Dynamic thoracohumeral kinematics are dependent upon the etiology of the shoulder injury

• Published in: PloS one 2017-08, Vol.12 (8), p.e0183954-e0183954
• Main Authors: López-Pascual, Juan, Page, Álvaro, Serra-Añó, Pilar
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Activities of daily living; Adult; Angular velocity; Biology and Life Sciences; Biomechanical Phenomena; Care and treatment; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diagnosis; Elevation; Etiology; Female; Humans; Humerus - physiopathology; Injuries; Isometric; Kinematics; Male; Mathematical analysis; Medicine and Health Sciences; Middle Aged; Movement; Neuromuscular system; Pain; Patients; Physical Sciences; Physiological aspects; Range of Motion, Articular; Rehabilitation; Reproducibility; Rhythm; Shoulder; Shoulder injuries; Shoulder Injuries - physiopathology; Stereophotogrammetry; Studies; Tearing; Thorax - physiopathology; Velocity
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183954

Obtaining kinematic patterns that depend on the shoulder injury may be important when planning rehabilitation. The main goal of this study is to explore whether the kinematic patterns of continuous and repetitive shoulder elevation motions are different according to the type of shoulder injury in question, specifically tendinopathy or rotator cuff tear, and to analyze the influence of the load handled during its assessment. For this purpose, 19 individuals with tendinopathy and 9 with rotator cuff tear performed a repetitive scaption movement that was assessed with stereophotogrammetry. Furthermore, static range of motion (ROM) and isometric strength were evaluated with a goniometer and a dynamometer, respectively. Dynamic measurements of maximum elevation (Emax), variablility of the maximum angle (VMA), maximum angular velocity (Velmax), and time to maximum velocity (tmaxvel) were found to be significantly different between the tendinopathy group (TG) and the rotator cuff tear group (RTCG). No differences were found in the ROM assessed with goniometry and the isometric strength. The effect of increasing the load placed in the hand during the scaption movement led to significant differences in Emax, VMA, tmaxvel and repeatability. Therefore, only the dynamic variables showed sufficient capability of detecting differences in functional performance associated with structural shoulder injury. The differences observed in the kinematic variables between patients with tendinopathy and rotator cuff tear seem to be related to alterations in thoracohumeral rhythm and neuromuscular control. Kinematic analysis may contribute to a better understanding of the functional impact of shoulder injuries, which would help in the assessment and treatment of shoulder pain.