Loading…
HIV Screening Rates among Medicaid Enrollees Diagnosed with Other Sexually Transmitted Infections
Approximately 20 million new sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are diagnosed yearly in the United States costing the healthcare system an estimated $16 billion in direct medical expenses. The presence of other STIs increases the risk of HIV transmission. The Centers for Disease Control and Prev...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2016-08, Vol.11 (8), p.e0161560-e0161560 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-9c76c547b548bba695bdc88013f84c8c2e953e6dcf9ae5796cc64002e20235a03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-9c76c547b548bba695bdc88013f84c8c2e953e6dcf9ae5796cc64002e20235a03 |
container_end_page | e0161560 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | e0161560 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Adekeye, Oluwatoyosi A Abara, Winston E Xu, Junjun Lee, Joel M Rust, George Satcher, David |
description | Approximately 20 million new sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are diagnosed yearly in the United States costing the healthcare system an estimated $16 billion in direct medical expenses. The presence of other STIs increases the risk of HIV transmission. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has long recommended routine HIV screening for individuals with a diagnosed STI. Unfortunately, HIV screening prevalence among STI diagnosed patients are still sub-optimal in many healthcare settings.
To determine the proportion of STI-diagnosed persons in the Medicaid population who are screened for HIV, examine correlates of HIV screening, and to suggest critical intervention points to increase HIV screening in this population.
A retrospective database analysis was conducted to examine the prevalence and correlates of HIV screening among participants. Participant eligibility was restricted to Medicaid enrollees in 29 states with a primary STI diagnosis (chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis) or pelvic inflammatory disease claim in 2009. HIV-positive persons were excluded from the study. Frequencies and descriptive statistics were conducted to characterize the sample in general and by STI diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to estimate unadjusted odds ratios and adjusted odds ratio respectively and the 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate logistic regression models that included the independent variables (race, STI diagnosis, and healthcare setting) and covariates (gender, residential status, age, and state) were analyzed to examine independent associations with HIV screening.
About 43% of all STI-diagnosed study participants were screened for HIV. STI-diagnosed persons that were between 20-24 years, female, residing in a large metropolitan area and with a syphilis diagnosis were more likely to be screened for HIV. Participants who received their STI diagnosis in the emergency department were less likely to be screened for HIV than those diagnosed in a physician's office.
This study showed that HIV screening prevalence among persons diagnosed with an STI are lower than expected based on the CDC's recommendations. These suboptimal HIV screening prevalence present "missed opportunities" for HIV screening in at-risk populations. Measures and incentives to increase HIV screening among all STI-diagnosed persons are vital to the timely identification of HIV infection, linkage to HIV care, and mitigating further HIV tr |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0161560 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1813899315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A461496482</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c9845db82976449983d121637a468e4d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A461496482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-9c76c547b548bba695bdc88013f84c8c2e953e6dcf9ae5796cc64002e20235a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk01vEzEQhlcIREvgHyBYCQnBIWG9_lj7glSVQiMVRWpKr5bjnU1cOXawvdD-e5yPVgnqofLB1swzr8cznqJ4i6oRwg36cuP74JQdrbyDUYUYoqx6Vhwjgeshqyv8fO98VLyK8aaqKOaMvSyO6oZSJmp6XKjz8XU51QHAGTcvL1WCWKqlz-ef0BqtTFueueCthez4ZtTc-Qht-dekRTlJCwjlFG57Ze1deRWUi0uTUvaPXQc6Ge_i6-JFp2yEN7t9UPz6fnZ1ej68mPwYn55cDHVT0zQUumGakmZGCZ_NFBN01mrOK4Q7TjTXNQiKgbW6EwpoI5jWjFRVDXVVY6oqPCjeb3VX1ke5q06UiCPMhcCIZmK8JVqvbuQqmKUKd9IrIzcGH-ZShWS0BakFJ7Sd8Vo0jBAhOG5RjRhuFGEcSJu1vu5u62dLaDW4FJQ9ED30OLOQc_9HZjFGs9Kg-LQTCP53DzHJpYkarFUOfL_JWyBMm6Z5CkpYw3nOclB8-A99vBA7aq7yW43rfE5Rr0XlCWGICEZ4nanRI1ReLSyNzr-uM9l-EPD5ICAzCW7TXPUxyvH08uns5PqQ_bjHLkDZtIje9pvvdQiSLaiDjzFA99APVMn10NxXQ66HRu6GJoe92-_lQ9D9lOB_mrwQEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1813899315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HIV Screening Rates among Medicaid Enrollees Diagnosed with Other Sexually Transmitted Infections</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Adekeye, Oluwatoyosi A ; Abara, Winston E ; Xu, Junjun ; Lee, Joel M ; Rust, George ; Satcher, David</creator><contributor>Consolaro, Marcia Edilaine Lopes</contributor><creatorcontrib>Adekeye, Oluwatoyosi A ; Abara, Winston E ; Xu, Junjun ; Lee, Joel M ; Rust, George ; Satcher, David ; Consolaro, Marcia Edilaine Lopes</creatorcontrib><description>Approximately 20 million new sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are diagnosed yearly in the United States costing the healthcare system an estimated $16 billion in direct medical expenses. The presence of other STIs increases the risk of HIV transmission. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has long recommended routine HIV screening for individuals with a diagnosed STI. Unfortunately, HIV screening prevalence among STI diagnosed patients are still sub-optimal in many healthcare settings.
