Loading…

A Random Forest approach to predict the spatial distribution of sediment pollution in an estuarine system

Modeling the magnitude and distribution of sediment-bound pollutants in estuaries is often limited by incomplete knowledge of the site and inadequate sample density. To address these modeling limitations, a decision-support tool framework was conceived that predicts sediment contamination from the s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2017-07, Vol.12 (7), p.e0179473-e0179473
Main Authors: Walsh, Eric S, Kreakie, Betty J, Cantwell, Mark G, Nacci, Diane
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a715t-f93ef8f3c59bb6db153c06207c2fd5a8fbe41eb304a35b401430a5d7aad89bd53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a715t-f93ef8f3c59bb6db153c06207c2fd5a8fbe41eb304a35b401430a5d7aad89bd53
container_end_page e0179473
container_issue 7
container_start_page e0179473
container_title PloS one
container_volume 12
creator Walsh, Eric S
Kreakie, Betty J
Cantwell, Mark G
Nacci, Diane
description Modeling the magnitude and distribution of sediment-bound pollutants in estuaries is often limited by incomplete knowledge of the site and inadequate sample density. To address these modeling limitations, a decision-support tool framework was conceived that predicts sediment contamination from the sub-estuary to broader estuary extent. For this study, a Random Forest (RF) model was implemented to predict the distribution of a model contaminant, triclosan (5-chloro-2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenol) (TCS), in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, USA. TCS is an unregulated contaminant used in many personal care products. The RF explanatory variables were associated with TCS transport and fate (proxies) and direct and indirect environmental entry. The continuous RF TCS concentration predictions were discretized into three levels of contamination (low, medium, and high) for three different quantile thresholds. The RF model explained 63% of the variance with a minimum number of variables. Total organic carbon (TOC) (transport and fate proxy) was a strong predictor of TCS contamination causing a mean squared error increase of 59% when compared to permutations of randomized values of TOC. Additionally, combined sewer overflow discharge (environmental entry) and sand (transport and fate proxy) were strong predictors. The discretization models identified a TCS area of greatest concern in the northern reach of Narragansett Bay (Providence River sub-estuary), which was validated with independent test samples. This decision-support tool performed well at the sub-estuary extent and provided the means to identify areas of concern and prioritize bay-wide sampling.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0179473
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1923784841</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A499142451</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e0e0950ae2064cc5a36c5554de99047f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A499142451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a715t-f93ef8f3c59bb6db153c06207c2fd5a8fbe41eb304a35b401430a5d7aad89bd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk1-L1DAUxYso7rr6DUQDgujDjEmTtM2LMCyuDiwsrH9ew22SzmRpm5qk4n57M7a7TGUfpA8pt79z0nuSm2UvCV4TWpIPN270PbTrwfVmjUkpWEkfZadE0HxV5Jg-Pno_yZ6FcIMxp1VRPM1O8qqkFa7EaWY36Bp67Tp04bwJEcEweAdqj6JDgzfaqoji3qAwQLTQIm1D9LYeo3U9cg0KCelMH9Hg2naq2h5Bj5LZCN72SXoboumeZ08aaIN5Ma9n2feLT9_Ov6wurz5vzzeXKygJj6tGUNNUDVVc1HWha8KpwqmHUuWN5lA1tWHE1BQzoLxmmDCKgesSQFei1pyeZa8n36F1Qc4pBUlETsuKVYwkYjsR2sGNHLztwN9KB1b-LTi_k-CjVa2RBhssOAaT44IpxYEWinPOtBECs7JJXh_n3ca6M1qlJDy0C9Pll97u5c79kpznjDKWDN7NBt79HFNosrNBmbaF3rhx-m9CSI5xQt_8gz7c3UztIDVg-8alfdXBVG6YEITljB-o9QNUerTprEpXqrGpvhC8XwgSE83vuIMxBLn9ev3_7NWPJfv2iN0baOM-uOkmhSXIJlB5F4I3zX3IBMvDRNylIQ8TIeeJSLJXxwd0L7obAfoHv3UHLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1923784841</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Random Forest approach to predict the spatial distribution of sediment pollution in an estuarine system</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Walsh, Eric S ; Kreakie, Betty J ; Cantwell, Mark G ; Nacci, Diane</creator><contributor>Dias, João Miguel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Eric S ; Kreakie, Betty J ; Cantwell, Mark G ; Nacci, Diane ; Dias, João Miguel</creatorcontrib><description>Modeling the magnitude and distribution of sediment-bound pollutants in estuaries is often limited by incomplete knowledge of the site and inadequate sample density. To address these modeling limitations, a decision-support tool framework was conceived that predicts sediment contamination from the sub-estuary to broader estuary extent. For this study, a Random Forest (RF) model was implemented to predict the distribution of a model contaminant, triclosan (5-chloro-2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenol) (TCS), in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, USA. TCS is an unregulated contaminant used in many personal care products. The RF explanatory variables were associated with TCS transport and fate (proxies) and direct and indirect environmental entry. The continuous RF TCS concentration predictions were discretized into three levels of contamination (low, medium, and high) for three different quantile thresholds. The RF model explained 63% of the variance with a minimum number of variables. Total organic carbon (TOC) (transport and fate proxy) was a strong predictor of TCS contamination causing a mean squared error increase of 59% when compared to permutations of randomized values of TOC. Additionally, combined sewer overflow discharge (environmental entry) and sand (transport and fate proxy) were strong predictors. The discretization models identified a TCS area of greatest concern in the northern reach of Narragansett Bay (Providence River sub-estuary), which was validated with independent test samples. This decision-support tool performed well at the sub-estuary extent and provided the means to identify areas of concern and prioritize bay-wide sampling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179473</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28738089</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Chemical