Loading…
Evaluation of a Commercial Multiplex PCR Assay for Detection of Pathogen DNA in Blood from Patients with Suspected Sepsis
The Magicplex Sepsis Real-time Test (MST) is a commercial multiplex PCR that can detect more than 90 different pathogens in blood, with an analysis time of six hours. The aim of the present study was to evaluate this method for the detection of bloodstream infection (BSI). An EDTA whole blood sample...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e0167883-e0167883 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c850t-84fa91d4e4ec2c72645a393ade8ea0a807bfba524db6dc1b99744346563f39eb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c850t-84fa91d4e4ec2c72645a393ade8ea0a807bfba524db6dc1b99744346563f39eb3 |
container_end_page | e0167883 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e0167883 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Ziegler, Ingrid Fagerström, Anna Strålin, Kristoffer Mölling, Paula |
description | The Magicplex Sepsis Real-time Test (MST) is a commercial multiplex PCR that can detect more than 90 different pathogens in blood, with an analysis time of six hours. The aim of the present study was to evaluate this method for the detection of bloodstream infection (BSI). An EDTA whole blood sample for MST was collected together with blood cultures (BC) from patients with suspected sepsis at the Emergency Department of a university hospital. Among 696 study patients, 322 (46%) patients were positive with at least one method; 128 (18%) were BC positive and 268 (38%) were MST positive. Considering BC to be the gold standard, MST had an overall sensitivity of 47%, specificity of 66%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 23%, and a negative predictive value of 87%. Among the MST positive samples with a negative BC, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and species that rarely cause community-acquired BSI were frequently noted. However, the quantification cycle (Cq) values of the MST+/BC- results were often high. We thus hypothesized that the performance of the MST test could be improved if the Cq cut-off level was adjusted downwards. With a lower Cq cut-off value, i.e. 6.0 for Staphylococcus species and 9.0 for all other species, the number of MST positive cases decreased to 83 (12%) and the overall sensitivity decreased to 38%. However, the PPV increased to 59% and the specificity increased to 96%, as many MST positive results for CoNS and bacteria that rarely cause community-acquired BSI turned MST negative. In conclusion, our study shows that with a lower Cq cut-off value, the MST will detect less contaminants and findings with unclear relevance, but to the cost of a lower sensitivity. Consequently, we consider that a positive MST results with a Cq value above the adjusted cut-off should be interpreted with caution, as the result might be clinically irrelevant. In a correspondent way, quantitative results could probably be useful in the interpretation of positive results from other molecular assays for the detection of BSI. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0167883 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1850758456</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A474641696</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_b398aa17d5fe48909ff222be283057c3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A474641696</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c850t-84fa91d4e4ec2c72645a393ade8ea0a807bfba524db6dc1b99744346563f39eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBYQkIg0eLPxLlBKt2ASYNNG-zWchKn9XDiYCf7-Pc4bToWtElTLmIdP--bk_PqRNFLBGeIJOjjue1cLc2ssbWaQRQnnJNH0S5KCZ7GGJLHt8470TPvzyFkhMfx02gHJ2maxIjvRtf7F9J0stW2BrYEEixsVSmXa2nA9860ujHqChwvTsDce3kNSuvAnmpVvlUcy3Zll6oGez_mQNfgs7G2AKWzVX-lVd16cKnbFTjtfBNkqgCnqvHaP4-elNJ49WJ4T6JfX_Z_Lr5ND4--Hizmh9OcM9hOOS1ligqqqMpxnuCYMklSIgvFlYSSwyQrM8kwLbK4yFEWfoxSQmMWk5KkKiOT6PXGtzHWi2FqXqDgnjBOAzeJDjZEYeW5aJyupLsWVmqxLli3FNK1OjdKZCTlUqKkYKWiPIVpWWKMM4U5gSzJSfCabrz8pWq6bOQ2lH6HkxIMQhwngU_v5Rtni3-irRARhiCjqO_7w73aPX02X3duXScYpZAG_NMwiC6rVJGHaJw04y-Obmq9Ekt7IRhKMFv3-m4wcPZPp3wrKu1zZYysle3WI00p55DCh6CIQIxDkpPozX_o3RkN1FKGGHRd2tBi3puKOU1oHOaR9tTsDio8hap0Hhal1KE-ErwfCQLTqqt2KTvvxcHpycPZo7Mx-_YWu1LStCtvTddvjR-DdAPmznrvVHmTB4Ki3_PtNES_52LY8yB7dTvLG9F2sclfhDVOZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1850758456</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a Commercial Multiplex PCR Assay for Detection of Pathogen DNA in Blood from Patients with Suspected Sepsis</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Ziegler, Ingrid ; Fagerström, Anna ; Strålin, Kristoffer ; Mölling, Paula</creator><contributor>Minogue, Timothy D.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ziegler, Ingrid ; Fagerström, Anna ; Strålin, Kristoffer ; Mölling, Paula ; Minogue, Timothy D.