Loading…

HIV Screening Rates among Medicaid Enrollees Diagnosed with Other Sexually Transmitted Infections

Approximately 20 million new sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are diagnosed yearly in the United States costing the healthcare system an estimated $16 billion in direct medical expenses. The presence of other STIs increases the risk of HIV transmission. The Centers for Disease Control and Prev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2016-08, Vol.11 (8), p.e0161560-e0161560
Main Authors: Adekeye, Oluwatoyosi A, Abara, Winston E, Xu, Junjun, Lee, Joel M, Rust, George, Satcher, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-9c76c547b548bba695bdc88013f84c8c2e953e6dcf9ae5796cc64002e20235a03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-9c76c547b548bba695bdc88013f84c8c2e953e6dcf9ae5796cc64002e20235a03
container_end_page e0161560
container_issue 8
container_start_page e0161560
container_title PloS one
container_volume 11
creator Adekeye, Oluwatoyosi A
Abara, Winston E
Xu, Junjun
Lee, Joel M
Rust, George
Satcher, David
description Approximately 20 million new sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are diagnosed yearly in the United States costing the healthcare system an estimated $16 billion in direct medical expenses. The presence of other STIs increases the risk of HIV transmission. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has long recommended routine HIV screening for individuals with a diagnosed STI. Unfortunately, HIV screening prevalence among STI diagnosed patients are still sub-optimal in many healthcare settings. To determine the proportion of STI-diagnosed persons in the Medicaid population who are screened for HIV, examine correlates of HIV screening, and to suggest critical intervention points to increase HIV screening in this population. A retrospective database analysis was conducted to examine the prevalence and correlates of HIV screening among participants. Participant eligibility was restricted to Medicaid enrollees in 29 states with a primary STI diagnosis (chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis) or pelvic inflammatory disease claim in 2009. HIV-positive persons were excluded from the study. Frequencies and descriptive statistics were conducted to characterize the sample in general and by STI diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to estimate unadjusted odds ratios and adjusted odds ratio respectively and the 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate logistic regression models that included the independent variables (race, STI diagnosis, and healthcare setting) and covariates (gender, residential status, age, and state) were analyzed to examine independent associations with HIV screening. About 43% of all STI-diagnosed study participants were screened for HIV. STI-diagnosed persons that were between 20-24 years, female, residing in a large metropolitan area and with a syphilis diagnosis were more likely to be screened for HIV. Participants who received their STI diagnosis in the emergency department were less likely to be screened for HIV than those diagnosed in a physician's office. This study showed that HIV screening prevalence among persons diagnosed with an STI are lower than expected based on the CDC's recommendations. These suboptimal HIV screening prevalence present "missed opportunities" for HIV screening in at-risk populations. Measures and incentives to increase HIV screening among all STI-diagnosed persons are vital to the timely identification of HIV infection, linkage to HIV care, and mitigating further HIV tr
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0161560
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1813899315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A461496482</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c9845db82976449983d121637a468e4d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A461496482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-9c76c547b548bba695bdc88013f84c8c2e953e6dcf9ae5796cc64002e20235a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk01vEzEQhlcIREvgHyBYCQnBIWG9_lj7glSVQiMVRWpKr5bjnU1cOXawvdD-e5yPVgnqofLB1swzr8cznqJ4i6oRwg36cuP74JQdrbyDUYUYoqx6Vhwjgeshqyv8fO98VLyK8aaqKOaMvSyO6oZSJmp6XKjz8XU51QHAGTcvL1WCWKqlz-ef0BqtTFueueCthez4ZtTc-Qht-dekRTlJCwjlFG57Ze1deRWUi0uTUvaPXQc6Ge_i6-JFp2yEN7t9UPz6fnZ1ej68mPwYn55cDHVT0zQUumGakmZGCZ_NFBN01mrOK4Q7TjTXNQiKgbW6EwpoI5jWjFRVDXVVY6oqPCjeb3VX1ke5q06UiCPMhcCIZmK8JVqvbuQqmKUKd9IrIzcGH-ZShWS0BakFJ7Sd8Vo0jBAhOG5RjRhuFGEcSJu1vu5u62dLaDW4FJQ9ED30OLOQc_9HZjFGs9Kg-LQTCP53DzHJpYkarFUOfL_JWyBMm6Z5CkpYw3nOclB8-A99vBA7aq7yW43rfE5Rr0XlCWGICEZ4nanRI1ReLSyNzr-uM9l-EPD5ICAzCW7TXPUxyvH08uns5PqQ_bjHLkDZtIje9pvvdQiSLaiDjzFA99APVMn10NxXQ66HRu6GJoe92-_lQ9D9lOB_mrwQEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1813899315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HIV Screening Rates among Medicaid Enrollees Diagnosed with Other Sexually Transmitted Infections</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Adekeye, Oluwatoyosi A ; Abara, Winston E ; Xu, Junjun ; Lee, Joel M ; Rust, George ; Satcher, David</creator><contributor>Consolaro, Marcia Edilaine Lopes</contributor><creatorcontrib>Adekeye, Oluwatoyosi A ; Abara, Winston E ; Xu, Junjun ; Lee, Joel M ; Rust, George ; Satcher, David ; Consolaro, Marcia Edilaine Lopes</creatorcontrib><description>Approximately 20 million new sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are diagnosed yearly in the United States costing the healthcare system an estimated $16 billion in direct medical expenses. The presence of other STIs increases the risk of HIV transmission. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has long recommended routine HIV screening for individuals with a diagnosed STI. Unfortunately, HIV screening prevalence among STI diagnosed patients are still sub-optimal in many healthcare settings. To determine the proportion of STI-diagnosed persons in the Medicaid population who are screened for HIV, examine correlates of HIV screening, and to suggest critical intervention points to increase HIV screening in this population. A retrospective database analysis was conducted to examine the prevalence and correlates of HIV screening among participants. Participant eligibility was restricted to Medicaid enrollees in 29 states with a primary STI diagnosis (chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis) or pelvic inflammatory disease claim in 2009. HIV-positive persons were excluded from the study. Frequencies and descriptive statistics were conducted to characterize the sample in general and by STI diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to estimate unadjusted odds ratios and adjusted odds ratio respectively and the 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate logistic regression models that included the independent variables (race, STI diagnosis, and healthcare setting) and covariates (gender, residential status, age, and state) were analyzed to examine independent associations with HIV screening. About 43% of all STI-diagnosed study participants were screened for HIV. STI-diagnosed persons that were between 20-24 years, female, residing in a large metropolitan area and with a syphilis diagnosis were more likely to be screened for HIV. Participants who received their STI diagnosis in the emergency department were less likely to be screened for HIV than those diagnosed in a physician's office. This study showed that HIV screening prevalence among persons diagnosed with an STI are lower than expected based on the CDC's recommendations. These suboptimal HIV screening prevalence present "missed opportunities" for HIV screening in at-risk populations. Measures and incentives to increase HIV screening among all STI-diagnosed persons are vital to the timely identification of HIV infection, linkage to HIV care, and mitigating further HIV transmission.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161560</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27556925</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome ; Adolescent ; Adult ; AIDS ; Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Chlamydia ; Confidence intervals ; Costs ; Databases, Factual ; Diagnosis ; Disease control ; Disease transmission ; Economic aspects ; Emergency medical services ; Female ; Gonorrhea ; Government programs ; Health aspects ; Health care ; Health risks ; Health screening ; HIV ; HIV infections ; HIV Infections - diagnosis ; HIV Infections - epidemiology ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Humans ; Incentives ; Independent variables ; Infections ; Male ; Mass Screening ; Medicaid ; Medical diagnosis ; Medicine and health sciences ; Metropolitan areas ; Middle Aged ; Odds Ratio ; Patient Protection &amp; Affordable Care Act 2010-US ; Pelvic inflammatory disease ; People and Places ; Prevalence ; Prevention ; Preventive medicine ; Public Health Surveillance ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Screening ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology ; Statistical analysis ; STD ; Syphilis ; Treponema pallidum ; United States - epidemiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-08, Vol.11 (8), p.e0161560-e0161560</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Adekeye et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Adekeye et al 2016 Adekeye et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-9c76c547b548bba695bdc88013f84c8c2e953e6dcf9ae5796cc64002e20235a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-9c76c547b548bba695bdc88013f84c8c2e953e6dcf9ae5796cc64002e20235a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1813899315/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1813899315?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27556925$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Consolaro, Marcia Edilaine Lopes</contributor><creatorcontrib>Adekeye, Oluwatoyosi A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abara, Winston E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Junjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rust, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satcher, David</creatorcontrib><title>HIV Screening Rates among Medicaid Enrollees Diagnosed with Other Sexually Transmitted Infections</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Approximately 20 million new sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are diagnosed yearly in the United States costing the healthcare system an estimated $16 billion in direct medical expenses. The presence of other STIs increases the risk of HIV transmission. