Loading…
Spatial Configuration of Drought Disturbance and Forest Gap Creation across Environmental Gradients
Climate change is increasing the risk of drought to forested ecosystems. Although drought impacts are often anecdotally noted to occur in discrete patches of high canopy mortality, the landscape effects of drought disturbances have received virtually no study. This study characterized the landscape...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2016-06, Vol.11 (6), p.e0157154-e0157154 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-81e174f1fbf5eb0f558df8ff3d592ff22b14238e0987240036c36230aef0f1833 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-81e174f1fbf5eb0f558df8ff3d592ff22b14238e0987240036c36230aef0f1833 |
container_end_page | e0157154 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e0157154 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Andrew, Margaret E Ruthrof, Katinka X Matusick, George Hardy, Giles E St J |
description | Climate change is increasing the risk of drought to forested ecosystems. Although drought impacts are often anecdotally noted to occur in discrete patches of high canopy mortality, the landscape effects of drought disturbances have received virtually no study. This study characterized the landscape configuration of drought impact patches and investigated the relationships between patch characteristics, as indicators of drought impact intensity, and environmental gradients related to water availability to determine factors influencing drought vulnerability. Drought impact patches were delineated from aerial surveys following an extreme drought in 2011 in southwestern Australia, which led to patchy canopy dieback of the Northern Jarrah Forest, a Mediterranean forest ecosystem. On average, forest gaps produced by drought-induced dieback were moderate in size (6.6 ± 9.7 ha, max = 85.7 ha), compact in shape, and relatively isolated from each other at the scale of several kilometers. However, there was considerable spatial variation in the size, shape, and clustering of forest gaps. Drought impact patches were larger and more densely clustered in xeric areas, with significant relationships observed with topographic wetness index, meteorological variables, and stand height. Drought impact patch clustering was more strongly associated with the environmental factors assessed (R2 = 0.32) than was patch size (R2 = 0.21); variation in patch shape remained largely unexplained (R2 = 0.02). There is evidence that the xeric areas with more intense drought impacts are 'chronic disturbance patches' susceptible to recurrent drought disturbance. The spatial configuration of drought disturbances is likely to influence ecological processes including forest recovery and interacting disturbances such as fire. Regime shifts to an alternate, non-forested ecosystem may occur preferentially in areas with large or clustered drought impact patches. Improved understanding of drought impacts and their patterning in space and time will expand our knowledge of forest ecosystems and landscape processes, informing management of these dynamic systems in an uncertain future. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0157154 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1794824503</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A454562840</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_cde6886523b64bedb0ee66bfe3bee971</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A454562840</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-81e174f1fbf5eb0f558df8ff3d592ff22b14238e0987240036c36230aef0f1833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk99rFDEQxxdRbK3-B6ILgujDnfm92RehXNvzoFCw6mvI7k7uUvaSM9kt-t-b7W3LrRSUPCSZfOabzGQmy15jNMe0wJ9ufB-cbuc772COMC8wZ0-yY1xSMhME0acH66PsRYw3CHEqhXieHZGCFLxg7Dirr3e6s7rNF94Zu-5D2nmXe5OfBd-vN11-ZmPXh0q7GnLtmvzCB4hdvtS7fBFgj-s6-Bjzc3drg3dbcF1SXAbd2LSML7NnRrcRXo3zSfb94vzb4svs8mq5WpxezuqC8G4mMeCCGWwqw6FChnPZGGkMbXhJjCGkwoxQCaiUBWEIUVFTQSjSYJDBktKT7O1ed9f6qMb8RIWLkknCOBqI1Z5ovL5Ru2C3OvxWXlt1Z_BhrXTobN2CqhsQUgpOaCVYBU2FAISoDNAKoCxw0vo83tZXW2jqFGnQ7UR0euLsRq39rWIyBSBYEvgwCgT_s085VVsba2hb7cD36d0SpUCF4PjfaFHygS0H1Xd_oY8nYqTWOsVqnfHpifUgqk4ZZ1wQyVCi5o9QaTSwtXWqO2OTfeLwceKQmA5-dWvdx6hW11__n736MWXfH7Ab0G23ib7th-KLU5DtwbuCDGAe_gMjNbTNfTbU0DZqbJvk9ubwLx-c7vuE_gE0MRKJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1794824503</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial Configuration of Drought Disturbance and Forest Gap Creation across Environmental Gradients</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Andrew, Margaret E ; Ruthrof, Katinka X ; Matusick, George ; Hardy, Giles E St J</creator><contributor>Zang, RunGuo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Andrew, Margaret E ; Ruthrof, Katinka X ; Matusick, George ; Hardy, Giles E St J ; Zang, RunGuo</creatorcontrib><description>Climate change is increasing the risk of drought to forested ecosystems. Although drought impacts are often anecdotally noted to occur in discrete patches of high canopy mortality, the landscape effects of drought disturbances have received virtually no study. This study characterized the landscape configuration of drought impact patches and investigated the relationships between patch characteristics, as indicators of drought impact intensity, and environmental gradients related to water availability to determine factors influencing drought vulnerability. Drought impact patches were delineated from aerial surveys following an extreme drought in 2011 in southwestern Australia, which led to patchy canopy dieback of the Northern Jarrah Forest, a Mediterranean forest ecosystem. On average, forest gaps produced by drought-induced dieback were moderate in size (6.6 ± 9.7 ha, max = 85.7 ha), compact in shape, and relatively isolated from each other at the scale of several kilometers. However, there was considerable spatial variation in the size, shape, and clustering of forest gaps. Drought impact patches were larger and more densely clustered in xeric areas, with significant relationships observed with topographic wetness index, meteorological variables, and stand height. Drought impact patch clustering was more strongly associated with the environmental factors assessed (R2 = 0.32) than was patch size (R2 = 0.21); variation in patch shape remained largely unexplained (R2 = 0.02). There is evidence that the xeric areas with more intense drought impacts are 'chronic disturbance patches' susceptible to recurrent drought disturbance. The spatial configuration of drought disturbances is likely to influence ecological processes including forest recovery and interacting disturbances such as fire. Regime shifts to an alternate, non-forested ecosystem may occur preferentially in areas with large or clustered drought impact patches. Improved understanding of drought impacts and their patterning in space and time will expand our knowledge of forest ecosystems and landscape processes, informing management of these dynamic systems in an uncertain future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157154</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27275744</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aerial surveys ; Australia ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Canopies ; Climate Change ; Clustering ; Configurations ; Dieback ; Disturbance ; Disturbances ; Drought ; Droughts ; Earth Sciences ; Ecological effects ; Ecological risk assessment ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Ecosystem management ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental changes ; Environmental factors ; Environmental gradient ; Environmental impact ; Extreme drought ; Extreme weather ; Forest ecology ; Forest ecosystems ; Forests ; Influence ; Life sciences ; Models, Biological ; Moisture content ; Patches (structures) ; Strategic management ; Surveys ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Water availability ; Wetness index ; Wilderness areas</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-06, Vol.11 (6), p.e0157154-e0157154</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Andrew et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Andrew et al 2016 Andrew et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-81e174f1fbf5eb0f558df8ff3d592ff22b14238e0987240036c36230aef0f1833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-81e174f1fbf5eb0f558df8ff3d592ff22b14238e0987240036c36230aef0f1833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1794824503/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1794824503?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27275744$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Zang, RunGuo</contributor><creatorcontrib>Andrew, Margaret E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruthrof, Katinka X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matusick, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Giles E St J</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial Configuration of Drought Disturbance and Forest Gap Creation across Environmental Gradients</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Climate change is increasing the risk of drought to forested ecosystems. Although drought impacts are often anecdotally noted to occur in discrete patches of high canopy mortality, the landscape effects of drought disturbances have received virtually no study. This study characterized the landscape configuration of drought impact patches and investigated the relationships between patch characteristics, as indicators of drought impact intensity, and environmental gradients related to water