</creatorcontrib><description>The Magicplex Sepsis Real-time Test (MST) is a commercial multiplex PCR that can detect more than 90 different pathogens in blood, with an analysis time of six hours. The aim of the present study was to evaluate this method for the detection of bloodstream infection (BSI). An EDTA whole blood sample for MST was collected together with blood cultures (BC) from patients with suspected sepsis at the Emergency Department of a university hospital. Among 696 study patients, 322 (46%) patients were positive with at least one method; 128 (18%) were BC positive and 268 (38%) were MST positive. Considering BC to be the gold standard, MST had an overall sensitivity of 47%, specificity of 66%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 23%, and a negative predictive value of 87%. Among the MST positive samples with a negative BC, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and species that rarely cause community-acquired BSI were frequently noted. However, the quantification cycle (Cq) values of the MST+/BC- results were often high. We thus hypothesized that the performance of the MST test could be improved if the Cq cut-off level was adjusted downwards. With a lower Cq cut-off value, i.e. 6.0 for Staphylococcus species and 9.0 for all other species, the number of MST positive cases decreased to 83 (12%) and the overall sensitivity decreased to 38%. However, the PPV increased to 59% and the specificity increased to 96%, as many MST positive results for CoNS and bacteria that rarely cause community-acquired BSI turned MST negative. In conclusion, our study shows that with a lower Cq cut-off value, the MST will detect less contaminants and findings with unclear relevance, but to the cost of a lower sensitivity. Consequently, we consider that a positive MST results with a Cq value above the adjusted cut-off should be interpreted with caution, as the result might be clinically irrelevant. In a correspondent way, quantitative results could probably be useful in the interpretation of positive results from other molecular assays for the detection of BSI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167883</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27997618</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Bacteria ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Blood ; Coagulase ; Communities ; Contaminants ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Diagnosis ; DNA ; DNA, Bacterial - blood ; DNA, Bacterial - genetics ; Drug resistance ; Emergency medical services ; Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acids ; Female ; Genetic aspects ; Genotypes ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Identification ; Identification and classification ; Infectious diseases ; Innovations ; Intensive care ; Laboratories ; Male ; Medicin och hälsovetenskap ; Medicine ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Microbiology ; Molecular diagnostic techniques ; Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Multiplexing ; Pathogenic microorganisms ; Pathogens ; Patients ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Sensitivity ; Sepsis ; Sepsis - blood ; Sepsis - genetics ; Sepsis - microbiology ; Species ; Staphylococcal Infections - blood ; Staphylococcal Infections - genetics ; Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology ; Staphylococcus ; Staphylococcus - genetics ; Streptococcus infections ; Studies</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e0167883-e0167883</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2016 Ziegler et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Ziegler et al 2016 Ziegler et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c850t-84fa91d4e4ec2c72645a393ade8ea0a807bfba524db6dc1b99744346563f39eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c850t-84fa91d4e4ec2c72645a393ade8ea0a807bfba524db6dc1b99744346563f39eb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5929-212X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1850758456/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1850758456?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27997618$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-54404$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:135105416$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Minogue, Timothy D.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ziegler, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fagerström, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strålin, Kristoffer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mölling, Paula</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a Commercial Multiplex PCR Assay for Detection of Pathogen DNA in Blood from Patients with Suspected Sepsis</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>The Magicplex Sepsis Real-time Test (MST) is a commercial multiplex PCR that can detect more than 90 different pathogens in blood, with an analysis time of six hours. The aim of the present study was to evaluate this method for the detection of bloodstream infection (BSI). An EDTA whole blood sample for MST was collected together with blood cultures (BC) from patients with suspected sepsis at the Emergency Department of a university hospital. Among 696 study patients, 322 (46%) patients were positive with at least one method; 128 (18%) were BC positive and 268 (38%) were MST positive. Considering BC to be the gold standard, MST had an overall sensitivity of 47%, specificity of 