Loading…

Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh

Habitat reconstruction is commonly employed to restore degraded estuarine habitats and lost ecological functions. In this study, we use a combination of stable isotope analyses and macrofauna community analysis to compare the ecological structure and function between a recently constructed Spartina...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189871-e0189871
Main Authors: Rezek, Ryan J, Lebreton, Benoit, Sterba-Boatwright, Blair, Beseres Pollack, Jennifer
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-47e6bf7fadc781672a634445f48ebef78485ff24ab7428f813b4bed8ab9b1cad3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-47e6bf7fadc781672a634445f48ebef78485ff24ab7428f813b4bed8ab9b1cad3
container_end_page e0189871
container_issue 12
container_start_page e0189871
container_title PloS one
container_volume 12
creator Rezek, Ryan J
Lebreton, Benoit
Sterba-Boatwright, Blair
Beseres Pollack, Jennifer
description Habitat reconstruction is commonly employed to restore degraded estuarine habitats and lost ecological functions. In this study, we use a combination of stable isotope analyses and macrofauna community analysis to compare the ecological structure and function between a recently constructed Spartina alterniflora salt marsh and a natural reference habitat over a 2-year period. The restored marsh was successful in providing habitat for economically and ecologically important macrofauna taxa; supporting similar or greater density, biomass, and species richness to the natural reference during all but one sampling period. Stable isotope analyses revealed that communities from the natural and the restored marshes relied on a similar diversity of food resources and that decapods had similar trophic levels. However, some generalist consumers (Palaemonetes spp. and Penaeus aztecus) were more 13C-enriched in the natural marsh, indicating a greater use of macrophyte derived organic matter relative to restored marsh counterparts. This difference was attributed to the higher quantities of macrophyte detritus and organic carbon in natural marsh sediments. Reduced marsh flooding frequency was associated with a reduction in macrofaunal biomass and decapod trophic levels. The restored marsh edge occurred at lower elevations than natural marsh edge, apparently due to reduced fetch and wind-wave exposure provided by the protective berm structures. The lower elevation of the restored marsh edge mitigated negative impacts in sampling periods with low tidal elevations that affected the natural marsh. The results of this study highlight the importance of considering sediment characteristics and elevation in salt marsh constructions.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0189871
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1978702711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A519523325</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7d8022e376a74628bf095288b9e92dfe</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A519523325</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-47e6bf7fadc781672a634445f48ebef78485ff24ab7428f813b4bed8ab9b1cad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQ6E0F7u1DtbhprCEtFkIBHq6FbI82vXilTaSvbRvXznrhHXIRfGFzeibXzO_Z7LsLSrmiHD0eeP74HQ733kH8wIJKTh6lp0iSfCM4YI8P_o-yV7FuCmKkgjGXmYnWGKGuCxPs-Wl8a1fNUa3eexCb7o-QK5dndvema7xLm9crvMAsfMB6nwPIfYxdzqBQ45uu3yrQ1y_zl5Y3UZ4M77Psl9fL39eXM2ub74tLxbXM8Mx62aUA6sst7o2XCDGsWaEUlpaKqACywUVpbWY6opTLKxApKIV1EJXskJG1-Qse3_Q3bU-qtGFqJDkgheYI5SI5YGovd6oXWhSfX-V1426C_iwUjp0jWlB8VoUGAPhTHPKsKhsIUssRCVB4tpC0voy3tZXW6gNuC61PRGdnrhmrVZ-r0pOWKopCZwfBNaP0q4W12qIFcmEUjK2Hwr_NF4W_G2fHFfbJhpoW-3A93c9SipLhGVCPzxCn3ZipFY6Nds461ONZhBVixKlTgnBZaLmT1DpqWHbmDRetknxScL5JCExHfzpVrqPUS1_fP9_9ub3lP14xK4hzdY6-rYfxjBOQXoATfAxBrAPzqJCDdtx74YatkON25HS3h3_zIek-3Ug_wA6aAkY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1978702711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh</title><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Rezek, Ryan J ; Lebreton, Benoit ; Sterba-Boatwright, Blair ; Beseres Pollack, Jennifer</creator><contributor>Armas, Cristina</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rezek, Ryan J ; Lebreton, Benoit ; Sterba-Boatwright, Blair ; Beseres Pollack, Jennifer ; Armas, Cristina</creatorcontrib><description>Habitat reconstruction is commonly employed to restore degraded estuarine habitats and lost ecological functions. In this study, we use a combination of stable isotope analyses and macrofauna community analysis to compare the ecological structure and function between a recently constructed Spartina alterniflora salt marsh and a natural reference habitat over a 2-year period. The restored marsh was successful in providing habitat for economically and ecologically important macrofauna taxa; supporting similar or greater density, biomass, and species richness to the natural reference during all but one sampling period. Stable isotope analyses revealed that communities from the natural and the restored marshes relied on a similar diversity of food resources and that decapods had similar trophic levels. However, some generalist consumers (Palaemonetes spp. and Penaeus aztecus) were more 13C-enriched in the natural marsh, indicating a greater use of macrophyte derived organic matter relative to restored marsh counterparts. This difference was attributed to the higher quantities of macrophyte detritus and organic carbon in natural marsh sediments. Reduced marsh flooding frequency was associated with a reduction in macrofaunal biomass and decapod trophic levels. The restored marsh edge occurred at lower elevations than natural marsh edge, apparently due to reduced fetch and wind-wave exposure provided by the protective berm structures. The lower elevation of the restored marsh edge mitigated negative impacts in sampling periods with low tidal elevations that affected the natural