availability to determine factors influencing drought vulnerability. Drought impact patches were delineated from aerial surveys following an extreme drought in 2011 in southwestern Australia, which led to patchy canopy dieback of the Northern Jarrah Forest, a Mediterranean forest ecosystem. On average, forest gaps produced by drought-induced dieback were moderate in size (6.6 ± 9.7 ha, max = 85.7 ha), compact in shape, and relatively isolated from each other at the scale of several kilometers. However, there was considerable spatial variation in the size, shape, and clustering of forest gaps. Drought impact patches were larger and more densely clustered in xeric areas, with significant relationships observed with topographic wetness index, meteorological variables, and stand height. Drought impact patch clustering was more strongly associated with the environmental factors assessed (R2 = 0.32) than was patch size (R2 = 0.21); variation in patch shape remained largely unexplained (R2 = 0.02). There is evidence that the xeric areas with more intense drought impacts are 'chronic disturbance patches' susceptible to recurrent drought disturbance. The spatial configuration of drought disturbances is likely to influence ecological processes including forest recovery and interacting disturbances such as fire. Regime shifts to an alternate, non-forested ecosystem may occur preferentially in areas with large or clustered drought impact patches. Improved understanding of drought impacts and their patterning in space and time will expand our knowledge of forest ecosystems and landscape processes, informing management of these dynamic systems in an uncertain future.</description><subject>Aerial surveys</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Configurations</subject><subject>Dieback</subject><subject>Disturbance</subject><subject>Disturbances</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Droughts</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecological risk assessment</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystem management</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Environmental gradient</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Extreme drought</subject><subject>Extreme weather</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Life sciences</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Patches (structures)</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Water availability</subject><subject>Wetness index</subject><subject>Wilderness areas</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk99rFDEQxxdRbK3-B6ILgujDnfm92RehXNvzoFCw6mvI7k7uUvaSM9kt-t-b7W3LrRSUPCSZfOabzGQmy15jNMe0wJ9ufB-cbuc772COMC8wZ0-yY1xSMhME0acH66PsRYw3CHEqhXieHZGCFLxg7Dirr3e6s7rNF94Zu-5D2nmXe5OfBd-vN11-ZmPXh0q7GnLtmvzCB4hdvtS7fBFgj-s6-Bjzc3drg3dbcF1SXAbd2LSML7NnRrcRXo3zSfb94vzb4svs8mq5WpxezuqC8G4mMeCCGWwqw6FChnPZGGkMbXhJjCGkwoxQCaiUBWEIUVFTQSjSYJDBktKT7O1ed9f6qMb8RIWLkknCOBqI1Z5ovL5Ru2C3OvxWXlt1Z_BhrXTobN2CqhsQUgpOaCVYBU2FAISoDNAKoCxw0vo83tZXW2jqFGnQ7UR0euLsRq39rWIyBSBYEvgwCgT_s085VVsba2hb7cD36d0SpUCF4PjfaFHygS0H1Xd_oY8nYqTWOsVqnfHpifUgqk4ZZ1wQyVCi5o9QaTSwtXWqO2OTfeLwceKQmA5-dWvdx6hW11__n736MWXfH7Ab0G23ib7th-KLU5DtwbuCDGAe_gMjNbTNfTbU0DZqbJvk9ubwLx-c7vuE_gE0MRKJ</recordid><startdate>20160608</startdate><enddate>20160608</enddate><creator>Andrew, Margaret E</creator><creator>Ruthrof, Katinka X</creator><creator>Matusick, George</creator><creator>Hardy, Giles E St J</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160608</creationdate><title>Spatial Configuration of Drought Disturbance and Forest Gap Creation across Environmental Gradients</title><author>Andrew, Margaret E ; Ruthrof, Katinka X ; Matusick, George ; Hardy, Giles E St J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-81e174f1fbf5eb0f558df8ff3d592ff22b14238e0987240036c36230aef0f1833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aerial surveys</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Configurations</topic><topic>Dieback</topic><topic>Disturbance</topic><topic>Disturbances</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Droughts</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecological risk assessment</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystem management</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Environmental gradient</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Extreme drought</topic><topic>Extreme weather</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Life sciences</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Patches (structures)</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Water availability</topic><topic>Wetness index</topic><topic>Wilderness areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andrew, Margaret E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruthrof, Katinka