wastewater ; Classification ; Consumer products ; Contaminants ; Decision support systems ; Decision trees ; Discretization ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology ; Engineering and Technology ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Environmental Pollution - analysis ; Environmental protection ; Estuaries ; Estuarine environments ; Forests ; Geologic Sediments - analysis ; Internet ; Laboratories ; Methods ; Modelling ; Organic carbon ; Overflow ; PCB ; Permutations ; Personal grooming ; Phenols ; Physical Sciences ; Pollutants ; Pollution control ; Polychlorinated biphenyls ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Rhode Island ; Rivers ; Rivers - chemistry ; Sand transport ; Sediment pollution ; Sediments ; Sediments (Geology) ; Soil contamination ; Spatial distribution ; Thresholds ; Total organic carbon ; Triclosan ; Triclosan - chemistry ; Variables ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry ; Watershed management</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-07, Vol.12 (7), p.e0179473-e0179473</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a715t-f93ef8f3c59bb6db153c06207c2fd5a8fbe41eb304a35b401430a5d7aad89bd53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a715t-f93ef8f3c59bb6db153c06207c2fd5a8fbe41eb304a35b401430a5d7aad89bd53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0077-3639</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1923784841/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1923784841?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28738089$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Dias, João Miguel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Eric S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreakie, Betty J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantwell, Mark G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nacci, Diane</creatorcontrib><title>A Random Forest approach to predict the spatial distribution of sediment pollution in an estuarine system</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Modeling the magnitude and distribution of sediment-bound pollutants in estuaries is often limited by incomplete knowledge of the site and inadequate sample density. To address these modeling limitations, a decision-support tool framework was conceived that predicts sediment contamination from the sub-estuary to broader estuary extent. For this study, a Random Forest (RF) model was implemented to predict the distribution of a model contaminant, triclosan (5-chloro-2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenol) (TCS), in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, USA. TCS is an unregulated contaminant used in many personal care products. The RF explanatory variables were associated with TCS transport and fate (proxies) and direct and indirect environmental entry. The continuous RF TCS concentration predictions were discretized into three levels of contamination (low, medium, and high) for three different quantile thresholds. The RF model explained 63% of the variance with a minimum number of variables. Total organic carbon (TOC) (transport and fate proxy) was a strong predictor of TCS contamination causing a mean squared error increase of 59% when compared to permutations of randomized values of TOC. Additionally, combined sewer overflow discharge (environmental entry) and sand (transport and fate proxy) were strong predictors. The discretization models identified a TCS area of greatest concern in the northern reach of Narragansett Bay (Providence River sub-estuary), which was validated with independent test samples. This decision-support tool performed well at the sub-estuary extent and provided the means to identify areas of concern and prioritize bay-wide sampling.</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chemical wastewater</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Consumer products</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Decision support systems</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Discretization</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Environmental Pollution - analysis</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Estuarine environments</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Geologic Sediments - analysis</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Overflow</subject><subject>PCB</subject><subject>Permutations</subject><subject>Personal grooming</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Polychlorinated biphenyls</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Rhode Island</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Rivers - chemistry</subject><subject>Sand transport</subject><subject>Sediment pollution</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Sediments (Geology)</subject><subject>Soil contamination</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><subject>Total organic carbon</subject><subject>Triclosan</subject><subject>Triclosan - chemistry</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</subject><subject>Watershed management</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk1-L1DAUxYso7rr6DUQDgujDjEmTtM2LMCyuDiwsrH9ew22SzmRpm5qk4n57M7a7TGUfpA8pt79z0nuSm2UvCV4TWpIPN270PbTrwfVmjUkpWEkfZadE0HxV5Jg-Pno_yZ6FcIMxp1VRPM1O8qqkFa7EaWY36Bp67Tp04bwJEcEweAdqj6JDgzfaqoji3qAwQLTQIm1D9LYeo3U9cg0KCelMH9Hg2naq2h5Bj5LZCN72SXoboumeZ08aaIN5Ma9n2feLT9_Ov6wurz5vzzeXKygJj6tGUNNUDVVc1HWha8KpwqmHUuWN5lA1tWHE1BQzoLxmmDCKgesSQFei1pyeZa8n36F1Qc4pBUlETsuKVYwkYjsR2sGNHLztwN9KB1b-LTi_k-CjVa2RBhssOAaT44IpxYEWinPOtBECs7JJXh_n3ca6M1qlJDy0C9Pll97u5c79kpznjDKWDN7NBt79HFNosrNBmbaF3rhx-m9CSI5xQt_8gz7c3UztIDVg-8alfdXBVG6YEITljB-o9QNUerTprEpXqrGpvhC8XwgSE83vuIMxBLn9ev3_7NWPJfv2iN0baOM-uOkmhSXIJlB5F4I3zX3IBMvDRNylIQ8TIeeJSLJXxwd0L7obAfoHv3UHLw</recordid><startdate>20170724</startdate><enddate>20170724</enddate><creator>Walsh, Eric S</creator><creator>Kreakie, Betty J</creator><creator>Cantwell, Mark G</creator><creator>Nacci, Diane</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0077-3639</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170724</creationdate><title>A Random Forest approach to predict the spatial distribution of sediment pollution in an estuarine system</title><author>Walsh, Eric S ; Kreakie, Betty J ; Cantwell, Mark G ; Nacci, Diane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a715t-f93ef8f3c59bb6db153c06207c2fd5a8fbe41eb304a35b401430a5d7aad89bd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chemical wastewater</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Consumer products</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Decision support systems</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Discretization</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Environmental Pollution - analysis</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Estuarine environments</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Geologic Sediments - analysis</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Overflow</topic><topic>PCB</topic><topic>Permutations</topic><topic>Personal grooming</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Polychlorinated biphenyls</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Rhode Island</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Rivers - chemistry</topic><topic>Sand transport</topic><topic>Sediment pollution</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Sediments (Geology)</topic><topic>Soil contamination</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><topic>Total organic carbon</topic><topic>Triclosan</topic><topic>Triclosan - chemistry</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</topic><topic>Watershed management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Eric S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreakie, Betty J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantwell, Mark G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nacci, Diane</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale in Context : Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walsh, Eric S</au><au>Kreakie, Betty J</au><au>Cantwell, Mark G</au><au>Nacci, Diane</au><au>Dias, João Miguel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Random Forest approach to predict the spatial distribution of sediment pollution in an estuarine system</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-07-24</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0179473</spage><epage>e0179473</epage><pages>e0179473-e0179473</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Modeling the magnitude and distribution of sediment-bound pollutants in estuaries is often limited by incomplete knowledge of the site and inadequate sample density. To address these modeling limitations, a decision-support tool framework was conceived that predicts sediment contamination from the sub-estuary to broader estuary extent. For this study, a Random Forest (RF) model was implemented to predict the distribution of a model contaminant, triclosan (5-chloro-2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenol) (TCS), in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, USA. TCS is an unregulated contaminant used in many personal care products. The RF explanatory variables were associated with TCS transport and fate (proxies) and direct and indirect environmental entry. The continuous RF TCS concentration predictions were discretized into three levels of contamination (low, medium, and high) for three different quantile thresholds. The RF model explained 63% of the variance with a minimum number of variables. Total organic carbon (TOC) (transport and fate proxy) was a strong predictor of TCS contamination causing a mean squared error increase of 59% when compared to permutations of randomized values of TOC. Additionally, combined sewer overflow discharge (environmental entry) and sand (transport and fate proxy) were strong predictors. The discretization models identified a TCS area of greatest concern in the northern reach of Narragansett Bay (Providence River sub-estuary), which was validated with independent test samples. This decision-support tool performed well at the sub-estuary extent and provided the means to identify areas of concern and prioritize bay-wide sampling.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>28738089</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0179473</doi><tpages>e0179473</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0077-3639</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2017-07, Vol.12 (7), p.e0179473-e0179473
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1923784841
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central
subjects Biology and Life Sciences
Chemical wastewater
Classification
Consumer products
Contaminants
Decision support systems
Decision trees
Discretization
Earth Sciences
Ecology
Engineering and Technology
Environmental aspects
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Environmental Pollution - analysis
Environmental protection
Estuaries
Estuarine environments
Forests
Geologic Sediments - analysis
Internet
Laboratories
Methods
Modelling
Organic carbon
Overflow
PCB
Permutations
Personal grooming
Phenols
Physical Sciences
Pollutants
Pollution control
Polychlorinated biphenyls
R&D
Research & development
Research and Analysis Methods
Rhode Island
Rivers
Rivers - chemistry
Sand transport
Sediment pollution
Sediments
Sediments (Geology)
Soil contamination
Spatial distribution
Thresholds
Total organic carbon
Triclosan
Triclosan - chemistry
Variables
Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry
Watershed management
title A Random Forest approach to predict the spatial distribution of sediment pollution in an estuarine system
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T16%3A39%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Random%20Forest%20approach%20to%20predict%20the%20spatial%20distribution%20of%20sediment%20pollution%20in%20an%20estuarine%20system&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Walsh,%20Eric%20S&rft.date=2017-07-24&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0179473&rft.epage=e0179473&rft.pages=e0179473-e0179473&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0179473&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA499142451%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a715t-f93ef8f3c59bb6db153c06207c2fd5a8fbe41eb304a35b401430a5d7aad89bd53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1923784841&rft_id=info:pmid/28738089&rft_galeid=A499142451&rfr_iscdi=true