marsh. The results of this study highlight the importance of considering sediment characteristics and elevation in salt marsh constructions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189871</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29261795</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Aquatic plants ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Biomass ; Carbon ; Coasts ; Comparative analysis ; Construction ; Decapoda ; Detritus ; Earth Sciences ; Ecological function ; Ecological monitoring ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Ecosystems ; Elevation ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental Sciences ; Estuaries ; Estuarine environments ; Fisheries ; Flood frequency ; Flooding ; Food resources ; Habitats ; Isotope geology ; Life sciences ; Macrofauna ; Organic carbon ; Organic matter ; Palaemonetes pugio ; Physical Sciences ; Protective structures ; Salt marshes ; Sampling ; Sediments ; Sediments (Geology) ; Soil erosion ; Spartina ; Spartina alterniflora ; Species richness ; Stable isotopes ; Structure-function relationships ; Taxa ; Trophic levels ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189871-e0189871</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Rezek et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>2017 Rezek et al 2017 Rezek et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-47e6bf7fadc781672a634445f48ebef78485ff24ab7428f813b4bed8ab9b1cad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-47e6bf7fadc781672a634445f48ebef78485ff24ab7428f813b4bed8ab9b1cad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2995-4006</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1978702711/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1978702711?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,25734,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571,53772,53774,74875</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29261795$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01675966$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Armas, Cristina</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rezek, Ryan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebreton, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterba-Boatwright, Blair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beseres Pollack, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><title>Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Habitat reconstruction is commonly employed to restore degraded estuarine habitats and lost ecological functions. In this study, we use a combination of stable isotope analyses and macrofauna community analysis to compare the ecological structure and function between a recently constructed Spartina alterniflora salt marsh and a natural reference habitat over a 2-year period. The restored marsh was successful in providing habitat for economically and ecologically important macrofauna taxa; supporting similar or greater density, biomass, and species richness to the natural reference during all but one sampling period. Stable isotope analyses revealed that communities from the natural and the restored marshes relied on a similar diversity of food resources and that decapods had similar trophic levels. However, some generalist consumers (Palaemonetes spp. and Penaeus aztecus) were more 13C-enriched in the natural marsh, indicating a greater use of macrophyte derived organic matter relative to restored marsh counterparts. This difference was attributed to the higher quantities of macrophyte detritus and organic carbon in natural marsh sediments. Reduced marsh flooding frequency was associated with a reduction in macrofaunal biomass and decapod trophic levels. The restored marsh edge occurred at lower elevations than natural marsh edge, apparently due to reduced fetch and wind-wave exposure provided by the protective berm structures. The lower elevation of the restored marsh edge mitigated negative impacts in sampling periods with low tidal elevations that affected the natural marsh. The results of this study highlight the importance of considering sediment characteristics and elevation in salt marsh constructions.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Decapoda</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecological function</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Estuarine environments</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Flood frequency</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>Food resources</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Isotope geology</subject><subject>Life sciences</subject><subject>Macrofauna</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Palaemonetes pugio</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Protective structures</subject><subject>Salt marshes</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Sediments (Geology)</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Spartina</subject><subject>Spartina alterniflora</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Stable isotopes</subject><subject>Structure-function relationships</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Trophic levels</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQ6E0F7u1DtbhprCEtFkIBHq6FbI82vXilTaSvbRvXznrhHXIRfGFzeibXzO_Z7LsLSrmiHD0eeP74HQ733kH8wIJKTh6lp0iSfCM4YI8P_o-yV7FuCmKkgjGXmYnWGKGuCxPs-Wl8a1fNUa3eexCb7o-QK5dndvema7xLm9crvMAsfMB6nwPIfYxdzqBQ45uu3yrQ1y_zl5Y3UZ4M77Psl9fL39eXM2ub74tLxbXM8Mx62aUA6sst7o2XCDGsWaEUlpaKqACywUVpbWY6opTLKxApKIV1EJXskJG1-Qse3_Q3bU-qtGFqJDkgheYI5SI5YGovd6oXWhSfX-V1426C_iwUjp0jWlB8VoUGAPhTHPKsKhsIUssRCVB4tpC0voy3tZXW6gNuC61PRGdnrhmrVZ-r0pOWKopCZwfBNaP0q4W12qIFcmEUjK2Hwr_NF4W_G2fHFfbJhpoW-3A93c9SipLhGVCPzxCn3ZipFY6Nds461ONZhBVixKlTgnBZaLmT1DpqWHbmDRetknxScL5JCExHfzpVrqPUS1_fP9_9ub3lP14xK4hzdY6-rYfxjBOQXoATfAxBrAPzqJCDdtx74YatkON25HS3h3_zIek-3Ug_wA6aAkY</recordid><startdate>20171219</startdate><enddate>20171219</enddate><creator>Rezek, Ryan