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has long recommended routine HIV screening for individuals with a diagnosed STI. Unfortunately, HIV screening prevalence among STI diagnosed patients are still sub-optimal in many healthcare settings. To determine the proportion of STI-diagnosed persons in the Medicaid population who are screened for HIV, examine correlates of HIV screening, and to suggest critical intervention points to increase HIV screening in this population. A retrospective database analysis was conducted to examine the prevalence and correlates of HIV screening among participants. Participant eligibility was restricted to Medicaid enrollees in 29 states with a primary STI diagnosis (chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis) or pelvic inflammatory disease claim in 2009. HIV-positive persons were excluded from the study. Frequencies and descriptive statistics were conducted to characterize the sample in general and by STI diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to estimate unadjusted odds ratios and adjusted odds ratio respectively and the 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate logistic regression models that included the independent variables (race, STI diagnosis, and healthcare setting) and covariates (gender, residential status, age, and state) were analyzed to examine independent associations with HIV screening. About 43% of all STI-diagnosed study participants were screened for HIV. STI-diagnosed persons that were between 20-24 years, female, residing in a large metropolitan area and with a syphilis diagnosis were more likely to be screened for HIV. Participants who received their STI diagnosis in the emergency department were less likely to be screened for HIV than those diagnosed in a physician's office. This study showed that HIV screening prevalence among persons diagnosed with an STI are lower than expected based on the CDC's recommendations. These suboptimal HIV screening prevalence present "missed opportunities" for HIV screening in at-risk populations. Measures and incentives to increase HIV screening among all STI-diagnosed persons are vital to the timely identification of HIV infection, linkage to HIV care, and mitigating further HIV transmission.</description><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>AIDS</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chlamydia</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gonorrhea</subject><subject>Government programs</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Health screening</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>HIV infections</subject><subject>HIV Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>HIV Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Independent variables</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medicine and health sciences</subject><subject>Metropolitan areas</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Patient Protection &amp; Affordable Care Act 2010-US</subject><subject>Pelvic inflammatory disease</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Public Health Surveillance</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>Syphilis</subject><subject>Treponema pallidum</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk01vEzEQhlcIREvgHyBYCQnBIWG9_lj7glSVQiMVRWpKr5bjnU1cOXawvdD-e5yPVgnqofLB1swzr8cznqJ4i6oRwg36cuP74JQdrbyDUYUYoqx6Vhwjgeshqyv8fO98VLyK8aaqKOaMvSyO6oZSJmp6XKjz8XU51QHAGTcvL1WCWKqlz-ef0BqtTFueueCthez4ZtTc-Qht-dekRTlJCwjlFG57Ze1deRWUi0uTUvaPXQc6Ge_i6-JFp2yEN7t9UPz6fnZ1ej68mPwYn55cDHVT0zQUumGakmZGCZ_NFBN01mrOK4Q7TjTXNQiKgbW6EwpoI5jWjFRVDXVVY6oqPCjeb3VX1ke5q06UiCPMhcCIZmK8JVqvbuQqmKUKd9IrIzcGH-ZShWS0BakFJ7Sd8Vo0jBAhOG5RjRhuFGEcSJu1vu5u62dLaDW4FJQ9ED30OLOQc_9HZjFGs9Kg-LQTCP53DzHJpYkarFUOfL_JWyBMm6Z5CkpYw3nOclB8-A99vBA7aq7yW43rfE5Rr0XlCWGICEZ4nanRI1ReLSyNzr-uM9l-EPD5ICAzCW7TXPUxyvH08uns5PqQ_bjHLkDZtIje9pvvdQiSLaiDjzFA99APVMn10NxXQ66HRu6GJoe92-_lQ9D9lOB_mrwQEg</recordid><startdate>20160824</startdate><enddate>20160824</enddate><creator>Adekeye, Oluwatoyosi A</creator><creator>Abara, Winston E</creator><creator>Xu, Junjun</creator><creator>Lee, Joel M</creator><creator>Rust, George</creator><creator>Satcher, David</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160824</creationdate><title>HIV Screening Rates among Medicaid Enrollees Diagnosed with Other Sexually Transmitted Infections</title><author>Adekeye, Oluwatoyosi A ; Abara, Winston E ; Xu, Junjun ; Lee, Joel M ; Rust, George ; Satcher, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-9c76c547b548bba695bdc88013f84c8c2e953e6dcf9ae5796cc64002e20235a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>AIDS</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chlamydia</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gonorrhea</topic><topic>Government programs</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Health screening</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>HIV infections</topic><topic>HIV Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>HIV Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Independent variables</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medicine and health sciences</topic><topic>Metropolitan areas</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Patient Protection &amp; Affordable Care Act 2010-US</topic><topic>Pelvic inflammatory disease</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Public Health Surveillance</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>Syphilis</topic><topic>Treponema pallidum</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adekeye, Oluwatoyosi A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abara, Winston E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Junjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rust, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satcher, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adekeye, Oluwatoyosi