X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matusick, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Giles E St J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale in Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andrew, Margaret E</au><au>Ruthrof, Katinka X</au><au>Matusick, George</au><au>Hardy, Giles E St J</au><au>Zang, RunGuo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial Configuration of Drought Disturbance and Forest Gap Creation across Environmental Gradients</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-06-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e0157154</spage><epage>e0157154</epage><pages>e0157154-e0157154</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Climate change is increasing the risk of drought to forested ecosystems. Although drought impacts are often anecdotally noted to occur in discrete patches of high canopy mortality, the landscape effects of drought disturbances have received virtually no study. This study characterized the landscape configuration of drought impact patches and investigated the relationships between patch characteristics, as indicators of drought impact intensity, and environmental gradients related to water availability to determine factors influencing drought vulnerability. Drought impact patches were delineated from aerial surveys following an extreme drought in 2011 in southwestern Australia, which led to patchy canopy dieback of the Northern Jarrah Forest, a Mediterranean forest ecosystem. On average, forest gaps produced by drought-induced dieback were moderate in size (6.6 ± 9.7 ha, max = 85.7 ha), compact in shape, and relatively isolated from each other at the scale of several kilometers. However, there was considerable spatial variation in the size, shape, and clustering of forest gaps. Drought impact patches were larger and more densely clustered in xeric areas, with significant relationships observed with topographic wetness index, meteorological variables, and stand height. Drought impact patch clustering was more strongly associated with the environmental factors assessed (R2 = 0.32) than was patch size (R2 = 0.21); variation in patch shape remained largely unexplained (R2 = 0.02). There is evidence that the xeric areas with more intense drought impacts are 'chronic disturbance patches' susceptible to recurrent drought disturbance. The spatial configuration of drought disturbances is likely to influence ecological processes including forest recovery and interacting disturbances such as fire. Regime shifts to an alternate, non-forested ecosystem may occur preferentially in areas with large or clustered drought impact patches. Improved understanding of drought impacts and their patterning in space and time will expand our knowledge of forest ecosystems and landscape processes, informing management of these dynamic systems in an uncertain future.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27275744</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0157154</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-06, Vol.11 (6), p.e0157154-e0157154 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1794824503 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central |
subjects | Aerial surveys Australia Biology and Life Sciences Canopies Climate Change Clustering Configurations Dieback Disturbance Disturbances Drought Droughts Earth Sciences Ecological effects Ecological risk assessment Ecology and Environmental Sciences Ecosystem management Environmental aspects Environmental changes Environmental factors Environmental gradient Environmental impact Extreme drought Extreme weather Forest ecology Forest ecosystems Forests Influence Life sciences Models, Biological Moisture content Patches (structures) Strategic management Surveys Terrestrial ecosystems Water availability Wetness index Wilderness areas |
title | Spatial Configuration of Drought Disturbance and Forest Gap Creation across Environmental Gradients |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T03%3A52%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20Configuration%20of%20Drought%20Disturbance%20and%20Forest%20Gap%20Creation%20across%20Environmental%20Gradients&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Andrew,%20Margaret%20E&rft.date=2016-06-08&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e0157154&rft.epage=e0157154&rft.pages=e0157154-e0157154&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0157154&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA454562840%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-81e174f1fbf5eb0f558df8ff3d592ff22b14238e0987240036c36230aef0f1833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1794824503&rft_id=info:pmid/27275744&rft_galeid=A454562840&rfr_iscdi=true |