Loading…

Comparative study of qualitative and quantitative methods to determine toxicity level of Aspergillus flavus isolates in maize

An attempt was made to compare between easy and inexpensive qualitative method (ammonia vapour test) and analytical methods (thin layer chromatography and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) for identification of aflatoxigenic isolates of Aspergillus flavus in maize. In this comparative study the tox...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189760
Main Authors: Shekhar, Meena, Singh, Nirupma, Dutta, Ram, Kumar, Shrvan, Mahajan, Vinay
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7ea4f9e6089348c1345f3bdad5fd37a215872d4b3f69497987ae3acd69a2f8503
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7ea4f9e6089348c1345f3bdad5fd37a215872d4b3f69497987ae3acd69a2f8503
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page e0189760
container_title PloS one
container_volume 12
creator Shekhar, Meena
Singh, Nirupma
Dutta, Ram
Kumar, Shrvan
Mahajan, Vinay
description An attempt was made to compare between easy and inexpensive qualitative method (ammonia vapour test) and analytical methods (thin layer chromatography and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) for identification of aflatoxigenic isolates of Aspergillus flavus in maize. In this comparative study the toxicity level of A. flavus isolates exhibited 100% agreement among ammonia vapour test, ELISA and TLC for highly toxigenic (>2000 ppb) and toxigenic (501-2000 ppb) isolates while 88.5% agreement observed for least toxic (
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0189760
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1977543375</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A518987847</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_76d79cf7cff64777843dd8422e222ade</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A518987847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7ea4f9e6089348c1345f3bdad5fd37a215872d4b3f69497987ae3acd69a2f8503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNktuK2zAQhk1p6W63fYPSGgqFXiS1JduSbhZC6CGwsNDTrVCkUaIgW1lJDptC371K4ywxtFB0MZrRN7-G4c-yl2UxLTEp329c7zthp1vXwbQoKSNN8Si7LBlGkwYV-PHZ_SJ7FsKmKGpMm-ZpdoEYqipKi8vs19y1W-FFNDvIQ-zVPnc6v-uFNfFYFJ065F08FVqIa6dCHl2uIIJvTQcpuTfSxH1uYQf2oDELW_ArY20fcm3FLgUTnBUR0qXLW2F-wvPsiRY2wIshXmXfP374Nv88ubn9tJjPbiayYShOCIhKM2gKynBFZYmrWuOlEqrWChOBypoSpKol1g2rGGGUCMBCqoYJpGld4Kvs9VF3a13gw-YCLxkhdYUxqROxOBLKiQ3fetMKv-dOGP6n4PyKCx-NtMBJowiTmkitm4oQQiusFK0QAoSQUJC0roff-mULSkIXvbAj0fFLZ9Z85Xa8JrgkiCWBN4OAd3c9hPiPkQdqJdJUptMuicnWBMlndfIDTZORRE3_QqWjoDUyeUebVB81vBs1JCbCfVyJPgS--Prl_9nbH2P27Rm7BmHjOvmhj8Z1YQxWR1B6F4IH_bC5suAH65-2wQ_W54P1U9ur860_NJ28jn8DOscB6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1977543375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative study of qualitative and quantitative methods to determine toxicity level of Aspergillus flavus isolates in maize</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Shekhar, Meena ; Singh, Nirupma ; Dutta, Ram ; Kumar, Shrvan ; Mahajan, Vinay</creator><contributor>Gupta, Vijai</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shekhar, Meena ; Singh, Nirupma ; Dutta, Ram ; Kumar, Shrvan ; Mahajan, Vinay ; Gupta, Vijai</creatorcontrib><description>An attempt was made to compare between easy and inexpensive qualitative method (ammonia vapour test) and analytical methods (thin layer chromatography and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) for identification of aflatoxigenic isolates of Aspergillus flavus in maize. In this comparative study the toxicity level of A. flavus isolates exhibited 100% agreement among ammonia vapour test, ELISA and TLC for highly toxigenic (&gt;2000 ppb) and toxigenic (501-2000 ppb) isolates while 88.5% agreement observed for least toxic (&lt;20 ppb) isolates. In ammonia vapour test 51% of A. flavus isolates showed creamish or no colour change corresponding to least toxic/atoxic (&lt;20ppb) category estimated by ELISA. Similarly 22% highly toxic isolates exhibited plum red colour, 12% moderately toxic indicated pink colour and 10% toxic isolates showed red colour. However, 11.5% isolates were found to be false positive in cream colour category (least toxic) and 28.5% false negatives in pink colour (moderately toxic) category. The isolates from different agroclimatic zones of maize in India showed high variability for aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) production potential ranging from 0.214-8116.61 ppb. Toxigenic potential of Aspergillus flavus isolates in culture was further validated by inoculating maize grain sample with four different isolates with varied toxin producing ability. With good agreement percentage between cultural and analytical methods the study concludes the ammonia vapour test to be easy, inexpensive, reliable and time saving method that can be used for segregating or pre-screening of contaminated samples from bulk food/feed stock.