To determine the proportion of STI-diagnosed persons in the Medicaid population who are screened for HIV, examine correlates of HIV screening, and to suggest critical intervention points to increase HIV screening in this population.
A retrospective database analysis was conducted to examine the prevalence and correlates of HIV screening among participants. Participant eligibility was restricted to Medicaid enrollees in 29 states with a primary STI diagnosis (chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis) or pelvic inflammatory disease claim in 2009. HIV-positive persons were excluded from the study. Frequencies and descriptive statistics were conducted to characterize the sample in general and by STI diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to estimate unadjusted odds ratios and adjusted odds ratio respectively and the 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate logistic regression models that included the independent variables (race, STI diagnosis, and healthcare setting) and covariates (gender, residential status, age, and state) were analyzed to examine independent associations with HIV screening.
About 43% of all STI-diagnosed study participants were screened for HIV. STI-diagnosed persons that were between 20-24 years, female, residing in a large metropolitan area and with a syphilis diagnosis were more likely to be screened for HIV. Participants who received their STI diagnosis in the emergency department were less likely to be screened for HIV than those diagnosed in a physician's office.
This study showed that HIV screening prevalence among persons diagnosed with an STI are lower than expected based on the CDC's recommendations. These suboptimal HIV screening prevalence present "missed opportunities" for HIV screening in at-risk populations. Measures and incentives to increase HIV screening among all STI-diagnosed persons are vital to the timely identification of HIV infection, linkage to HIV care, and mitigating further HIV transmission.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161560</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27556925</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome ; Adolescent ; Adult ; AIDS ; Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Chlamydia ; Confidence intervals ; Costs ; Databases, Factual ; Diagnosis ; Disease control ; Disease transmission ; Economic aspects ; Emergency medical services ; Female ; Gonorrhea ; Government programs ; Health aspects ; Health care ; Health risks ; Health screening ; HIV ; HIV infections ; HIV Infections - diagnosis ; HIV Infections - epidemiology ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Humans ; Incentives ; Independent variables ; Infections ; Male ; Mass Screening ; Medicaid ; Medical diagnosis ; Medicine and health sciences ; Metropolitan areas ; Middle Aged ; Odds Ratio ; Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act 2010-US ; Pelvic inflammatory disease ; People and Places ; Prevalence ; Prevention ; Preventive medicine ; Public Health Surveillance ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Screening ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology ; Statistical analysis ; STD ; Syphilis ; Treponema pallidum ; United States - epidemiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-08, Vol.11 (8), p.e0161560-e0161560</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Adekeye et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Adekeye et al 2016 Adekeye et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-9c76c547b548bba695bdc88013f84c8c2e953e6dcf9ae5796cc64002e20235a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-9c76c547b548bba695bdc88013f84c8c2e953e6dcf9ae5796cc64002e20235a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1813899315/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1813899315?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27556925$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Consolaro, Marcia Edilaine Lopes</contributor><creatorcontrib>Adekeye, Oluwatoyosi A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abara, Winston E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Junjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rust, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satcher, David</creatorcontrib><title>HIV Screening Rates among Medicaid Enrollees Diagnosed with Other Sexually Transmitted Infections</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Approximately 20 million new sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are diagnosed yearly in the United States costing the healthcare system an estimated $16 billion in direct medical expenses. The presence of other STIs increases the risk of HIV transmission. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has long recommended routine HIV screening for individuals with a diagnosed STI. Unfortunately, HIV screening prevalence among STI diagnosed patients are still sub-optimal in many healthcare settings.
