Loading…
Patient Satisfaction with Hospital Inpatient Care: Effects of Trust, Medical Insurance and Perceived Quality of Care
Deteriorations in the patient-provider relationship in China have attracted increasing attention in the international community. This study aims to explore the role of trust in patient satisfaction with hospital inpatient care, and how patient-provider trust is shaped from the perspectives of both p...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2016-10, Vol.11 (10), p.e0164366 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-2a2e278b9605d7db116b2a4c19f2c94049f1562fd41aa6fa324f20f8cc9a9de03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-2a2e278b9605d7db116b2a4c19f2c94049f1562fd41aa6fa324f20f8cc9a9de03 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e0164366 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Shan, Linghan Li, Ye Ding, Ding Wu, Qunhong Liu, Chaojie Jiao, Mingli Hao, Yanhua Han, Yuzhen Gao, Lijun Hao, Jiejing Wang, Lan Xu, Weilan Ren, Jiaojiao |
description | Deteriorations in the patient-provider relationship in China have attracted increasing attention in the international community. This study aims to explore the role of trust in patient satisfaction with hospital inpatient care, and how patient-provider trust is shaped from the perspectives of both patients and providers.
We adopted a mixed methods approach comprising a multivariate logistic regression model using secondary data (1200 people with inpatient experiences over the past year) from the fifth National Health Service Survey (NHSS, 2013) in Heilongjiang Province to determine the associations between patient satisfaction and trust, financial burden and perceived quality of care, followed by in-depth interviews with 62 conveniently selected key informants (27 from health and 35 from non-health sectors). A thematic analysis established a conceptual framework to explain deteriorating patient-provider relationships.
About 24% of respondents reported being dissatisfied with hospital inpatient care. The logistic regression model indicated that patient satisfaction was positively associated with higher level of trust (OR = 14.995), lower levels of hospital medical expenditure (OR = 5.736-1.829 as compared with the highest quintile of hospital expenditure), good staff attitude (OR = 3.155) as well as good ward environment (OR = 2.361). But patient satisfaction was negatively associated with medical insurance for urban residents and other insurance status (OR = 0.215-0.357 as compared with medical insurance for urban employees). The qualitative analysis showed that patient trust-the most significant predictor of patient satisfaction-is shaped by perceived high quality of service delivery, empathic and caring interpersonal interactions, and a better designed medical insurance that provides stronger financial protection and enables more equitable access to health care.
At the core of high levels of patient dissatisfaction with hospital care is the lack of trust. The current health care system reform in China has yet to address the fundamental problems embedded in the system that caused distrust. A singular focus on doctor-patient inter-personal interactions will not offer a successful solution to the deteriorated patient-provider relationships unless a systems approach to accountability is put into place involving all stakeholders. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0164366 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1830058360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A471884639</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c87d594242a34151b56faedffe5ccd2f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A471884639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-2a2e278b9605d7db116b2a4c19f2c94049f1562fd41aa6fa324f20f8cc9a9de03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkIg0RJ_xHG4QJqqwSoNbbDBrXXqj9ZVGhfbGezf47TZ1KJdLLmw5Tzv65PXPln2EhVjRCr0cek630IzXrtWjwvEKGHsUXaIaoJHDBfk8c78IHsWwrIoSsIZe5od4Koq08MPs3gB0eo25pdpDAZktK7N_9i4yE9dWNsITT5t1wM0Aa8_5SfGaBlD7kx-5bsQP-TftLJyQ4bOQyt1Dq3KL7SX2l5rlX_voLHxplf0Fs-zJwaaoF8M41H288vJ1eR0dHb-dTo5PhvJCpdxhAFrXPFZzYpSVWqGEJthoBLVBsuaFrQ2qGTYKIoAmAGCqcGF4VLWUCtdkKPs9dZ33bgghsCCQJykKDhhPTHdEsrBUqy9XYG_EQ6s2Cw4Pxfgo5WNFpJXqqwpphgIRSWalWlLrVIWpZQKm-T1editm620kikwD82e6f6X1i7E3F2LsmC8onUyeDcYePe70yGKlQ1SNw202nWbuiuSqubsIWhJKcecJPTNf-j9QQzUHNK_2ta4VKLsTcUxrRDnlJG-wvE9VHqVXlmZLqKxaX1P8H5PkJio_8Y5dCGI6eWPh7Pnv_bZtzvsQkMTF8E1XX97wz5It6D0LgSvzd15oEL0fXSbhuj7SAx9lGSvds_yTnTbOOQft50YGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1830058360</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient Satisfaction with Hospital Inpatient Care: Effects of Trust, Medical Insurance and Perceived Quality of Care</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central (PMC)</source><creator>Shan, Linghan ; Li, Ye ; Ding, Ding ; Wu, Qunhong ; Liu, Chaojie ; Jiao, Mingli ; Hao, Yanhua ; Han, Yuzhen ; Gao, Lijun ; Hao, Jiejing ; Wang, Lan ; Xu, Weilan ; Ren, Jiaojiao</creator><contributor>Zhang, Harry</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shan, Linghan ; Li, Ye ; Ding, Ding ; Wu, Qunhong ; Liu, Chaojie ; Jiao, Mingli ; Hao, Yanhua ; Han, Yuzhen ; Gao, Lijun ; Hao, Jiejing ; Wang, Lan ; Xu, Weilan ; Ren, Jiaojiao ; Zhang, Harry</creatorcontrib><description>Deteriorations in the patient-provider relationship in China have attracted increasing attention in the international community. This study aims to explore the role of trust in patient satisfaction with hospital inpatient care, and how patient-provider trust is shaped from the perspectives of both patients and providers.
