Use of the MATRICS consensus cognitive battery (MCCB) to evaluate cognitive deficits in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: PloS one 2017-04, Vol.12 (4), p.e0176212-e0176212
• Main Authors: Bo, Qijing, Mao, Zhen, Li, Xianbin, Wang, Zhimin, Wang, Chuanyue, Ma, Xin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biology and Life Sciences; Bipolar disorder; Bipolar Disorder - complications; Bipolar Disorder - psychology; Brain research; Cognition; Cognition & reasoning; Cognition - physiology; Cognition Disorders - complications; Cognition Disorders - diagnosis; Cognition Disorders - psychology; Cognitive ability; Humans; Laboratories; Learning; Libraries; Medical research; Medicine and Health Sciences; Memory; Mental depression; Mental disorders; Meta-analysis; Neuropsychological Tests; Patients; Physical Sciences; Problem solving; Psychiatry; Psychosis; Research and Analysis Methods; Schizophrenia; Science; Social Sciences; Studies; Verbal learning
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176212

The Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition Schizophrenia Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) has also been proposed for use in clinical trials to assess cognitive deficits in patients with bipolar disorder (BD). The aim of this study was to evaluate cognitive function assessed by the MCCB in BD. A literature search of the PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, SCI, Cochrane Library databases and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register was conducted. Case reports, reviews and meta-analyses were excluded and a systematic review of the remaining studies of cognitive function in BD was carried out. The cognitive outcome measure was the MCCB, including 7 domains and overall cognition. A random-effects model was applied. Eighty eight studies were initially identified. Seven clinical studies comprising a total of 487 patients and 570 healthy controls (HC) were included in the meta-analysis. Patients with BD performed worse than HC in overall cognition and processing speed with a large effect size of >0.8; with a medium effect size (0.5-0.8) in attention, working memory, verbal learning and visual learning; and with a small effect size (0.2-0.5) in reasoning and problem solving and social cognition. Patients with BD performed worse than HC in overall cognition and all cognitive domains of the MCCB. Cognitive deficits in domains of processing speed and working memory are prominent in patients with BD. Our findings suggest that MCCB can be usefully applied in BD.