Loading…
Trait variation and genetic diversity in a banana genomic selection training population
Banana (Musa spp.) is an important crop in the African Great Lakes region in terms of income and food security, with the highest per capita consumption worldwide. Pests, diseases and climate change hamper sustainable production of bananas. New breeding tools with increased crossbreeding efficiency a...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2017-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e0178734 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-ed763857a3a8c321ac0d1cb75a1138d0d580914c74e491e540fa4b420ff868123 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-ed763857a3a8c321ac0d1cb75a1138d0d580914c74e491e540fa4b420ff868123 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e0178734 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Nyine, Moses Uwimana, Brigitte Swennen, Rony Batte, Michael Brown, Allan Christelová, Pavla Hřibová, Eva Lorenzen, Jim Doležel, Jaroslav |
description | Banana (Musa spp.) is an important crop in the African Great Lakes region in terms of income and food security, with the highest per capita consumption worldwide. Pests, diseases and climate change hamper sustainable production of bananas. New breeding tools with increased crossbreeding efficiency are being investigated to breed for resistant, high yielding hybrids of East African Highland banana (EAHB). These include genomic selection (GS), which will benefit breeding through increased genetic gain per unit time. Understanding trait variation and the correlation among economically important traits is an essential first step in the development and selection of suitable GS models for banana. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that trait variations in bananas are not affected by cross combination, cycle, field management and their interaction with genotype. A training population created using EAHB breeding material and its progeny was phenotyped in two contrasting conditions. A high level of correlation among vegetative and yield related traits was observed. Therefore, genomic selection models could be developed for traits that are easily measured. It is likely that the predictive ability of traits that are difficult to phenotype will be similar to less difficult traits they are highly correlated with. Genotype response to cycle and field management practices varied greatly with respect to traits. Yield related traits accounted for 31-35% of principal component variation under low and high input field management conditions. Resistance to Black Sigatoka was stable across cycles but varied under different field management depending on the genotype. The best cross combination was 1201K-1xSH3217 based on selection response (R) of hybrids. Genotyping using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers revealed that the training population was genetically diverse, reflecting a complex pedigree background, which was mostly influenced by the male parents. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0178734 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1906414808</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A494560581</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_97bde63d2a984a5ca0146d5dae659682</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A494560581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-ed763857a3a8c321ac0d1cb75a1138d0d580914c74e491e540fa4b420ff868123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLguDFjEnz0fRGWBY_BhYWdNXLcJqknQydZEzawf33pjPdZQoKkouEnOd9k5y8WfYSoyUmJX6_8UNw0C133pklwqUoCX2UneOKFAteIPL4ZH2WPYtxgxAjgvOn2VkhmOCEs_Ps520A2-d7CBZ6610OTuetcaa3Ktd2b0K0_V1uUyGvwaUxVv02VaPpjDpo-uThrGvznd8N3cHnefakgS6aF9N8kX3_9PH26svi-ubz6uryeqF4VfQLo0tOBCuBgFCkwKCQxqouGWBMhEaaCVRhqkpqaIUNo6gBWtMCNY3gAhfkInt99N11PsqpJ1HiCnGKqUAiEasjoT1s5C7YLYQ76cHKw4YPrYSQXtsZWZW1NpzoAipBgSlAmHLNNBjOKi7G0z5Mpw311mhlXHp6NzOdV5xdy9bvJaMcCcaSwZvJIPhfg4n9P648US2kW1nX-GSmtjYqeUkryjhiAidq-RcqDW3S96RUNDbtzwTvZoLE9OZ338IQo1x9-_r_7M2POfv2hF0b6Pp19N0w5iDOQXoEVfAxBtM8dA4jOYb6vhtyDLWcQp1kr067_iC6TzH5A3DI8d8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1906414808</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trait variation and genetic diversity in a banana genomic selection training population</title><source>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Nyine, Moses ; Uwimana, Brigitte ; Swennen, Rony ; Batte, Michael ; Brown, Allan ; Christelová, Pavla ; Hřibová, Eva ; Lorenzen, Jim ; Doležel, Jaroslav</creator><contributor>Buenrostro-Nava, Marco</contributor><creatorcontrib>Nyine, Moses ; Uwimana, Brigitte ; Swennen, Rony ; Batte, Michael ; Brown, Allan ; Christelová, Pavla ; Hřibová, Eva ; Lorenzen, Jim ; Doležel, Jaroslav ; Buenrostro-Nava, Marco</creatorcontrib><description>Banana (Musa spp.) is an important crop in the African Great Lakes region in terms of income and food security, with the highest per capita consumption worldwide. Pests, diseases and climate change hamper sustainable production of bananas. New breeding tools with increased crossbreeding efficiency are being investigated to breed for resistant, high yielding hybrids of East African Highland banana (EAHB). These include genomic selection (GS), which will benefit breeding through increased genetic gain per unit time. Understanding trait variation and the correlation among economically important traits is an essential first step in the development and selection of suitable GS models for banana. