Digitized Spiral Drawing: A Possible Biomarker for Early Parkinson's Disease

• Published in: PloS one 2016-10, Vol.11 (10), p.e0162799
• Main Authors: San Luciano, Marta, Wang, Cuiling, Ortega, Roberto A, Yu, Qiping, Boschung, Sarah, Soto-Valencia, Jeannie, Bressman, Susan B, Lipton, Richard B, Pullman, Seth, Saunders-Pullman, Rachel
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abnormalities; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Area Under Curve; Biology and Life Sciences; Biomarkers; Biomarkers - analysis; Case-Control Studies; Change detection; Comparative analysis; Correlation analysis; Digitization; Digitizing; Digitizing tablets; Discriminant Analysis; Family medical history; Female; Handedness; Handwriting; Humans; Male; Medical schools; Medicine; Medicine and Health Sciences; Middle Aged; Motor task performance; Movement disorders; Neurodegenerative diseases; Neurology; Parkinson Disease - diagnosis; Parkinson's disease; Physical Sciences; ROC Curve; Smoothness; Spirals; Studies; Tightness
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162799

Pre-clinical markers of Parkinson's Disease (PD) are needed, and to be relevant in pre-clinical disease, they should be quantifiably abnormal in early disease as well. Handwriting is impaired early in PD and can be evaluated using computerized analysis of drawn spirals, capturing kinematic, dynamic, and spatial abnormalities and calculating indices that quantify motor performance and disability. Digitized spiral drawing correlates with motor scores and may be more sensitive in detecting early changes than subjective ratings. However, whether changes in spiral drawing are abnormal compared with controls and whether changes are detected in early PD are unknown. 138 PD subjects (50 with early PD) and 150 controls drew spirals on a digitizing tablet, generating x, y, z (pressure) data-coordinates and time. Derived indices corresponded to overall spiral execution (severity), shape and kinematic irregularity (second order smoothness, first order zero-crossing), tightness, mean speed and variability of spiral width. Linear mixed effect adjusted models comparing these indices and cross-validation were performed. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was applied to examine discriminative validity of combined indices. All indices were significantly different between PD cases and controls, except for zero-crossing. A model using all indices had high discriminative validity (sensitivity = 0.86, specificity = 0.81). Discriminative validity was maintained in patients with early PD. Spiral analysis accurately discriminates subjects with PD and early PD from controls supporting a role as a promising quantitative biomarker. Further assessment is needed to determine whether spiral changes are PD specific compared with other disorders and if present in pre-clinical PD.