Loading…
Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh
Habitat reconstruction is commonly employed to restore degraded estuarine habitats and lost ecological functions. In this study, we use a combination of stable isotope analyses and macrofauna community analysis to compare the ecological structure and function between a recently constructed Spartina...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189871-e0189871 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-47e6bf7fadc781672a634445f48ebef78485ff24ab7428f813b4bed8ab9b1cad3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-47e6bf7fadc781672a634445f48ebef78485ff24ab7428f813b4bed8ab9b1cad3 |
container_end_page | e0189871 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e0189871 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Rezek, Ryan J Lebreton, Benoit Sterba-Boatwright, Blair Beseres Pollack, Jennifer |
description | Habitat reconstruction is commonly employed to restore degraded estuarine habitats and lost ecological functions. In this study, we use a combination of stable isotope analyses and macrofauna community analysis to compare the ecological structure and function between a recently constructed Spartina alterniflora salt marsh and a natural reference habitat over a 2-year period. The restored marsh was successful in providing habitat for economically and ecologically important macrofauna taxa; supporting similar or greater density, biomass, and species richness to the natural reference during all but one sampling period. Stable isotope analyses revealed that communities from the natural and the restored marshes relied on a similar diversity of food resources and that decapods had similar trophic levels. However, some generalist consumers (Palaemonetes spp. and Penaeus aztecus) were more 13C-enriched in the natural marsh, indicating a greater use of macrophyte derived organic matter relative to restored marsh counterparts. This difference was attributed to the higher quantities of macrophyte detritus and organic carbon in natural marsh sediments. Reduced marsh flooding frequency was associated with a reduction in macrofaunal biomass and decapod trophic levels. The restored marsh edge occurred at lower elevations than natural marsh edge, apparently due to reduced fetch and wind-wave exposure provided by the protective berm structures. The lower elevation of the restored marsh edge mitigated negative impacts in sampling periods with low tidal elevations that affected the natural marsh. The results of this study highlight the importance of considering sediment characteristics and elevation in salt marsh constructions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0189871 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_1978702711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A519523325</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7d8022e376a74628bf095288b9e92dfe</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A519523325</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-47e6bf7fadc781672a634445f48ebef78485ff24ab7428f813b4bed8ab9b1cad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQ6E0F7u1DtbhprCEtFkIBHq6FbI82vXilTaSvbRvXznrhHXIRfGFzeibXzO_Z7LsLSrmiHD0eeP74HQ733kH8wIJKTh6lp0iSfCM4YI8P_o-yV7FuCmKkgjGXmYnWGKGuCxPs-Wl8a1fNUa3eexCb7o-QK5dndvema7xLm9crvMAsfMB6nwPIfYxdzqBQ45uu3yrQ1y_zl5Y3UZ4M77Psl9fL39eXM2ub74tLxbXM8Mx62aUA6sst7o2XCDGsWaEUlpaKqACywUVpbWY6opTLKxApKIV1EJXskJG1-Qse3_Q3bU-qtGFqJDkgheYI5SI5YGovd6oXWhSfX-V1426C_iwUjp0jWlB8VoUGAPhTHPKsKhsIUssRCVB4tpC0voy3tZXW6gNuC61PRGdnrhmrVZ-r0pOWKopCZwfBNaP0q4W12qIFcmEUjK2Hwr_NF4W_G2fHFfbJhpoW-3A93c9SipLhGVCPzxCn3ZipFY6Nds461ONZhBVixKlTgnBZaLmT1DpqWHbmDRetknxScL5JCExHfzpVrqPUS1_fP9_9ub3lP14xK4hzdY6-rYfxjBOQXoATfAxBrAPzqJCDdtx74YatkON25HS3h3_zIek-3Ug_wA6aAkY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1978702711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh</title><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Rezek, Ryan J ; Lebreton, Benoit ; Sterba-Boatwright, Blair ; Beseres Pollack, Jennifer</creator><contributor>Armas, Cristina</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rezek, Ryan J ; Lebreton, Benoit ; Sterba-Boatwright, Blair ; Beseres Pollack, Jennifer ; Armas, Cristina</creatorcontrib><description>Habitat reconstruction is commonly employed to restore degraded estuarine habitats and lost ecological functions. In this study, we use a combination of stable isotope analyses and macrofauna community analysis to compare the ecological structure and function between a recently constructed Spartina alterniflora salt marsh and a natural reference habitat over a 2-year period. The restored marsh was successful in providing habitat for economically and ecologically important macrofauna taxa; supporting similar or greater density, biomass, and species richness to the natural reference during all but one sampling period. Stable isotope analyses revealed that communities from the natural and the restored marshes relied on a similar diversity of food resources and that decapods had similar trophic levels. However, some generalist consumers (Palaemonetes spp. and Penaeus aztecus) were more 13C-enriched in the natural marsh, indicating a greater use of macrophyte derived organic matter relative to restored marsh counterparts. This difference was attributed to the higher quantities of macrophyte detritus and organic carbon in natural marsh sediments. Reduced marsh flooding frequency was associated with a reduction in macrofaunal biomass and decapod trophic levels. The restored marsh edge occurred at lower elevations than natural marsh edge, apparently due to reduced fetch and wind-wave exposure provided by the protective berm structures. The lower elevation of the restored marsh edge mitigated negative impacts in sampling periods with low tidal elevations that affected the natural marsh. The results of this study highlight the importance of considering sediment