The Effects of Instruction on the Frequency and Characteristics of Involuntary Autobiographical Memories

• Published in: PloS one 2016-06, Vol.11 (6), p.e0157121-e0157121
• Main Authors: Barzykowski, Krystian, Niedźwieńska, Agnieszka
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Amnesia; Autobiographies; Biology and Life Sciences; Care and treatment; Cognition & reasoning; Complications and side effects; Female; Humans; Laboratories; Linguistics; Male; Medicine and Health Sciences; Memory; Memory, Episodic; Mental Recall; Psychology; Psychology - methods; Recall; Research and Analysis Methods; Retrieval; Social Sciences; Studies; Surveys and Questionnaires; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157121

The present study investigated the effects of experimental instruction on the retrieval of involuntary autobiographical memories (IAMs). In previous studies of IAMs, participants were either instructed to record only memories (henceforth, the restricted group) or any thoughts (henceforth, the unrestricted group). However, it is unknown whether these two different types of instructions influence the retrieval of IAMs. The most recent study by Vannucci and her colleagues directly addressed this question and demonstrated that the frequency and phenomenological characteristics of IAMs strongly depended on the type of instruction received. The goal of the present study was to replicate these results while addressing some limitations of the Vannucci et al. study and to test three possible mechanisms proposed to explain the effect of instructions on the retrieval of IAMs. Our results accord well with the data presented by Vannucci et al. When participants were instructed to record only IAMs (the restricted group), they reported more memories and rated them as being retrieved in a more goal-oriented fashion. Their memories also were less clear, vivid, detailed and were less frequently accompanied by physiological reactions, compared to memories reported by the participants in the unrestricted group. In addition, the events to which the memories referred were rated as more unusual and personal by the restricted group. These results are consistent with the assumption that retrieval of IAMs depends on the type of instructions used in a study. In addition, our results suggest that one of the main mechanisms underlying the higher frequency of IAMs in the restricted group may be participants' ability to monitor the stream of consciousness and to extract autobiographical content from this flow. Further implications of the effect of instructions for IAMs research are discussed.