Loading…
Self-delivered misinformation - Merging the choice blindness and misinformation effect paradigms
Choice blindness is the failure to detect a discrepancy between a choice and its outcome. The misinformation effect occurs when the recollection of an event changes because new, misleading information about the event is received. The purpose of this study was to merge the choice blindness and misinf...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2017-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e0173606-e0173606 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-13a5b83056724fcfa911e323622958becb96a14d5876e576decaf7000437e6ee3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-13a5b83056724fcfa911e323622958becb96a14d5876e576decaf7000437e6ee3 |
container_end_page | e0173606 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e0173606 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Stille, Lotta Norin, Emelie Sikström, Sverker |
description | Choice blindness is the failure to detect a discrepancy between a choice and its outcome. The misinformation effect occurs when the recollection of an event changes because new, misleading information about the event is received. The purpose of this study was to merge the choice blindness and misinformation effect paradigms, and thus examine whether choice blindness can be created for individuals' recollections of a witnessed event, and whether this will affect their later recollections of the event. Thus, as a way of delivering misinformation the participants ostensibly became their own source of the misleading information. The participants watched a short film and filled out a questionnaire about events shown in the film. Some of their answers were then manipulated using reattachable stickers, which allowed alteration of their original answers. The participants gave justifications for their manipulated choices, and later their recollection of the original event was tested through another questionnaire. Choice blindness was created for a majority of the participants. A majority of the choice blind participants later changed their reported recollection of the event in line with the manipulations, whereas only a small minority of the participants in the control condition changed their recollection. This study provides new information about the misinformation effect, suggesting that this effect also can occur when misinformation is given immediately following presentation of the original stimuli, and about choice blindness and its effects on the recollections of events. The results suggest that memory blindness can be created when people inadvertently supply themselves with misleading information about an event, causing a change in their recollection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0173606 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1875378487</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A484557774</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a2270efcb6dc4f05abda16f36db9d432</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A484557774</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-13a5b83056724fcfa911e323622958becb96a14d5876e576decaf7000437e6ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7jr6D0QLgujFjEnz1d4Iy-LHwsqCq97GNDnpZMk0s0m76r83dWZlq3uxlNBw-rxvD-ejKJ5itMJE4DcXYYy98qtt6GGFsCAc8XvFIW5IteQVIvdv3A-KRyldIMRIzfnD4qCqK0Eww4fF93PwdmnAuyuIYMqNS663IW7U4EJfLstPEDvXd-WwhlKvg9NQtt71poeUStX_pwBrQQ_lVkVlXLdJj4sHVvkET_bvRfH1_bsvxx-Xp2cfTo6PTpdaNHRYYqJYWxPEuKio1VY1GAOpCK-qhtUt6LbhClPDasGBCW5AKysQQpQI4ABkUTzf-W59SHJfnCRxLRgRNa1FJk52hAnqQm6j26j4Swbl5J9AiJ1UcXDag1RVJRBY3XKjqUVMtUZhbgk3bWNoTmtRnO680g_Yju3MzY_bfNp8ZAJJs5M1hEmhwUpqSCMVUq2kzCDBhM7hKfm3--THdgNGQz9E5Weu8y-9W8suXElGaEXQlM-rvUEMlyOkQea2aPBe9RDGqQw1YYIgTO-CYsFRQ3hGX_yD3l7XPdWpXLppFnKKejKVR7SmjAkhpt-ubqHyY2DjdJ5h63J8Jng9E2RmgJ9Dp8aU5Mn557uzZ9_m7Msb7BqUH9Yp-HGa3jQH6Q7UMaQUc_eu-4GRnFbwuhpyWkG5X8Ese3azl39F1ztHfgPJliwp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1875378487</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self-delivered misinformation - Merging the choice blindness and misinformation effect paradigms</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Stille, Lotta ; Norin, Emelie ; Sikström, Sverker</creator><contributor>Glasauer, Stefan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Stille, Lotta ; Norin, Emelie ; Sikström, Sverker ; Glasauer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>Choice blindness is the failure to detect a discrepancy between a choice and its outcome. The misinformation effect occurs when the recollection of an event changes because new, misleading information about the event is received. The purpose of this study was to merge the choice blindness and misinformation effect paradigms, and thus examine whether choice blindness can be created for individuals' recollections of a witnessed event, and whether this will affect their later recollections of the event. Thus, as a way of delivering misinformation the participants ostensibly became their own source of the misleading information. The participants watched a short film and filled out a questionnaire about events shown in the film. Some of their answers were then manipulated using reattachable stickers, which allowed alteration of their original answers. The participants gave justifications for their manipulated choices, and later their recollection of the original event was tested through another questionnaire. Choice blindness was created for a majority of the participants. A majority of the choice blind participants later changed their reported recollection of the event in line with the manipulations, whereas only a small minority of the participants in the control condition changed their