We adopted a mixed methods approach comprising a multivariate logistic regression model using secondary data (1200 people with inpatient experiences over the past year) from the fifth National Health Service Survey (NHSS, 2013) in Heilongjiang Province to determine the associations between patient satisfaction and trust, financial burden and perceived quality of care, followed by in-depth interviews with 62 conveniently selected key informants (27 from health and 35 from non-health sectors). A thematic analysis established a conceptual framework to explain deteriorating patient-provider relationships.
About 24% of respondents reported being dissatisfied with hospital inpatient care. The logistic regression model indicated that patient satisfaction was positively associated with higher level of trust (OR = 14.995), lower levels of hospital medical expenditure (OR = 5.736-1.829 as compared with the highest quintile of hospital expenditure), good staff attitude (OR = 3.155) as well as good ward environment (OR = 2.361). But patient satisfaction was negatively associated with medical insurance for urban residents and other insurance status (OR = 0.215-0.357 as compared with medical insurance for urban employees). The qualitative analysis showed that patient trust-the most significant predictor of patient satisfaction-is shaped by perceived high quality of service delivery, empathic and caring interpersonal interactions, and a better designed medical insurance that provides stronger financial protection and enables more equitable access to health care.
At the core of high levels of patient dissatisfaction with hospital care is the lack of trust. The current health care system reform in China has yet to address the fundamental problems embedded in the system that caused distrust. A singular focus on doctor-patient inter-personal interactions will not offer a successful solution to the deteriorated patient-provider relationships unless a systems approach to accountability is put into place involving all stakeholders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164366</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27755558</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Analysis ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Embedded systems ; Engineering and Technology ; Expenditures ; Fees, Medical ; Female ; Health care ; Health care costs ; Health care policy ; Health care reform ; Health insurance ; Health services ; Health Surveys ; Hospital administration ; Humans ; Inpatients - psychology ; Insurance ; Insurance Coverage ; Interpersonal relations ; Interviews as Topic ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Medical care quality ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Middle Aged ; Odds Ratio ; Patient Care ; Patient Satisfaction ; People and Places ; Physicians ; Public health ; Qualitative analysis ; Quality ; Quality of Health Care ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Rural areas ; Social Sciences ; Studies ; Surveys ; Trust ; Violence ; Workers ; Workplace violence ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-10, Vol.11 (10), p.e0164366</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Shan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Shan et al 2016 Shan et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-2a2e278b9605d7db116b2a4c19f2c94049f1562fd41aa6fa324f20f8cc9a9de03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-2a2e278b9605d7db116b2a4c19f2c94049f1562fd41aa6fa324f20f8cc9a9de03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1830058360/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1830058360?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25751,27922,27923,37010,37011,44588,53789,53791,74896</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27755558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Zhang, Harry</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shan, Linghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Ding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Qunhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chaojie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Mingli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Yanhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Yuzhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Lijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Jiejing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Weilan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Jiaojiao</creatorcontrib><title>Patient Satisfaction with Hospital Inpatient Care: Effects of Trust, Medical Insurance and Perceived Quality of Care</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Deteriorations in the patient-provider relationship in China have attracted increasing attention in the international community. This study aims to explore the role of trust in patient satisfaction with hospital inpatient care, and how patient-provider trust is shaped from the perspectives of both patients and providers.
