Sexual assault incidents among college undergraduates: Prevalence and factors associated with risk

• Published in: PloS one 2017-11, Vol.12 (11), p.e0186471-e0186471
• Main Authors: Mellins, Claude A, Walsh, Kate, Sarvet, Aaron L, Wall, Melanie, Gilbert, Louisa, Santelli, John S, Thompson, Martie, Wilson, Patrick A, Khan, Shamus, Benson, Stephanie, Bah, Karimata, Kaufman, Kathy A, Reardon, Leigh, Hirsch, Jennifer S
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Alcohol Drinking - psychology; Alcohol use; Alcoholic beverages; Binge drinking; Biology and Life Sciences; College campuses; College students; Drinking behavior; Drug abuse; Environmental statistics; Female; Gender identity; Gender nonconforming; Health aspects; Heterosexuality - psychology; Humans; Internet; Logistic Models; Male; Medicine and Health Sciences; Methods; Monogamy; New York City; Penetration; People and Places; Prevention; Psychiatry; Public health; Research and Analysis Methods; Risk factors; Risk groups; School violence; Schools; Sex crimes; Sex Offenses; Sexual abuse; Sexual and Gender Minorities - psychology; Sexual assault; Sexual behavior; Sexual Behavior - psychology; Sexual relationships; Social Sciences; Statistical tests; Statistics; Students; Students - psychology; Studies; Surveys and Questionnaires; Transportation services; Universities; Vagina; Victimization; Victims of crime; Violence; Workforce
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186471

Sexual assault on college campuses is a public health issue. However varying research methodologies (e.g., different sexual assault definitions, measures, assessment timeframes) and low response rates hamper efforts to define the scope of the problem. To illuminate the complexity of campus sexual assault, we collected survey data from a large population-based random sample of undergraduate students from Columbia University and Barnard College in New York City, using evidence based methods to maximize response rates and sample representativeness, and behaviorally specific measures of sexual assault to accurately capture victimization rates. This paper focuses on student experiences of different types of sexual assault victimization, as well as sociodemographic, social, and risk environment correlates. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression were used to estimate prevalences and test associations. Since college entry, 22% of students reported experiencing at least one incident of sexual assault (defined as sexualized touching, attempted penetration [oral, anal, vaginal, other], or completed penetration). Women and gender nonconforming students reported the highest rates (28% and 38%, respectively), although men also reported sexual assault (12.5%). Across types of assault and gender groups, incapacitation due to alcohol and drug use and/or other factors was the perpetration method reported most frequently (> 50%); physical force (particularly for completed penetration in women) and verbal coercion were also commonly reported. Factors associated with increased risk for sexual assault included non-heterosexual identity, difficulty paying for basic necessities, fraternity/sorority membership, participation in more casual sexual encounters ("hook ups") vs. exclusive/monogamous or no sexual relationships, binge drinking, and experiencing sexual assault before college. High rates of re-victimization during college were reported across gender groups. Our study is consistent with prevalence findings previously reported. Variation in types of assault and methods of perpetration experienced across gender groups highlight the need to develop prevention strategies tailored to specific risk groups.