recollection. This study provides new information about the misinformation effect, suggesting that this effect also can occur when misinformation is given immediately following presentation of the original stimuli, and about choice blindness and its effects on the recollections of events. The results suggest that memory blindness can be created when people inadvertently supply themselves with misleading information about an event, causing a change in their recollection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173606</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28273151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Blindness ; Choice (Psychology) ; Choice Behavior ; choice blindness ; Communication ; Computer and Information Sciences ; effect ; Experiments ; False information ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Memory ; Mental Recall ; Middle Aged ; missinformation ; Psychology ; Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology) ; Psykologi ; Psykologi (exklusive tillämpad psykologi) ; Realism ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Researchers ; Samhällsvetenskap ; Social Sciences ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Witnesses ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e0173606-e0173606</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Stille et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Stille et al 2017 Stille et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-13a5b83056724fcfa911e323622958becb96a14d5876e576decaf7000437e6ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-13a5b83056724fcfa911e323622958becb96a14d5876e576decaf7000437e6ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1875378487/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1875378487?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792,74997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28273151$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://lup.lub.lu.se/record/4270fd35-7cef-4d39-a0ab-45d0757c7cee$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Glasauer, Stefan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Stille, Lotta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norin, Emelie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sikström, Sverker</creatorcontrib><title>Self-delivered misinformation - Merging the choice blindness and misinformation effect paradigms</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Choice blindness is the failure to detect a discrepancy between a choice and its outcome. The misinformation effect occurs when the recollection of an event changes because new, misleading information about the event is received. The purpose of this study was to merge the choice blindness and misinformation effect paradigms, and thus examine whether choice blindness can be created for individuals' recollections of a witnessed event, and whether this will affect their later recollections of the event. Thus, as a way of delivering misinformation the participants ostensibly became their own source of the misleading information. The participants watched a short film and filled out a questionnaire about events shown in the film. Some of their answers were then manipulated using reattachable stickers, which allowed alteration of their original answers. The participants gave justifications for their manipulated choices, and later their recollection of the original event was tested through another questionnaire. Choice blindness was created for a majority of the participants. A majority of the choice blind participants later changed their reported recollection of the event in line with the manipulations, whereas only a small minority of the participants in the control condition changed their recollection. This study provides new information about the misinformation effect, suggesting that this effect also can occur when misinformation is given immediately following presentation of the original stimuli, and about choice blindness and its effects on the recollections of events. The results suggest that memory blindness can be created when people inadvertently supply themselves with misleading information about an event, causing a change in their recollection.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Blindness</subject><subject>Choice (Psychology)</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>choice blindness</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Computer and Information Sciences</subject><subject>effect</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>False information</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>missinformation</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)</subject><subject>Psykologi</subject><subject>Psykologi (exklusive tillämpad psykologi)</subject><subject>Realism</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Samhällsvetenskap</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Witnesses</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12L1DAUhoso7jr6D0QLgujFjEnz1d4Iy-LHwsqCq97GNDnpZMk0s0m76r83dWZlq3uxlNBw-rxvD-ejKJ5itMJE4DcXYYy98qtt6GGFsCAc8XvFIW5IteQVIvdv3A-KRyldIMRIzfnD4qCqK0Eww4fF93PwdmnAuyuIYMqNS663IW7U4EJfLstPEDvXd-WwhlKvg9NQtt71poeUStX_pwBrQQ_lVkVlXLdJj4sHVvkET_bvRfH1_bsvxx-Xp2cfTo6PTpdaNHRYYqJYWxPEuKio1VY1GAOpCK-qhtUt6LbhClPDasGBCW5AKysQQpQI4ABkUTzf-W59SHJfnCRxLRgRNa1FJk52hAnqQm6j26j4Swbl5J9AiJ1UcXDag1RVJRBY3XKjqUVMtUZhbgk3bWNoTmtRnO680g_Yju3MzY_bfNp8ZAJJs5M1hEmhwUpqSCMVUq2kzCDBhM7hKfm3--THdgNGQz9E5Weu8y-9W8suXElGaEXQlM-rvUEMlyOkQea2aPBe9RDGqQw1YYIgTO-CYsFRQ3hGX_yD3l7XPdWpXLppFnKKejKVR7SmjAkhpt-ubqHyY2DjdJ5h63J8Jng9E2RmgJ9Dp8aU5Mn557uzZ9_m7Msb7BqUH9Yp-HGa3jQH6Q7UMaQUc_eu-4GRnFbwuhpyWkG5X8Ese3azl39F1ztHfgPJliwp</recordid><startdate>20170308</startdate><enddate>20170308</enddate><creator>Stille, Lotta</creator><creator>Norin, Emelie</creator><creator>Sikström, Sverker</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AGCHP</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>D95</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170308</creationdate><title>Self-delivered