately classified 91% of the participants within the correct or nearest quintile of measured VO2peak. Judicious use of the exercise prediction models presented in this study offers valuable information in providing a fairly accurate assessment of VO2peak, which may be beneficial for risk stratification in health care settings.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>26794677</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0144873</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2016-01, Vol.11 (1), p.e0144873-e0144873
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1758975453
source NCBI_PubMed Central(免费); ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Adult
Bicycling
Biology and Life Sciences
Body Weight
Cardiovascular disease
Cardiovascular diseases
Exercise
Exercise Test
Female
Fitness equipment
Health care
Health risks
Heart Rate
Humans
Linear Models
Male
Mathematical models
Medical imaging
Medicine
Medicine and Health Sciences
Men
Mens health
Metabolism
Middle Aged
Model accuracy
Models, Biological
Mortality
Multiple regression analysis
Norway
Oxygen
Oxygen Consumption - physiology
Oxygen uptake
Physical fitness
Physical Sciences
Population
Prediction models
Regression analysis
Reproducibility of Results
Research and Analysis Methods
Running
Splitting
Velocity
Walking
Womens health
Workloads
title Predicting VO2peak from Submaximal- and Peak Exercise Models: The HUNT 3 Fitness Study, Norway
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A20%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20VO2peak%20from%20Submaximal-%20and%20Peak%20Exercise%20Models:%20The%20HUNT%203%20Fitness%20Study,%20Norway&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Loe,%20Henrik&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0144873&rft.epage=e0144873&rft.pages=e0144873-e0144873&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0144873&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_plos_%3E3929105551%3C/proquest_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-ab88ad84a1ebeb77efb58b9ea99be5a6a4dcc5984db8db0bb3fecda96ad66d803%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1758975453&rft_id=info:pmid/26794677&rfr_iscdi=true