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189760</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29244880</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Aflatoxin B1 ; Agricultural commodities ; Ammonia ; Analytical methods ; Aspergillus ; Aspergillus flavus ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Causes of ; Chromatography ; Color ; Comparative studies ; Corn ; Cream ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Food contamination &amp; poisoning ; Genetic aspects ; Grain ; Hepatitis ; Identification methods ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Oryza ; Physical Sciences ; Physiological aspects ; Qualitative analysis ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Test procedures ; Thin layer chromatography ; Toxicity ; Vapors ; Virulence (Microbiology)</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189760</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Shekhar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2017 Shekhar et al 2017 Shekhar et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7ea4f9e6089348c1345f3bdad5fd37a215872d4b3f69497987ae3acd69a2f8503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7ea4f9e6089348c1345f3bdad5fd37a215872d4b3f69497987ae3acd69a2f8503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1977543375/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1977543375?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29244880$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gupta, Vijai</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shekhar, Meena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Nirupma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutta, Ram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Shrvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Vinay</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative study of qualitative and quantitative methods to determine toxicity level of Aspergillus flavus isolates in maize</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>An attempt was made to compare between easy and inexpensive qualitative method (ammonia vapour test) and analytical methods (thin layer chromatography and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) for identification of aflatoxigenic isolates of Aspergillus flavus in maize. In this comparative study the toxicity level of A. flavus isolates exhibited 100% agreement among ammonia vapour test, ELISA and TLC for highly toxigenic (&gt;2000 ppb) and toxigenic (501-2000 ppb) isolates while 88.5% agreement observed for least toxic (&lt;20 ppb) isolates. In ammonia vapour test 51% of A. flavus isolates showed creamish or no colour change corresponding to least toxic/atoxic (&lt;20ppb) category estimated by ELISA. Similarly 22% highly toxic isolates exhibited plum red colour, 12% moderately toxic indicated pink colour and 10% toxic isolates showed red colour. However, 11.5% isolates were found to be false positive in cream colour category (least toxic) and 28.5% false negatives in pink colour (moderately toxic) category. The isolates from different agroclimatic zones of maize in India showed high variability for aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) production potential ranging from 0.214-8116.61 ppb. Toxigenic potential of Aspergillus flavus isolates in culture was further validated by inoculating maize grain sample with four different isolates with varied toxin producing ability. With good agreement percentage between cultural and analytical methods the study concludes the ammonia vapour test to be easy, inexpensive, reliable and time saving method that can be used for segregating or pre-screening of contaminated samples from bulk food/feed stock.</description><subject>Aflatoxin B1</subject><subject>Agricultural commodities</subject><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Analytical methods</subject><subject>Aspergillus</subject><subject>Aspergillus flavus</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Causes of</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Cream</subject><subject>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Food contamination &amp; poisoning</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Hepatitis</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Oryza</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><subject>Thin layer chromatography</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Vapors</subject><subject>Virulence (Microbiology)</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNktuK2zAQhk1p6W63fYPSGgqFXiS1JduSbhZC6CGwsNDTrVCkUaIgW1lJDptC371K4ywxtFB0MZrRN7-G4c-yl2UxLTEp329c7zthp1vXwbQoKSNN8Si7LBlGkwYV-PHZ_SJ7FsKmKGpMm-ZpdoEYqipKi8vs19y1W-FFNDvIQ-zVPnc6v-uFNfFYFJ065F08FVqIa6dCHl2uIIJvTQcpuTfSxH1uYQf2oDELW_ArY20fcm3FLgUTnBUR0qXLW2F-wvPsiRY2wIshXmXfP374Nv88ubn9tJjPbiayYShOCIhKM2gKynBFZYmrWuOlEqrWChOBypoSpKol1g2rGGGUCMBCqoYJpGld4Kvs9VF3a13gw-YCLxkhdYUxqROxOBLKiQ3fetMKv-dOGP6n4PyKCx-NtMBJowiTmkitm4oQQiusFK0QAoSQUJC0roff-mULSkIXvbAj0fFLZ9Z85Xa8JrgkiCWBN4OAd3c9hPiPkQdqJdJUptMuicnWBMlndfIDTZORRE3_QqWjoDUyeUebVB81vBs1JCbCfVyJPgS--Prl_9nbH2P27Rm7BmHjOvmhj8Z1YQxWR1B6F4IH_bC5suAH65-2wQ_W54P1U9ur860_NJ28jn8DOscB6w</recordid><startdate>20171215</startdate><enddate>20171215</enddate><creator>Shekhar, Meena</creator><creator>Singh, Nirupma</creator><creator>Dutta, Ram</creator><creator>Kumar, Shrvan</creator><creator>Mahajan, Vinay</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171215</creationdate><title>Comparative study of qualitative and quantitative methods to determine toxicity level of Aspergillus flavus isolates in maize</title><author>Shekhar, Meena ; Singh, Nirupma ; Dutta, Ram ; Kumar, Shrvan ; Mahajan, Vinay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7ea4f9e6089348c1345f3bdad5fd37a215872d4b3f69497987ae3acd69a2f8503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aflatoxin B1</topic><topic>Agricultural commodities</topic><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Analytical methods</topic><topic>Aspergillus</topic><topic>Aspergillus flavus</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Causes of</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Cream</topic><topic>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Food contamination &amp; poisoning</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Hepatitis</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Oryza</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><topic>Thin layer chromatography</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Vapors</topic><topic>Virulence (Microbiology)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shekhar, Meena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Nirupma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutta, Ram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Shrvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Vinay</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints (Gale)</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shekhar, Meena</au><au>Singh, Nirupma</au><au>Dutta, Ram</au><au>Kumar, Shrvan</au><au>Mahajan, Vinay</au><au>Gupta, Vijai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative study of qualitative and quantitative methods to determine toxicity level of Aspergillus flavus isolates in maize</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-12-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0189760</spage><pages>e0189760-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>An attempt was made to compare between easy and inexpensive qualitative method (ammonia vapour test) and analytical methods (thin layer chromatography and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) for identification of aflatoxigenic isolates of Aspergillus flavus in maize. In this comparative study the toxicity level of A. flavus isolates exhibited 100% agreement among ammonia vapour test, ELISA and TLC for highly toxigenic (&gt;2000 ppb) and toxigenic (501-2000 ppb) isolates while 88.5% agreement observed for least toxic (&lt;20 ppb) isolates. In ammonia vapour test 51% of A. flavus isolates showed creamish or no colour change corresponding to least toxic/atoxic (&lt;20ppb) category estimated by ELISA. Similarly 22% highly toxic isolates exhibited plum red colour, 12% moderately toxic indicated pink colour and 10% toxic isolates showed red colour. However, 11.5% isolates were found to be false positive in cream colour category (least toxic) and 28.5% false negatives in pink colour (moderately toxic) category. The isolates from different agroclimatic zones of maize in India showed high variability for aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) production potential ranging from 0.214-8116.61 ppb. Toxigenic potential of Aspergillus flavus isolates in culture was further validated by inoculating maize grain sample with four different isolates with varied toxin producing ability. With good agreement percentage between cultural and analytical methods the study concludes the ammonia vapour test to be easy, inexpensive, reliable and time saving method that can be used for segregating or pre-screening of contaminated samples from bulk food/feed stock.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29244880</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0189760</doi><tpages>e0189760</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189760
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1977543375
source PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Aflatoxin B1
Agricultural commodities
Ammonia
Analytical methods
Aspergillus
Aspergillus flavus
Biology and Life Sciences
Causes of
Chromatography
Color
Comparative studies
Corn
Cream
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Food contamination & poisoning
Genetic aspects
Grain
Hepatitis
Identification methods
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
Oryza
Physical Sciences
Physiological aspects
Qualitative analysis
Research and Analysis Methods
Test procedures
Thin layer chromatography
Toxicity
Vapors
Virulence (Microbiology)
title Comparative study of qualitative and quantitative methods to determine toxicity level of Aspergillus flavus isolates in maize
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A17%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20study%20of%20qualitative%20and%20quantitative%20methods%20to%20determine%20toxicity%20level%20of%20Aspergillus%20flavus%20isolates%20in%20maize&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Shekhar,%20Meena&rft.date=2017-12-15&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0189760&rft.pages=e0189760-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0189760&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA518987847%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-7ea4f9e6089348c1345f3bdad5fd37a215872d4b3f69497987ae3acd69a2f8503%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1977543375&rft_id=info:pmid/29244880&rft_galeid=A518987847&rfr_iscdi=true