J</creator><creator>Lebreton, Benoit</creator><creator>Sterba-Boatwright, Blair</creator><creator>Beseres Pollack, Jennifer</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2995-4006</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171219</creationdate><title>Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh</title><author>Rezek, Ryan J ; Lebreton, Benoit ; Sterba-Boatwright, Blair ; Beseres Pollack, Jennifer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-47e6bf7fadc781672a634445f48ebef78485ff24ab7428f813b4bed8ab9b1cad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Decapoda</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecological function</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Estuarine environments</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Flood frequency</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>Food resources</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Isotope geology</topic><topic>Life sciences</topic><topic>Macrofauna</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Palaemonetes pugio</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Protective structures</topic><topic>Salt marshes</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Sediments (Geology)</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Spartina</topic><topic>Spartina alterniflora</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Stable isotopes</topic><topic>Structure-function relationships</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Trophic levels</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rezek, Ryan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebreton, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterba-Boatwright, Blair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beseres Pollack, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rezek, Ryan J</au><au>Lebreton, Benoit</au><au>Sterba-Boatwright, Blair</au><au>Beseres Pollack, Jennifer</au><au>Armas, Cristina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-12-19</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0189871</spage><epage>e0189871</epage><pages>e0189871-e0189871</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Habitat reconstruction is commonly employed to restore degraded estuarine habitats and lost ecological functions. In this study, we use a combination of stable isotope analyses and macrofauna community analysis to compare the ecological structure and function between a recently constructed Spartina alterniflora salt marsh and a natural reference habitat over a 2-year period. The restored marsh was successful in providing habitat for economically and ecologically important macrofauna taxa; supporting similar or greater density, biomass, and species richness to the natural reference during all but one sampling period. Stable isotope analyses revealed that communities from the natural and the restored marshes relied on a similar diversity of food resources and that decapods had similar trophic levels. However, some generalist consumers (Palaemonetes spp. and Penaeus aztecus) were more 13C-enriched in the natural marsh, indicating a greater use of macrophyte derived organic matter relative to restored marsh counterparts. This difference was attributed to the higher quantities of macrophyte detritus and organic carbon in natural marsh sediments. Reduced marsh flooding frequency was associated with a reduction in macrofaunal biomass and decapod trophic levels. The restored marsh edge occurred at lower elevations than natural marsh edge, apparently due to reduced fetch and wind-wave exposure provided by the protective berm structures. The lower elevation of the restored marsh edge mitigated negative impacts in sampling periods with low tidal elevations that affected the natural marsh. The results of this study highlight the importance of considering sediment characteristics and elevation in salt marsh constructions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29261795</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0189871</doi><tpages>e0189871</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2995-4006</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189871-e0189871
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_1978702711
source PubMed Central(OpenAccess); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Analysis
Aquatic plants
Biology and Life Sciences
Biomass
Carbon
Coasts
Comparative analysis
Construction
Decapoda
Detritus
Earth Sciences
Ecological function
Ecological monitoring
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Ecosystems
Elevation
Environmental aspects
Environmental Sciences
Estuaries
Estuarine environments
Fisheries
Flood frequency
Flooding
Food resources
Habitats
Isotope geology
Life sciences
Macrofauna
Organic carbon
Organic matter
Palaemonetes pugio
Physical Sciences
Protective structures
Salt marshes
Sampling
Sediments
Sediments (Geology)
Soil erosion
Spartina
Spartina alterniflora
Species richness
Stable isotopes
Structure-function relationships
Taxa
Trophic levels
Wetlands
title Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T23%3A31%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecological%20structure%20and%20function%20in%20a%20restored%20versus%20natural%20salt%20marsh&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Rezek,%20Ryan%20J&rft.date=2017-12-19&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0189871&rft.epage=e0189871&rft.pages=e0189871-e0189871&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0189871&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA519523325%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-47e6bf7fadc781672a634445f48ebef78485ff24ab7428f813b4bed8ab9b1cad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1978702711&rft_id=info:pmid/29261795&rft_galeid=A519523325&rfr_iscdi=true