misinformation - Merging the choice blindness and misinformation effect paradigms</title><author>Stille, Lotta ; Norin, Emelie ; Sikström, Sverker</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-13a5b83056724fcfa911e323622958becb96a14d5876e576decaf7000437e6ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Blindness</topic><topic>Choice (Psychology)</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>choice blindness</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Computer and Information Sciences</topic><topic>effect</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>False information</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>missinformation</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)</topic><topic>Psykologi</topic><topic>Psykologi (exklusive tillämpad psykologi)</topic><topic>Realism</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Samhällsvetenskap</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Witnesses</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stille, Lotta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norin, Emelie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sikström, Sverker</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SWEPUB Lunds universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Lunds universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stille, Lotta</au><au>Norin, Emelie</au><au>Sikström, Sverker</au><au>Glasauer, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Self-delivered misinformation - Merging the choice blindness and misinformation effect paradigms</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-03-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0173606</spage><epage>e0173606</epage><pages>e0173606-e0173606</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Choice blindness is the failure to detect a discrepancy between a choice and its outcome. The misinformation effect occurs when the recollection of an event changes because new, misleading information about the event is received. The purpose of this study was to merge the choice blindness and misinformation effect paradigms, and thus examine whether choice blindness can be created for individuals' recollections of a witnessed event, and whether this will affect their later recollections of the event. Thus, as a way of delivering misinformation the participants ostensibly became their own source of the misleading information. The participants watched a short film and filled out a questionnaire about events shown in the film. Some of their answers were then manipulated using reattachable stickers, which allowed alteration of their original answers. The participants gave justifications for their manipulated choices, and later their recollection of the original event was tested through another questionnaire. Choice blindness was created for a majority of the participants. A majority of the choice blind participants later changed their reported recollection of the event in line with the manipulations, whereas only a small minority of the participants in the control condition changed their recollection. This study provides new information about the misinformation effect, suggesting that this effect also can occur when misinformation is given immediately following presentation of the original stimuli, and about choice blindness and its effects on the recollections of events. The results suggest that memory blindness can be created when people inadvertently supply themselves with misleading information about an event, causing a change in their recollection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28273151</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0173606</doi><tpages>e0173606</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2017-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e0173606-e0173606 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1875378487 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Biology and Life Sciences Blindness Choice (Psychology) Choice Behavior choice blindness Communication Computer and Information Sciences effect Experiments False information Female Humans Male Medicine and Health Sciences Memory Mental Recall Middle Aged missinformation Psychology Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology) Psykologi Psykologi (exklusive tillämpad psykologi) Realism Research and Analysis Methods Researchers Samhällsvetenskap Social Sciences Studies Surveys and Questionnaires Witnesses Young Adult |
title | Self-delivered misinformation - Merging the choice blindness and misinformation effect paradigms |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A26%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self-delivered%20misinformation%20-%20Merging%20the%20choice%20blindness%20and%20misinformation%20effect%20paradigms&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Stille,%20Lotta&rft.date=2017-03-08&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0173606&rft.epage=e0173606&rft.pages=e0173606-e0173606&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0173606&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA484557774%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c794t-13a5b83056724fcfa911e323622958becb96a14d5876e576decaf7000437e6ee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1875378487&rft_id=info:pmid/28273151&rft_galeid=A484557774&rfr_iscdi=true |