66%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 23%, and a negative predictive value of 87%. Among the MST positive samples with a negative BC, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and species that rarely cause community-acquired BSI were frequently noted. However, the quantification cycle (Cq) values of the MST+/BC- results were often high. We thus hypothesized that the performance of the MST test could be improved if the Cq cut-off level was adjusted downwards. With a lower Cq cut-off value, i.e. 6.0 for Staphylococcus species and 9.0 for all other species, the number of MST positive cases decreased to 83 (12%) and the overall sensitivity decreased to 38%. However, the PPV increased to 59% and the specificity increased to 96%, as many MST positive results for CoNS and bacteria that rarely cause community-acquired BSI turned MST negative. In conclusion, our study shows that with a lower Cq cut-off value, the MST will detect less contaminants and findings with unclear relevance, but to the cost of a lower sensitivity. Consequently, we consider that a positive MST results with a Cq value above the adjusted cut-off should be interpreted with caution, as the result might be clinically irrelevant. In a correspondent way, quantitative results could probably be useful in the interpretation of positive results from other molecular assays for the detection of BSI.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Coagulase</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - blood</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acids</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Identification and classification</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Molecular diagnostic techniques</subject><subject>Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Multiplexing</subject><subject>Pathogenic microorganisms</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Sepsis - blood</subject><subject>Sepsis - genetics</subject><subject>Sepsis - microbiology</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - blood</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - genetics</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Staphylococcus</subject><subject>Staphylococcus - genetics</subject><subject>Streptococcus infections</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11v0zAUhiMEYqPwDxBYQkIg0eLPxLlBKt2ASYNNG-zWchKn9XDiYCf7-Pc4bToWtElTLmIdP--bk_PqRNFLBGeIJOjjue1cLc2ssbWaQRQnnJNH0S5KCZ7GGJLHt8470TPvzyFkhMfx02gHJ2maxIjvRtf7F9J0stW2BrYEEixsVSmXa2nA9860ujHqChwvTsDce3kNSuvAnmpVvlUcy3Zll6oGez_mQNfgs7G2AKWzVX-lVd16cKnbFTjtfBNkqgCnqvHaP4-elNJ49WJ4T6JfX_Z_Lr5ND4--Hizmh9OcM9hOOS1ligqqqMpxnuCYMklSIgvFlYSSwyQrM8kwLbK4yFEWfoxSQmMWk5KkKiOT6PXGtzHWi2FqXqDgnjBOAzeJDjZEYeW5aJyupLsWVmqxLli3FNK1OjdKZCTlUqKkYKWiPIVpWWKMM4U5gSzJSfCabrz8pWq6bOQ2lH6HkxIMQhwngU_v5Rtni3-irRARhiCjqO_7w73aPX02X3duXScYpZAG_NMwiC6rVJGHaJw04y-Obmq9Ekt7IRhKMFv3-m4wcPZPp3wrKu1zZYysle3WI00p55DCh6CIQIxDkpPozX_o3RkN1FKGGHRd2tBi3puKOU1oHOaR9tTsDio8hap0Hhal1KE-ErwfCQLTqqt2KTvvxcHpycPZo7Mx-_YWu1LStCtvTddvjR-DdAPmznrvVHmTB4Ki3_PtNES_52LY8yB7dTvLG9F2sclfhDVOZw</recordid><startdate>20161220</startdate><enddate>20161220</enddate><creator>Ziegler, Ingrid</creator><creator>Fagerström, Anna</creator><creator>Strålin, Kristoffer</creator><creator>Mölling, Paula</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>AABEP</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>D91</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5929-212X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161220</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a Commercial Multiplex PCR Assay for Detection of Pathogen DNA in Blood from Patients with Suspected Sepsis</title><author>Ziegler, Ingrid ; Fagerström, Anna ; Strålin, Kristoffer ; Mölling, Paula</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c850t-84fa91d4e4ec2c72645a393ade8ea0a807bfba524db6dc1b99744346563f39eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Coagulase</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - blood</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acids</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Identification and classification</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicin och hälsovetenskap</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Molecular diagnostic techniques</topic><topic>Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Multiplexing</topic><topic>Pathogenic microorganisms</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Sepsis - blood</topic><topic>Sepsis - genetics</topic><topic>Sepsis - microbiology</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - blood</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - genetics</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Staphylococcus</topic><topic>Staphylococcus - genetics</topic><topic>Streptococcus infections</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ziegler, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fagerström, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strålin, Kristoffer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mölling, Paula</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale_Opposing