We adopted a mixed methods approach comprising a multivariate logistic regression model using secondary data (1200 people with inpatient experiences over the past year) from the fifth National Health Service Survey (NHSS, 2013) in Heilongjiang Province to determine the associations between patient satisfaction and trust, financial burden and perceived quality of care, followed by in-depth interviews with 62 conveniently selected key informants (27 from health and 35 from non-health sectors). A thematic analysis established a conceptual framework to explain deteriorating patient-provider relationships.
About 24% of respondents reported being dissatisfied with hospital inpatient care. The logistic regression model indicated that patient satisfaction was positively associated with higher level of trust (OR = 14.995), lower levels of hospital medical expenditure (OR = 5.736-1.829 as compared with the highest quintile of hospital expenditure), good staff attitude (OR = 3.155) as well as good ward environment (OR = 2.361). But patient satisfaction was negatively associated with medical insurance for urban residents and other insurance status (OR = 0.215-0.357 as compared with medical insurance for urban employees). The qualitative analysis showed that patient trust-the most significant predictor of patient satisfaction-is shaped by perceived high quality of service delivery, empathic and caring interpersonal interactions, and a better designed medical insurance that provides stronger financial protection and enables more equitable access to health care.
At the core of high levels of patient dissatisfaction with hospital care is the lack of trust. The current health care system reform in China has yet to address the fundamental problems embedded in the system that caused distrust. A singular focus on doctor-patient inter-personal interactions will not offer a successful solution to the deteriorated patient-provider relationships unless a systems approach to accountability is put into place involving all stakeholders.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Embedded systems</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Fees, Medical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care costs</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health care reform</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Hospital administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatients - psychology</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>Insurance Coverage</subject><subject>Interpersonal relations</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical care quality</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Patient Care</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Workplace violence</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYmPwDxBEQkIg0RJ_xHG4QJqqwSoNbbDBrXXqj9ZVGhfbGezf47TZ1KJdLLmw5Tzv65PXPln2EhVjRCr0cek630IzXrtWjwvEKGHsUXaIaoJHDBfk8c78IHsWwrIoSsIZe5od4Koq08MPs3gB0eo25pdpDAZktK7N_9i4yE9dWNsITT5t1wM0Aa8_5SfGaBlD7kx-5bsQP-TftLJyQ4bOQyt1Dq3KL7SX2l5rlX_voLHxplf0Fs-zJwaaoF8M41H288vJ1eR0dHb-dTo5PhvJCpdxhAFrXPFZzYpSVWqGEJthoBLVBsuaFrQ2qGTYKIoAmAGCqcGF4VLWUCtdkKPs9dZ33bgghsCCQJykKDhhPTHdEsrBUqy9XYG_EQ6s2Cw4Pxfgo5WNFpJXqqwpphgIRSWalWlLrVIWpZQKm-T1editm620kikwD82e6f6X1i7E3F2LsmC8onUyeDcYePe70yGKlQ1SNw202nWbuiuSqubsIWhJKcecJPTNf-j9QQzUHNK_2ta4VKLsTcUxrRDnlJG-wvE9VHqVXlmZLqKxaX1P8H5PkJio_8Y5dCGI6eWPh7Pnv_bZtzvsQkMTF8E1XX97wz5It6D0LgSvzd15oEL0fXSbhuj7SAx9lGSvds_yTnTbOOQft50YGQ</recordid><startdate>20161018</startdate><enddate>20161018</enddate><creator>Shan, Linghan</creator><creator>Li, Ye</creator><creator>Ding, Ding</creator><creator>Wu, Qunhong</creator><creator>Liu, Chaojie</creator><creator>Jiao, Mingli</creator><creator>Hao, Yanhua</creator><creator>Han, Yuzhen</creator><creator>Gao, Lijun</creator><creator>Hao, Jiejing</creator><creator>Wang, Lan</creator><creator>Xu, Weilan</creator><creator>Ren, Jiaojiao</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161018</creationdate><title>Patient Satisfaction with Hospital Inpatient Care: Effects of Trust, Medical Insurance and Perceived Quality of Care</title><author>Shan, Linghan ; Li, Ye ; Ding, Ding ; Wu, Qunhong ; Liu, Chaojie ; Jiao, Mingli ; Hao, Yanhua ; Han, Yuzhen ; Gao, Lijun ; Hao, Jiejing ; Wang, Lan ; Xu, Weilan ; Ren, Jiaojiao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-2a2e278b9605d7db116b2a4c19f2c94049f1562fd41aa6fa324f20f8cc9a9de03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Embedded systems</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Fees, Medical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care costs</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health care reform</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Hospital administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatients - psychology</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>Insurance Coverage</topic><topic>Interpersonal relations</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical care quality</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Patient Care</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Workplace