To determine the proportion of STI-diagnosed persons in the Medicaid population who are screened for HIV, examine correlates of HIV screening, and to suggest critical intervention points to increase HIV screening in this population.
A retrospective database analysis was conducted to examine the prevalence and correlates of HIV screening among participants. Participant eligibility was restricted to Medicaid enrollees in 29 states with a primary STI diagnosis (chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis) or pelvic inflammatory disease claim in 2009. HIV-positive persons were excluded from the study. Frequencies and descriptive statistics were conducted to characterize the sample in general and by STI diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to estimate unadjusted odds ratios and adjusted odds ratio respectively and the 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate logistic regression models that included the independent variables (race, STI diagnosis, and healthcare setting) and covariates (gender, residential status, age, and state) were analyzed to examine independent associations with HIV screening.
About 43% of all STI-diagnosed study participants were screened for HIV. STI-diagnosed persons that were between 20-24 years, female, residing in a large metropolitan area and with a syphilis diagnosis were more likely to be screened for HIV. Participants who received their STI diagnosis in the emergency department were less likely to be screened for HIV than those diagnosed in a physician's office.
This study showed that HIV screening prevalence among persons diagnosed with an STI are lower than expected based on the CDC's recommendations. These suboptimal HIV screening prevalence present "missed opportunities" for HIV screening in at-risk populations. Measures and incentives to increase HIV screening among all STI-diagnosed persons are vital to the timely identification of HIV infection, linkage to HIV care, and mitigating further HIV transmission.</description><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>AIDS</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chlamydia</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gonorrhea</subject><subject>Government programs</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Health screening</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>HIV infections</subject><subject>HIV Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>HIV Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Independent variables</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medicine and health sciences</subject><subject>Metropolitan areas</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act 2010-US</subject><subject>Pelvic inflammatory disease</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Public Health Surveillance</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>Syphilis</subject><subject>Treponema pallidum</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk01vEzEQhlcIREvgHyBYCQnBIWG9_lj7glSVQiMVRWpKr5bjnU1cOXawvdD-e5yPVgnqofLB1swzr8cznqJ4i6oRwg36cuP74JQdrbyDUYUYoqx6Vhwjgeshqyv8fO98VLyK8aaqKOaMvSyO6oZSJmp6XKjz8XU51QHAGTcvL1WCWKqlz-ef0BqtTFueueCthez4ZtTc-Qht-dekRTlJCwjlFG57Ze1deRWUi0uTUvaPXQc6Ge_i6-JFp2yEN7t9UPz6fnZ1ej68mPwYn55cDHVT0zQUumGakmZGCZ_NFBN01mrOK4Q7TjTXNQiKgbW6EwpoI5jWjFRVDXVVY6oqPCjeb3VX1ke5q06UiCPMhcCIZmK8JVqvbuQqmKUKd9IrIzcGH-ZShWS0BakFJ7Sd8Vo0jBAhOG5RjRhuFGEcSJu1vu5u62dLaDW4FJQ9ED30OLOQc_9HZjFGs9Kg-LQTCP53DzHJpYkarFUOfL_JWyBMm6Z5CkpYw3nOclB8-A99vBA7aq7yW43rfE5Rr0XlCWGICEZ4nanRI1ReLSyNzr-uM9l-EPD5ICAzCW7TXPUxyvH08uns5PqQ_bjHLkDZtIje9pvvdQiSLaiDjzFA99APVMn10NxXQ66HRu6GJoe92-_lQ9D9lOB_mrwQEg</recordid><startdate>20160824</startdate><enddate>20160824</enddate><creator>Adekeye, Oluwatoyosi A</creator><creator>Abara, Winston E</creator><creator>Xu, Junjun</creator><creator>Lee, Joel M</creator><creator>Rust, George</creator><creator>Satcher, David</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160824</creationdate><title>HIV Screening Rates among Medicaid Enrollees Diagnosed with Other Sexually Transmitted Infections</title><author>Adekeye, Oluwatoyosi A ; Abara, Winston E ; Xu, Junjun ; Lee, Joel M ; Rust, George ; Satcher, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-9c76c547b548bba695bdc88013f84c8c2e953e6dcf9ae5796cc64002e20235a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>AIDS</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chlamydia</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gonorrhea</topic><topic>Government programs</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Health screening</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>HIV infections</topic><topic>HIV Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>HIV Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Independent variables</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medicine and health sciences</topic><topic>Metropolitan areas</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act 2010-US</topic><topic>Pelvic inflammatory disease</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Public Health Surveillance</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>Syphilis</topic><topic>Treponema pallidum</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adekeye, Oluwatoyosi A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abara, Winston E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Junjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rust, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satcher, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adekeye, Oluwatoyosi A</au><au>Abara, Winston E</au><au>Xu, Junjun</au><au>Lee, Joel M</au><au>Rust, George</au><au>Satcher, David</au><au>Consolaro, Marcia Edilaine Lopes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HIV Screening Rates among Medicaid Enrollees Diagnosed with Other Sexually Transmitted Infections</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-08-24</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0161560</spage><epage>e0161560</epage><pages>e0161560-e0161560</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Approximately 20 million new sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are diagnosed yearly in the United States costing the healthcare system an estimated $16 billion in direct medical expenses. The presence of other STIs increases the risk of HIV transmission. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has long recommended routine HIV screening for individuals with a diagnosed STI. Unfortunately, HIV screening prevalence among STI diagnosed patients are still sub-optimal in many healthcare settings.