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that trait variations in bananas are not affected by cross combination, cycle, field management and their interaction with genotype. A training population created using EAHB breeding material and its progeny was phenotyped in two contrasting conditions. A high level of correlation among vegetative and yield related traits was observed. Therefore, genomic selection models could be developed for traits that are easily measured. It is likely that the predictive ability of traits that are difficult to phenotype will be similar to less difficult traits they are highly correlated with. Genotype response to cycle and field management practices varied greatly with respect to traits. Yield related traits accounted for 31-35% of principal component variation under low and high input field management conditions. Resistance to Black Sigatoka was stable across cycles but varied under different field management depending on the genotype. The best cross combination was 1201K-1xSH3217 based on selection response (R) of hybrids. Genotyping using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers revealed that the training population was genetically diverse, reflecting a complex pedigree background, which was mostly influenced by the male parents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178734</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28586365</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abiotic stress ; Africa ; Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Bananas ; Biodiversity ; Bioinformatics ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Black Sigatoka ; Breeding ; Climate ; Climate change ; Consumption ; Correlation ; Crop diseases ; Crop yield ; Crops ; Diseases ; Economics ; Efficiency ; Evolution ; Farmers ; Food ; Food security ; Genetic aspects ; Genetic crosses ; Genetic diversity ; Genetic Variation ; Genetics, Population ; Genome, Plant ; Genomics ; Genotype ; Genotyping ; Hybrids ; Income ; Influence ; Lakes ; Management ; Markers ; Microsatellite Repeats - genetics ; Musa - genetics ; Offspring ; Parents ; Pedigree ; Pests ; Phenotype ; Phenotypes ; Plant breeding ; Plant sciences ; Population ; Population genetics ; Progeny ; Quantitative genetics ; Quantitative Trait Loci - genetics ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Security ; Selection, Genetic ; Sigatoka ; Sustainability ; Training ; Yield</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e0178734</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Nyine et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Nyine et al 2017 Nyine et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-ed763857a3a8c321ac0d1cb75a1138d0d580914c74e491e540fa4b420ff868123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-ed763857a3a8c321ac0d1cb75a1138d0d580914c74e491e540fa4b420ff868123</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6263-0492</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1906414808/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1906414808?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28586365$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Buenrostro-Nava, Marco</contributor><creatorcontrib>Nyine, Moses</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uwimana, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swennen, Rony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batte, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christelová, Pavla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hřibová, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzen, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doležel, Jaroslav</creatorcontrib><title>Trait variation and genetic diversity in a banana genomic selection training population</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Banana (Musa spp.) is an important crop in the African Great Lakes region in terms of income and food security, with the highest per capita consumption worldwide. Pests, diseases and climate change hamper sustainable production of bananas. New breeding tools with increased crossbreeding efficiency are being investigated to breed for resistant, high yielding hybrids of East African Highland banana (EAHB). These include genomic selection (GS), which will benefit breeding through increased genetic gain per unit time. Understanding trait variation and the correlation among economically important traits is an essential first step in the development and selection of suitable GS models for banana. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that trait variations in bananas are not affected by cross combination, cycle, field management and their interaction with genotype. A training population created using EAHB breeding material and its progeny was phenotyped in two contrasting conditions. A high level of correlation among vegetative and yield related traits was observed. Therefore, genomic selection models could be developed for traits that are easily measured. It is likely that the predictive ability of traits that are difficult to phenotype will be similar to less difficult traits they are highly correlated with. Genotype response to cycle and field management practices varied greatly with respect to traits. Yield related traits accounted for 31-35% of principal component variation under low and high input field management conditions. Resistance to Black Sigatoka was stable across cycles but varied under different field management depending on the genotype. The best cross combination was 1201K-1xSH3217 based on selection response (R) of hybrids. Genotyping using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers revealed that the training population was genetically diverse, reflecting a complex pedigree background, which was mostly influenced by the male parents.</description><subject>Abiotic stress</subject><subject>Africa</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Bananas</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Black Sigatoka</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Crop diseases</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genetic crosses</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Genetics, Population</subject><subject>Genome, Plant</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Genotyping</subject><subject>Hybrids</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Markers</subject><subject>Microsatellite Repeats - genetics</subject><subject>Musa - genetics</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Pedigree</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Plant breeding</subject><subject>Plant sciences</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Progeny</subject><subject>Quantitative genetics</subject><subject>Quantitative Trait Loci - genetics</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>Sigatoka</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Yield</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLguDFjEnz0fRGWBY_BhYWdNXLcJqknQydZEzawf33pjPdZQoKkouEnOd9k5y8WfYSoyUmJX6_8UNw0C133pklwqUoCX2UneOKFAteIPL4ZH2WPYtxgxAjgvOn2VkhmOCEs_Ps520A2-d7CBZ6610OTuetcaa3Ktd2b0K0_V1uUyGvwaUxVv02VaPpjDpo-uThrGvznd8N3cHnefakgS6aF9N8kX3_9PH26svi-ubz6uryeqF4VfQLo0tOBCuBgFCkwKCQxqouGWBMhEaaCVRhqkpqaIUNo6gBWtMCNY3gAhfkInt99N11PsqpJ1HiCnGKqUAiEasjoT1s5C7YLYQ76cHKw4YPrYSQXtsZWZW1NpzoAipBgSlAmHLNNBjOKi7G0z5Mpw311mhlXHp6NzOdV5xdy9bvJaMcCcaSwZvJIPhfg4n9P648US2kW1nX-GSmtjYqeUkryjhiAidq-RcqDW3S96RUNDbtzwTvZoLE9OZ338IQo1x9-_r_7M2POfv2hF0b6Pp19N0w5iDOQXoEVfAxBtM8dA4jOYb6vhtyDLWcQp1kr067_iC6TzH5A3DI8d8</recordid><startdate>20170606</startdate><enddate>20170606</enddate><creator>Nyine, Moses</creator><creator>Uwimana, Brigitte</creator><creator>Swennen, Rony</creator><creator>Batte, Michael</creator><creator>Brown, Allan</creator><creator>Christelová, Pavla</creator><creator>Hřibová, Eva</creator><creator>Lorenzen, Jim</creator><creator>Doležel, Jaroslav</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6263-0492</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170606</creationdate><title>Trait variation and genetic diversity in a banana genomic selection training population</title><author>Nyine, Moses ; Uwimana, Brigitte ; Swennen, Rony ; Batte, Michael ; Brown, Allan ; Christelová, Pavla ; Hřibová, Eva ; Lorenzen, Jim ; Doležel, Jaroslav</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-ed763857a3a8c321ac0d1cb75a1138d0d580914c74e491e540fa4b420ff868123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abiotic stress</topic><topic>Africa</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Bananas</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Black Sigatoka</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Crop diseases</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genetic crosses</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Genetics, Population</topic><topic>Genome, Plant</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Genotyping</topic><topic>Hybrids</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Markers</topic><topic>Microsatellite Repeats - genetics</topic><topic>Musa - genetics</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Pedigree</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Plant breeding</topic><topic>Plant sciences</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Progeny</topic><topic>Quantitative genetics</topic><topic>Quantitative Trait Loci - genetics</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>Sigatoka</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Yield</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nyine, Moses</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uwimana, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swennen, Rony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batte, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christelová, Pavla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hřibová, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzen, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doležel, Jaroslav</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nyine, Moses</au><au>Uwimana, Brigitte</au><au>Swennen, Rony</au><au>Batte, Michael</au><au>Brown, Allan</au><au>Christelová, Pavla</au><au>Hřibová, Eva</au><au>Lorenzen, Jim</au><au>Doležel, Jaroslav</au><au>Buenrostro-Nava, Marco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trait variation and genetic diversity in a banana genomic selection training population</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-06-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e0178734</spage><pages>e0178734-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Banana (Musa spp.) is an important crop in the African Great Lakes region in terms of income and food security, with the highest per capita consumption worldwide. Pests, diseases and climate change hamper sustainable production of bananas. New breeding tools with increased crossbreeding efficiency are being investigated to breed for resistant, high yielding hybrids of East African Highland banana (EAHB). These include genomic selection (GS), which will benefit breeding through increased genetic gain per unit time. Understanding trait variation and the correlation among economically important traits is an essential first step in the development and selection of suitable GS models for banana. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that trait variations in bananas are not affected by cross combination, cycle, field management and their interaction with genotype. A training population created using EAHB breeding material and its progeny was phenotyped in two contrasting conditions. A high level of correlation among vegetative and yield related traits was observed. Therefore, genomic selection models could be developed for traits that are easily measured. It is likely that the predictive ability of traits that are difficult to phenotype will be similar to less difficult traits they are highly correlated with. Genotype response to cycle and field management practices varied greatly with respect to traits. Yield related traits accounted for 31-35% of principal component variation under low and high input field management conditions. Resistance to Black Sigatoka was stable across cycles but varied under different field management depending on the genotype. The best cross combination was 1201K-1xSH3217 based on selection response (R) of hybrids. Genotyping using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers revealed that the training population was genetically diverse, reflecting a complex pedigree background, which was mostly influenced by the male parents.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28586365</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0178734</doi><tpages>e0178734</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6263-0492</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2017-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e0178734 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1906414808 |
source | Access via ProQuest (Open Access); PubMed Central |
subjects | Abiotic stress Africa Agricultural production Agriculture Bananas Biodiversity Bioinformatics Biology and Life Sciences Black Sigatoka Breeding Climate Climate change Consumption Correlation Crop diseases Crop yield Crops Diseases Economics Efficiency Evolution Farmers Food Food security Genetic aspects Genetic crosses Genetic diversity Genetic Variation Genetics, Population Genome, Plant Genomics Genotype Genotyping Hybrids Income Influence Lakes Management Markers Microsatellite Repeats - genetics Musa - genetics Offspring Parents Pedigree Pests Phenotype Phenotypes Plant breeding Plant sciences Population Population genetics Progeny Quantitative genetics Quantitative Trait Loci - genetics Research and Analysis Methods Security Selection, Genetic Sigatoka Sustainability Training Yield |
title | Trait variation and genetic diversity in a banana genomic selection training population |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A34%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trait%20variation%20and%20genetic%20diversity%20in%20a%20banana%20genomic%20selection%20training%20population&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Nyine,%20Moses&rft.date=2017-06-06&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e0178734&rft.pages=e0178734-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0178734&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA494560581%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-ed763857a3a8c321ac0d1cb75a1138d0d580914c74e491e540fa4b420ff868123%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1906414808&rft_id=info:pmid/28586365&rft_galeid=A494560581&rfr_iscdi=true |