violence</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shan, Linghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Ding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Qunhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chaojie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiao, Mingli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Yanhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Yuzhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Lijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Jiejing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Weilan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Jiaojiao</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shan, Linghan</au><au>Li, Ye</au><au>Ding, Ding</au><au>Wu, Qunhong</au><au>Liu, Chaojie</au><au>Jiao, Mingli</au><au>Hao, Yanhua</au><au>Han, Yuzhen</au><au>Gao, Lijun</au><au>Hao, Jiejing</au><au>Wang, Lan</au><au>Xu, Weilan</au><au>Ren, Jiaojiao</au><au>Zhang, Harry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient Satisfaction with Hospital Inpatient Care: Effects of Trust, Medical Insurance and Perceived Quality of Care</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-10-18</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0164366</spage><pages>e0164366-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Deteriorations in the patient-provider relationship in China have attracted increasing attention in the international community. This study aims to explore the role of trust in patient satisfaction with hospital inpatient care, and how patient-provider trust is shaped from the perspectives of both patients and providers.
We adopted a mixed methods approach comprising a multivariate logistic regression model using secondary data (1200 people with inpatient experiences over the past year) from the fifth National Health Service Survey (NHSS, 2013) in Heilongjiang Province to determine the associations between patient satisfaction and trust, financial burden and perceived quality of care, followed by in-depth interviews with 62 conveniently selected key informants (27 from health and 35 from non-health sectors). A thematic analysis established a conceptual framework to explain deteriorating patient-provider relationships.
About 24% of respondents reported being dissatisfied with hospital inpatient care. The logistic regression model indicated that patient satisfaction was positively associated with higher level of trust (OR = 14.995), lower levels of hospital medical expenditure (OR = 5.736-1.829 as compared with the highest quintile of hospital expenditure), good staff attitude (OR = 3.155) as well as good ward environment (OR = 2.361). But patient satisfaction was negatively associated with medical insurance for urban residents and other insurance status (OR = 0.215-0.357 as compared with medical insurance for urban employees). The qualitative analysis showed that patient trust-the most significant predictor of patient satisfaction-is shaped by perceived high quality of service delivery, empathic and caring interpersonal interactions, and a better designed medical insurance that provides stronger financial protection and enables more equitable access to health care.
At the core of high levels of patient dissatisfaction with hospital care is the lack of trust. The current health care system reform in China has yet to address the fundamental problems embedded in the system that caused distrust. A singular focus on doctor-patient inter-personal interactions will not offer a successful solution to the deteriorated patient-provider relationships unless a systems approach to accountability is put into place involving all stakeholders.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27755558</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0164366</doi><tpages>e0164366</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-10, Vol.11 (10), p.e0164366 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1830058360 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central (PMC) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Analysis Ecology and Environmental Sciences Embedded systems Engineering and Technology Expenditures Fees, Medical Female Health care Health care costs Health care policy Health care reform Health insurance Health services Health Surveys Hospital administration Humans Inpatients - psychology Insurance Insurance Coverage Interpersonal relations Interviews as Topic Logistic Models Male Medical care quality Medical research Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Middle Aged Odds Ratio Patient Care Patient Satisfaction People and Places Physicians Public health Qualitative analysis Quality Quality of Health Care Regression analysis Regression models Rural areas Social Sciences Studies Surveys Trust Violence Workers Workplace violence Young Adult |
title | Patient Satisfaction with Hospital Inpatient Care: Effects of Trust, Medical Insurance and Perceived Quality of Care |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T10%3A53%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20Satisfaction%20with%20Hospital%20Inpatient%20Care:%20Effects%20of%20Trust,%20Medical%20Insurance%20and%20Perceived%20Quality%20of%20Care&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Shan,%20Linghan&rft.date=2016-10-18&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0164366&rft.pages=e0164366-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0164366&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA471884639%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-2a2e278b9605d7db116b2a4c19f2c94049f1562fd41aa6fa324f20f8cc9a9de03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1830058360&rft_id=info:pmid/27755558&rft_galeid=A471884639&rfr_iscdi=true |