To determine the proportion of STI-diagnosed persons in the Medicaid population who are screened for HIV, examine correlates of HIV screening, and to suggest critical intervention points to increase HIV screening in this population.
A retrospective database analysis was conducted to examine the prevalence and correlates of HIV screening among participants. Participant eligibility was restricted to Medicaid enrollees in 29 states with a primary STI diagnosis (chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis) or pelvic inflammatory disease claim in 2009. HIV-positive persons were excluded from the study. Frequencies and descriptive statistics were conducted to characterize the sample in general and by STI diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to estimate unadjusted odds ratios and adjusted odds ratio respectively and the 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate logistic regression models that included the independent variables (race, STI diagnosis, and healthcare setting) and covariates (gender, residential status, age, and state) were analyzed to examine independent associations with HIV screening.
About 43% of all STI-diagnosed study participants were screened for HIV. STI-diagnosed persons that were between 20-24 years, female, residing in a large metropolitan area and with a syphilis diagnosis were more likely to be screened for HIV. Participants who received their STI diagnosis in the emergency department were less likely to be screened for HIV than those diagnosed in a physician's office.
This study showed that HIV screening prevalence among persons diagnosed with an STI are lower than expected based on the CDC's recommendations. These suboptimal HIV screening prevalence present "missed opportunities" for HIV screening in at-risk populations. Measures and incentives to increase HIV screening among all STI-diagnosed persons are vital to the timely identification of HIV infection, linkage to HIV care, and mitigating further HIV transmission.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27556925</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0161560</doi><tpages>e0161560</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-08, Vol.11 (8), p.e0161560-e0161560 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1813899315 |
source | ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Acquired immune deficiency syndrome Adolescent Adult AIDS Analysis Biology and Life Sciences Chlamydia Confidence intervals Costs Databases, Factual Diagnosis Disease control Disease transmission Economic aspects Emergency medical services Female Gonorrhea Government programs Health aspects Health care Health risks Health screening HIV HIV infections HIV Infections - diagnosis HIV Infections - epidemiology Human immunodeficiency virus Humans Incentives Independent variables Infections Male Mass Screening Medicaid Medical diagnosis Medicine and health sciences Metropolitan areas Middle Aged Odds Ratio Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act 2010-US Pelvic inflammatory disease People and Places Prevalence Prevention Preventive medicine Public Health Surveillance Regression analysis Regression models Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Screening Sexually transmitted diseases Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology Statistical analysis STD Syphilis Treponema pallidum United States - epidemiology Young Adult |
title | HIV Screening Rates among Medicaid Enrollees Diagnosed with Other Sexually Transmitted Infections |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A34%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HIV%20Screening%20Rates%20among%20Medicaid%20Enrollees%20Diagnosed%20with%20Other%20Sexually%20Transmitted%20Infections&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Adekeye,%20Oluwatoyosi%20A&rft.date=2016-08-24&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0161560&rft.epage=e0161560&rft.pages=e0161560-e0161560&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0161560&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA461496482%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-9c76c547b548bba695bdc88013f84c8c2e953e6dcf9ae5796cc64002e20235a03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1813899315&rft_id=info:pmid/27556925&rft_galeid=A461496482&rfr_iscdi=true |