Viewpoints In Context</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SWEPUB Örebro universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Örebro universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ziegler, Ingrid</au><au>Fagerström, Anna</au><au>Strålin, Kristoffer</au><au>Mölling, Paula</au><au>Minogue, Timothy D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a Commercial Multiplex PCR Assay for Detection of Pathogen DNA in Blood from Patients with Suspected Sepsis</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2016-12-20</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0167883</spage><epage>e0167883</epage><pages>e0167883-e0167883</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The Magicplex Sepsis Real-time Test (MST) is a commercial multiplex PCR that can detect more than 90 different pathogens in blood, with an analysis time of six hours. The aim of the present study was to evaluate this method for the detection of bloodstream infection (BSI). An EDTA whole blood sample for MST was collected together with blood cultures (BC) from patients with suspected sepsis at the Emergency Department of a university hospital. Among 696 study patients, 322 (46%) patients were positive with at least one method; 128 (18%) were BC positive and 268 (38%) were MST positive. Considering BC to be the gold standard, MST had an overall sensitivity of 47%, specificity of 66%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 23%, and a negative predictive value of 87%. Among the MST positive samples with a negative BC, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and species that rarely cause community-acquired BSI were frequently noted. However, the quantification cycle (Cq) values of the MST+/BC- results were often high. We thus hypothesized that the performance of the MST test could be improved if the Cq cut-off level was adjusted downwards. With a lower Cq cut-off value, i.e. 6.0 for Staphylococcus species and 9.0 for all other species, the number of MST positive cases decreased to 83 (12%) and the overall sensitivity decreased to 38%. However, the PPV increased to 59% and the specificity increased to 96%, as many MST positive results for CoNS and bacteria that rarely cause community-acquired BSI turned MST negative. In conclusion, our study shows that with a lower Cq cut-off value, the MST will detect less contaminants and findings with unclear relevance, but to the cost of a lower sensitivity. Consequently, we consider that a positive MST results with a Cq value above the adjusted cut-off should be interpreted with caution, as the result might be clinically irrelevant. In a correspondent way, quantitative results could probably be useful in the interpretation of positive results from other molecular assays for the detection of BSI.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>27997618</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0167883</doi><tpages>e0167883</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5929-212X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e0167883-e0167883 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1850758456 |
source | PubMed Central Free; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Antibiotics Bacteria Biology and Life Sciences Blood Coagulase Communities Contaminants Deoxyribonucleic acid Diagnosis DNA DNA, Bacterial - blood DNA, Bacterial - genetics Drug resistance Emergency medical services Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acids Female Genetic aspects Genotypes Hospitals Humans Identification Identification and classification Infectious diseases Innovations Intensive care Laboratories Male Medicin och hälsovetenskap Medicine Medicine and Health Sciences Methods Microbiology Molecular diagnostic techniques Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods Multiplexing Pathogenic microorganisms Pathogens Patients Polymerase chain reaction Research and Analysis Methods Sensitivity Sepsis Sepsis - blood Sepsis - genetics Sepsis - microbiology Species Staphylococcal Infections - blood Staphylococcal Infections - genetics Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology Staphylococcus Staphylococcus - genetics Streptococcus infections Studies |
title | Evaluation of a Commercial Multiplex PCR Assay for Detection of Pathogen DNA in Blood from Patients with Suspected Sepsis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A30%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20Commercial%20Multiplex%20PCR%20Assay%20for%20Detection%20of%20Pathogen%20DNA%20in%20Blood%20from%20Patients%20with%20Suspected%20Sepsis&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ziegler,%20Ingrid&rft.date=2016-12-20&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0167883&rft.epage=e0167883&rft.pages=e0167883-e0167883&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0167883&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA474641696%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c850t-84fa91d4e4ec2c72645a393ade8ea0a807bfba524db6dc1b99744346563f39eb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1850758456&rft_id=info:pmid/27997618&rft_galeid=A474641696&rfr_iscdi=true |