A Meta-Analysis of the Association between Gender and Protective Behaviors in Response to Respiratory Epidemics and Pandemics

• Published in: PloS one 2016-10, Vol.11 (10), p.e0164541-e0164541
• Main Authors: Moran, Kelly R, Del Valle, Sara Y
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Antiviral agents; Biology and Life Sciences; Communicable diseases; Constraining; Demographics; Determinants; Disease control; Disease spread; Disease transmission; Epidemics; Female; Humans; Hygiene; Immunization; Infectious diseases; Male; Mathematical models; Medicine and Health Sciences; Men; Meta-analysis; Moderators; Pandemics; People and Places; Pharmaceuticals; Physical Sciences; Protective behavior; Protective equipment; Public health; Public transportation; Research and Analysis Methods; Respiratory Tract Diseases - epidemiology; Reviews; Swine flu; Vaccination; Vaccines
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164541

Respiratory infectious disease epidemics and pandemics are recurring events that levy a high cost on individuals and society. The health-protective behavioral response of the public plays an important role in limiting respiratory infectious disease spread. Health-protective behaviors take several forms. Behaviors can be categorized as pharmaceutical (e.g., vaccination uptake, antiviral use) or non-pharmaceutical (e.g., hand washing, face mask use, avoidance of public transport). Due to the limitations of pharmaceutical interventions during respiratory epidemics and pandemics, public health campaigns aimed at limiting disease spread often emphasize both non-pharmaceutical and pharmaceutical behavioral interventions. Understanding the determinants of the public's behavioral response is crucial for devising public health campaigns, providing information to parametrize mathematical models, and ultimately limiting disease spread. While other reviews have qualitatively analyzed the body of work on demographic determinants of health-protective behavior, this meta-analysis quantitatively combines the results from 85 publications to determine the global relationship between gender and health-protective behavioral response. The results show that women in the general population are about 50% more likely than men to adopt/practice non-pharmaceutical behaviors. Conversely, men in the general population are marginally (about 12%) more likely than women to adopt/practice pharmaceutical behaviors. It is possible that factors other than pharmaceutical/non-pharmaceutical status not included in this analysis act as moderators of this relationship. These results suggest an inherent difference in how men and women respond to epidemic and pandemic respiratory infectious diseases. This information can be used to target specific groups when developing non-pharmaceutical public health campaigns and to parameterize epidemic models incorporating demographic information.