characteristics and elevation in salt marsh constructions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189871</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29261795</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Aquatic plants ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Biomass ; Carbon ; Coasts ; Comparative analysis ; Construction ; Decapoda ; Detritus ; Earth Sciences ; Ecological function ; Ecological monitoring ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Ecosystems ; Elevation ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental Sciences ; Estuaries ; Estuarine environments ; Fisheries ; Flood frequency ; Flooding ; Food resources ; Habitats ; Isotope geology ; Life sciences ; Macrofauna ; Organic carbon ; Organic matter ; Palaemonetes pugio ; Physical Sciences ; Protective structures ; Salt marshes ; Sampling ; Sediments ; Sediments (Geology) ; Soil erosion ; Spartina ; Spartina alterniflora ; Species richness ; Stable isotopes ; Structure-function relationships ; Taxa ; Trophic levels ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189871-e0189871</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2017 Rezek et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>2017 Rezek et al 2017 Rezek et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-47e6bf7fadc781672a634445f48ebef78485ff24ab7428f813b4bed8ab9b1cad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-47e6bf7fadc781672a634445f48ebef78485ff24ab7428f813b4bed8ab9b1cad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2995-4006</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1978702711/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1978702711?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,25734,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571,53772,53774,74875</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29261795$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01675966$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Armas, Cristina</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rezek, Ryan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebreton, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterba-Boatwright, Blair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beseres Pollack, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><title>Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Habitat reconstruction is commonly employed to restore degraded estuarine habitats and lost ecological functions. In this study, we use a combination of stable isotope analyses and macrofauna community analysis to compare the ecological structure and function between a recently constructed Spartina alterniflora salt marsh and a natural reference habitat over a 2-year period. The restored marsh was successful in providing habitat for economically and ecologically important macrofauna taxa; supporting similar or greater density, biomass, and species richness to the natural reference during all but one sampling period. Stable isotope analyses revealed that communities from the natural and the restored marshes relied on a similar diversity of food resources and that decapods had similar trophic levels. However, some generalist consumers (Palaemonetes spp. and Penaeus aztecus) were more 13C-enriched in the natural marsh, indicating a greater use of macrophyte derived organic matter relative to restored marsh counterparts. This difference was attributed to the higher quantities of macrophyte detritus and organic carbon in natural marsh sediments. Reduced marsh flooding frequency was associated with a reduction in macrofaunal biomass and decapod trophic levels. The restored marsh edge occurred at lower elevations than natural marsh edge, apparently due to reduced fetch and wind-wave exposure provided by the protective berm structures. The lower elevation of the restored marsh edge mitigated negative impacts in sampling periods with low tidal elevations that affected the natural marsh. The results of this study highlight the importance of considering sediment characteristics and elevation in salt marsh constructions.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Decapoda</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecological function</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Estuarine environments</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Flood frequency</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>Food resources</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Isotope geology</subject><subject>Life sciences</subject><subject>Macrofauna</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Palaemonetes pugio</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Protective structures</subject><subject>Salt marshes</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Sediments (Geology)</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Spartina</subject><subject>Spartina alterniflora</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Stable isotopes</subject><subject>Structure-function relationships</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Trophic levels</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1padK0b1BaQ6E0F7u1DtbhprCEtFkIBHq6FbI82vXilTaSvbRvXznrhHXIRfGFzeibXzO_Z7LsLSrmiHD0eeP74HQ733kH8wIJKTh6lp0iSfCM4YI8P_o-yV7FuCmKkgjGXmYnWGKGuCxPs-Wl8a1fNUa3eexCb7o-QK5dndvema7xLm9crvMAsfMB6nwPIfYxdzqBQ45uu3yrQ1y_zl5Y3UZ4M77Psl9fL39eXM2ub74tLxbXM8Mx62aUA6sst7o2XCDGsWaEUlpaKqACywUVpbWY6opTLKxApKIV1EJXskJG1-Qse3_Q3bU-qtGFqJDkgheYI5SI5YGovd6oXWhSfX-V1426C_iwUjp0jWlB8VoUGAPhTHPKsKhsIUssRCVB4tpC0voy3tZXW6gNuC61PRGdnrhmrVZ-r0pOWKopCZwfBNaP0q4W12qIFcmEUjK2Hwr_NF4W_G2fHFfbJhpoW-3A93c9SipLhGVCPzxCn3ZipFY6Nds461ONZhBVixKlTgnBZaLmT1DpqWHbmDRetknxScL5JCExHfzpVrqPUS1_fP9_9ub3lP14xK4hzdY6-rYfxjBOQXoATfAxBrAPzqJCDdtx74YatkON25HS3h3_zIek-3Ug_wA6aAkY</recordid><startdate>20171219</startdate><enddate>20171219</enddate><creator>Rezek, Ryan