A</au><au>Abara, Winston E</au><au>Xu, Junjun</au><au>Lee, Joel M</au><au>Rust, George</au><au>Satcher, David</au><au>Consolaro, Marcia Edilaine Lopes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HIV Screening Rates among Medicaid Enrollees Diagnosed with Other Sexually Transmitted Infections</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-08-24</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0161560</spage><epage>e0161560</epage><pages>e0161560-e0161560</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Approximately 20 million new sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are diagnosed yearly in the United States costing the healthcare system an estimated $16 billion in direct medical expenses. The presence of other STIs increases the risk of HIV transmission. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has long recommended routine HIV screening for individuals with a diagnosed STI. Unfortunately, HIV screening prevalence among STI diagnosed patients are still sub-optimal in many healthcare settings. To determine the proportion of STI-diagnosed persons in the Medicaid population who are screened for HIV, examine correlates of HIV screening, and to suggest critical intervention points to increase HIV screening in this population. A retrospective database analysis was conducted to examine the prevalence and correlates of HIV screening among participants. Participant eligibility was restricted to Medicaid enrollees in 29 states with a primary STI diagnosis (chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis) or pelvic inflammatory disease claim in 2009. HIV-positive persons were excluded from the study. Frequencies and descriptive statistics were conducted to characterize the sample in general and by STI diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to estimate unadjusted odds ratios and adjusted odds ratio respectively and the 95% confidence intervals. Multivariate logistic regression models that included the independent variables (race, STI diagnosis, and healthcare setting) and covariates (gender, residential status, age, and state) were analyzed to examine independent associations with HIV screening. About 43% of all STI-diagnosed study participants were screened for HIV. STI-diagnosed persons that were between 20-24 years, female, residing in a large metropolitan area and with a syphilis diagnosis were more likely to be screened for HIV. Participants who received their STI diagnosis in the emergency department were less likely to be screened for HIV than those diagnosed in a physician's office. This study showed that HIV screening prevalence among persons diagnosed with an STI are lower than expected based on the CDC's recommendations. These suboptimal HIV screening prevalence present "missed opportunities" for HIV screening in at-risk populations. Measures and incentives to increase HIV screening among all STI-diagnosed persons are vital to the timely identification of HIV infection, linkage to HIV care, and mitigating further HIV transmission.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27556925</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0161560</doi><tpages>e0161560</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2016-08, Vol.11 (8), p.e0161560-e0161560
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1813899315
source ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Acquired immune deficiency syndrome
Adolescent
Adult
AIDS
Analysis
Biology and Life Sciences
Chlamydia
Confidence intervals
Costs
Databases, Factual
Diagnosis
Disease control
Disease transmission
Economic aspects
Emergency medical services
Female
Gonorrhea
Government programs
Health aspects
Health care
Health risks
Health screening
HIV
HIV infections
HIV Infections - diagnosis
HIV Infections - epidemiology
Human immunodeficiency virus
Humans
Incentives
Independent variables
Infections
Male
Mass Screening
Medicaid
Medical diagnosis
Medicine and health sciences
Metropolitan areas
Middle Aged
Odds Ratio
Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act 2010-US
Pelvic inflammatory disease
People and Places
Prevalence
Prevention
Preventive medicine
Public Health Surveillance
Regression analysis
Regression models
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Screening
Sexually transmitted diseases
Sexually Transmitted Diseases - diagnosis
Sexually Transmitted Diseases - epidemiology
Statistical analysis
STD
Syphilis
Treponema pallidum
United States - epidemiology
Young Adult
title HIV Screening Rates among Medicaid Enrollees Diagnosed with Other Sexually Transmitted Infections
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A34%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HIV%20Screening%20Rates%20among%20Medicaid%20Enrollees%20Diagnosed%20with%20Other%20Sexually%20Transmitted%20Infections&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Adekeye,%20Oluwatoyosi%20A&rft.date=2016-08-24&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0161560&rft.epage=e0161560&rft.pages=e0161560-e0161560&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0161560&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA461496482%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-9c76c547b548bba695bdc88013f84c8c2e953e6dcf9ae5796cc64002e20235a03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1813899315&rft_id=info:pmid/27556925&rft_galeid=A461496482&rfr_iscdi=true