REMCARE: Pragmatic Multi-Centre Randomised Trial of Reminiscence Groups for People with Dementia and their Family Carers: Effectiveness and Economic Analysis

• Published in: PloS one 2016-04, Vol.11 (4), p.e0152843-e0152843
• Main Authors: Woods, Robert T, Orrell, Martin, Bruce, Errollyn, Edwards, Rhiannon T, Hoare, Zoe, Hounsome, Barry, Keady, John, Moniz-Cook, Esme, Orgeta, Vasiliki, Rees, Janice, Russell, Ian
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Activities of daily living; Activities of Daily Living - psychology; Adaptation, Psychological - physiology; Affect - physiology; Age; Aged; Aging; Analysis; Anxiety; Anxiety Disorders - economics; Anxiety Disorders - psychology; Art galleries & museums; Biology and Life Sciences; Care and treatment; Caregivers; Caregivers - economics; Caregivers - psychology; Communities; Cost analysis; Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics; Dementia; Dementia - economics; Dementia - therapy; Dementia disorders; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; Economic analysis; Economic aspects; Female; Health aspects; Humans; Intervention; Male; Medicine and Health Sciences; Memory; Memory - physiology; Mental depression; Mental disorders; Mental health; Mood; Motivation; Older people; Psychiatry; Psychological Tests; Public sector; Quality of life; Quality of Life - psychology; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Randomization; Reminiscence (Psychology); Researchers; Social Sciences; Stress; Stresses; Studies; Surveys and Questionnaires; Withdrawal
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152843

Joint reminiscence groups, involving people with dementia and family carers together, are popular, but the evidence-base is limited. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of joint reminiscence groups as compared to usual care. This multi-centre, pragmatic randomised controlled trial had two parallel arms: intervention group and usual-care control group. A restricted dynamic method of randomisation was used, with an overall allocation ratio of 1:1, restricted to ensure viable sized intervention groups. Assessments, blind to treatment allocation, were carried out at baseline, three months and ten months (primary end-point), usually in the person's home. Participants were recruited in eight centres, mainly through NHS Memory Clinics and NHS community mental health teams. Included participants were community resident people with mild to moderate dementia (DSM-IV), who had a relative or other care-giver in regular contact, to act as informant and willing and able to participate in intervention. 71% carers were spouses. 488 people with dementia (mean age 77.5)were randomised: 268 intervention, 220 control; 350 dyads completed the study (206 intervention, 144 control). The intervention evaluated was joint reminiscence groups (with up to 12 dyads) weekly for twelve weeks; monthly maintenance sessions for further seven months. Sessions followed a published treatment manual and were held in a variety of community settings. Two trained facilitators in each centre were supported by volunteers. Primary outcome measures were self-reported quality of life for the person with dementia (QoL-AD), psychological distress for the carer (General Health Questionnaire, GHQ-28). Secondary outcome measures included: autobiographical memory and activities of daily living for the person with dementia; carer stress for the carer; mood, relationship quality and service use and costs for both. The intention to treat analysis (ANCOVA) identified no differences in outcome between the intervention and control conditions on primary or secondary outcomes (self-reported QoL-AD mean difference 0.07 (-1.21 to 1.35), F = 0.48, p = 0.53). Carers of people with dementia allocated to the reminiscence intervention reported a significant increase in anxiety on a General Health Questionnaire-28 sub-scale at the ten month end-point (mean difference 1.25 (0.25 to 2.26), F = 8.28, p = 0.04). Compliance analyses suggested improved autobiographical memory, quality of life and