J</creator><creator>Lebreton, Benoit</creator><creator>Sterba-Boatwright, Blair</creator><creator>Beseres Pollack, Jennifer</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2995-4006</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171219</creationdate><title>Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh</title><author>Rezek, Ryan J ; Lebreton, Benoit ; Sterba-Boatwright, Blair ; Beseres Pollack, Jennifer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-47e6bf7fadc781672a634445f48ebef78485ff24ab7428f813b4bed8ab9b1cad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Decapoda</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecological function</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Estuarine environments</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Flood frequency</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>Food resources</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Isotope geology</topic><topic>Life sciences</topic><topic>Macrofauna</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Palaemonetes pugio</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Protective structures</topic><topic>Salt marshes</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Sediments (Geology)</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Spartina</topic><topic>Spartina alterniflora</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Stable isotopes</topic><topic>Structure-function relationships</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Trophic levels</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rezek, Ryan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebreton, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterba-Boatwright, Blair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beseres Pollack, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rezek, Ryan J</au><au>Lebreton, Benoit</au><au>Sterba-Boatwright, Blair</au><au>Beseres Pollack, Jennifer</au><au>Armas, Cristina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2017-12-19</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0189871</spage><epage>e0189871</epage><pages>e0189871-e0189871</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Habitat reconstruction is commonly employed to restore degraded estuarine habitats and lost ecological functions. In this study, we use a combination of stable isotope analyses and macrofauna community analysis to compare the ecological structure and function between a recently constructed Spartina alterniflora salt marsh and a natural reference habitat over a 2-year period. The restored marsh was successful in providing habitat for economically and ecologically important macrofauna taxa; supporting similar or greater density, biomass, and species richness to the natural reference during all but one sampling period. Stable isotope analyses revealed that communities from the natural and the restored marshes relied on a similar diversity of food resources and that decapods had similar trophic levels. However, some generalist consumers (Palaemonetes spp. and Penaeus aztecus) were more 13C-enriched in the natural marsh, indicating a greater use of macrophyte derived organic matter relative to restored marsh counterparts. This difference was attributed to the higher quantities of macrophyte detritus and organic carbon in natural marsh sediments. Reduced marsh flooding frequency was associated with a reduction in macrofaunal biomass and decapod trophic levels. The restored marsh edge occurred at lower elevations than natural marsh edge, apparently due to reduced fetch and wind-wave exposure provided by the protective berm structures. The lower elevation of the restored marsh edge mitigated negative impacts in sampling periods with low tidal elevations that affected the natural marsh. The results of this study highlight the importance of considering sediment characteristics and elevation in salt marsh constructions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>29261795</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0189871</doi><tpages>e0189871</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2995-4006</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e0189871-e0189871 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_plos_journals_1978702711 |
source | PubMed Central(OpenAccess); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Analysis Aquatic plants Biology and Life Sciences Biomass Carbon Coasts Comparative analysis Construction Decapoda Detritus Earth Sciences Ecological function Ecological monitoring Ecology and Environmental Sciences Ecosystems Elevation Environmental aspects Environmental Sciences Estuaries Estuarine environments Fisheries Flood frequency Flooding Food resources Habitats Isotope geology Life sciences Macrofauna Organic carbon Organic matter Palaemonetes pugio Physical Sciences Protective structures Salt marshes Sampling Sediments Sediments (Geology) Soil erosion Spartina Spartina alterniflora Species richness Stable isotopes Structure-function relationships Taxa Trophic levels Wetlands |
title | Ecological structure and function in a restored versus natural salt marsh |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T23%3A31%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecological%20structure%20and%20function%20in%20a%20restored%20versus%20natural%20salt%20marsh&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Rezek,%20Ryan%20J&rft.date=2017-12-19&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0189871&rft.epage=e0189871&rft.pages=e0189871-e0189871&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0189871&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA519523325%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c726t-47e6bf7fadc781672a634445f48ebef78485ff24ab7428f813b4bed8ab9b1cad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1978702711&rft_id=info:pmid/29261795&rft_galeid=A519523325&rfr_iscdi=true |